-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186847
January 01, 2015 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186776
January 01, 2004 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186228
January 01, 2012 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186801
January 01, 2007 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186172
January 01, 2018 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186174
January 01, 2014 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186807
January 01, 2013 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186139
January 01, 2010 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186725
January 01, 2016 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186762
January 01, 2014 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186693
January 01, 2019 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186781
January 01, 2019 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/189216
January 01, 2013 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186403
January 01, 2012 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186803
January 01, 2017 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1542/studies/186834
January 01, 2011 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1542/studies/186813
January 01, 2018 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186750
January 01, 2014 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186782
January 01, 2010 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for
-
srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186804
January 01, 2017 - If Y/PY to 2.2 and 2.3, or N/PN to 2.4: Were adjustment techniques used that are likely to correct for