Results

Total Results: 789 records

Showing results for "strategy".
Users also searched for: bedside shift report

1. Screening for Cervical Cancer in Primary Care: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (pdf file)
   www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/HZGtYqL_8u57Gkc6YFctmT
   August 21, 2018 - harm to benefit ratio than a strategy with less harms. … 1 (3) Strategy 1 (39) Strategy 6 (43) Strategy 3 (22 335) Strategy 14 (73) Strategy 14 (640) Strategy … 13 (1161) Strategy 12 (1735) Strategy 9 (7018) Strategy 3 (23 974) Strategy 13 (143) Strategy 12 … (195) Strategy 9 (2188) Strategy 3 (3822) Strategies varied in terms of primary screening test (cytology … 9) to 3822 (16/18 genotype triage, strategy 3).

2. Final Evidence Review: Rh(D) Incompatibility: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
   www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-review86/rh-d-incompatibility-screening
   February 15, 2004 - Return to Recommendation Table of Contents Introduction Search Strategy … A general search strategy … Because no clearly defined MeSH® headings were relevant to this topic, the search strategy focused on … This general search strategy was refined into a combined search strategy linking Rh (D) incompatibility … The search strategy was expanded in response to expert reviews to include amniocentesis and fetal antigen

3. Modeling Study: Cervical Cancer: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
   www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/modeling-study/cervical-cancer-screening
   August 21, 2018 - harm to benefit ratio than a strategy with less harms. … compared with the strategy with the next fewer colposcopies. … 9) to 3822 (16/18 genotype triage, strategy 3). … 13) and 1735 for switch age 25 years (strategy 12). … compared with the strategy having the next fewer harms.

4. Archived: Modeling Study: Colorectal Cancer: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
   www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/modeling-study/colorectal-cancer-screening-june-2016
   June 15, 2016 - If more than 1 strategy within a class was recommendable by at least 2 models, then only the strategy … , −6% to 6% for the FIT strategy, −4% to 5% for the SIG-plus-FIT strategy, and −5% to 7% for the CTC … strategy. … is not efficient or near-efficient; S, strategy is strongly dominated (ie, another screening strategy … strategy also met the criteria for being a recommendable strategy and provided more LYG.

5. Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the USPSTF (pdf file)
   www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/vw-LTWCTZ_N5pAaydcNQTx
   June 21, 2016 - If more than 1 strategy within a class was recommendable by at least 2 models, then only the strategy … , −6% to 6% for the FIT strategy, −4% to 5% for the SIG-plus-FIT strategy, and −5% to 7% for the CTC … strategy. … is not efficient or near-efficient; S, strategy is strongly dominated (ie, another screening strategy … strategy also met the criteria for being a recommendable strategy and provided more LYG.

6. Archived: Final Modeling Report: Breast Cancer: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
   www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-modeling-report/breast-cancer-screening-2009
   November 15, 2009 - d Strategy is dominated ("inefficient") within the specific model. … A strategy is classified as dominated if another strategy (from the efficient, borderline, or inefficient … c Strategy is dominated within a specific model. … Strategy is classified as dominated if another strategy (from the efficient, borderline or inefficient … c Strategy is dominated by other strategies; the strategy that dominates may not be in this table.

7. Screening for Rh (D) Incompatibility: A Brief Evidence Update (pdf file)
   www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/3d2JBp6qErtFkw4JjCQ-eo
   November 01, 2004 - Screening for Rh (D) Incompatibility: A Brief Evidence Update Methodology A general search strategy … Because no clearly defined MeSH headings were relevant to this topic, the search strategy focused on … This general search strategy was refined into a combined search strategy linking Rh (D) incompatibility … The search strategy was expanded in response to expert reviews to include amniocentesis and fetal antigen

8. Effects of Mammography Screening Under Different Screening Schedules: Model Estimates of Potential Benefits and Harms (pdf file)
   www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/r3f2G_ReqS8tN48szHPCxt
   November 01, 2009 - For a strategy with mixed results across the models, we classified it as borderline. … is dominated by other strategies; the strategy that dominates may not be in this table. … A strategy is classified as dominated if another strategy (from the efficient, borderline, or inefficient … Average Number of Screening Examinations and Life-Years Gained, by Screening Strategy Screening Strategy … Strategy is classified as dominated if another strategy (from the efficient, borderline or inefficient

9. Final Research Plan: Cervical Cancer: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
   www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-research-plan/cervical-cancer-screening
   October 29, 2015 - effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, with or without cytology, as a primary screening strategy … For each primary screening strategy, how does the rescreening interval relate to future cancer incidence … Does the appropriate rescreening interval for each primary screening strategy vary by subpopulation ( … are the potential adverse effects of HPV testing, with or without cytology, as a primary screening strategy … Do the adverse effects vary by screening strategy, including by rescreening interval?

10. Archived: Evaluating Test Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: Colorectal Cancer: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
    www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evaluating-test-strategies-for-colorectal-cancer-screening-a-decision-analysis-for-the-us-preventive-services-task-force/colorectal-cancer-screening-2008
    October 15, 2008 - The effectiveness of a screening strategy is modeled through a test's ability to detect lesions (that … A strategy was considered dominant when no other strategy or combination of strategies provided more … Each strategy is plotted along a line, connecting the markers of levels of adherence to that strategy … Bold indicates recommendable strategy. Age and intervals expressed as years. b. … Strategy yields life-years gained within 98% of the efficient frontier.

11. Modeling Study: Colorectal Cancer: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
    www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-modeling-study18/colorectal-cancer-screening
    May 18, 2021 - A strategy is efficient if no other strategy, or combination of strategies, within the class is estimated … Because an inefficient strategy providing outcomes similar to an efficient strategy may be a reasonable … With many recommended options for colorectal cancer screening, deciding which strategy to adopt may be … Strategy c COLs Non-COL tests d Complications CRC LYG Cases Deaths Colonoscopy … For these strategies, the efficiency ratio column indicates whether the 2016 highlighted strategy was

12. Archived: Brief Evidence Update: Oral Cancer: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
    www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-update-2004/oral-cancer-screening-2004
    February 04, 2004 - Evidence Update (PDF) Table of Contents Introduction Search Strategy … Return to Table of Contents Search Strategy … The search strategy for this brief update included a MEDLINE® review for English-language articles … The MEDLINE® search strategy combined the exploded MeSH® heading of Oral Neoplasm with Lip Neoplasm,

13. Evaluating Test Strategies for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Decision Analysis (pdf file)
    www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/UPu84CV2CNuxR8kpVU6e3V
    November 01, 2008 - For years in which both tests were due for the combined strategy, the FOBT was performed first; if the … Evaluation of Outcomes Determination of Efficient Strategies The most effective strategy was defined … A strategy was consid- ered dominant when no other strategy or combination of Table 2. … For a given start and stop age, we selected a colonoscopy strategy; the default was the generally recom … Age and intervals expressed as years. † Strategy yields life-years gained within 98% of the efficient

14. Archived: Evidence Summary: Collaborative Modeling of U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies: Breast Cancer: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
    www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary-collaborative-modeling-of-us-breast-cancer-/breast-cancer-screening-january-2016
    January 11, 2016 - Depending on screening strategy, the models estimated that 2% to 12% of invasive disease cases and 30% … Strategy * Screens, n † Model Median (Range Across Models), % D … § Strategies that are inferior or inefficient ("dominated") within a specific model; a strategy is … classified as such if another strategy results in an equal or higher benefit (percentage of decline … Efficiency frontier for life-years gained versus mammograms performed for each screening strategy, by

15. Procedure Manual Appendix XIII. Template for Scoping the “Decision Problem” to Address Through Decision Modeling | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
    www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/about-uspstf/methods-and-processes/procedure-manual/procedure-manual-appendix-xiii-template-scoping-decision-problem-address-through-decision-modeling
    July 01, 2017 - Intervention/Comparison/Strategy: Consider the base case and how well it represents current U.S. practice … addressed, critical service components (including services that might precede or follow the intervention or strategy

16. Collaborative Modeling of U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies (pdf file)
    www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/nmcMhEwWT9BncBBBQQN6Uf
    December 01, 2015 - Benefits and Harms by Density, Risk Level, and Screening Strategy Table 14. … Impact of Disutilities on Screening Benefits by Screening Strategy U.S. … We considered a strategy more efficient than a comparison strategy if it resulted in more benefits for … Benefits and Harms by Breast Density, Risk Level, and Screening Strategy Screening Strategy Number … Impact of Disutilities on Screening Benefits by Screening Strategy

17. Collaborative Modeling of U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies (pdf file)
    www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Home/GetFile/1/16255/collabmodelingbc/pdf
    December 01, 2015 - Benefits and Harms by Density, Risk Level, and Screening Strategy Table 14. … Impact of Disutilities on Screening Benefits by Screening Strategy U.S. … We considered a strategy more efficient than a comparison strategy if it resulted in more benefits for … Benefits and Harms by Breast Density, Risk Level, and Screening Strategy Screening Strategy Number … Impact of Disutilities on Screening Benefits by Screening Strategy

18. Overview of Prostate Cancer Screening Decision Models: A Contextual Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (pdf file)
    www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/vTHBrY6VuqjoouJvUmtkr4
    May 01, 2018 - For the reference strategy (Table 3, strategy 8), annual screening for men 50 to 74 years with a PSA … For strategy 22, the estimated lifetime probability Prostate Cancer Screening Decision Models 9 … The corresponding probability of prostate cancer morality for this strategy was 2.53%. … 1), the American Cancer Society (strategy 9), and Vickers and Lilja (strategy 22). … preferred strategy if survival is the highest priority.

19. Hdzuzdx4Qlnc2Pjbkfwquw (pdf file)
    www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/hDZUZdx4qLNc2PjbkfWQuw
    April 01, 2016 - Use and Harms Use of services focused on the number of mammo- grams required for the screening strategy … Ranking of Benefits per 1000 Women Screened, by Model and Screening Strategy Strategy* Screens, n† Model … . § Strategies that are inferior or inefficient ("dominated") within a specific model; a strategy is … classified as such if another strategy results in an equal or higher benefit (percentage of decline in … De- pending on screening strategy, the models estimated that 2% to 12% of invasive disease cases and

20. Archived: Final Research Plan: Breast Cancer: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
    www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-research-plan97/breast-cancer-screening-january-2016
    July 17, 2014 - breast cancer screening in reducing breast cancer–specific and all-cause mortality differ by screening strategy … reducing the incidence of advanced breast cancer and treatment-related morbidity c differ by screening strategy … How do the harms e of routine breast cancer screening differ by screening strategy d ? … One clinical situation in which a combined screening strategy may be employed is when a screening mammogram … modalities, either in a primary screening capacity (such as breast tomosynthesis) or as a screening strategy