-
digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/rouf-e-et-al-2007
January 01, 2007 - likely than faculty to report these same adverse effects, but these differences were smaller and not statistically … significant.
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st16/stat16.pdf
January 01, 2000 - Furthermore, there was significant variation in the average employee premium
contributions by industry … Only those estimates which had a statistically significant difference from the National
average at the
-
digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/ross-s-et-al-2005
January 01, 2005 - Workflow-Related Findings
"No significant difference was found between e-prescribers and the traditional … No statistically significant difference in average copayment amount was observed between e-prescriber
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary/intimate-partner-violence-and-abuse-of-elderly-and-vulnerable-adults-screening-october-2018
October 23, 2018 - improvement in some 36-Item Short Form Health Survey subdomains, no difference in others, and statistically … to 0.80]) 31 and fewer very preterm neonates (≤33 weeks) (2 vs 9 women; P = 0.03); there was no statistically … life; both found similar scores among the intervention and control groups, and differences were not statistically … KQ4: Benefits of Treatment
11 RCTs
(n = 6740)
IPV exposure (10 studies): 2 found a statistically … in both groups with no statistically significant differences and 2 reported on subtypes of violence
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/ch_9-user-guide-to-ocer_130129.pdf
September 21, 2012 - Without the context of a numeric
rationale for the study size, readers may misinterpret
the lack of a statistically … significant difference in
effect as false reassurance of lack of harm, or falsely
conclude that there … In the case of a trial comparing
treatments, this is the probability of finding a
statistically significant … i.e., false
positive or false negative) rank higher as possible
explanations for a finding of “no statistically … significant difference” because randomization has
overcome the potential confounding, the protocol
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/migraine-prevention_disposition-comments.pdf
April 18, 2013 - We did not detect statistically significant
differences in outcomes among botulinum
formulations. … We did not detect statistically significant
differences in outcomes among botulinum
formulations. … Post hoc subgroup analysis reported
statistically significant reduction in migraine
attacks only in … The pilot study by Winner et al (2005) did not
show a statistically significant difference in the 50% … We added an
explanation of statistically significant
differences when 95% CI of attributable events
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/oaVhMNVAnx3b5-UUunZkjr
December 17, 2018 - significant association with
illicit drug use (standardized mean difference, −0.08 [95% CI, −0.16 to … Across all 29 trials, only 1 trial reported on harms and found no
statistically significant group differences … on illicit
and nonmedical drug use were wide ranging, and the result of the
pooled analysis was not statistically … Despite the small pooled result, some interventions did show
statistically significant reductions in … significant
increases in drug use outcomes, and
others reported statistically
nonsignificant increases
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/chronic-fatigue_executive.pdf
July 01, 2016 - (Insufficient evidence)
*Statistically significant differences between treatment and placebo groups. … None reported statistically significant
clinical differences between treatment and control groups … (Insufficient evidence)
*Statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups. … (Insufficient evidence)
* Statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups … (Insufficient evidence)
* Statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/-hnLT26c2NHs6thK9yznPF
July 01, 2002 - After
6.75 years of follow-up, this study reported a non-
statistically significant trend toward a reduction … No study found statistically significant differences in
mortality between study arms. … The
BCPT found a non-statistically significant trend
toward a reduction in hip, spine, and Colles’
fractures … significant for women aged 50 and older (RR, 4.01;
95% CI, 1.70-10.90). … The power of the trials to find a statistically
significant difference in the incidence of breast
cancer
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary/breast-cancer-medications-for-risk-reduction-2002
May 06, 2002 - After 6.75 years of followup, this study reported a non-statistically significant trend toward a reduction … No study found statistically significant differences in mortality between study arms. … The BCPT found a non-statistically significant trend toward a reduction in hip, spine, and Colles' fractures … significant for women ages 50 and older (RR, 4.01; 95 percent CI, 1.70-10.90). … The power of the trials to find a statistically significant difference in the incidence of breast cancer
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb179-Emergency-Department-Trends.pdf
November 01, 2013 - Changes
in rates are considered statistically significant if the p-value is 0.05
or less. … All differences were statistically significant at p<0.05. … All differences
were statistically significant at p<0.05. … All differences were statistically significant at p<0.05. … Results were
considered nominally significant if the value was 0.05 or less.
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary24/falls-prevention-in-older-adults-counseling-and-preventive-medication-2012
December 15, 2010 - significant. … significant either ( Figure 1 . … significant differences ( Figure 2 . … There was also a non-statistically significant increase in fall-related fractures. … Like that review and meta-analyses, we found no statistically significant reduction in fall risk when
-
digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/chase-h-et-al-2003
January 01, 2003 - The GHbA(1c) values significantly decreased in both groups, with no statistically significant difference
-
digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/chen-c-et-al-2009
January 01, 2009 - The increase between 2005 and 2007 was statistically significant (p < 0.001)."
-
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/opportunistic-decision-making-information-needs-and-workflow-emergency-care/annual-summary/2012
January 01, 2012 - This decrease, although not statistically significant, is likely triggered by the anchoring of physicians
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary-screening-for-breast-cancer/breast-cancer-screening-january-2016
January 11, 2016 - significant at all ages and the magnitudes of effect are small. … significant 22% reduction. … significant reduction from our meta-analysis of trials. … A meta-analysis of trials indicated a statistically significant reduction in advanced disease for women … significant; T = tomosynthesis.
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb108.pdf
April 01, 2011 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are
statistically significant at the 0.05 level … (percentage growth)
20.8% 14.0%
‡ Differences between uninsured stays and insured stays were statistically … significant at p<0.05. … significant
at p<0.05. … significant at p<0.05.
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/cHbBWNok76hRWKDXXm3R2_
February 13, 2018 - In the 2 large screening trials
(PLCO and UKCTOCS, n = 271 103), there was not a statistically significant … This difference was not statistically significant
(hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.74-1.08])31 (Table 3 … A statistically significant difference in survival between women
with index cancers in the intervention … No statistically significant differences in anxiety or risk
of psychological morbidity were observed … Psychological harms were
reported in a subset of 1 trial
No statistically significant
differences were
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st21/stat21.pdf
January 01, 1997 - All results discussed in this statistical brief are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. … National estimates derived from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) indicate there
was a significant
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st15/stat15.pdf
January 01, 2000 - Furthermore, there was significant variation in the average employee premium
contributions by industry … Only those estimates which had a statistically significant difference from the National
average at the