Results

Total Results: 420 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

101. STATISTICAL BRIEF #489: Transitions in Health Insurance Coverage for Non-Elderly Adults in the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population: 2013-2014 and Selected Preceding Two-Year Periods
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st489/stat489.shtml
     June 01, 2016 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … or are noted if significant at the 0.10 level (p < 0.10). … gaining other private/public insurance were not as widespread across population subgroups, but were statistically … significant for younger adults (ages 18–35), adults with a high school diploma/GED or less education … While there were not significant changes in the likelihood that insured adults lost coverage in most

102. STATISTICAL BRIEF #430: Trends in Antidepressant Utilization and Expenditures in the U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population by Age, 2000 and 2010
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st430/stat430.shtml
     February 01, 2014 - For those persons under age 18, there was no significant increase or decrease. … All differences discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level. … There was no significant change in the inflation adjusted average drug expense per antidepressant purchase … From 2000 to 2010, MEPS estimates showed no significant difference in the inflation adjusted average … For those persons ages 0–17, there was no significant change (figure 7).

103. Statistical Brief #51: State Differences in the Cost of Job-Related Health Insurance, 2002 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st51/stat51.pdf
     July 01, 2004 - percent in New York to 19.5 percent in Texas, and for family coverage from Only those estimates with statistically … significant differences from the national average using a multiple comparison procedure at the 0.05 … sharing between employers and employees is the most common tributions for single arrangement, a significant … — Employee contributions (in dollars) for employee-plus-one coverage were not statistically significantly

104. Statistical Brief #34: The The Prevalence of Obesity and Other Chronic Health Conditions Among Diabetic Adults in the U.S. Community Population, 2001 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st34/stat34.pdf
     January 01, 2001 - All results discussed are statistically significant at the 0.05 level.

105. Statistical Brief #26: Use of the Pap Test as a Cancer Screening Tool -- 2001 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st26/stat26.pdf
     January 01, 2002 - All differences discussed in this Statistical Brief are statistically significant at the .05 level.

106. Statistical Brief #273: Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance for Employees of State and Local Governments, by Census Division, 2008 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st273/stat273.pdf
     December 01, 2009 - Only those estimates that had a statistically significant difference from the national average at the

107. STATISTICAL BRIEF #492: Results from the 2015 MEPS-IC Private-Sector National Tables
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st492/stat492.shtml
     July 01, 2016 - While there was no significant change in these rates, there was an increase in the number of enrollees … pattern as large employers for the 2013 to 2015 period, however, the year-to-year changes are not statistically … significant. … There were no significant changes in take-up rates at small employers between 2014 and 2015. … In the U.S. overall, there was no significant increase in average employee contributions for single

108. Statistical Brief #145: Co-pays, Deductibles, and Coinsurance Percentages for Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance in the Non-Federal Workforce, by Industry Classification, 2004 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st145/stat145.pdf
     October 01, 2006 - Only those estimates that had a statistically significant difference from the national average at the

109. Statistical Brief #142: Co-pays, Deductibles, and Coinsurance Percentages for Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance in the Private Sector, by Firm Size Classification, 2004 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st142/stat142.pdf
     September 01, 2006 - Only those estimates that had a statistically significant difference from the national average at the

110. Research Findings #24: Utilization and Expenditures for Children with Special Health Care Needs
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/rf24/rf24.shtml
     January 01, 2006 - No statistically significant associations were found of SHCN status by region, metropolitan statistical … There was no statistically significant difference between children with and without SHCN status in average … significant. … significant. … significant).

111. Statistical Brief #299: Dental Expenditures in the 10 Largest States, 2007 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st299/stat299.pdf
     November 01, 2010 - Only those estimates with statistically significant differences from the national average using a multiple

112. STATISTICAL BRIEF #273: Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance for Employees of State and Local Governments, by Census Division, 2008
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st273/stat273.shtml
     December 01, 2009 - Only those estimates that had a statistically significant difference from the national average at the

113. Statistical Brief #33: Outpatient Prescribed Medicines: A Comparison of Use and Expenditures, 1987 and 2001 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st33/stat33.pdf
     June 01, 2004 - This Statistical Brief summarizes data that indicate a significant growth between 1987 and 2001 in … tests were done using the adjusted 1987 estimates and the 2001 estimates, and results discussed are statistically … significant at the 0.05 level.

114. STATISTICAL BRIEF #452: Employees in Smaller Private-Sector Firms: Trends in Offers, Enrollment Rates, and Deductibles, by Firm Size, 2008-2013
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st452/stat452.shtml
     October 01, 2014 - Only those estimates that had a statistically significant difference from the national average at the … There was no significant difference in the percentage of employees enrolled in single coverage in firms … There was no significant difference in the percentage of enrollees who took employee-plus-one coverage … There was no significant difference by firm size in the percentage of enrollees who took family coverage

115. Statistical Brief #115: Health Service Use and Expenses for Migraines and Other Headaches, 2002–03 (Average Annual Estimates) (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st115/stat115.pdf
     February 01, 2006 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … Among adults with reported treatment for headaches, however, there were no significant differences by … While there was no significant difference by sex, this percentage decreased with age, ranging from 17.9

116. Statistical Brief #101: Variations in Smoking by Selected Demographic, Socioeconomic, Insurance, and Health Characteristics, United States, 2003 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st101/stat101.pdf
     October 01, 2005 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … The differences among the subgroups under 65 were not significant. … difference between the rates of smoking of males and females in the 65 and over age category were not significant … Chronic conditions A significant number of persons with reported physician-diagnosed chronic conditions

117. STATISTICAL BRIEF #325: Changes in Premiums and Employee Contributions for Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance, Private Industry, 2001-2009
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st325/stat325.shtml
     June 01, 2011 - Only differences that were statistically significant at the 0.05 percent significance level are noted … coverage employee contributions were up 92.2 percent over the period; this increase did not differ statistically

118. Dental Utilization and Expenditures, U.S. Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population Aged 2 and Older, 2019-2021
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st555/stat555.shtml
     March 01, 2024 - All differences discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level unless

119. Statistical Brief #106: Estimates of Health Care Expenditures for the 10 Largest States, 2003 (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st106/stat106.pdf
     December 01, 2005 - Only those estimates with statistically significant differences from the national average using a multiple

120. MEPS_SB529_FINAL (pdf file)
     meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st529/stat529.pdf
     April 01, 2020 - All differences between estimates discussed in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level