Results

Total Results: 866 records

Showing results for "good".

  1. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/bladder-cancer-adults-screening-1996
    January 01, 1996 - with a specificity of 96% 6 of the 7 cases missed were well-differentiated, superficial lesions with a good … Most of the bladder cancers detected have a good prognosis in the absence of screening: 5-year survival
  2. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary30/speech-and-language-delay-and-disorders-in-children-age-5-and-younger-screening-july-2015
    July 07, 2015 - Two reviewers independently rated the quality of each study based on USPSTF guidelines as good, fair, … We included 24 good and fair studies (26 articles): 8 newly identified studies (9 articles 27–35 ) and … Late talkers: do good predictors of outcome exist? Dev Disabil Res Rev . 2011;17(2):141–150 72. … 50-80 words and grammatical scores below cutoff Sachse and Von Suchodoletz 2008, 2009 32 , 33 Good … Checklist: previous version of the General Language Screen 1 failed item Burden et al 1996 40 Good
  3. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/breast-and-ovarian-cancer-brca-testing-screening-2005
    September 15, 2005 - indicates that annual mammography may miss aggressive cancer in carriers of the BRCA mutation. 1 Good … high rate of false-positive results (only 3 of 61 women with abnormal scans had ovarian cancer). 37 Good-quality … described cancer incidence or mortality outcomes associated with genetic counseling, although 10 fair- to good-quality … There is good-quality evidence on the harms of prophylactic tamoxifen, 1 including thromboembolic events
  4. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary/abdominal-aortic-aneurysm-screening-february-2005
    February 15, 2005 - assess the internal validity of each population-based screening trial and to assign quality ratings of "good … All 4 trials were rated as good or fair quality according to the USPSTF rating criteria ( Appendix ). … In general, a good study meets all criteria, a fair study does not meet all criteria but is judged to … Only studies receiving a fair or good rating were included in the evidence synthesis. … 19,352 6319 3228 4660 Outcomes ascertained, % 99 99 3 100 NR NR Quality Good
  5. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/draft-research-plan/chronic-kidney-disease-screening
    January 19, 2023 - Studies reporting diagnostic accuracy Study designs not described as included Study Quality Good-quality
  6. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/oral-cancer-screening-2004
    February 04, 2004 - Rationale: The USPSTF found no new good-quality evidence that screening for oral cancer leads to improved
  7. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-research-plan95/syphilis-infection-in-nonpregnant-adults-and-adolescents-june-2016
    September 18, 2014 - gynecology clinics, emergency departments, and STI clinics)   Study designs All KQs: Good-quality
  8. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-research-plan/tobacco-use-in-adults-and-pregnant-women-counseling-and-interventions
    July 12, 2018 - Publication language English Any language other than English Quality rating Fair or good-quality
  9. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-research-plan88/tobacco-use-in-adults-and-pregnant-women-counseling-and-interventions-september-2015
    February 18, 2014 - date 2008 to present Reviews published before 2008 Quality rating Fair or good
  10. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/hepatitis-b-virus-infection-pregnant-women-screening-2004
    February 15, 2004 - Rationale The USPSTF found good
  11. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/aHpXYasjc3n6zhaTtoWMwK
    August 01, 2016 - Only stud- ies rated as good or fair quality were included. … Two independent investigators assessed the quality of each study as good, fair, or poor, using predefined … We included 11 good- or fair-quality studies (n = 7129; range, 61-3290) assessing the accuracy of 1 or … seroprevalence and incidence Study participants; Uganda NR Women: NR Nonwhite: NR 12 (HIV-1) NR Good … at 1 university; United States 25 (4.4) Women: 64 Nonwhite: 31 NR 9 (by HerpeSelect); 3 (by WB) Good
  12. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary-latent-tuberculosis/latent-tuberculosis-infection-screening-september-2016
    September 06, 2016 - Only studies rated as of fair or good quality were included. … Two independent investigators assessed the quality of each study as good, fair, or poor, using predefined … Of the 72 fair- or good-quality studies that met inclusion criteria (n = 51,711), 67 were observational … Seventy-one studies of fair or good quality are included in this report's evidence synthesis. … Good (fair to good for studies in sensitivity analysis) KQ4: Harms of screening 0 NA NA
