-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st482/stat482.shtml
November 01, 2015 - All comparisons discussed in the text are statistically significant at the .05 level unless otherwise
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st491/stat491.shtml
July 01, 2016 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/prostatic-hyperplasia-medications_disposition-comments.pdf
May 26, 2016 - have revised the methods section to
clarify what we mean by clinical significance:
“When there were statistically … significant
differences between treatment groups in
specific LUTS/BPH outcomes, we
interpreted efficacy … A potential for
significant blood pressure reduction using both classes together is also noted. … when it is
statistically significant and the weighted
mean difference is at least half of the MDD. … Maybe instead they could
say "While vardenfail use was associated with significant improvement in mean
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary/impaired-visual-acuity-screening-older-adults
May 24, 2022 - Four trials (n = 4819) found no significant differences between screening vs no screening in visual acuity … However, direct evidence found no significant association between vision screening vs no screening in … Data on effects of multivitamins on vision- related function were limited, with most trials showing no statistically … sufficiently powered to assess rates of cardiovascular events or other serious adverse events, although no statistically … However, direct evidence found no significant association between vision screening vs no screening in
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/zHvENvrSUeZh6gFPUK_37c
February 13, 2018 - There was also no significant dif-
ference in mortality risk in the transvaginal ultrasound and CA-125 … However, this finding was not statistically significant un-
less cases of primary peritoneal cancer were … It evaluated the use of a single cutoff value
for CA-125 testing and found no significant difference … Although no significant differences were found be-
tween the intervention and control groups, there was … Al-
though no statistically significant difference in cancer worry was
found between study groups, the
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nrd/stats/MaskedStats_NRD_2015Q4_Dx_Pr_Grps.PDF
October 31, 2017 - TRAUMA 338 0.01%
956: LIMB REATTACHMENT, HIP & FEMUR PROC FOR MULTIPLE
SIGNIFICANT TRAUMA
2,151 0.05% … PROCEDURES FOR MULTIPLE SIGNIFICANT TRAUMA W
MCC
1,797 0.04%
958: OTHER O.R. … PROCEDURES FOR MULTIPLE SIGNIFICANT TRAUMA W CC 1,904 0.04%
959: OTHER O.R. … PROCEDURES FOR MULTIPLE SIGNIFICANT TRAUMA W/O
CC/MCC
353 0.01%
963: OTHER MULTIPLE SIGNIFICANT TRAUMA … W MCC 1,009 0.02%
964: OTHER MULTIPLE SIGNIFICANT TRAUMA W CC 2,175 0.05%
965: OTHER MULTIPLE SIGNIFICANT
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/vCzPVrVJfgFWfpWRdEHMKQ
July 01, 2012 - the 7 centers included in the ERSPC analysis,
only 2 countries (Sweden and the Netherlands) reported
statistically … significant lower risk for
dying of prostate cancer than healthier men (23, 34). … Similar results were reported after 11 years of follow-up
and were statistically significant (RR, 0.83 … individ-
ual centers included in the mortality analysis, 2 (Sweden
and the Netherlands) demonstrated statistically … significant
reductions in prostate cancer deaths with PSA screening.
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st173/stat173.pdf
June 01, 2007 - All
differences discussed in the text are statistically significant at 0.05 or
better.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/arthritis-horizon-scan-high-impact-1512.pdf
December 29, 2015 - Only about 30% of patients achieve overall gout
control, so a significant unmet need exists for more … ES-5
Key Expert Comments: Experts commenting on this intervention stated that a significant
unmet … In phase III trials,
patients treated with secukinumab yielded a significant improvement in American … At 16 weeks, patients who received secukinumab 75 mg did
not have significant improvements in ASAS20 … Patients treated
with lesinurad 200 mg and febuxostat did not achieve a statistically significant improvement
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r21hs022578-kharrazi-final-report-2015.pdf
January 01, 2015 - Methods: Significant readmission variables were identified through a systematic review. … Developing the HIE-derived RRPM included the following phases: (1) Mapping ADT-message segments with significant … These informatics advancements can produce significant impact on the
application of predictive modeling
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/ehc-presentation-quantitative-synthesis-chapter-3.pdf
February 01, 2018 - Quantitative Synthesis Chapter 3. Choice of Statistical Model for Combining Studies
Quantitative Synthesis
Chapter 3. Choice of Statistical Model for Combining Studies
Prepared for:
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Training Modules for Systematic Reviews Methods Guide
www.ahrq.gov
Presenter…
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs018649-levick-final-report-2014.pdf
January 01, 2014 - Significant discussions were held among the stakeholders to determine the most appropriate list
of … We found that there was a significant
change in how users perceived standardization. … The impact of stage 3 on total wRVUs
was negative but not significant. … In contrast, there is a statistically significant
convex learning curve for wRVUs/visit. … Further,
there was a statistically significant decline in inductions and in the severity of adverse
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/workingpapers/wp_12005.pdf
August 01, 2012 - but when linking with the NHIS sample adult or sample
child file the impacts on many estimates are significant … and unadjusted estimates are mostly similar and reasonably close to the
benchmark estimates (only 1 statistically … significant difference). … whether the differences of both adjusted and
unadjusted estimates from the benchmark estimate are statistically … significant or not, the adjusted
estimates are closer to the benchmark estimates.
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/vision-in-children-ages-6-months-to-5-years-screening
September 05, 2017 - Negative LRs were in the minimal range for detecting amblyopia risk factors or significant nonamblyogenic … at age 7.5 years compared with 1-time screening at age 37 months; however, the difference was only statistically … significant for 1 of 2 definitions of amblyopia (interocular difference in acuity ≥0.2 logMAR [logarithm … The ALSPAC cohort study (n=6081) compared screening at age 37 months vs no screening and found no statistically … significant difference in the prevalence of amblyopia at age 7.5 years for 3 definitions of amblyopia
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb41.pdf
November 01, 2007 - All differences between estimates in the text are statistically
significant at the 0.05 level or better … **Statistically different from zero at the 95 percent level. … *Statistically different from zero at the 90 percent level.
10
Source: AHRQ, Center for Delivery
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/r18hs025645-jariwal-final-report-2022.pdf
January 01, 2022 - There were no significant relationships between age or gender and health literacy. … UTAUT total score as well as the instrument’s four domain scores
showed statistically significant increases … We
observed significant increases in asthma knowledge from baseline to 6 months. … Regarding the Effectiveness
domain, ASTHMAXcel was linked to significant improvements in asthma
quality … The ASTHMAXcel intervention was
linked to significant improvements in asthma quality of life, asthma
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb174-Emergency-Department-Visits-Overview.pdf
April 01, 2014 - Introduction
Emergency departments (EDs) provide a significant source of
medical care in the United … All differences between
estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the .0005
level
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st267/stat267.pdf
October 01, 2009 - All differences between
estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st103/stat103.pdf
November 01, 2005 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are
statistically significant at the 0.05 level
-
meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st39/stat39.pdf
May 01, 2004 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are
statistically significant at the 0.05 level