Results

Total Results: 5,388 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

  1. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/reports/2007niscomparisonrpt.jsp
    May 01, 2016 - **Significant at p<0.01.   Table 6. … **Significant at p<0.01.   … **Significant at p<0.01.   Figure 4. … **Significant at p<0.01.   Figure 6. … **Significant at p<0.01.  
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/nonopioid-chronic-pain-summary.pdf
    April 01, 2020 - Studies rated “poor” have significant flaws that imply biases of various types that may invalidate … None ++ QoL = quality of life; SOE = strength of evidence Effect size: none (i.e., no effect/no statistically … tricyclic antidepressant; WAE = withdrawal due to adverse event Effect size: none (i.e., no effect/no statistically … = strength of evidence; WAE = withdrawal due to adverse event Effect size: none (i.e., no effect/no statistically … strength of evidence; WAE = withdrawal due to adverse event Effect size: none (i.e., no effect/no statistically
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/colorectal-surgery-preparation_executive.pdf
    April 01, 2014 - Across all 106 analyzable results (outcome/comparison combinations), 1 was statistically significant.b … significant findings are false. … No statistically significant differences among arms were reported. … Across all 88 analyzable results (outcome/comparison combinations), 27 were statistically significantsignificant findings are more than what would be expected by chance.
  4. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/breast-cancer-screening
    April 30, 2024 - Trials reporting on at least 2 consecutive rounds of screening have generally found no statisticallysignificant difference in breast cancer detection or in tumor characteristics (tumor size, histologic … diagnosed with a stage IIB or higher cancer and cancer with less favorable characteristics was not statistically … The trials found no statistically significant difference in detection at the second screening round ( … There were no statistically significant differences in tumor diameter, histologic grade, and node status
  5. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/mr19/mr19.pdf
    March 01, 2007 - Further, in a significant number of instances, respondents are simply not aware of either the total … Second, the insurance industry made significant movement toward capitation as a way of increasing the … Separate imputations are conducted for each event type category because relevant variables and statisticallysignificant correlates of expenditures vary by type of event.
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/migraine-prevention_disposition-comments.pdf
    April 18, 2013 - We did not detect statistically significant differences in outcomes among botulinum formulations. … We did not detect statistically significant differences in outcomes among botulinum formulations. … Post hoc subgroup analysis reported statistically significant reduction in migraine attacks only in … The pilot study by Winner et al (2005) did not show a statistically significant difference in the 50% … We added an explanation of statistically significant differences when 95% CI of attributable events
  7. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/oaVhMNVAnx3b5-UUunZkjr
    December 17, 2018 - significant association with illicit drug use (standardized mean difference, −0.08 [95% CI, −0.16 to … Across all 29 trials, only 1 trial reported on harms and found no statistically significant group differences … on illicit and nonmedical drug use were wide ranging, and the result of the pooled analysis was not statistically … Despite the small pooled result, some interventions did show statistically significant reductions in … significant increases in drug use outcomes, and others reported statistically nonsignificant increases
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/chronic-fatigue_executive.pdf
    July 01, 2016 - (Insufficient evidence) *Statistically significant differences between treatment and placebo groups. … None reported statistically significant clinical differences between treatment and control groups … (Insufficient evidence) *Statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups. … (Insufficient evidence) * Statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups … (Insufficient evidence) * Statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups
  9. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/-hnLT26c2NHs6thK9yznPF
    July 01, 2002 - After 6.75 years of follow-up, this study reported a non- statistically significant trend toward a reduction … No study found statistically significant differences in mortality between study arms. … The BCPT found a non-statistically significant trend toward a reduction in hip, spine, and Colles’ fractures … significant for women aged 50 and older (RR, 4.01; 95% CI, 1.70-10.90). … The power of the trials to find a statistically significant difference in the incidence of breast cancer
  10. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary/breast-cancer-medications-for-risk-reduction-2002
    May 06, 2002 - After 6.75 years of followup, this study reported a non-statistically significant trend toward a reduction … No study found statistically significant differences in mortality between study arms. … The BCPT found a non-statistically significant trend toward a reduction in hip, spine, and Colles' fractures … significant for women ages 50 and older (RR, 4.01; 95 percent CI, 1.70-10.90). … The power of the trials to find a statistically significant difference in the incidence of breast cancer
  11. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb179-Emergency-Department-Trends.pdf
    November 01, 2013 - Changes in rates are considered statistically significant if the p-value is 0.05 or less. … All differences were statistically significant at p<0.05. … All differences were statistically significant at p<0.05. … All differences were statistically significant at p<0.05. … Results were considered nominally significant if the value was 0.05 or less.
  12. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary24/falls-prevention-in-older-adults-counseling-and-preventive-medication-2012
    December 15, 2010 - significant. … significant either ( Figure 1 . … significant differences ( Figure 2 . … There was also a non-statistically significant increase in fall-related fractures. … Like that review and meta-analyses, we found no statistically significant reduction in fall risk when
  13. digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/chase-h-et-al-2003
    January 01, 2003 - The GHbA(1c) values significantly decreased in both groups, with no statistically significant difference
  14. digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/chen-c-et-al-2009
    January 01, 2009 - The increase between 2005 and 2007 was statistically significant (p < 0.001)."
  15. digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/opportunistic-decision-making-information-needs-and-workflow-emergency-care/annual-summary/2012
    January 01, 2012 - This decrease, although not statistically significant, is likely triggered by the anchoring of physicians
  16. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary-screening-for-breast-cancer/breast-cancer-screening-january-2016
    January 11, 2016 - significant at all ages and the magnitudes of effect are small. … significant 22% reduction. … significant reduction from our meta-analysis of trials. … A meta-analysis of trials indicated a statistically significant reduction in advanced disease for women … significant; T = tomosynthesis.
  17. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb108.pdf
    April 01, 2011 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … (percentage growth) 20.8% 14.0% ‡ Differences between uninsured stays and insured stays were statisticallysignificant at p<0.05. … significant at p<0.05. … significant at p<0.05.
  18. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/cHbBWNok76hRWKDXXm3R2_
    February 13, 2018 - In the 2 large screening trials (PLCO and UKCTOCS, n = 271 103), there was not a statistically significant … This difference was not statistically significant (hazard ratio, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.74-1.08])31 (Table 3 … A statistically significant difference in survival between women with index cancers in the intervention … No statistically significant differences in anxiety or risk of psychological morbidity were observed … Psychological harms were reported in a subset of 1 trial No statistically significant differences were
  19. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st21/stat21.pdf
    January 01, 1997 - All results discussed in this statistical brief are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. … National estimates derived from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) indicate there was a significant
  20. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st15/stat15.pdf
    January 01, 2000 - Furthermore, there was significant variation in the average employee premium contributions by industry … Only those estimates which had a statistically significant difference from the National average at the