  13. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary28/cognitive-impairment-in-older-adults-screening-2014
    October 22, 2013 - We included fair- to good-quality English-language studies of community-dwelling adults that were most … Fair-quality (as opposed to good-quality) studies did not meet at least 1 criterion but had no important … Only 4 studies were of good quality; the rest were of fair quality and had various risks of bias, the … Although the MIS can have relatively good test performance in screening for dementia (sensitivity, 43% … On the basis of 10 fair- to good-quality trials ( n = 3015), memantine had a benefit similar to that
  14. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary14/bladder-cancer-in-adults-screening
    October 15, 2010 - Two authors independently rated the internal validity of each study as good, fair, or poor on the basis … We assessed the overall strength of the body of evidence for each key question (good, fair, or poor) … predetermined 19 All patients undergo the reference standard 19 Definition of ratings (based on criteria) Good … for cluster RCTs, correction for correlation coefficient Definition of ratings (based on criteria) Good … Appropriate attention to potential confounding variables Definition of ratings (based on criteria) Good
  15. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/wdxHdZ2U5ggjuNW-nwun8n
    October 01, 2009 - ELISA, enzymatic, and other assays; widely available Good agreement among different methods No accepted … For periodontal disease, ABI, and carotid IMT, good-quality studies relevant to predicting major CHD … For leukocyte count and fasting blood glucose level, good- quality cohort studies did not consistently … Effectiveness of Treatment, and Harms (Reference) Overall Strength of Evidence CRP level 10 Some Good … risk factors for CHD events (hyper- lipidemia, hypertension, and smoking) were found to be equally good
  16. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/kGvn_HBPEEdfu2rs38VN8_
    March 11, 2025 - Data Extraction and Quality Assessment Two reviewers independently rated each study as “good,” “fair, … 0.97 (NR) 0.94 (NR) Shaded areas indicate range of 0.70-1.0, the arbitrary range in this review for good … Thus, studies could have fair or good quality methods for their primary aim, which would not be reflected … tools, finding that 2- and 6-item subsets of a longer 18-item food security assessment instrument had good … preferred language.72 Although the acceptability of screening for food insecurity is generally rated good
  17. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary/breastfeeding-primary-care-interventions
    April 11, 2025 - The review was limited to fair- and good-quality randomized clinical trials (RCTs, including cluster … Quality Assessment Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of each study as good … Limitations This review was limited to fair- and good-quality RCTs evaluating breastfeeding support … 19 RCTs (n = 11,175) Good: 5 Fair: 14 Infant health outcomes variably reported Most outcomes based … 28 RCTs (n = 15,011) Good: 8 Fair: 20 Only 7 trials reported harms, and details about specific harms
  18. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/other-supporting-document19468/tobacco-and-nicotine-use-prevention-in-children-and-adolescents-primary-care-interventions
    April 28, 2020 - Two investigators independently assessed the quality of each study as good, fair, or poor using predefined … Four of the trials were rated good-quality 33 , 34 , 42 , 46 and the remainder were rated fair-quality … One new, good-quality trial (n = 257) evaluated NRT for smoking cessation in children aged 12 to 18 years … 2014 Fair Both Recruitment only Print 12 10.8 12.0 NR e Hollis et al, 33 2005 Good … delivered part Face-to-face, computer 12 9.3 12.1 0.76 (0.59-0.99) Hovell et al, 34 1996 Good
  19. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary/skin-cancer-screening
    April 18, 2023 - Synthesis: Two reviewers independently appraised the articles and extracted relevant data from fair- or good-quality … Data Extraction and Quality Assessment The quality of each study was independently assessed as “good … cosmetic outcomes at 6-month follow-up (median score, 1.5 [interquartile range, 1-2]; excellent to good … Nine fair- or good-quality nonrandomized studies with data collected between 1975 and 2016 (n = 1,326,051 … 360,288    New studies since 2016 systematic review 8 9 17 5,685,492 Rated as good
  20. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-research-plan/tobacco-cessation-adults-interventions
    July 17, 2025 - Reviews: High-, moderate-, and low-credibility existing systematic reviews Primary studies: Fair- and good-quality

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: