Results

Total Results: 420 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

121. STATISTICAL BRIEF #378: Asthma Medication Use among Adults with Reported Treatment for Asthma, United States, 1998-1999 and 2008-2009
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st378/stat378.shtml
     July 01, 2012 - Unless otherwise indicated, all differences discussed in the text are statistically significant at the … for asthma using asthma medications by health insurance status As shown in figure 10, there were no statistically … significant differences in the use of controllers and no statistically significant differences in the

122. Statistical Brief #135: State Differences in the Cost of Job-Related Health Insurance, 2004 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st135/stat135.pdf
     July 01, 2006 - Only those estimates with statistically significant differences from the national average using a multiple … While cost sharing between employers and employees is the most common arrangement, a significant number … — Employee contributions (in dollars) for employee-plus-one coverage were not statistically significantly

123. STATISTICAL BRIEF #87: Attitudes toward Health Insurance among Adults Age 18 and Over
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st87/stat87.shtml
     July 01, 2005 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … However, there were no significant differences across race/ethnicity categories in the percentage of … figure 2), but the percentage of persons who felt that health insurance was not worth the cost was not statistically

124. STATISTICAL BRIEF #356: Trends in Dermatological Agents Utilization and Expenditures for the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population, 1999 and 2008
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st356/stat356.shtml
     February 01, 2012 - All differences discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. … , even with decreases in utilization and the number of people obtaining prescriptions, there was no significant … There was no significant change for topical emollients (figure 6). … There was no significant change for topical emollients (figure 6).

125. Statistical Brief #83: The Uninsured in America, 2004: Estimates for the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population under Age 65 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st83/stat83.pdf
     July 01, 2005 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level

126. Statistical Brief #24: The Uninsured in America — 1996-2002 Estimates for the Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population Under Age 65 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st24/stat24.pdf
     January 01, 2001 - Unless otherwise noted, only differences that are statistically significant at the 0.05 level are discussed

127. Statistical Brief #42: Screening for Prostate Cancer with the Prostate-Specific Antigen Test, United States, 2002 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st42/stat42.pdf
     September 01, 2004 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level

128. STATISTICAL BRIEF #529: Total Expenses, Total Utilization, and Sources of Payment for Outpatient Prescription Opioids in the U.S. Adult Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population, 2017
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st529/stat529.shtml
     April 01, 2020 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level

129. Statistical Brief #147: Children Living with Adult Smokers, United States, 2004 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st147/stat147.pdf
     November 01, 2006 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05

130. Statistical Brief #168: Trends in Outpatient Prescription Drug Utilization and Expenditures, 1997 and 2004 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st168/stat168.pdf
     April 01, 2007 - All differences discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level.

131. Statistical Brief #128: Changes in Out-of-Pocket Maximum Limits for Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance Plans, 1999–2003 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st128/stat128.pdf
     June 01, 2006 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … For small firms, however, there was no significant change from 1999 to 2003 in the medium group.

132. AHRQ Statistical Brief 520 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st520/stat520.pdf
     February 01, 2019 - Practice Attributes When comparing average expense per visit for USC adults in 2016, there were no statistically … significant differences when comparing by practice type—independent practice ($139), physician-owned

133. STATISTICAL BRIEF #507: Out-of-Pocket Health Care Expenses for Non-Elderly Families by Income and Family Structure, 2015
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st507/stat507.shtml
     January 01, 2018 - population in 2015 was paid out of pocket by families. 1 These out-of-pocket expenditures can constitute a significant … All differences by income or family structure noted in the text are statistically significant at the … However, single people who live with neither a relative nor a person identified as a "significant other

134. STATISTICAL BRIEF #117: Children's Dental Visits and Expenses, United States, 2003
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st117/stat117.shtml
     March 01, 2006 - Only differences that are statistically significant at the 0.05 level are discussed in the text. … A significant difference in the average expenses for a dental services visit was also evident among children

135. STATISTICAL BRIEF #415: Dental Expenditures in the 10 Largest States, 2010
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st415/stat415.shtml
     June 01, 2013 - Only those estimates with statistically significant differences from the national average using a multiple

136. STATISTICAL BRIEF #299: Dental Expenditures in the 10 Largest States, 2007
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st299/stat299.shtml
     November 01, 2010 - Only those estimates with statistically significant differences from the national average using a multiple

137. STATISTICAL BRIEF #407: Trends in Utilization and Expenditures of Prescribed Drugs Treating Diabetes, Hypertension, and High Cholesterol for Persons under Age 40 in the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population, 2000 and 2010
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st407/stat407.shtml
     June 01, 2013 - All differences discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. … There was no significant increase in total inflation adjusted expenditures for anti-hypertensives when … From 2000 to 2010, MEPS estimates showed no significant difference in the inflation adjusted average … There was no significant difference when comparing the mean number of prescriptions obtained annually

138. Research Findings #40: Uninsured All Year, 2013–2016: Estimates for Non-Elderly Adults by Selected Population Sub-groups and State Medicaid Expansion Status (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf40/rf40.pdf
     January 01, 2019 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … In non-expansion states, there were no significant changes in uninsured rates in 2016 for either men … In both Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states, there were no significant changes in uninsured … Nationally and in non-expansion states, uninsured rates declined by age, with significant differences … Race/ethnicity From 2015 to 2016, there were no significant changes in uninsured rates in any race/

139. STATISTICAL BRIEF #295: Dental Coverage of Adults Ages 21 to 64, United States, 1997 and 2007
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st295/stat295.shtml
     October 01, 2010 - Only differences that are statistically significant at the 0.05 level are discussed in the text. … There was no significant difference in the proportion of adults age 21-64 with private dental coverage … In 1997 and 2007 there were no significant differences for adults in the same age group with private

140. Statistical Brief #18: Employer-Sponsored Single and Family Health Insurance Coverage: Selection and Cost, 2000 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st18/stat18.pdf
     January 01, 2000 - Only differences that are statistically significant at the 0.05 level are discussed in the text.