Results

Total Results: 420 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

  1. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st63/stat63.pdf
    January 01, 2005 - All differences discussed in this brief are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. … While differences in median total expenses between two-person and larger families were not statisticallysignificant, mean total expenses for two-person families were approximately $1,000 higher than for … themselves a family unit and single persons living with neither a relative nor a person identified as a “significant
  2. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st419/stat419.shtml
    August 01, 2013 - Black children and children reporting multiple-racial identities did not statistically significantly … All differences discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or better. … Findings From 2002 to 2009, there was a statistically significant increase in the percentage of children … Black children and children reporting multiple-racial identities did not statistically significantly
  3. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st549/stat549.shtml
    July 01, 2023 - All differences discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level unless … However, among older people (ages 65+) there were no significant differences in the percentages of people … Despite these differences in event-specific utilization, there were no statistically significant differences … Despite this large apparent discrepancy in expenditures, this difference was only statistically significantsignificant at the 0.1 significance level.
  4. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st64/stat64.pdf
    January 01, 2005 - All differences discussed in this brief are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. … � Among families with some health care expenses, there was no significant variation in mean expenses … The variation in mean expenses by income level among families with some expenses was not statisticallysignificant (figure 3). … themselves a family unit and single persons living with neither a relative nor a person identified as a “significant
  5. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st510/stat510.shtml
    April 01, 2018 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … We find no statistically significant differences in the patterns of prior coverage between new Marketplace … of retaining Marketplace coverage to rates for other types of coverage (figure 3), we do not find a significant
  6. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st446/stat446.shtml
    July 01, 2014 - Only those estimates with a statistically significant difference from the national average at the 0.05 … Washington D.C. 87.7 Miami-Fort Lauderdale 84.2 Atlanta 88.2* Boston 90.0* * Statistically … Washington D.C. 59.9 Miami-Fort Lauderdale 63.5 Atlanta 63.2* Boston 55.0 * Statistically … contribution $2,940 $2,804 $3,061 $3,002 $3,133 $3,464* $3,091 $3,215 $3,873* $2,940 $3,422 * Statistically … contribution $4,421 $4,291 $4,559 $4,429 $4,783 $5,276* $4,653 $4,861 $5,568 $4,405 $4,367 * Statistically
  7. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st417/stat417.shtml
    July 01, 2013 - Only those estimates with a statistically significant difference from the national average at the 0.05 … National Average 87.0*% 81.8*% 86.7% 80.4% 90.7*% 82.8% 85.1% 88.0*% 88.7*% 90.6*% 84.7% *Statistically … contribution $1,225* $1,070 $1,146 $925* $1,177 $1,178 $1,277* $1,180 $1,086 $1,455* $1,118 *Statistically … contribution $2,756 $2,980 $2,652 $2,703 $3,024 $3,486* $3,375* $3,146 $2,812 $3,275* $2,824 *Statistically … contribution $4,492 $4,400 $3,941* $4,136 $4,174 $4,780 $6,042* $4,723* $4,489 $4,544* $4,236 *Statistically
  8. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf41/rf41.shtml
    May 01, 2019 - Note that some large differences between estimates are not statistically significant due to lack of precision … significant. … There were statistically significant differences by education and insurance coverage. … Only differences in estimates between sociodemographic subgroups that are statistically significant at … Note that some large differences between estimates are not statistically significant due to lack of precision
  9. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st524/stat524.shtml
    July 01, 2019 - Patricia Keenan, PhD, and Jessica Vistnes, PhD Highlights There was no statisticallysignificant change in the overall percentage of private-sector employees covered by a health insurance … Between 2017 and 2018, there was no statistically significant change in the percentage of employees working … These percentages were not statistically different from their 2017 values. … This was the first year without a significant increase in the 2008 to 2018 period.
  10. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st553/stat553.pdf
    October 01, 2023 - plan offered by their employers increased from 62.2 million to 63.4 million, but this change was not statisticallysignificant (figure 2). … rates for small (79.3 percent), medium (77.8 percent), and large employers (81.5 percent) were not statistically … rate for employees at private-sector establishments who were eligible for insurance did not show a statistically … There were no significant changes in premiums among small and medium firms.
  11. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st522/stat522.pdf
    May 01, 2019 - All differences discussed in the text are statistically significant at the p<0.05 level, or better. … There was no statistically significant change from 2009 to 2016 in median total spending, which was … for persons with drug coverage, but people without drug coverage, including the uninsured, saw no significant … The rates of increase were not statistically different for the two groups. … some drug coverage during the year, but the uninsured and the elderly without drug coverage saw no significant
  12. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st503/stat503.pdf
    July 01, 2017 - Findings Enrollment rates and number of covered employees From 2015 to 2016, there was no significant … There was also no significant change in the number of enrollees overall, or in any firm-size category … Highlights From 2015 to 2016, there was no statistically significant change in either the overall percentage … There was no statistically significant change in the percentage of employees working at establishments … Deductibles There was no statistically significant change in the overall percentage of enrollees in a
  13. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st429/stat429.shtml
    January 01, 2014 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or … However, the difference between average expenses in 2006 and 2011 was not statistically significant. … However, differences between 2006 and 2011 in these averages were not statistically significant.
  14. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st530/stat530.shtml
    July 01, 2020 - Edward Miller, PhD and Patricia Keenan, PhD Highlights There was no statisticallysignificant change in the overall percentage of private-sector employees covered by a health insurance … This is the only statistically significant increase in small-firm enrollment from 2008 to 2019, a period … For employees in small firms, the offer rate rose from 47.3 to 50.7 percent–the first statistically significant … There was no significant difference in the 2018 to 2019 versus the 2017 to 2018 growth rates for single
  15. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st22/stat22.pdf
    January 01, 2002 - There was significant variation in mammography screening rates by health insurance coverage status. … All results presented in this statistical brief are statistically significant at the .05 level.
  16. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st553/stat553.shtml
    October 01, 2023 - plan offered by their employers increased from 62.2 million to 63.4 million, but this change was not statisticallysignificant (figure 2). … rates for small (79.3 percent), medium (77.8 percent), and large employers (81.5 percent) were not statistically … rate for employees at private-sector establishments who were eligible for insurance did not show a statistically … There were no significant changes in premiums among small and medium firms.
  17. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st7/stat07.pdf
    September 17, 2024 - The results presented in this statistical brief are statistically significant at the .05 level.
  18. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st16/stat16.pdf
    January 01, 2000 - Furthermore, there was significant variation in the average employee premium contributions by industry … Only those estimates which had a statistically significant difference from the National average at the
  19. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st559/stat559.shtml
    February 01, 2025 - Despite the significant decline in prescription opioid use since 2011, a as evidenced … all prescription drugs (40.1 percent) than for opioids (27.4 percent) but there was not a statisticallysignificant difference in the Medicare share between opioids (38.6 percent) and all drugs … was lower for all drugs (7.7 percent) than for opioids (18.0 percent), but there were no statisticallysignificant differences in the shares of spending financed by Medicaid and other insurers.
  20. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st21/stat21.pdf
    January 01, 1997 - All results discussed in this statistical brief are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. … National estimates derived from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) indicate there was a significant

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: