Results

Total Results: 5,385 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

301. Psn-Pdf (pdf file)
     psnet.ahrq.gov/node/46340/psn-pdf
     September 27, 2017 - Although 17 of the studies demonstrated a statistically significant benefit from the intervention alerts

302. Final Progress Report: The Impact of Shift-Accumulated Fatigue on Patient Care and Risk of Post-Shift Driving Collisions among 12-Hour Day and Night Shift Nurses (pdf file)
     www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/james-report.pdf
     January 01, 2024 - When tested with multi-level modelling, this difference was found to be statistically significant … This difference was statistically significant (f=4.23; df=1, 345; p<.05), supporting this research … significant difference. … This main effect was statistically significant (f=25.22; df=1, 161; p<.001). … This difference was not statistically significant; thus, this research hypothesis was not supported.

303. Chronic-Urinary-Retention Research (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/chronic-urinary-retention_research.pdf
     September 01, 2014 - Neither of these differences was statistically significant. … None of the TURP patients needed to return to surgery; the difference was not statistically significant … The adjusted mean change in IPSS scores for the TURP versus laser therapy group was statistically significant … No statistically significant difference Mean difference at endpoint: no statistically significant … significant difference No statistically significant difference No statistically significant

304. Rapid Response_Linking Dental Services to Treatment Outcomes for Chronic Kidney Disease: A Rapid Response Review (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/treatment-outcomes-chronic-kidney-rapid-research.pdf
     November 01, 2024 - Statistically significant reduction of systemic inflammation markers like CRP23,25,27 and IL-6 levels23,27 … Overall, most of the studies/meta-analyses show statistically significant reductions in CRP in as little … Note: all described changes are statistically significant (p < 0.05) post-dental treatment relative … Note: all described changes are statistically significant (p < 0.05) Evidence from 6 SRs (1 of high … Of these, IL6 showed statistically significant reductions in a majority of the studies where it was

305. Statistical Brief #126
     hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb126.jsp
     February 01, 2012 - significant at the 0.05 level or better. … There were no significant changes since 2005. Figure 1. … There were no significant differences between 2005 and 2009 (table 1). … significant at p<0.05 … significant at p<0.05

306. 2025 AHRQ Surveys on Patient Safety Culture® (SOPS®) Nursing Home Survey Version 2.0 Pilot Test Results (pdf file)
     www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/nursing-home/2025-nursing-home-20-pilot-test-results.pdf
     January 01, 2025 - “Significant” Differences Between Scores You might be interested in determining the statistical significance … significant. … While a 1 percentage point difference between percent positive scores might be “statistically” significant … Keep in mind that statistically significant differences are not always important, and nonsignificant … “Significant” Differences Between Scores Data Limitations

307. Standardized infection ratios for central line-associated bloodstream infections and surgical site infections, 2009–2012
     www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/research/findings/nhqrdr/chartbooks/healthyliving/qdr2015-chartbook-healthyliving.pptx
     January 01, 2020 - No Change = Rates of change are less than 1% per year or are not statistically significant. … Differences are not statistically significant or are smaller than 10%. … There were no statistically significant differences between White females and Black females. … From 2010 to 2013, there was no statistically significant change in this disparity. … From 2010 to 2013, there was no statistically significant change in this disparity.

308. Screening for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement (pdf file)
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/g2bEcQW6ae_NTFZ9KUxT_t
     August 24, 2021 - Neither trial found statistically significant differences in cardiovascular events, quality of life … in quality of life scores that are not likely clinically significant. … Another trial (n = 150)41 found no statistically significant difference in myocardial infarction over … The analysis reported a statistically significant effect modification by BMI, with greater effect on … significant.42 Both trials reported no significant dif- ference in blood pressure among persons receiving

309. White Paper: Enhancing Systematic Review Methods by Incorporating Unpublished Drug Trials (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/unpublished-drug-trials-white-paper.pdf
     December 01, 2024 - show significant associations. … a Statistically significant benefit shown in the LOCF analysis of CAPS-2 score but not in the observed … This indicates a statistically significant effect that is just below the threshold for a clinically … significant effect based on the 10-point MCID criterion. 4 Figure 1. … and clinically significant.

