Results

Total Results: 840 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

81. Evaluating Progress Among Hospitals (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/datainnovations/raceethnicitytoolkit/nm9.pdf
    June 16, 2014 - Larger hospitals (>100 beds), urban • Worsened: – 3 (7%) – Decreased 1 grade – Rural • No changes statistically … significant at .05 Completeness • Q1-Q3 2011 General Hospitals • 95% non-missing fields by

82. MAINTAIN AND EXPAND (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2000NISComparisonReportFinal.pdf
    February 28, 2003 - When viewing results, readers should note that statistically significant differences between the NIS … Statistically significant differences between the NIS and NHDS can be expected for a variety of reasons … Finally, the sheer number of tests (about 330), will produce, purely by chance, some statistically significant … Table 9 Overall and Regional Comparisons Overall and by region, no statistically significant … Tests of Statistical Significance To test for a statistically significant difference between an NIS

83. Statistical Brief #139
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb139.jsp
    July 01, 2012 - MD Introduction Kidney stone disease (also known as urolithiasis) represents a significant … Conversely, large stones or those causing significant side effects such as infection, renal (kidney) … There was a significant rise in the percent of kidney stone-related disease ED visits during the hottest

84. Summary (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/KIDComp1997Final.pdf
    March 16, 2001 - For each statistic, a test was performed to determine whether a difference was statistically significant … * Difference is significant at the 0.05 level. ** Difference is significant at the 0.01 level. … * Difference is significant at the 0.05 level. ** Difference is significant at the 0.01 level. … * Difference is significant at the 0.05 level. ** Difference is significant at the 0.01 level. … reliable and unbiased. 38 Appendix 1 Tests of Statistical Significance To test for a statistically

85. Kid 1997 Comparison (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/kid/reports/KID_1997_Comparison.pdf
    January 01, 1997 - For each statistic, a test was performed to determine whether a difference was statistically significant … * Difference is significant at the 0.05 level. ** Difference is significant at the 0.01 level. … * Difference is significant at the 0.05 level. ** Difference is significant at the 0.01 level. … * Difference is significant at the 0.05 level. ** Difference is significant at the 0.01 level. … KID (01/28/02) 39 Comparative Analysis Appendix Tests of Statistical Significance To test for a statistically

86. Statistical Brief #35
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb35.jsp
    July 01, 2007 - All differences noted in the text, tables, and figures are significant at the 0.05 level or better.

87. HCUP Statistical Brief #126: Circumcisions Performed in U.S. Community Hospitals, 2009 (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb126.pdf
    February 01, 2012 - There were no significant changes since 2005. … significant at the 0.05 level or better. … There were no significant differences between 2005 and 2009 (table 1). … significant at p<0.05 … significant at p<0.05

88. Statistical Brief #128
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb128.jsp
    April 01, 2012 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or

89. Statistical Brief #27
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb27.jsp
    March 01, 2007 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or

90. Statistical Brief #122: Septicemia in U.S. Hospitals, 2009 (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb122.pdf
    October 01, 2011 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … ‡ Differences between stays in 2000 and 2009 were statistically significant at p<0.05. … ‡ Differences between stays for septicemia and all other stays were statistically significant at p … ‡ Differences between stays for septicemia and all other stays were statistically significant at p

91. HCUP Calculating Standard Errors - Accessible Version
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/tech_assist/standarderrors/508/508course_2016.jsp
    January 01, 2016 - Standard errors can be used to determine if differences between two sample statistics are significant … errors for the subset of discharges you are studying, you may want to check to see if there are any statistically … significant differences between outcomes or measures of hospital stays in your subset and other subsets … As you can see, the difference between the two estimates is statistically significant at p < 0.001. … As you can see, the difference between the two estimates is statistically significant at p < 0.001.

92. Statistical Brief #143
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb143.jsp
    November 01, 2012 - Figures highlight differences that were statistically significant. … All differences between subgroup estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05

93. Section2 5 (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/factsandfigures/2008/pdfs/section2_5.pdf
    January 01, 2008 - ‡ 2008 discharges are not statistically different from 1997 discharges at p<0.05. ** Includes discharges … There was no significant change in the number of private insurance liveborn infant stays between 1997

94. Statistical Brief #17
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb17.jsp
    November 17, 2006 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or

95. Statistical Brief #22
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb22.jsp
    January 22, 2007 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or

96. HCUP Statistical Brief #5: Hospitalizations for Women with Circulatory Disease, 2003 (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb5.pdf
    May 05, 2006 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … As shown in table 1, over the seven-year time period from 1997 to 2003, there were no significant shifts … ost circulatory conditions were no significant nces in in-hospital lity between men and n, except … For most conditions, there were no significant differences between men and women in in-hospital mortality … Percent women Principal diagnosis Number of hospital stays, overall, 2003 1997 2003 Significant

97. HCUP Statistical Brief #10: Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Potentially Preventable Hospitalizations, 2003 (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb10.pdf
    July 01, 2006 - quality of health care has been a focal point of both past and present U.S. health care policy, but significant … All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … However, these statistically significant relative rates may also be affected by differences in disease … minorities relative to whites, risk adjusted, 2003 1.0 = White, Non-Hispanic (reference group) Significant … minorities relative to whites, risk adjusted, 2003 1.0 = White, Non-Hispanic (reference group) Significant

98. Statistical Brief #129: Rates of Obstetric Trauma, 2009 (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb129.pdf
    April 01, 2012 - All differences between estimates that are noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05

99. Statistical Brief #74: Potentially Avoidable Injuries to Mothers and Newborns During Childbirth, 2006 (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb74.pdf
    June 01, 2009 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level … Though there appeared to be no significant differences in the rate of newborn injury between the wealthiest … As shown in table 2 and figure 4, there was also significant regional variation in the rates of potentially … There were no significant regional differences for rates of obstetrical trauma occurring during cesarean … NS—Comparison to reference group is not statistically significant, at the 0.05 level or better.

100. Statistical Brief #113
     hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb113.jsp
     May 01, 2011 - All differences between estimates noted in the text are statistically significant at the 0.05 level or … ‡ Values are not statistically different from values for delivery stays without complicating conditions … Regional differences were not statistically significant for stays with complications (with or without