Results

Total Results: 744 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

  1. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/visual-impairment-in-children-ages-1-5-screening-2011
    January 15, 2011 - age 7.5 years, compared with one-time screening at 37 months of age. 5 However, the difference was statisticallysignificant for only 1 definition of amblyopia. … errors (with or without amblyopia) reported that treatment (patching and/or eyeglasses) resulted in a statisticallysignificant but small (<1 line on the Snellen eye chart) average improvement in visual acuity in the
  2. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/hypertension-screening-1996
    January 01, 1996 - Agents, middle-aged men with diastolic blood pressure averaging 90 through 114 mm Hg experienced a significant … There was a statistically significant 17% reduction in 5-year all-cause mortality in the group receiving … Both trials included untreated control groups and did not report a significant reduction in deaths from … 49 This meta-analysis suggested reduced benefit with increasing age, although differences were not statisticallysignificant.
  3. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/k_QR3hvh2jVSPPLu6Q6m6r
    November 13, 2022 - significant. … The estimate for the association with cardiovascular mortal- ity was not statistically significant (12 … were imprecise and were not statistically significant for fatal MI (6 trials, n = 38 083; RR, 0.83 [95% … significant. … For cardiovascular mortality, the pooled estimate was no longer statistically significant, and the estimated
  4. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/breast-cancer-medications-for-risk-reduction-2002
    July 08, 2002 - was small, and differences in specific complication rates between the treatment and placebo arms were statisticallysignificant only for pulmonary embolism. 1  Among women aged 50 and older, for whom the potential harms … 3.58). 7 Fewer thromboembolic events occurred among women younger than 50, and the trial found no significant … women taking tamoxifen for a median of 55 months). 7 Among women younger than 50, the BCPT found no significant
  5. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/khUSqr94jqWPErt9ZRnQ95
    October 01, 2009 - We found statistically significant heterogeneity of effects among stud- ies at a P value less than 0.100 … In subgroup meta-regression analyses, we found no sta- tistically significant differences among categories … We detected no statistically significant asymmetry when we examined fun- nel plots or used the Egger … We found no statistically significant heterogeneity of effects among studies in this analysis. … significant percentage of incident CHD cases and noncases into higher or lower risk categories.
  6. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/low-dose-aspirin-use-for-the-prevention-of-morbidity-and-mortality-from-preeclampsia-preventive-medication-september-2014
    September 09, 2014 - There was no statistically significant reduction in perinatal mortality (pooled RR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.65 … Comparison of dosage effects showed 1 outcome with a significant difference—preterm birth—when a cut-point … Pooled analyses showed no statistically significant increase in abruption associated with aspirin (RR … Although a significant reduction in risk for preterm birth suggested benefits for infants, there was
  7. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/ghbfx9e3A6jQEqVW26y8Jv
    March 09, 2021 - Results of the other trials were very imprecise and did not show statistically significant dif- ferences … The other trials found no statistically significant differences between groups, but results were imprecise … smoking sta- tus (RR, 0.81 for current smokers vs 0.91 for former smokers; P = .40), and did not identify statistically … reported similar results for subgroups and did not iden- tify statistically significant interactions … Both LUSI and NELSON reported a similar pattern for subgroups by sex as found in the NLST that was not statistically
  8. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary/impaired-visual-acuity-screening-older-adults
    May 24, 2022 - Four trials (n = 4819) found no significant differences between screening vs no screening in visual acuity … However, direct evidence found no significant association between vision screening vs no screening in … Data on effects of multivitamins on vision- related function were limited, with most trials showing no statistically … sufficiently powered to assess rates of cardiovascular events or other serious adverse events, although no statistically … However, direct evidence found no significant association between vision screening vs no screening in
  9. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/suicide-risk-screening-2004
    May 15, 2004 - Suicidal ideation with a specific plan of action is associated with a significant risk for attempted … With respect to the outcomes on suicide attempts and completion, no statistically significant effects
  10. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/4NUuvS6nmzTdBgjBg3ELkE
    January 01, 2020 - We found no evidence for significant publica- tion bias except for triglyceride-level outcomes (Egger … several instances in which trials did not find any benefit in intermediate health outcomes, they showed statistically … physical activity–only counseling trials that reported be- havioral outcomes at 12 to 24 months found statisticallysignificant improvements in self-reported physical activity (that is, minutes per week or percentage … In 2 instances, results were no longer statistically significant for short-term (less than 12 months)
  11. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/vision-in-children-ages-6-months-to-5-years-screening
    September 05, 2017 - Negative LRs were in the minimal range for detecting amblyopia risk factors or significant nonamblyogenic … at age 7.5 years compared with 1-time screening at age 37 months; however, the difference was only statisticallysignificant for 1 of 2 definitions of amblyopia (interocular difference in acuity ≥0.2 logMAR [logarithm … The ALSPAC cohort study (n=6081) compared screening at age 37 months vs no screening and found no statisticallysignificant difference in the prevalence of amblyopia at age 7.5 years for 3 definitions of amblyopia
  12. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/R33bUm6oyjhWnbw96pJHwE
    April 01, 2009 - When considering individual SSRIs, fluoxetine and citalopram both yielded statistically significant higher … When data are pooled for individual drugs, they have not yielded statistically significant increases … That lack of statistically significant effects, how- ever, may be a result of lack of power. … This result, however, was not statistically signif- icant. … significant.
  13. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary/obesity-in-adults-interventions
    September 18, 2018 - All significance testing was 2-sided, and results were considered statistically significant if the P … n = 7120), with 14 showing no differences between groups on any measure; in the 3 trials that noted statistically … Training; IWQOL, Impact of Weight on Quality of Life; NA, not applicable; NR, not reported; NS, not statistically … follow-up ranged from 0%-15% in intervention and 0%-28.9% in control group DPP and Finnish DPS found statistically … diabetes at up to 4-y follow-up ranged from 0%-6% in medication and 1%-11% in placebo groups, which were statistically
  14. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary10/breastfeeding-counseling-2008
    October 15, 2008 - ratios, 1.28 [CI, 1.11 to 1.48] and 1.44 [CI, 1.13 to 1.84], respectively), with evidence for statistically … , the direction of the effects favors breastfeeding promotion interventions over usual care and was statisticallysignificant for some subgroups ( Table 4 ). … Finally, the summary rate ratios of breastfeeding initiation and duration did not statistically significantly … However, in subgroup analyses of the study, the only statistically significant association reported was
  15. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary3/chlamydia-and-gonorrhea-screening-september-2014
    September 23, 2014 - Although a good-quality trial in the United States reported a statistically significant reduction in … significant in a poor-quality trial in Denmark comparing 1-time home-based screening with usual care … Although all 3 trials reported point estimates suggesting reduced PID, only the U.S. trial showed a statisticallysignificant reduction. … These studies found no significant improvements in clinical outcomes among those screened for chlamydia
  16. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/obstructive-sleep-apnea-in-adults-screening
    November 15, 2022 - pressure (−0.92 mm Hg [95% CI, −1.39 to −0.46 mm Hg]; 5 trials; 1541 participants; I 2 = 0) and no significant … inactive control for improving blood pressure; however, differences between groups were imprecise and not statisticallysignificant. 15 , 16 Two reviews reported on the difference between groups in change from baseline … Three RCTs assessed mortality over a longer duration, and none found a statistically significant difference
  17. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/3R9N4ojm9Sk7qk8ybD3LU6
    October 11, 2019 - Asymptomatic Bacteriuria Asymptomatic bacteriuria occurs when the urinary tract is colo- nized with significant … The pooled analysis found statistically significant reduc- tions in the incidence of infants with low … cases in the intervention group, although the num- ber of cases was small and pooled estimates were not statisticallysignificant.2 Other infant or fetal harms, such as jaundice (2 stud- ies), respiratory distress (1 study
  18. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/5W2k4HLBPLPgHov6sSvuMH
    July 24, 2018 - Comparative effective- ness studies, including one conducted in the United States, have found no statisticallysignificant differences in efficacy for GON prevention with different agents, including silver Figure
  19. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/b5LjDb3-UoPV8LEWavJWB8
    February 01, 2010 - significant (Table 1; Fig 3). … significant, short-term benefit (P� .006). … significant. … For most questions, however, we re- lied on qualitative synthesis because of significant heterogeneity … significant cross- sectionally, we show it as being statis- tically significant in Table 3 and in the
  20. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/breast-cancer-screening-1996
    January 01, 1996 - sensitivity of mammography, especially for women in their forties, with current mammographic techniques. 20 Significant … The reduction was statistically significant in the Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York (HIP), … 10% reductions in breast cancer mortality in women aged 40-49. 42 , 43 One meta-analysis reported a significant … 50 and over can reduce breast cancer mortality, and that randomized clinical trials have not shown a statisticallysignificant reduction in mortality for women under the age of 50. 71 Organizations that presently

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: