Results

Total Results: 5,388 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

  1. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st519/stat519.shtml
    December 01, 2018 - STATISTICAL BRIEF #519: Enrollment in High-Premium Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance by State: Private Industry, 2016   Skip to main content An official website of the Department of Health & Human Services …
  2. digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/page/health-information-technology-evaluation-toolkit-2009-update.pdf
    January 01, 2009 - The study also notes that a significant number of clinicians are distracted by and frustrated with the … the number of observations you need to make in order to demonstrate that the measure has changed statistically … May be very difficult to find statistically significant differences in mortality rates, since death … Use of barcode scanning will catch a significant number of errors (“near misses”). … significant difference.
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/migraine-emergency_executive.pdf
    November 01, 2012 - 0.43 to 1.14) Headache recurrence (30 days) Dexamethasone vs. placebo (1 RCT) Insufficient No significant … Neither trial found a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of akathisia (Table D … comparisons were repeated in this review and, while a similar trend was observed, the differences were not statisticallysignificant. … Metoclopramide + anticholinergic vs. phenothiazine + anticholinergic (1 RCT) Insufficient No significant
  4. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/_q6ZTL2Yg6f6rLp-Re9whD
    June 24, 2025 - older or vulnerable adults by a caregiver or someone else they may trust is common and can result in significant … older or vulnerable adults by a caregiver or someone else they may trust is common and can result in significant … the control group (9.55 events per person-year) at 3 years, but the difference was not statisticallysignificant (incident rate ratio of average IP V events per person-year, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.73-1.01]).47 … The other home-visit study found statistically sig- nificant lower mean CTS2 scores from baseline in
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/acs-pci-adjunctive-devices_surveillance.pdf
    April 01, 2013 - Intermediate health outcomes showed significant reductions in distal embolization and no reflow, and … in mortality risk, although a single trial found a significant reduction in MACE. … Intermediate health outcomes showed significant reductions in distal embolization and no reflow, and … in mortality risk, although a single trial found a significant reduction in MACE. … The only significant finding was increased time to perform a PCI procedure compared with control for
  6. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb192-Pediatric-Preventable-Hospitalizations-Asthma-Diabetes.pdf
    December 01, 2014 - 31.9 –13.5 West 114.1 66.4 –41.8 25.4 14.6 –42.5 Abbreviations: DNC, data not collected; DSU, data statistically
  7. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary-harms-of-screening-for-breast-cancer/breast-cancer-screening-january-2016
    January 11, 2016 - Four of 5 studies showed statistically significantly lower rates of recall for tomosynthesis and mammography … A U.S. study comparing tomosynthesis and mammography versus mammography alone reported a significant … * Excludes women with preexisting breast cancer; clinically significant BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, … CBE = clinical breast examination; DM = digital mammography; FP = false-positive; NS = not statisticallysignificant; OR = odds ratio; RR = risk ratio; STORM = Screening with Tomosynthesis or Standard Mammography
  8. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb70.pdf
    April 01, 2009 - ***Statistically different from zero at the 99 percent level. … **Statistically different from zero at the 95 percent level. … *Statistically different from zero at the 90 percent level. … ***Statistically different from zero at the 99 percent level. … **Statistically different from zero at the 95 percent level.
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-applicability_methods.pdf
    January 01, 2011 - Emphasis should be given to factors where statistically significant interactions or sub-group differences … Use a summary table for applicability to highlight significant limitations to applicability. … When there is a large body of evidence or when there are significant issues relevant to applicability … age 65 had smaller benefits in a subgroup analysis of the Swedish trial but this difference was not statisticallysignificant; nonetheless the high risk of competing causes of death reduces the number of patients
  10. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/about-uspstf/methods-and-processes/procedure-manual/procedure-manual-section-6-methods-arriving-recommendation
    July 06, 2017 - the evidence is sufficient to answer a key question, but is less convincing because of one of more significant … the evidence is sufficient to answer the key question, but is less convincing because of one or more significant … Evidence showing a statistically significant effect but limited or unknown clinical importance. … determined to be inadequate because 1) there was limited evidence that these changes resulted in clinically significant … benefit because of the variability in the reporting of harms and the fact that many studies are not statistically
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/methods_guide_atkins.pdf
    January 01, 2011 - Emphasis should be given to factors where statistically significant interactions or sub-group differences … Use a summary table for applicability to highlight significant limitations to applicability. … When there is a large body of evidence or when there are significant issues relevant to applicability … age 65 had smaller benefits in a subgroup analysis of the Swedish trial but this difference was not statisticallysignificant; nonetheless the high risk of competing causes of death reduces the number of patients
  12. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb275-COVID19-HospitalLocation.pdf
    December 01, 2020 - Because of the large sample size of the HCUP data, small differences can be statistically significant
  13. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st426/stat426.shtml
    January 01, 2014 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level
  14. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb160.pdf
    July 01, 2013 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the .05 level
  15. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/ra19/ra19.pdf
    June 01, 2006 - expenses also have high out-of-pocket expenses relative to income Out-of-pocket costs can impose a significant … .10 Looking at the under-65 population with employer-provided health insurance, researchers found no statisticallysignificant differences in concentration between those enrolled in HMOs and other types of gatekeeper
  16. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb205-Hospital-Discharge-Postacute-Care.jsp
    May 01, 2016 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the .01 level or
  17. Ahrqfinalreportvhi (pdf file)

    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/datainnovations/clinicaldata/AHRQFINALREPORTVHI.pdf
    December 01, 2009 - The results of this survey played a significant role in the design of the data elements. … There were significant delays in getting a signed contract from one hospital system because they felt … The answers were “unknown but significant”,”Uncertain”, and “4.” … Altering Approach VHI made several significant adjustments based on the survey. … For one hospital system with four participating hospitals, there were significant delays in receiving
  18. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/treatment-resistant-depression_executive.pdf
    September 01, 2011 - eligible studies identified.c remission rTMS vs. sham Maintenance of 68 Insufficient 3 fair trials: no significant … Cognitive 22 Insufficient 1 fair trial: no significant differences in ECT + rTMS functioning a single … whereas some evidence suggests that rTMS improves cognitive functioning compared to sham (2 trials: significant … Adverse events 22 Low 1 fair trial: no significant differences in ECT + rTMS specific adverse events … Three fair trials compared rTMS with a sham procedure and found no significant differences.
  19. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2025-04/newman-toker2-report.pdf
    January 01, 2025 - Secondary analyses were conducted to test for significant demographic (age, sex, race, education) or … Secondary Analyses and Data Handling Secondary analyses were conducted to test for significant heterogeneity … All P values were two sided, with P<0.05 considered statistically significant. … Once the “save your life” stake was removed from the analysis, no statistically significant differences … By contrast, there were no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences across the
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-218-osteoporosis-fracture-prevention-evidence-summary.pdf
    April 01, 2019 - A), while absolute risk reductions for incident hip and nonvertebral fracture were small and not statisticallysignificant (low SOE).14 In women with osteoporosis by BMD or past fracture, 4 years of raloxifene … proportion of women with osteopenia had incident radiographic vertebral fractures, and results were not statisticallysignificant. … the absolute number of events was low and possible differences between treatment groups were not statistically