Results

Total Results: 743 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

  1. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/bQNXFv9Q5uaAQvWH6B7VWV
    June 11, 2019 - significant. … One open-label trial (n = 544), which enrolled men who have sex with men, found no statistically significant … events, there was no statistically significant in- teraction between PrEP regimen and any adverse event … There was no statistically significant interaction between HIV risk category and risk of STIs. … There was no statistically significant association between PrEP and increased risk of fracture,12,14,17,18,27,33,42
  2. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/RrE4_peSk5zVH3cCf77at3
    June 24, 2025 - nents with other support services (eg, parenting support, referral to community services); 1 found a statisticallysignificant reduction Figure 3. … and fewer very preterm neo- nates (�33 weeks) (2 vs 9 women; P = .03) than the control group, but no statistically … ).38-40 Last, 1 RCT enrolling new parents (n = 368 couples) with a history of verbal abuse found no statistically … 2 to 3 y associated with the intervention; however, the difference between groups in 1 RCT was not statistically
  3. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/prostate-cancer-screening-2012
    May 15, 2012 - significant reduction. … significant lower risk of dying of prostate cancer than healthier men. 23 , 34 Preliminary results … subgroup analysis limited to men aged 55 to 69 years, a statistically significant reduction in prostate … significant reductions in prostate cancer deaths with PSA screening. … After a median follow-up of 10 years, prostate cancer–specific or all-cause mortality did not statistically
  4. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/RecommendationStatementFinal/hepatitis-b-virus-infection-screening
    December 15, 2020 - alternate therapies (lamivudine and adefovir). 11 , 19 Pooled analysis showed that antiviral therapy was statistically … CI, 0.29-1.77]) or hepatocellular carcinoma (4 trials; RR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.16-2.33]) that were not statisticallysignificant. … lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma or composite health outcomes, but several associations were not statistically … Pooled analyses found no significant differences in the risk of serious adverse events (4 trials; RR,
  5. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary/prevention-of-human-immunodeficiency-virus-hiv-infection-pre-exposure-prophylaxis
    August 22, 2023 - significant ( P = .03), indicating potential publication bias (eFigure 2 in the  JAMA  Supplement). … Oral PrEP was associated with a modestly decreased risk of mortality that was not statistically significantsignificant ( P = .09), 18 indicating no statistically significant difference in treatment effect … significant ( P = .13) and the estimate for event-driven PrEP was similar to daily dosing with high … There were no statistically significant interactions with age, race, ethnicity, geographical region,
  6. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/draft-recommendation/cervical-cancer-screening-adults-adolescents
    December 10, 2024 - Implementation A significant amount of evidence shows that self-collection of primary HPV screening … One trial reported ICC detection after two rounds of screening and found a statistically significant … detects more CIN2+ and CIN3+ lesions in one round of screening compared with cytology; results were not statisticallysignificant for CIN3+ (pooled RR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.98 to 1.30]) but were statistically significant for … In six studies, primary HPV screening was associated with a statistically significant increase in colposcopy
  7. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary25/folic-acid-to-prevent-neural-tube-defects-preventive-medication-2009
    May 15, 2009 - was provided by 3 fair- or good-quality cohort, case-control, and meta-analytic studies that found statisticallysignificant benefit; a small, fair-quality case–control study reported benefit that was not statisticallysignificant. … Although this difference was statistically significant after adjustment for birth order, chronic maternal … significant.
  8. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary39/obesity-in-children-and-adolescents-screening-2010
    January 15, 2010 - significant ( Table 1 ; Figure 3 ). … significant, short-term benefit ( P = .006). … significant. … significant cross-sectionally, we show it as being statistically significant in Table 3 and in the text … considered statistically significant and used in the meta-analysis of short-term effects.
  9. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/obesity-in-children-and-adolescents-screening-june-2017
    June 20, 2017 - factors. 3 , 4 A German expert panel determined that a BMI z score reduction of 0.20 is clinically significant … Only 3 of the 24 trials with less than 26 contact hours showed statistically significant benefits of … Although the effects in the less intensive trials were seldom statistically significant, intervention … significant. 3 Pooled results did not demonstrate statistically significant improvements in lipid or … Trial results mostly demonstrated small, statistically insignificant increases in quality-of-life scores
  10. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/2XRG8Dz2EegVWYUrRThgmD
    October 01, 2015 - This study reported no statistically significant differences in rates of total mortality, coro- nary … significant. … ENDS 2 RCTs 1 trial found no statistically significant difference in biochemically verified abstinence … At 6 months, this trial reported no statistically significant differences in biochemically verified contin … significant result (RR, 0.41 [CI, 0.18 to 0.94]) (82).
  11. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/m_E9nFrmxuS5-surqVHK2u
    November 13, 2018 - The associations re- mained statistically significant when limited to trials conducted in primary care … A pooled analysis showed a statistically significant, but very small, standardized mean difference in … Differences in mortality between groups were statistically significant at 3 years of follow-up, when … This trial also reported statistically significant reductions in days of hospitalization (420 in the … a wide range of outcomes, even though differences were not al- ways statistically significant, suggests
  12. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary8/abdominal-aortic-aneurysm-screening-2014
    January 15, 2014 - reduced AAA rupture and AAA-related mortality rates for up to 10 and 15 years, respectively, but had no statisticallysignificant effect on all-cause mortality rates up to 15 years. … The good-quality MASS and Viborg trials showed statistically significant reductions in AAA-related mortality … trials showed a tendency toward reductions in AAA-related mortality rates with screening that was not statisticallysignificant. 33 , 42 An invitation to AAA screening was not associated with a statistically significant
  13. JAMA JATS (pdf file)

