Results

Total Results: 5,385 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

  1. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/antidepressants-2007_executive.pdf
    January 01, 2007 - Many efficacy trials were not powered to detect statistically or clinically significant differences, … Fluoxetine vs. paroxetine (seven studies; 950 patients): We did not find any statistically significant … One trial found statistically significant superiority of venlafaxine over fluoxetine. … One trial found statistically significant superiority for escitalopram over citalopram. … One open-label effectiveness trial found no statistically significant difference among three SSRIs for
  2. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/ofaMtvNZ-5KdhWAJjXfZpN
    February 01, 2011 - The differ- ences in these scores, although statistically significant, were small, and it is unclear … These stud- ies showed mixed results: Two studies found a statistically significant association between … Six of 11 case–control stud- ies did not find a statistically significant association be- tween ever … Of the 4 studies that found a statistically significant association between indoor tanning exposure and … significant difference, OR not reported Age >14 y Not statistically significant, OR not reported NR
  3. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2024-07/nabatchi-report.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - significant increases in patient activation.18 The control group did not experience significant changes … significant. … In contrast, t-tests indicate that the participatory feedback group experienced a statistically significant … • T-tests indicate that the deliberation and participatory feedback groups had statistically significant … However, only the deliberation group and the participatory feedback group experienced statistically
  4. digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/hollingworth
    January 01, 2023 - (1.1 minutes per hour) on prescription or formulary related facsimiles or phone calls, there was no significant … There was no significant difference between e-prescribing and paper-based sites in the proportion of … These changes offset each other, there was no significant increase in the total amount of time spent … less time on writing tasks (-0.9 minutes; -2.5, 0.7 (CI)) at the e-prescribing sites, this was not statisticallysignificant and did not offset additional computing time."
  5. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/draft-recommendation/perinatal-depression-interventions-to-prevent
    April 22, 2025 - (based on symptoms, history of depression, or social or socioeconomic risk factors) demonstrated a statisticallysignificant larger positive effect compared with trials enrolling lower-risk, unselected populations … significant findings. 2 Physical activity interventions to prevent perinatal depression were studied … Pooled results from three trials (n=364) found a statistically significant difference in the SMD in depression … significant differences between treatment groups.
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/obesity-child_executive.pdf
    March 31, 2010 - All of them reported statistically significant beneficial effects of the intervention compared with … However, only four of these changes were statistically significant. … The meta-analysis, which included four studies, was not statistically significant (p = 0.219). … None of the four studies detected a statistically significant beneficial intervention effect on BMI … Two of the RCTs detected a statistically significant beneficial effect of the intervention compared
  7. digital.ahrq.gov/program-overview/research-stories/displaying-patient-photos-medical-records-reduces-errors-improves
    January 01, 2023 - Notably, there were no significant differences between the two different photo displays, Storyboard versus … The findings are significant, according to Dr. … Adelman: “Photos in Storyboard passively work so well that adding a pop-up has a small increase, but not statisticallysignificant and likely not worth the burden to alert fatigue.”
  8. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/bF5BNLvASN5r9EnP3VTJPN
    December 01, 2010 - Re- ductions in blood pressure were still statistically significant, although slightly attenuated, at … Four other trials reported follow-up beyond 12 months, but none showed a statistically significant re … Two trials showed statistically significant group differences in adiposity, blood pressure, or lipid … No statistically significant changes were seen for HDL cholesterol or triglycerides. 3. … meta-analysis) showed statistically significant improvements in self-reported activity levels.
  9. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2008_05.pdf
    January 01, 2008 - The results shaded in yellow below denote statistically significant correlations. … Found in Appendix A, Tables 1-3, column 3: + = positive association, statistically significant at … significant as explained above ns = “Not Significant”, denotes a statistically insignificant association … The number of statistically significant associations for the nine individual PSIs range widely from … Although there is no pattern to which associations are statistically significant or their direction at
  10. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/abdominal-aortic-aneurysm-screening-2014
    June 23, 2014 - significant. 30 , 31 All-Cause Mortality None of the individual trials showed a statistically significant … Sensitivity analysis using ORs and a fixed-effects model found a statistically significant result at … AAA Rupture Invitation to screening was associated with a statistically significant reduced rate of … The Chichester trial found no statistically significant reduction in rupture rate at 15 years, although … The Western Australia trial found no statistically significant difference at a median followup of 3.6
  11. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/research/findings/nhqrdr/2014chartbooks/womenhealth/2014nhqdr-womenhealth.pptx
    January 01, 2020 - There were no statistically significant differences between males and females for 55% (138 of 253) of … Groups With Disparities: Education: There were no statistically significant differences observed. … None of these changes were statistically significant. … Trends: From 2005 to 2012, there were no statistically significant changes overall among women or men … There were no statistically significant changes overall or among males.
  12. digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/bloomfield-h-et-al-2005
    January 01, 2005 - The interaction between group (control v intervention) and time period was highly significant (p<0.0001 … Overall, there was no significant difference in prescription rates among the three prompt groups. … However, there was a significant interaction between prompt group and site, indicating that the efficacy … There was no significant difference in prescription rates at the control sites pre-post. … "There was no statistically significant difference in prescription rates among the three prompt groups
  13. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/folic-acid-for-the-prevention-of-neural-tube-defects-preventive-medication
    August 01, 2023 - The study reported a statistically significant reduction in neural tube defects in women taking folic … The study reported no statistically significant differences associated with folic acid supplementation … This study reported no statistically significant associations between daily or less than daily folic … Two studies reported statistically significant reductions of autism associated with folic acid supplementation … Neither reported harms; however, 1 study reported a statistically significant reduction of ASD associated
  14. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/advances-in-patient-safety-2/vol2/Advances-Layde_34.pdf
    March 14, 2008 - No statistically significant differences among the intervention groups or between either of the intervention … Overall and drug-injury rates showed statistically significant increases over time (P <0.0005). … No statistically significant differences among the intervention groups or between either of the intervention … No significant differences in rate change were seen for the other priority indicators. … performance feedback and organizational capacity building to improve hospital patient safety did not find a statistically
  15. digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/online-counseling-enable-lifestyle-focused-obesity-treatment-primary-care
    January 01, 2023 - Although there was not a statistically significant difference between the groups, point estimates suggested … that the COI-S intervention had a greater clinically significant impact. … At each time point, there was no significant difference in weight loss between groups.
  16. digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/r21hs023805-kutney-lee-final-report-2019.pdf
    January 01, 2019 - We found that the quality of the nurse work environment also has an independent and statistically significant … EHR adoption level did not have a statistically significant effect on job dissatisfaction and intention … We did not observe a statistically significant effect of EHR adoption level on the patient outcomes. … significant (see limitations). … significant findings.
  17. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/cahps/news-and-events/events/webinars/child-hcahps-benefits-participation.pdf
    January 01, 2019 - Hematology/Oncology Unit & Medical/Surgical Unit: Aggregated 75.3 (n=235) 80 (n=360) 83.3 (n=400) *Statisticallysignificant different p<.05.
  18. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb118.jsp
    August 01, 2011 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or … There were significant declines in hospital discharge rates for five MDCs during the decade. … Among the top 15 hospital discharge rates, there were two significant increases. … *Significant difference between 2009 and 2006. †Significant difference between 2006 and 2000. … §Significant difference between 2009 and 2000.
  19. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/aspirin-to-prevent-cardiovascular-disease-preventive-medication
    April 26, 2022 - Most trials with age subanalyses did not find a statistically significant difference in the relative … significant increase in CRC mortality at 10 years. … significant lower risk of CRC mortality at 18.3 years of follow-up (Peto OR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.41-0.94 … ]), and the WHS reported lower CRC mortality at 17.5 years of follow-up that was not statistically significant … Low-dose aspirin use was not associated with a statistically significant increase in risk of fatal hemorrhagic
  20. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st63/stat63.pdf
    January 01, 2005 - All differences discussed in this brief are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. … While differences in median total expenses between two-person and larger families were not statisticallysignificant, mean total expenses for two-person families were approximately $1,000 higher than for … themselves a family unit and single persons living with neither a relative nor a person identified as a “significant