Results

Total Results: 743 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

  1. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary19/high-blood-pressure-in-adults-screening-monitoring-october-2015
    December 22, 2014 - significant (rate ratio, 0.89 [CI, 0.79 to 0.99]; P = 0.03). … These results were statistically significant in 5 studies ( Figure 1 ). 34 , 36 , 38 , 41 , 43 Hazard … All showed statistically significant associations with an increased risk for cardiovascular and mortality … One good-quality 72 and 3 fair-quality 73–75 trials found no statistically significant differences … Among those randomly assigned to screening, there was a small but statistically significant reduction
  2. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/VpT-c4bnmvHFRPyKgPwb2Z
    December 01, 2010 - significant. … significant either (Figure 1). … significant differences (Figure 2). … There was also a non–statistically significant increase in fall-related fractures. … Like that review and meta-analyses, we found no statistically significant reduction in fall risk when
  3. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary/hypertensive-disorders-pregnancy-screening
    September 19, 2023 - The studies did not report statistically significant differences in maternal and infant complications … nulliparous (61%).The study examined several serious maternal and infant health outcomes; none were statisticallysignificant between study groups, but most were rare events with imprecise estimated effects. … significant (95% CI, −8.1 to 4.9).The BUMP1 trial 29 and an additional RCT (n = 80) 27 met inclusion … significant (RR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.40-1.55]) Estimated risk of SGA/IUGR was not statistically significant
  4. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/myqvgr-dsW7k3eQbwj4aR4
    February 01, 2013 - Results were somewhat variable, with larger studies suggesting either a statistically significant benefit … We found a statistically significant reduced relative risk for smoking initiation among young persons … significant (21). … significant after 2 years. … Combined behavioral interventions failed to show a statistically significant effect on overall smoking
  5. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary17/brca-related-cancer-risk-assessment-genetic-counseling-and-genetic-testing-2013
    December 15, 2013 - No studies reported statistically significant increases in anxiety and depression after genetic counseling … ; 3 reported statistically significant decreases 52 , 61 , 62 , and 3 reported no changes 48 , 56 , … Five studies reported statistically significant increases in breast cancer-related worry after receipt … Among-group differences were not statistically significant after 6 months. Ovarian Cancer. … Other studies indicated no statistically significant changes in psychological or sexual activity measures
  6. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/LPaUxRbrTshfsYVVTzenEQ
    April 26, 2022 - significant decreased risk of nonfatal ischemic stroke (Peto OR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.78-1.00]; P = .046) … Most trials with age subanalyses did not find a statistically signifi- cant difference in the relative … significant increase in CRC mortality at 10 years. … In the Thrombosis Prevention Trial30,31 (n = 5085), low-dose aspirin use was associated with a statistically … ]), and the WHS reported lower CRC mortality at 17.5 years of follow-up that was not statistically significant
  7. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary/chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease-screening-2016
    April 05, 2016 - significant difference in biochemically validated abstinence in the intervention group compared with … significant or no difference in the intervention group compared with control ( Table 4 ). … significant reduction in exacerbations and statistically significant, but probably not clinically meaningful … c Not statistically significant. d “Lung age” given to those with FEV 1 <80%. … f Statistically significant difference; validated quit rate difference, 7.2% (95% CI, 2.2%–12.1%);
  8. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/mHfCYrWoEdSr95bCUSfSEz
    September 21, 2021 - Results were considered statistically significant if the P value was less than .05, based on 2-sided … In stratified analyses, there were no statistically significant interactions between effects of GWG … However, stratified analysis showed statistically significant interactions between effects of GWG inter … There were statistically significant effects in the active (7 trials; RR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.41 to 0.82 … In stratified analyses, there were no statistically significant interactions between associations of
  9. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/folic-acid-to-prevent-neural-tube-defects-preventive-medication-2009
    May 15, 2009 - basis of several studies, including 1 large randomized, controlled trial (RCT) that demonstrated a statisticallysignificant reduction in incidence of neural tube defects in women who took a multivitamin with 0.8 … The difference between the supplemented and unsupplemented groups was statistically significant after … 0.55 to 1.55) for some use of supplements containing folic acid, but neither of these findings was statisticallysignificant. 4 Data from the 2001-2002 NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey),
  10. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary/lipid-disorders-in-children-screening
    July 18, 2023 - Nonstatin-drug trials showed statistically significant lowering of lipid levels in FH populations, but … All significance testing was 2-sided, and results were considered statistically significant at P < … One good-quality ezetimibe trial (n = 138) showed a statistically significant reduction in total cholesterol … significant improvement in lipid levels (MD in LDL-C, −13.9 mg/dL [95% CI, −32.0 mg/dL to 4.2 mg/dL] … access to the dietitian by phone with any questions after the session. 18 These 2 trials demonstrated statistically
  11. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-review11/asymptomatic-bacteriuria-in-adults-screening-2008
    July 15, 2008 - The review found statistically significant reductions in the incidence of pyelonephritis (relative risk … 0.49-0.89]) Results from 3 trials that measured the outcome of preterm delivery showed no statisticallysignificant effect of the intervention (RR, 0.37 [CI, 0.10-1.36]) A prior Cochrane review … allergic to sulfa drugs) twice daily for 14 d vs. no treatment After a mean follow-up of 27 mo, no statistically … The uriscreen test to detect significant asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy.
  12. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary44/sexually-transmitted-infections-behavioral-counseling-2008
    October 15, 2008 - significant. … Two fair-quality trials in young women attending primary care clinics showed no statistically significantsignificant differences in STI incidence. … First, trials reporting STI incidence with non-statistically significant intervention effects do not … Pre-sexually active and sexually active adolescents: One trial did not show a statistically significant
  13. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/healthy-weight-and-weight-gain-during-pregnancy-behavioral-counseling-interventions
    May 25, 2021 - trials. 1 , 31 Maternal Health Outcomes Gestational weight gain interventions were associated with statisticallysignificant reductions in risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (43 trials; relative risk [RR], 0.87 … Stratified analyses showed statistically significant interactions between intervention intensity and … There was no significant interaction between BMI category and effects on likelihood of excess weight … 1 The association between GWG interventions and small for gestational age size in infants was not statistically
  14. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/TkWNoq6KQb3SoZ54gscLCQ
    July 25, 2016 - significant. … Antiviral Therapy vs Placebo or No Treatment There were no statistically significant differences between … Preferred vs Nonpreferred Regimens There were no statistically significant differences between entecavir … significant. … significant.
  15. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary23/iron-deficiency-anemia-in-young-children-screening
    March 30, 2015 - The only study reporting statistically significant differences in growth parameters found lesser growth … 1657, respectively), including the Chilean study with methodologic flaws mentioned earlier, found no statistically … children with normal iron status at baseline. 22 , 25 , 30 Two fair-quality studies ( Table 3 ) found statistically … , 37 , 38 In addition, 1 of the largest studies included in the review that consistently found statistically … Hb = hemoglobin; NS = not significant.
  16. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/uM5P-6XpsqVfEC2axGnZaD
    November 16, 2020 - significant. … The 2 largest and most re- cent trials reported a statistically significant increase in smoking ces- … The 3 remaining trials reported no statistically significant differences in smoking cessation rates. … No statistically significant in- crease in headaches, dizziness, anxiety, or depression were found. … found.13 Additionally, no statistically significant increase in neuropsychiatric adverse events (including
  17. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary1/osteoporosis-screening-june-2018
    June 26, 2018 - However, a statistically significant difference in hip fracture incidence was observed (2.6% vs 3.5%; … Among women, the pooled estimate suggested no statistically significant association between treatment … Denosumab One large study 107 (7868 women) demonstrated a statistically significant difference between … Two studies did not report a statistically significant risk of atrial fibrillation with bisphosphonates … significant benefit.
  18. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/QZ-N4vDvgZSsghretDokg7
    March 01, 2014 - significant effect on all-cause mortality rates up to 15 years. … The good-quality MASS and Viborg trials showed statistically significant reductions in AAA-related mortality … significant (33, 42). … An invitation to AAA screening was not associated with a statistically significant all-cause mortality … Sensi- tivity analyses that were done using a fixed-effects model yielded statistically significant findings
  19. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary-aspirin-to-prevent-cancer/aspirin-to-prevent-cardiovascular-disease-and-cancer-april-2016
    April 11, 2016 - We observed a marginally statistically significant reduction in cancer incidence only when we restricted … They did not report a statistically significant effect on CRC mortality during the first 5 years after … randomization (HR, 0.78 [CI, 0.39 to 1.56]), but they did find a borderline statistically significantsignificant reduction in total cancer mortality (RR, 0.96 [CI, 0.87 to 1.06]). … significant reduction in cancer incidence after 4.2 to 8.2 years.
  20. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary/screening-depression-suicide-risk-adults
    June 20, 2023 - Significance testing was 2-sided, and results were considered statistically significant if P ≤ .05. … significant group differences in suicidal ideation at 2 weeks’ follow-up and 1 suicide attempt among … When limited to studies in primary care patients, the effect was smaller but statistically significantsignificant (OR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.73- 1.22]; 12 RCTs [n = 14,573]; I 2 = 11.2%, including only the … significant findings.

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: