Results

Total Results: 5,388 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

  1. digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/rouf-e-et-al-2007
    January 01, 2007 - likely than faculty to report these same adverse effects, but these differences were smaller and not statisticallysignificant.
  2. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st16/stat16.pdf
    January 01, 2000 - Furthermore, there was significant variation in the average employee premium contributions by industry … Only those estimates which had a statistically significant difference from the National average at the
  3. digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/ross-s-et-al-2005
    January 01, 2005 - Workflow-Related Findings "No significant difference was found between e-prescribers and the traditional … No statistically significant difference in average copayment amount was observed between e-prescriber
  4. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary/intimate-partner-violence-and-abuse-of-elderly-and-vulnerable-adults-screening-october-2018
    October 23, 2018 - improvement in some 36-Item Short Form Health Survey subdomains, no difference in others, and statistically … to 0.80]) 31 and fewer very preterm neonates (≤33 weeks) (2 vs 9 women; P = 0.03); there was no statistically … life; both found similar scores among the intervention and control groups, and differences were not statistically … KQ4: Benefits of Treatment 11 RCTs (n = 6740) IPV exposure (10 studies): 2 found a statistically … in both groups with no statistically significant differences and 2 reported on subtypes of violence
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/ch_9-user-guide-to-ocer_130129.pdf
    September 21, 2012 - Without the context of a numeric rationale for the study size, readers may misinterpret the lack of a statisticallysignificant difference in effect as false reassurance of lack of harm, or falsely conclude that there … In the case of a trial comparing treatments, this is the probability of finding a statistically significant … i.e., false positive or false negative) rank higher as possible explanations for a finding of “no statisticallysignificant difference” because randomization has overcome the potential confounding, the protocol
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/migraine-prevention_disposition-comments.pdf
    April 18, 2013 - We did not detect statistically significant differences in outcomes among botulinum formulations. … We did not detect statistically significant differences in outcomes among botulinum formulations. … Post hoc subgroup analysis reported statistically significant reduction in migraine attacks only in … The pilot study by Winner et al (2005) did not show a statistically significant difference in the 50% … We added an explanation of statistically significant differences when 95% CI of attributable events
  7. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/oaVhMNVAnx3b5-UUunZkjr
    December 17, 2018 - significant association with illicit drug use (standardized mean difference, −0.08 [95% CI, −0.16 to … Across all 29 trials, only 1 trial reported on harms and found no statistically significant group differences … on illicit and nonmedical drug use were wide ranging, and the result of the pooled analysis was not statistically … Despite the small pooled result, some interventions did show statistically significant reductions in … significant increases in drug use outcomes, and others reported statistically nonsignificant increases
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/chronic-fatigue_executive.pdf
    July 01, 2016 - (Insufficient evidence) *Statistically significant differences between treatment and placebo groups. … None reported statistically significant clinical differences between treatment and control groups … (Insufficient evidence) *Statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups. … (Insufficient evidence) * Statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups … (Insufficient evidence) * Statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups
  9. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/-hnLT26c2NHs6thK9yznPF
    July 01, 2002 - After 6.75 years of follow-up, this study reported a non- statistically significant trend toward a reduction … No study found statistically significant differences in mortality between study arms. … The BCPT found a non-statistically significant trend toward a reduction in hip, spine, and Colles’ fractures … significant for women aged 50 and older (RR, 4.01; 95% CI, 1.70-10.90). … The power of the trials to find a statistically significant difference in the incidence of breast cancer
  10. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary/breast-cancer-medications-for-risk-reduction-2002
    May 06, 2002 - After 6.75 years of followup, this study reported a non-statistically significant trend toward a reduction … No study found statistically significant differences in mortality between study arms. … The BCPT found a non-statistically significant trend toward a reduction in hip, spine, and Colles' fractures … significant for women ages 50 and older (RR, 4.01; 95 percent CI, 1.70-10.90). … The power of the trials to find a statistically significant difference in the incidence of breast cancer
  11. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb179-Emergency-Department-Trends.pdf
    November 01, 2013 - Changes in rates are considered statistically significant if the p-value is 0.05 or less. … All differences were statistically significant at p<0.05. … All differences were statistically significant at p<0.05. … All differences were statistically significant at p<0.05. … Results were considered nominally significant if the value was 0.05 or less.
  12. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary24/falls-prevention-in-older-adults-counseling-and-preventive-medication-2012
    December 15, 2010 - significant. … significant either ( Figure 1 . … significant differences ( Figure 2 . … There was also a non-statistically significant increase in fall-related fractures. … Like that review and meta-analyses, we found no statistically significant reduction in fall risk when
  13. digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/chase-h-et-al-2003
    January 01, 2003 - The GHbA(1c) values significantly decreased in both groups, with no statistically significant difference
  14. digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/chen-c-et-al-2009
    January 01, 2009 - The increase between 2005 and 2007 was statistically significant (p < 0.001)."
  15. digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/opportunistic-decision-making-information-needs-and-workflow-emergency-care/annual-summary/2012
    January 01, 2012 - This decrease, although not statistically significant, is likely triggered by the anchoring of physicians
  16. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary-screening-for-breast-cancer/breast-cancer-screening-january-2016
    January 11, 2016 - significant at all ages and the magnitudes of effect are small. … significant 22% reduction. … significant reduction from our meta-analysis of trials. … A meta-analysis of trials indicated a statistically significant reduction in advanced disease for women … significant; T = tomosynthesis.
  17. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb108.pdf
    April 01, 2011 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … (percentage growth) 20.8% 14.0% ‡ Differences between uninsured stays and insured stays were statisticallysignificant at p<0.05. … significant at p<0.05. … significant at p<0.05.
  18. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/cHbBWNok76hRWKDXXm3R2_
    February 13, 2018 - In the 2 large screening trials (PLCO and UKCTOCS, n = 271 103), there was not a statistically significant … This difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.74-1.08])31 (Table 3 … A statistically significant difference in survival between women with index cancers in the intervention … No statistically significant differences in anxiety or risk of psychological morbidity were observed … Psychological harms were reported in a subset of 1 trial No statistically significant differences were
  19. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st21/stat21.pdf
    January 01, 1997 - All results discussed in this statistical brief are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. … National estimates derived from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) indicate there was a significant
  20. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st15/stat15.pdf
    January 01, 2000 - Furthermore, there was significant variation in the average employee premium contributions by industry … Only those estimates which had a statistically significant difference from the National average at the