Results

Total Results: 425 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

81. STATISTICAL BRIEF #488: The Uninsured in America: Estimates of the Percentage of Non-Elderly Adults Uninsured throughout Each Calendar Year, by Selected Population Subgroups and State Medicaid Expansion Status: 2013 and 2014
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st488/stat488.shtml
    June 01, 2016 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … Findings Year-to-year changes in calendar-year uninsured rates for non-elderly adults were not significant … adults was larger than that for white non-Hispanic adults (p < 0.10), so that by 2014 there was no statistically … significant percentage point difference in uninsured rates for adults in these two racial/ethnic groups … There was a significant decrease in 2014 for adults in all education groups in both state categories,

82. Statistical Brief #79: Prescription Drug Expenditures in the 10 Largest States for Persons under Age 65, 2002 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st79/stat79.pdf
    May 01, 2005 - This was a significant increase from 1996, when prescription drugs expenditures were $65.2 billion … While the total expenditures for prescription drugs are a significant portion of all health care costs … Only those estimates with statistically significant differences from the national average using a multiple

83. Statistical Brief #121: Out-of-Pocket Expenditures on Health Care and Insurance Premiums among the Nonelderly Population, 2003 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st121/stat121.pdf
    March 01, 2006 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … This finding was associated with a significant difference in mean age between these two groups (49 versus … exceeding $10,000 between high income (3.9 percent) and middle income individuals (2.9 percent) was not statistically … significant.

84. Statistical Brief #36: State Differences in the Cost of Job-Related Health Insurance, 2001 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st36/stat36.pdf
    September 17, 2024 - Only those estimates with statistically significant differences from the national average using a multiple … While cost sharing between employers and employees is the most common arrangement, a significant number

85. STATISTICAL BRIEF #527: Premiums and Employee Contributions to Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance by Workforce Age and Firm Size, Private Industry, 2018
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st527/stat527.shtml
    November 01, 2019 - (This result was only significant at p<0.10 in establishments with 75 percent or more workers over the … with a workforce of less than 25 percent over the age of 50 ($19,257), but other differences were not statistically … significant. … There were no other statistically significant differences found in average ESI single employee contributions

86. Statistical Brief #180: The Top Five Outpatient Prescription Drugs Ranked by Total Expense for Children, Adults, and the Elderly, 2004 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st180/stat180.pdf
    July 01, 2007 - All differences discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. … During 2004, there were no significant differences in the average out-of-pocket payment for any of the … There was no significant difference in the average out-of-pocket payment per drug purchase for Prevacid … There was no significant difference in the average out-of-pocket payment per purchase for Lipitor ($61.29

87. STATISTICAL BRIEF #445: Selection and Costs for Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance in the Private Sector, 2013 versus 2012
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st445/stat445.shtml
    July 01, 2014 - Only differences that are statistically significant at the 0.05 significance level are discussed in the

88. Statistical Brief #10: Differentials in Employment-Related Health Insurance Coverage - 2000 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st10/stat10.pdf
    September 17, 2024 - Only differences that are statistically significant at the 0.05 level are discussed in the text.

89. STATISTICAL BRIEF #489: Transitions in Health Insurance Coverage for Non-Elderly Adults in the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population: 2013-2014 and Selected Preceding Two-Year Periods
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st489/stat489.shtml
    June 01, 2016 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … or are noted if significant at the 0.10 level (p < 0.10). … gaining other private/public insurance were not as widespread across population subgroups, but were statistically … significant for younger adults (ages 18–35), adults with a high school diploma/GED or less education … While there were not significant changes in the likelihood that insured adults lost coverage in most

90. Statistical Brief #88: Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance for Small Employers in the Private Sector, by Industry Classification, 2003 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st88/stat88.pdf
    July 01, 2005 - Only those estimates that had a statistically significant difference from the national average at the … Furthermore, there was significant variation in the average employee premium contributions by industry

91. Statistical Brief #17: Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance for Full Time Employees and Retirees: 1998 and 2000 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st17/stat17.pdf
    January 01, 2000 - Both estimates represent a significant decline from 1998. … Only those differences between years or type employer that are statistically significant at the .05

92. Statistical Brief #51: State Differences in the Cost of Job-Related Health Insurance, 2002 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st51/stat51.pdf
    July 01, 2004 - percent in New York to 19.5 percent in Texas, and for family coverage from Only those estimates with statistically … significant differences from the national average using a multiple comparison procedure at the 0.05 … sharing between employers and employees is the most common tributions for single arrangement, a significant … — Employee contributions (in dollars) for employee-plus-one coverage were not statistically significantly

93. STATISTICAL BRIEF #195: Dental Expenditures in the 10 Largest States, 2005
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st195/stat195.shtml
    January 01, 2008 - Only those estimates with statistically significant differences from the national average using a multiple

94. STATISTICAL BRIEF #156: Dental Expenditures in the 10 Largest States, 2004
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st156/stat156.shtml
    January 01, 2007 - Only those estimates with statistically significant differences from the national average using a multiple

95. STATISTICAL BRIEF #428: Trends in Health Care Expenditures for Children under Age 18: 2001, 2006, and 2011
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st428/stat428.shtml
    January 01, 2014 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or … However, differences in average expenses between 2006 and 2001 or 2011 were not significant.

96. STATISTICAL BRIEF #112: Dental Expenditures in the 10 Largest States, 2003
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st112/stat112.shtml
    January 01, 2006 - Only those estimates with statistically significant differences from the national average using a multiple

97. Statistical Brief #178: Offer Rates, Take-Up Rates, Premiums, and Employee Contributions for Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance in the Private Sector for the 10 Largest Metropolitan Areas, 2005 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st178/stat178.pdf
    July 01, 2007 - Only those estimates with a statistically significant difference from the national average at the 0.05

98. Statistical Brief #34: The The Prevalence of Obesity and Other Chronic Health Conditions Among Diabetic Adults in the U.S. Community Population, 2001 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st34/stat34.pdf
    January 01, 2001 - All results discussed are statistically significant at the 0.05 level.

99. Statistical Brief #26: Use of the Pap Test as a Cancer Screening Tool -- 2001 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st26/stat26.pdf
    January 01, 2002 - All differences discussed in this Statistical Brief are statistically significant at the .05 level.

100. Statistical Brief #89: Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance for Large Employers in the Private Sector, by Industry Classification, 2003 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st89/stat89.pdf
     July 01, 2005 - Only those estimates that had a statistically significant difference from the national average at the … The offer rate did not exhibit significant variation across the different industry classifications. … Furthermore, there was significant variation in the average employee premium contributions by industry