Results

Total Results: 420 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

61. Statistical Brief #15: Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance for Small Employers in the Private Sector, by Industry Classification: 2000 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st15/stat15.pdf
    January 01, 2000 - Furthermore, there was significant variation in the average employee premium contributions by industry … Only those estimates which had a statistically significant difference from the National average at the

62. Research Findings #23: Trends in Children's Antibiotic Use: 1996 to 2001
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf23/rf23.shtml
    March 01, 2005 - There was no statistically significant change in visits, as approximately three quarters … Sex There were no statistically significant differences between girls … Sex There were no statistically significant differences between girls and boys in the average … Among children with an ambulatory visit for otitis media, there was no statistically significant change … There was no statistically significant difference across age groups in the percentage of children with

63. Statistical Brief #27: National Health Care Expenses in the U.S. Community Population, 2000 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st27/stat27.pdf
    January 01, 2000 - All differences discussed in this Statistical Brief are statistically significant at the 0.05 level.

64. STATISTICAL BRIEF #504: Differences in Payments for Child Visits to Office-Based Physicians: Private versus Medicaid Insurance, 2010 to 2015
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st504/stat504.shtml
    August 01, 2017 - Introduction The degree of access to medical care for poor children has historically been a significant … Only differences in estimates between visits covered by Medicaid versus private insurance that are statistically … significant at the.05 level or better are highlighted in the text. … orthopedist visits ($423 versus $162) relative to the $52 gap for primary care visits ($174 versus $122) was statistically … significant (figure 5) 2 .

65. STATISTICAL BRIEF #263: Dental Expenditures in the 10 Largest States, 2006
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st263/stat263.shtml
    September 01, 2009 - Only those estimates with statistically significant differences from the national average using a multiple … appears to be lower than the U.S.; however, because of its high standard error, it was not found to be statistically

66. Statistical Brief #8: Access to Urgent Medical Care: 2001 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st8/stat08.pdf
    February 27, 2025 - Only differences that are statistically significant at the 0.05 level are discussed in the text.

67. AHRQ Statistical Brief 526 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st526/stat526.pdf
    October 01, 2019 - Only differences between estimates that are statistically significant at the 0.05 level are mentioned … The differences shown in Figure 2 by age group are not statistically significant.

68. Research Findings #19: Health Care Expenses for Injuries: Estimates from the 1997 MEPS
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf19/rf19.shtml
    January 01, 2010 - Only differences between estimates that are statistically significant … There were no statistically significant differences among poverty status groups in … There were no statistically significant differences in the proportion of total ambulatory … There were no statistically significant differences in mean ambulatory care expenses … There were no statistically significant differences in either the proportion of inpatient

69. Chartbook #13: Health Care in Urban and Rural Areas, Combined Years 1998-2000
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/cb13/cb13.shtml
    January 01, 2010 - Unless otherwise noted, only differences between groups that are statistically significant at the 0.05 … In a few instances, differences that appear large may not be statistically significant because estimates … However, differences between rural counties and other county types were not statistically significant … detailed racial/ethnic groups are not shown because estimates for these smaller subgroups were not statistically … significant.

70. RESEARCH FINDINGS #37: Ever Uninsured During the Calendar Year, 2013-2015: Estimates of Non-Elderly Adults Ever Uninsured During Each Calendar Year, by Selected Population Sub-groups and State Medicaid Expansion Status
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf37/rf37.shtml
    August 01, 2017 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … adults ages 55–64, the "ever uninsured" rate was lower in expansion states in 2014 but there was no significant … There was no statistically significant narrowing of rates for black compared to white adults in either … Furthermore, there was no statistically significant narrowing of the difference in rates between Hispanic … for those with a high school diploma or GED and for those with some college education, there was no significant

71. Statistical Brief #31: Work Loss Days in the United States: 1996–2000 Estimates for the Employed Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population, Age 16 to 64 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st31/stat31.pdf
    January 01, 1999 - Unless otherwise noted, only those differences that are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … Hispanics and blacks in all years (although the difference between whites and others and blacks was not significant

72. Statistical Brief #20: State Differences in the Cost of Job-Related Health Insurance - 2000 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st20/stat20.pdf
    September 17, 2024 - Only those estimates with statistically significant differences from the National average using a multiple … While cost sharing between employers and employees is the most common arrangement, there are still a significant

73. Statistical Brief #137: Treatment of Sore Throats: Antibiotic Prescriptions and Throat Cultures for Children under 18 Years of Age, 2002–2004 (Average Annual) (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st137/stat137.pdf
    August 01, 2006 - Average annual estimates are shown for 2002–2004, and only differences that are statistically significant … While there was no significant variation by race/ethnicity in the likelihood of being prescribed an antibiotic … Differences between white children and the other two race/ethnicity groups were not statistically significant

74. STATISTICAL BRIEF #454: Expenditures for Mental Health among Adults, Ages 18-64, 2009-2011: Estimates for the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st454/stat454.shtml
    October 01, 2014 - Except where noted, all differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant … percent) to have had mental health-related expenses (the difference among the latter three groups is not statistically … significant). … percent versus 13.6 percent, not shown) to have received mental health treatment, but there were no significant

75. STATISTICAL BRIEF #479: Veterans Usual Source of Care, 2009-2012: Estimates for the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st479/stat479.shtml
    August 01, 2015 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … The difference in USC rates between veterans with private and public insurance was statistically significant

76. AHRQ Statistical Brief (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st515/stat515.pdf
    September 01, 2018 - All differences mentioned in the text are significant at the p<0.05 level, or better. … There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of any use, or the rate of frequent use

77. research Findings #34: Transitions in Health Insurance Coverage for Non-Elderly Adults in the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population: 2012-2013 through 2014-2015 and Selected Preceding Two-Year Periods (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf34/rf34.pdf
    August 01, 2017 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … With respect to rates of insured adults losing coverage, there was no significant change between 2012 … However, there were no significant changes in these rates between 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 in either … non-Hispanic black adults (31.9 percent) to gain insurance, but the difference with Asian adults was not statistically … significant.

78. STATISTICAL BRIEF #445: Selection and Costs for Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance in the Private Sector, 2013 versus 2012
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st445/stat445.shtml
    July 01, 2014 - Only differences that are statistically significant at the 0.05 significance level are discussed in the

79. Statistical Brief #36: State Differences in the Cost of Job-Related Health Insurance, 2001 (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st36/stat36.pdf
    September 17, 2024 - Only those estimates with statistically significant differences from the national average using a multiple … While cost sharing between employers and employees is the most common arrangement, a significant number

80. Statistical Brief #87: Attitudes toward Health Insurance among Adults Age 18 and Over (pdf file)
    meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st87/stat87.pdf
    July 01, 2005 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … However, there were no significant differences across race/ethnicity categories in the percentage of … figure 2), but the percentage of persons who felt that health insurance was not worth the cost was not statistically