Results

Total Results: 5,388 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

  1. digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017864-ciemins-final-report-2012.pdf
    January 01, 2012 - Significant differences between groups were noted for sex, hypertension diagnosis, and mean numbers … Table 5 reveals statistically significant improvements in the proportion of patients with factors such … strongly agree” or “agree” increased over time for 10 out of 13 measures, none of the improvements were statisticallysignificant (p=0.12 – 0.93). … Significant improvements were observed when patients were seen post-discharge by a provider within
  2. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2024-02/schnipper2-report.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - In the restricted cubic spline analysis (Figure 1b), the only significant terms were linear terms, … There were no statistically significant quadratic or cubic terms. … There was no significant change in the y intercept (i.e., no sudden improvement at the beginning of … refined evidence-based toolkit of medication reconciliation best practices was associated with a large, statistically … A recent systematic review of 19 studies focused on pharmacist-led interventions found a significant
  3. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/mr19/mr19.shtml
    March 01, 2007 - Further, in a significant number of instances, respondents are simply not aware of either the … Second, the insurance industry made significant movement toward capitation as a way of increasing … Separate imputations are conducted for each event type category because relevant variables and statisticallysignificant correlates of expenditures vary by type of event.
  4. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb69.pdf
    March 01, 2009 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level
  5. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb58.pdf
    August 01, 2008 - Despite significant efforts to address the disease, through advances in medicine and interventions
  6. digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/r01hs015188-huck-final-report-2008.pdf
    January 01, 2008 - at 2 hospitals) Quantitative Data Analysis Although slight, there does appear to be evidence of statistically … Barriers to Success There was significant delay of approximately one year in initiating quality improvement … • Significant delay in initiating data collection efforts by hospitals due to INHS experiment and … • Significant expenditure for data abstraction as a result of the INHS experiment. … Although improving, there remains a significant opportunity for improvement.
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/rheumatoid-arthritis-medicine_executive.pdf
    April 01, 2012 - Low No clinically significant difference for functional capacity. … Statistically significant difference between groups for quality of life (SF- 36 PCS) that did not reach … No significant differences when compared with golimumab. … MTX In patients with early RA, no clinically significant differences in clinical response between … Patients with moderate RA had significant improvements and better overall functional status than those
  8. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/-hnLT26c2NHs6thK9yznPF
    July 01, 2002 - After 6.75 years of follow-up, this study reported a non- statistically significant trend toward a reduction … No study found statistically significant differences in mortality between study arms. … The BCPT found a non-statistically significant trend toward a reduction in hip, spine, and Colles’ fractures … significant for women aged 50 and older (RR, 4.01; 95% CI, 1.70-10.90). … The power of the trials to find a statistically significant difference in the incidence of breast cancer
  9. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary/breast-cancer-medications-for-risk-reduction-2002
    May 06, 2002 - After 6.75 years of followup, this study reported a non-statistically significant trend toward a reduction … No study found statistically significant differences in mortality between study arms. … The BCPT found a non-statistically significant trend toward a reduction in hip, spine, and Colles' fractures … significant for women ages 50 and older (RR, 4.01; 95 percent CI, 1.70-10.90). … The power of the trials to find a statistically significant difference in the incidence of breast cancer
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-bias_methods.pdf
    February 01, 2013 - In one meta-analysis,3 the conclusion was that the decrease in nonvertebral fractures was not statisticallysignificant. … was that the beneficial effect of alendronate compared with placebo on nonvertebral fractures was statisticallysignificant. … significant effect on the summary odds ratio” and that masking required 1.3 hours per paper.
  11. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb179-Emergency-Department-Trends.pdf
    November 01, 2013 - Changes in rates are considered statistically significant if the p-value is 0.05 or less. … All differences were statistically significant at p<0.05. … All differences were statistically significant at p<0.05. … All differences were statistically significant at p<0.05. … Results were considered nominally significant if the value was 0.05 or less.
  12. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary24/falls-prevention-in-older-adults-counseling-and-preventive-medication-2012
    December 15, 2010 - significant. … significant either ( Figure 1 . … significant differences ( Figure 2 . … There was also a non-statistically significant increase in fall-related fractures. … Like that review and meta-analyses, we found no statistically significant reduction in fall risk when
  13. digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/chase-h-et-al-2003
    January 01, 2003 - The GHbA(1c) values significantly decreased in both groups, with no statistically significant difference
  14. digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/chen-c-et-al-2009
    January 01, 2009 - The increase between 2005 and 2007 was statistically significant (p < 0.001)."
  15. digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/opportunistic-decision-making-information-needs-and-workflow-emergency-care/annual-summary/2012
    January 01, 2012 - This decrease, although not statistically significant, is likely triggered by the anchoring of physicians
  16. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary-screening-for-breast-cancer/breast-cancer-screening-january-2016
    January 11, 2016 - significant at all ages and the magnitudes of effect are small. … significant 22% reduction. … significant reduction from our meta-analysis of trials. … A meta-analysis of trials indicated a statistically significant reduction in advanced disease for women … significant; T = tomosynthesis.
  17. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb108.pdf
    April 01, 2011 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … (percentage growth) 20.8% 14.0% ‡ Differences between uninsured stays and insured stays were statisticallysignificant at p<0.05. … significant at p<0.05. … significant at p<0.05.
  18. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/cHbBWNok76hRWKDXXm3R2_
    February 13, 2018 - In the 2 large screening trials (PLCO and UKCTOCS, n = 271 103), there was not a statistically significant … This difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.74-1.08])31 (Table 3 … A statistically significant difference in survival between women with index cancers in the intervention … No statistically significant differences in anxiety or risk of psychological morbidity were observed … Psychological harms were reported in a subset of 1 trial No statistically significant differences were
  19. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st21/stat21.pdf
    January 01, 1997 - All results discussed in this statistical brief are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. … National estimates derived from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) indicate there was a significant
  20. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st15/stat15.pdf
    January 01, 2000 - Furthermore, there was significant variation in the average employee premium contributions by industry … Only those estimates which had a statistically significant difference from the National average at the