-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cer-232-breathlessness-cancer-comments.pdf
November 19, 2020 - that there were methodologic concerns for the Minchom
study. … This would make
it a multicomponent non-pharmacologic study. … The Pinna
study was already included. … Or does it differ based on
individual
study? … Or does it differ based on
individual
study?
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/ptsd-protocol-2021_0.pdf
January 01, 2021 - duration or length of follow up
• Settings:
o No limitation on study setting
• Study Design:
o … duration and length of follow up None
Setting • All study settings None
Study
Design
• RCTs … If study authors respond and report
missing study data, corrections, or other study information relevant … Proportion of participants meeting study-defined criteria for PTSD at baseline
c. … Proportion of participants who achieved study-defined PTSD diagnostic change
j.
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/rheumatoid-arthritis-medicine-1/research
January 01, 2020 - During the study period, the overall utilization of glucocorticoids decreased from 46% to 38%, whereas … Study Medications
Medication utilization was measured using information from the TennCare pharmacy … Statistical Analysis
We estimated the proportion of RA patients who were using study medications on … Results
During the study period we identified 24,250 patients with RA. … Interestingly, about 10% of patients were not using any study drugs on the index dates.
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/rheumatoid-arthritis-medicine/research-protocol
December 01, 2019 - design and other criteria)
Original research; eligible study designs include:
Randomized … If both reviewers agree that a study does not meet the eligibility criteria, the study will be excluded … A “fair” study is susceptible to some bias but probably not sufficient enough to invalidate its results … As described above, this reviewer completes a second full review of the study and is well positioned … Therefore study questions, study designs, and/or methodological approaches do not necessarily represent
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/fatigue-sleepiness-protocol.pdf
July 01, 2023 - Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Study
Parameter Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria
Population … maximum shift duration
• Shift patterns including changes to
No intervention of interest
6
Study … , including author, year, study design, number of study participants, and main
findings relevant to … the ROBINS-I
tool that assess bias due to confounding, bias in selection of participants into the study … The risk of bias assessments will focus on the main outcome of
interest in each study.
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/mhs4-patient-family-engagement/protocol
September 01, 2023 - Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Study Parameter Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Population Adult … article will be reviewed by a single team member to confirm eligibility and prepare a summary of the study … , including author, year, study design, number of study participants, and main findings relevant to each … in the ROBINS-I tool that assess bias due to confounding, bias in selection of participants into the study … A qualitative study. Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):253-63. doi: 10.1111/hex.12342. PMID: 25644998.
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/dementia-nursing-home-characteristics_executive.pdf
October 01, 2012 - as to whether the study
was included. … RC/AL
setting or in an SCU vs. non-SCU (1 study; 1,252 subjects). … RC/AL
setting (1 study; 422 subjects). … RC/AL
setting (1 study; 422 subjects) or after validation therapy (1 study; 88 subjects) studies;
510 … aEvidence was from a single study with imprecise estimates.
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/transparency-tympanostomy/research-protocol
March 01, 2021 - Terminology
We use the term study to refer to the conducted research. … A researcher other than the one who initially screened the record in will reassess study eligibility … Specifically, we will capture basic information about the study design, study population, intervention … by detailing study initiation date and rationale for discontinuation or delay. … Detecting and adjusting for small-study effects in meta-analysis.
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/antidepressants-update/research-protocol
December 01, 2019 - drugs or combinations of study drugs. … If both reviewers agree that a study does not meet the eligibility criteria, the study will be excluded … In general terms, a “good” study has the least bias and results are considered to be valid. … A “fair” study is susceptible to some bias but probably not sufficient to invalidate its results. … Two independent reviewers will assign quality ratings to each study.
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/methods-guidance-tests-metaanalysis/methods
December 01, 2019 - At the first level, they model the counts of the 2×2 table within each study, which accounts for within-study … Systematic reviewers are encouraged to look at study characteristics and think through how study characteristics … Another option is to use all available thresholds per study . … (they show only a few thresholds that could be extracted from the study). … Explore between-study heterogeneity.