310. Evidence Summary: Ovarian Cancer: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary/ovarian-cancer-screening
     February 13, 2018 - In the 2 large screening trials (PLCO and UKCTOCS, n = 271,103), there was not a statistically significant … This difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.74-1.08]) 31 ( Table … A statistically significant difference in survival between women with index cancers in the intervention … The overall differences by group and stage were also statistically significant when comparing localized … Psychological harms were reported in a subset of 1 trial No statistically significant differences

311. Dietary-Supplements Surveillance (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/dietary-supplements_surveillance.pdf
     January 01, 2013 - Coenzyme Q + statins, fenofibrate, ACE inhibitors, or statins: No statistically significant differences … No statistically significant effects were observed in withdrawal due to adverse events, bleeding, renal … No statistically significant differences were observed for total adverse events, incidence of headache … Coenzyme Q + statins, fenofibrate, ACE inhibitors, or statins: No statistically significant differences … No statistically significant differences were observed for total adverse events, incidence of headache

312. Statistical Brief #5
     hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb5.jsp
     May 01, 2006 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or … As shown in table 1, over the seven-year time period from 1997 to 2003, there were no significant shifts … For most circulatory conditions there were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality between … For most conditions, there were no significant differences between men and women in in-hospital mortality … 1997 and 2003 Principal diagnosis Number of hospital stays, overall, 2003 Percent women Significant

313. Impact of a statewide intensive care unit quality improvement initiative on hospital mortality and length of stay: retrospective comparative analysis. | PSNet
     psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/impact-statewide-intensive-care-unit-quality-improvement-initiative-hospital-mortality-and
     October 16, 2012 - retrospective follow-up study found that implementation of the Keystone project was associated with a significant … However, the differences noted in length of stay were not statistically significant.

314. Bladder-Cancer-Non-Muscle-Invasive Executive (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/bladder-cancer-non-muscle-invasive_executive.pdf
     October 01, 2015 - MMC was associated with increased risk of recurrence, but the difference was not statistically significant … Doxorubicin Versus Thiotepa: • There was no statistically significant difference between doxorubicin … no intravesical therapy: Progression Low Epirubicin was associated with a non– statistically significant … MMC was associated with increased risk of recurrence, but the difference was not statistically significant … Doxorubicin vs. thiotepa: Recurrence Low There was no statistically significant difference in risk

315. C:\unzipped\Methods Series Reports to Convert\Comparison_Report_NIS4 1995.wpd (pdf file)
     hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/Comparison_Report_NIS41995Final.pdf
     December 21, 1998 - For each statistic, a test was performed to determine whether a difference was statistically significant … Moreover, because of the large number of comparisons, some of the statistically significant differences … Average length of stay estimates from the two sources are not statistically different. … None of the comparisons for average lengths of stay are statistically different. … Tests of Statistical Significance To test for a statistically significant difference between an NIS

316. Executive summary_Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 250_Living Systematic Review on Cannabis and Other Plant-Based Treatments for Chronic Pain: 2024 Update (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-250-cannabis-2024-surv-rep-update-executive-sum.pdf
     January 01, 2024 - to statistically significant; however, the SOE for these outcomes remained low. … significant. … Effect size: None (i.e., no effect/no statistically significant effect), small, moderate, or large increased … significant. … Effect size: None (i.e., no effect/no statistically significant effect), small, moderate, or large increased

317. Maternal and Child Health Care: Effectiveness Measures | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
     www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/chartbooks/healthyliving/mcheff-measures.html
     June 01, 2018 - However, there was no statistically significant increase for Black children (61.9% in 2002 and 69.8% … Groups With Disparities: In 2013, there were no statistically significant differences between White … There were no statistically significant differences between White females and Black females. … There were no statistically significant differences between White males and Black males.

318. Evidence Summary Comparative Effectiveness Review 216 Telehealth for Acute and Chronic Care Consultations (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-216-telehealth-evidence-summary.pdf
     April 01, 2019 - • Intermediate outcomes: ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS) are not statistically different with … significant in most studies (low strength of evidence) … significant (low strength of evidence) … ; majority not statistically significant or not tested Low Time to Treatment (KQ2) 23 Time to treatment … significant (low strength of evidence)

319. Part 2: Trends in Priorities of the Heckler Report—Suicide Prevention and Mental Health Care | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
     www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/chartbooks/blackhealth/part2-spmh.html
     June 01, 2018 - In 2013, this disparity was no longer statistically significant. … Trends: From 2008 to 2013, there were no statistically significant changes over time overall, for Blacks

320. Program Impact | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
     www.ahrq.gov/hai/cusp/clabsi-final/clabsifinal3.html
     January 01, 2013 - Among adult ICUs, a statistically significant improvement was found in two dimensions: "feedback and … No statistically significant difference was found among the remaining HSOPS dimensions.