    www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/Nop5YpEpMybx_oNPKC76-X
    July 11, 2017 - appeared to be a dose-response effect, with higher-intensity interventions demonstrating greater and statisticallysignificant benefits. … Few deaths occurred in these trials, and no significant effect was seen in all-cause or CVD- related … The results, however, were not statistically significant when revascularization was removed from the … When all good- and fair-quality intervention trials were pooled, they demonstrated statistically significant
  14. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary13/child-maltreatment-primary-care-interventions-2013
    January 15, 2013 - Five trials reported no statistically significant effects of home visitation on the number or percentage … home-visited children received immunizations at an earlier age than control children, resulting in significant … A trial reporting significant differences in the mean number of well-child visits at 9 months (3.14 vs … One trial found a significant difference in self-reported severe physical assault at 36 months (4% of … Most of the statistically significant benefits of home visitation were demonstrated by trials with more
  15. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/hepatitis-b-virus-infection-screening
    December 15, 2020 - alternate therapies (lamivudine and adefovir). 11 , 19 Pooled analysis showed that antiviral therapy was statistically … CI, 0.29-1.77]) or hepatocellular carcinoma (4 trials; RR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.16-2.33]) that were not statisticallysignificant. … lower risk of hepatocellular carcinoma or composite health outcomes, but several associations were not statistically … Pooled analyses found no significant differences in the risk of serious adverse events (4 trials; RR,
  16. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary/aspirin-use-prevent-cardiovascular-disease-colorectal-cancer-preventive-medication-2002
    January 15, 2002 - Of the five trials, only PHS reported a statistically significant decrease in risk with aspirin (OR, … There was no significant heterogeneity in trial results ( P > 0.2). … The results displayed no significant heterogeneity ( P > 0.2). … However, its effect in women was smaller and not statistically significant (1.7/1,000 patient-years in … significant.
  17. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/xUc_vXf7323faUQY7SePhT
    January 01, 2002 - Of the 5 trials, only PHS reported a statistically significant decrease in risk with aspirin (OR, 0.64 … There was no significant heterogeneity in trial results (P>0.2). … The results displayed no significant heterogeneity (P>0.2). … However, its effect in women was smaller and not statistically significant (1.7/1,000 patient-years … significant.
  18. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/VN82XmdDhcK74WtHxWBTqm
    May 01, 2004 - the intervention group was 0.7/1,000; the rate was 0.8/1,000 in the control population, not different statistically … 1,000 person-years in the dual-screening group and 3.8/1,000 person-years in the control group (not statisticallysignificant differences) and were similar to community lung cancer mortality rates at the time.71,72 … significant for all studies … significant findings.
  19. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary14/chlamydial-infection-screening-2007
    June 15, 2007 - There is a significant evidence gap regarding the ability of screening in men for chlamydial infection … Both of these differences were found to be statistically significant. … investigators noted a lower adjusted relative risk for hospitalization for PID, but this difference was not statisticallysignificant (0.94 [CI, 0.69 to 1.29]). … Has the epidemiology of chlamydial infection in the United States changed in significant ways since 2001
  20. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/9H5mgkBCjNQVZZ4pnkNo6B
    February 01, 2016 - In contrast, the combined fluoxetine and CBT group of TADS found significant differences in response … These differences were not statisti- cally significant. … patients from primary care or school clinic settings 1: Good 3: Fair The fluoxetine study found a statisticallystatistically significant benefits for relapse; the citalopram trial did not find significant differences … 983 Limited number of studies; only escitalopram had more than 1 trial; analyses not powered to find statistically

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: