Results

Total Results: 1,229 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

  1. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pqmp/measures/acute/chipra-203-fullreport.pdf
    April 10, 2017 - This was not statistically significant (p=0.41). 6.B. … These differences were not statistically significant. … These differences were not statistically significant. 7.B. … This difference was not statistically significant. 7.D. … This difference was not statistically significant.
  2. www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/2014chartbooks/womenhealth/wm-ptsafety.html
    September 01, 2015 - From 2009 to 2012, there was no statistically significant change in the percentage of women with postoperative
  3. www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/2014chartbooks/womenhealth/wm-afford.html
    September 01, 2015 - Trends: From 2006 to 2012, there were no statistically significant changes among the total population … Unaffordable health care has been cited as a significant factor precluding women veterans from obtaining
  4. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2024-11/kowozer-report.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - There was no significant relationship between volume and in-hospital mortality using spline regression … The majority of the 111 hospitals performed in a similar fashion, but there were significant differences … Hospital procedure volume was not a statistically significant predictor of in-hospital mortality for … Volume to In-hospital Mortality This work is extrememly important because it does not demonstrate a significant
  5. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/advances-in-patient-safety/vol1/Masheter.pdf
    March 01, 2004 - significant. … This difference is statistically significant but not substantially different. … All other increases are not significant. … Differences in percentage of AEs There could be several explanations for statistically significant … Limitations Though statistically significant differences alone do not provide definitive answers,
  6. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/patient-safety/quality-measures/qsrs/qsrs-2021-2022-adverse-event-data-report.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Results were considered statistically significant if the confidence intervals did not overlap. … When the individual AE rates were compared by sex, there were no statistically significant differences … No other statistically significant differences were identified. 16 Table 21. 2022 Composite AE … There were no statistically significant differences between years for deaths during hospital stays. … Additional Analyses Results were considered statistically significant if the confidence intervals did
  7. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/patient-safety/quality-measures/qsrs/qsrs-2021-2022-adverse-event-data-report-nov-rev.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Results were considered statistically significant if the confidence intervals did not overlap. … When the individual AE rates were compared by sex, there were no statistically significant differences … No other statistically significant differences were identified. 16 Table 21. 2022 Composite AE … There were no statistically significant differences between years for deaths during hospital stays. … Additional Analyses Results were considered statistically significant if the confidence intervals did
  8. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/patient-safety/quality-measures/qsrs/qsrs-2021-2022-adverse-event-data-report-oct-rev.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - Results were considered statistically significant if the confidence intervals did not overlap. … When the individual AE rates were compared by sex, there were no statistically significant differences … No other statistically significant differences were identified. 16 Table 21. 2022 Composite AE … There were no statistically significant differences between years for deaths during hospital stays. … Additional Analyses Results were considered statistically significant if the confidence intervals did
  9. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/2019-pharmacy-sops-database-report-parti.pdf
    January 01, 2019 - “Significant” Differences Between Scores ...................................................... 31 Data … StatisticallySignificant” Differences Between Scores You may be interested in determining the statistical … significant. … ” significant. … Keep in mind that statistically significant differences are not always important, and nonsignificant
  10. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/2019-pharmacy-sops-database-report-parti-rev091721.pdf
    January 01, 2019 - “Significant” Differences Between Scores ...................................................... 31 Data … StatisticallySignificant” Differences Between Scores You may be interested in determining the statistical … significant. … ” significant. … Keep in mind that statistically significant differences are not always important, and nonsignificant
  11. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/advances-in-patient-safety/vol4/Blegen.pdf
    January 01, 2004 - Two of the seven differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05), while one was marginally significant … among the safety climate dimensions, quality management perceptions, and job satisfaction were all statisticallysignificant (see Table 3). … The correlations of the safety climate dimensions and Job Satisfaction were statistically significantsignificant at P < 0.01.
  12. www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/chartbooks/blackhealth/part2-diabetes.html
    June 01, 2018 - Trends: From 2008 to 2013, among adults age 40 and over with diagnosed diabetes, there were no statisticallysignificant improvements overall or among any racial groups. … Differences in 2007-2010 and 2011-2012 were not statistically significant.
  13. www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/nhqrdr/chartbooks/effectivetreatment/respiratory.html
    June 01, 2018 - Despite the variability of earlier years, in 2011, there were no statistically significant differences … slight differences for Asians related to English proficiency; however, none of these differences were statisticallysignificant due in part to large standard errors.
  14. www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/final-reports/ssi/ssi3.html
    April 01, 2018 - Male gender was only significant in the derivation analysis. … A longer preoperative stay was only significant in the combined dataset. 3.4.2. … during the univariate analysis that included surgery type as a binary variable, only CABG surgery was statisticallysignificant in the validation and combined regression models. … , followed again by history of MRSA (significant nine times).
  15. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/factsheets/chipra-16-p002-1-ef.pdf
    May 01, 2016 - develop pressure ulcers as early as the first day of admission to the PICU.5 Pressure ulcers cause significant … upon entry to a health care setting and be repeated on a regularly scheduled basis or when there is a significant … This difference was not statistically significant (p=0.41).
  16. www.ahrq.gov/hai/tools/mvp/modules/technical/ltvv-intro-slides.html
    February 01, 2025 - Significant benefit when outcomes are compared using lower volumes (6 cc/kg) versus traditional tidal … traditional tidal volumes (>10 cc/kg) to lower volumes (4–6 cc/kg) in patients with ARDS and ALI and found significant … Slide 21: Primary Findings 1 Image: The ARDSNET Trial showed statistically improved mortality, being … Patients who received a low tidal volume strategy using PEEP settings had statistically significant improvements
  17. www.ahrq.gov/downloads/pub/prevent/pdfser/thyrser.pdf
    January 01, 2004 - These results are not reported, however, and it is unclear whether they were statistically significant … Introduction 16 statistically significant for a cutoff serum TSH ≥ 7.0 mU/L, but not for a serum … When analyzed as a pre-/post-treatment study, there was a statistically significant reduction in LDL … After 11 months, patients treated with levothyroxine had a small but statistically significant improvement … Were baseline differences statistically significant?
  18. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/research/findings/nhqrdr/2023-nhqdr-es.pdf
    January 01, 2023 - There were, however, no statistically significant changes in the percentage of people who received recommended … • Cancer screening: ■ Nationally, there were no statistically significant differences in screening … None of the changes were statistically significant. … These changes were not statistically significant. … These changes were not statistically significant.
  19. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/research/findings/nhqrdr/2023-nhqdr-es-rev.pdf
    January 01, 2023 - There were, however, no statistically significant changes in the percentage of people who received recommended … • Cancer screening: ■ Nationally, there were no statistically significant differences in screening … None of the changes were statistically significant. … These changes were not statistically significant. … These changes were not statistically significant.
  20. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2024-01/bundy-report.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - We found no statistically significant association between medication and reported patient harm; harmful … the largest proportions of harmful reports, although differences between drug classes were not statisticallysignificant and numbers were small. … There were no significant differences in the proportions of harmful errors according to age. … Our data suggest that, by targeting these risk factors for harm in the NICU, a significant number of

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: