Results

Total Results: 744 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

241. Final Evidence Summary: Tobacco Use in Children and Adolescents: Primary Care Interventions | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/other-supporting-document19468/tobacco-and-nicotine-use-prevention-in-children-and-adolescents-primary-care-interventions
     April 28, 2020 - There was no statistically significant difference between behavioral interventions and controls in smoking … There were no significant benefits of medication on likelihood of smoking cessation in 2 trials of bupropion … 47 and smoking initiation. 19 , 26 , 28 , 30 , 43 Behavioral interventions were associated with statistically … , 42 7-day point prevalence of smoking, 24 , 25 , 31 or was not reported. 19 , 43 There was no statistically … significant difference between behavioral interventions vs controls in likelihood of continued smoking

242. Screening for Impaired Visual Acuity in Older Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the USPSTF (pdf file)
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/DCfAJZvNDzSYu7NqLJX2bv
     March 01, 2016 - Results were considered statistically significant if the P value was less than .05 based on 2-sided testing … , although the difference in the likelihood of losing 15 or more let- ters of visual acuity was not statistically … significant (adjusted OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.55-1.02). … significant (10%; 95% CI, −7% to 27%). … significant (adjusted OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.55-1.02).

243. Archived: Lung Cancer: Screening, 1996 | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/lung-cancer-screening-1996
     January 01, 1996 - In one study, over 40% of these disagreements were considered potentially significant. 4 Most errors … in those screened with chest x-rays (with or without sputum cytologic tests), the difference was not statistically … significant. 18 Three large clinical trials published by the NCI Cooperative Early Lung Cancer Detection … Although screening may increase early detection of resectable early cancers, controlled trials provide no significant

244. Final Evidence Summary: Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adolescents and Adults: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary/hepatitis-c-screening
     March 02, 2020 - All significance testing was 2-tailed; P < .05 was considered statistically significant. … significant. 95 , 96 Results were similar in 2 studies of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir/dasabuvir … significant (adjusted HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.43 to 1.28]). 68 Adolescents Three treatment studies of … significant (eTable 3 in the Supplement). 59 , 61 , 100 Treatment studies of DAA therapy in adolescents … significant (2 trials; RR, 1.53 [95% CI, 0.88 to 2.68]; I 2 = 29%).

245. Archived: Final Evidence Summary: Suicide Risk: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary48/suicide-risk-screening-2004
     May 15, 2004 - significant effects by meta-analysis. … significant reduced repetition of deliberate self-harm. … part of how they selected participants, met our inclusion criteria. 64 , 65 Neither study produced statistically … significant differences involving repeated suicidal behavior ( Table 3 ). … mixed. 25 Although some trends suggest incremental benefit from several interventions, no consistent statistically

246. Screening for Suicide Risk in Adults: A Summary of the Evidence (pdf file)
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/cJSpoZqW2M7czx_-GeTdtE
     May 01, 2004 - significant effects by meta-analysis. … significant reduced repetition of deliberate self-harm. … as part of how they selected participants, met our inclusion criteria.64,65 Neither study produced statistically … significant differences involving repeated suicidal behavior (Table 3). … mixed.25 Although some trends suggest incremental benefit from several interventions, no consistent statistically

247. Archived: Evidence Summary: Alcohol Misuse: Screening and Counseling | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary/alcohol-misuse-screening-and-counseling-2004
     April 06, 2004 - significant in study; WHO = World Health Organization … significant between-group differences ( Appendix Table 3 ) … significant, possibly because of small sample sizes. … significant, possibly because of small sample sizes. … Significant postrandomization exclusion (151/258 participants).

248. Interventions to Support Breastfeeding: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force (pdf file)
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/SJbAXUAQTv2GWemMuBab6W
     April 08, 2025 - All significance testing was 2-sided, and results were considered statistically significant if P < .05 … However, very few reported these differences to be statistically sig- nificantly different between groups … In meta-analyses, there was a statistically significant association Figure 2. … A meta-analysis of 8 trials (n = 4607) found no statistically significant association with receiving … significant Nine trials (n = 2334) reported minimal differences between groups in maternal well-being

249. Recommendation: Breast Cancer: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/breast-cancer-screening
     April 30, 2024 - Trials reporting on at least 2 consecutive rounds of screening have generally found no statistically … significant difference in breast cancer detection or in tumor characteristics (tumor size, histologic … diagnosed with a stage IIB or higher cancer and cancer with less favorable characteristics was not statistically … The trials found no statistically significant difference in detection at the second screening round ( … There were no statistically significant differences in tumor diameter, histologic grade, and node status

250. Evidence Summary: Chlamydia and Gonorrhea: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary/chlamydia-and-gonorrhea-screening
     September 14, 2021 - review indicated an association between screening and decreased risk of PID, although results were statistically … significant in only 1 trial. 32 Chlamydia screening was significantly associated with reduced risk … significant reduced risk of PID (RR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.34-1.22]). 32 However, 79% (30/38) of PID cases … significant in most trials and the magnitude of benefit was relatively small. … significant reduction in PID (RR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.20-0.90]) Chlamydia screening compared with no screening

251. 8Lbrrlzvtemzycdnsjtokz (pdf file)
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/8LBrrLzvtemZYcdNSjToKz
     December 01, 2014 - Results were very similar, and all statistically significant results remained statistically sig- nificant … significant. … significant (10, 15, 17, 18). … We found no statistically significant paradoxical increase in the overall incidence of STIs among any … A subgroup analysis in 1 trial, however, showed a statistically significant deleterious effect on STI

252. Screening for Suicide Risk in Adolescents, Adults, and Older Adults in Primary Care: USPSTF Recommendation Statement (pdf file)
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/EGPJ5VSbLv4_cDB7fQBmGR
     May 01, 2014 - significant. … There was a statistically signif- icantly lower rate of suicide deaths per patient-year in the intervention … In the study of adults, no statistically significant in- creases in suicide attempts or ideation were … Of the 11 adolescent psychotherapy treatment trials reporting suicide attempts, 4 noted non–statistically … with the effect; however, the other trials probably had enough events to represent stable but still statistically

253. Screening for Dementia in Primary Care: A Summary of the Evidence (pdf file)
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/B_Ae7DdLL7DNauBLXC-ptu
     June 01, 2003 - With few exceptions, all of these studies with at least 6 months of follow-up found a statistically significant … * Significance and non-significance were measured statistically. … Not significant Not significant Hebert et al., 1995 99 Mittelman et al., 206 Not tested Not tested … Significant 1996 100 Brodaty et al., 96 Not tested Not tested Significant 1997 104 McCurry et al., … 36 Not significant Significant Not tested 1998 101 Marriott et al., 42 Not significant Significant Not

254. Archived: Evidence Summary: False-Positive and False-Negative Rates of Digital Mammography Screening: Breast Cancer: Screening | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary-false-positive-and-false-negative-rates-of-/breast-cancer-screening-january-2016
     January 11, 2016 - Rates of recommendations for biopsy did not statistically significantly differ across age groups … significant. … Other comparisons between groups were not statistically significant. … Recommendations for Biopsy Rates of recommendations for biopsy were statistically significantly … Other comparisons between groups were not statistically significant.

255. Archived: Evidence Summary: Osteoporosis: Screening 2011 | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary6/osteoporosis-screening-2011
     July 06, 2010 - For total nonvertebral fractures, a pooled analysis of trials indicated no statistically significant … Results for bisphosphonates were statistically significant when estimated using alternative pooling methods … Results for hip, wrist, or ankle fractures were not statistically significant ( Table 2 ) but were limited … However, results of both trials were not statistically significant for selective sites, such as the hip … significant when estimates are adjusted.

256. Screening Children for Family Violence: A Review of the Evidence (pdf file)
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/qCaKmh7ayuG9VP2vj646pQ
     March 01, 2004 - A retrospective cohort study found that a high score on the KFI was the only statistically significant … relationship; 0 = studied but not significant. … High score on the KFI was the only statistically significant predictor of maltreatment at 1 year (relative … drug use, less convictions, and less jail time at the 15-year follow-up.14 This finding, however, was statistically … significant only for the subgroup of unmarried women with low socioeconomic status.

257. Archived: Evidence Summary (Pregnant and Postpartum Women): Screening for Depression in Adults | United States Preventive Services Taskforce
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary-primary-care-screening-for-and-treatment-of/depression-in-adults-screening
     January 26, 2016 - All significance testing was 2-sided, and results were considered statistically significant if the P … significant small studies bias, but power was limited. … Results were not statistically significant in 3 trials; 64 , 66 , 67 however, unadjusted mean differences … were statistically significant in 1 of these. 67 With usual care, EPDS scores declined by an average … significant group differences. 71 Effect sizes in CBT trials were very similar between the 2 trials

258. Screening for Chlamydial Infection: An Evidence Update (pdf file)
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/REES__d2DxtDLhZCXQjpPW
     July 01, 2007 - Both of these differ- ences were found to be statistically significant. … investigators noted a lower ad- justed relative risk for hospitalization for PID, but this difference was not statistically … significant (0.94 [CI, 0.69 to 1.29]). … However, the USPSTF noted the potential for significant benefit if screening in men can, in fact, de- … These stud- ies find significant anxiety and concern for the future of intimate relationships after a

259. Statin Use for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement (pdf file)
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/JcwfLrEqaaxP6DPEQvxgUs
     February 18, 2020 - Results were mixed, but most large trials found that statin use led to a statistically significant re … significant differences in the risk of experiencing any serious adverse event. … significant differences in performance scores on tests of attention, visual perception, motor and processing … significant differ- ences between the intervention and control groups for myalgia (7 trials; pooled … significant increased risk of diabetes with statin use.10 In post hoc stratified analysis, participants

260. Screening for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force (pdf file)
     www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/Z6Rfj-qwfoMbuLp-hBmhzS
     May 01, 2021 - with inactive control (by 1-2 mm Hg); however, differ- ences between groups were imprecise and not statistically … significant (eFigure 4 in the Supplement). … Three RCTs reported on the incidence of motor vehicle crashes over 12 to 52 weeks, and none found a statistically … Two studies reported that there was a statistically significant difference only in the percentage who … population with known OSA MADs Blood pressure: 1 systematic review (11 RCTs; 469 participants) No statistically