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/cancer-anemia-update/research-protocol
December 01, 2019 - but fails to report the number of patients per study arm we will assign 50 percent of the study patients … to each of the study arms. … Were study clinicians blinded (masked) to the treatment received by individual study participants? … The study was double-blind. … Between-study heterogeneity will be evaluated by examining measures of between-study variability (e.g
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/medical-test-reviews-risk-bias.ppt
June 01, 2012 - on a study. … In particular, it focuses on systematic errors resulting from:
Study design
Conduct of study
Reporting … Elements of study design/conduct that may increase risk of bias vary by study type. … by contacting the study authors. … Study relevance
Risk of bias
Systematic error
Random error
Other study limitations (e.g., inadequate
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/medical-test-reviews-risk-bias.ppt
June 01, 2012 - on a study. … In particular, it focuses on systematic errors resulting from:
Study design
Conduct of study
Reporting … Elements of study design/conduct that may increase risk of bias vary by study type. … by contacting the study authors. … Study relevance
Risk of bias
Systematic error
Random error
Other study limitations (e.g., inadequate
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/assessing-the-risk-of-bias-in-systematic-reviews-of-health-care-interventions-01_0.pdf
May 01, 2005 - Study Design. … Further, poor study reporting can make important aspects of study design
and conduct unclear. … arms)
Study design Yes (stronger study Not directly (however, Yes (overall risk of bias is
designs … A study by Marshall et al. … of study design.
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/prehospital-airway-management-protocol.pdf
December 20, 2019 - Study Design: For all Key Questions, we will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs). … No
studies will be excluded based on study design at this stage. … The criteria used will
depend on the study design as recommended in the chapter, “Assessing the Risk … The results of these studies are at least as likely to reflect
flaws in the study design as to show … We believe that the findings
are stable (i.e., another study would not change the conclusions).
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/ehc-research-gaps-telehealth.pdf
April 01, 2023 - Study Design
• More RCTs are needed. … Evidence Gaps
Study Population
• Studies that include diverse patient voices as well as
providers … Study Design
• Nonrandomized controlled study (NRS) designs,
ideally using a propensity score matching … Antenatal Care
Purpose of Review
Key Messages
Evidence Gaps
Study Population
Interventions
Study … Purpose
Key Findings
Evidence Gaps
Interventions
Study Design
Outcomes
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/weight-gain-prevention_research-protocol.pdf
January 01, 2020 - The
review was conducted as background for a study on the impact of cancer prevention
interventions … • The study must report the change in weight over at least 1 year
during adulthood. … □ If a study compares an approach of interest to an approach not of
interest, the study will be excluded … □ If there is no comparison, the study will be excluded. … loss, study did not report
weight or adiposity or weight-related outcomes in the abstract, the study
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/weight-gain-prevention/research-protocol
December 01, 2019 - , the study will be included. … If a study compares an approach of interest to an approach not of interest, the study will be excluded … If there is no comparison, the study will be excluded . … loss, study did not report weight or adiposity or weight-related outcomes in the abstract, the study … study on the pooled estimate.
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/sodium-potassium/research-protocol
January 01, 2019 - Study design
Parallel RCTs and cross-over RCTs with a washout period of two weeks or more will be … Study design
Parallel RCTs and cross-over RCTs with a washout period of two weeks or more will be … Study design
Parallel RCTs and cross-over RCTs with a washout period of two weeks or more will be … Study design
Parallel RCTs and cross-over RCTs with a washout period of two weeks or more will be … Data abstraction variables
Study details
ID, country, study design, sample size by intervention
-
effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pdf/child-growth-development-outcomes-protocol.pdf
August 19, 2024 - See the Study
Selection section. … The standardized form will be pilot tested by all study team members using 10
studies. … Multiple publications relating to the same study will be counted as one unique
study, but the information … Each study will be independently evaluated for risk of
bias by two team members. … The
findings are stable, i.e., another study would not change the conclusions.