Results

Total Results: 1,172 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mrsa-screening-2010_executive.pdf
    January 01, 2010 - This study showed a statistically significant reduction in healthcare- associated MRSA acquisition in … Although the three quasi-experimental studies21,23,25 found statistically significant reductions in … There was a statistically significant reduction in trend in incidence of MRSA acquisition (-0.045; … Both studies found statistically significant decreases in MRSA bacteremia. … The reduction was statistically significant for one intervention but not for the other.
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/deliberative-methods-demonstration-executive-131125.pdf
    November 01, 2013 - Participants in both methods shifted to more agreement at a statistically significant level on the item … significant level … Intensity—as measured by contrasting the CP and BCD methods—had an effect at a statistically significant … This difference was at a statistically significant level. … significant level
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-209-evidence-summary-non-pharma-chronic-pain.pdf
    June 01, 2018 - If differences were not statistically significant but confidence intervals were close to 0 (continuous … • There was no statistically significant difference between yoga versus exercise in short-term or … significant. … The pooled estimate at intermediate term was not statistically significant due to heterogeneity, however … significant effect; SOE = strength of evidence.
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/angina-heart-attack-treatments_executive.pdf
    January 01, 2014 - However, we found no statistically significant difference between upstream and deferred GPI therapy … significant [16% vs. 21%]; 1 not statistically significant); favors DAPT CI = confidence interval; … (1 month vs. 12 months and 6 months vs. 12 months) showed no statistically significant difference in … significant difference in MI rates; 1 study showed statistically significant increase in MI events … significant increase, 1 statistically significant decrease in the triple therapy group, and 2 studies
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/head-neck-cancer_surveillance.pdf
    August 01, 2012 - significant. … • Nine studies reported on late xerostomia, and eight were statistically significant in favor of … not in the other.81 The difference was statistically significant for higher disease-free survival … significant result in the original CER is now NOT statistically significant or vice versa- that is … a previously non-significant result become statistically significant.
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-250-cannabis-other-plant-based-treatments-evidence-summary_0.pdf
    October 01, 2021 - significant were considered to have “potential effects” if the 95 percent confidence interval included … a Effect size: none (i.e., no effect/no statistically significant effect), small, moderate, or large … b Findings with small or larger magnitude of effect, not statistically significant; but with SOE rating … a Effect size: none (i.e., no effect/no statistically significant effect), small, moderate, or large … b Findings with small or larger magnitude of effect, not statistically significant; but with SOE rating
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/atrial-fibrillation-ablation_surveillance.pdf
    May 16, 2013 - heterogeneous, but meta-analysis found statistically significant higher rates of recurrence in patients … Only 3 of 16 studies found a statistically significant association between duration and recurrence … significant result in the original CER is now NOT statistically significant or vice versa- that is … a previously non-significant result become statistically significant. …  meta-­‐analysis  found  statistically  significant   higher  rates  of  recurrence  
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/hepatitis-c-treatment-adherence_executive.pdf
    September 22, 2011 - However, no results were statistically significant. … This difference was not statistically significant in unadjusted or adjusted analysis that accounted … These differences, however, were not statistically significant. … Again, this was not a statistically significant difference (ORadj, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.03 to 1.15). … This effect was also not statistically significant. 11 Discussion Key Findings We identified
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/autoimmune-disease-rapid-research.pdf
    November 01, 2024 - All 3 meta-analyses found statistically significant improvement in systemic inflammation markers, per … One RCT stated that statistically significant improvements were found among patients who received NSPT … There was no statistically significant difference in DLQI. … Compared with the control group, patients in the treatment group had statistically significant greater … While statistically significant improvements were reported for disease activity and some inflammatory
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/colorectal-cancer-staging_disposition-comments.pdf
    November 20, 2014 - Wherever an outcome was statistically significant, we use the word “statistically significant”; it … We concluded there was no statistically significant difference. … Also “not statistically significant” should not be a reason for the grade to be “insufficient”. … There is no statistically significant difference in accuracy between MRI and ERUS for preoperative … While there is no statistically significant difference in accuracy between CT and MRI for rectal N
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/thromboembolism-update-executive-170622.pdf
    June 01, 2017 - The other two estimates were precise and statistically significant. … Across all comparisons, there were no statistically significant differences. … There were no statistically significant differences. … There were no statistically significant differences. … There were no statistically significant differences.
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/thromboembolism-update-executive-170622.pdf
    June 01, 2017 - The other two estimates were precise and statistically significant. … Across all comparisons, there were no statistically significant differences. … There were no statistically significant differences. … There were no statistically significant differences. … There were no statistically significant differences.
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/noninvasive-nonpharm-pain-summary.pdf
    April 01, 2020 - If effect estimates are close to zero and not statistically significant, results are interpreted as … significant effect; SOE = strength of evidence. 15 Table C. … significant effect; SOE = strength of evidence. … significant effect; PT = physical therapist; SOE = strength of evidence. 17 Table F. … significant effect; SOE = strength of evidence 19 Table I.
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/dementia-nursing-home-characteristics_executive.pdf
    October 01, 2012 - significant effects on health outcomes, with either insufficient or low SOE. … Almost all showed some statistically significant effects on outcomes (either low or moderate SOE). … Table C summarizes the SOE for statistically significant differences in health and psychosocial outcomes … Further, although we found statistically significant effects for some organizational characteristics … In addition, some statistically significant results were relatively small, meaning their clinical importance
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cad-pci-bypass_surveillance.pdf
    May 01, 2013 - Potentially Invalidating Changes in Evidence B1 A change in statistical significance (from nonsignificant to significant … Rates of death and myocardial infarction were not statistically different between groups. … Differences in stroke were no longer statistically significant Mohr, 20137 (SYNTAX) RCT Patients … significant difference in adjusted mortality. … There were no statistically significant differences in stroke or myocardial infarction.
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/chronic-urinary-retention_research.pdf
    September 01, 2014 - Neither of these differences was statistically significant. … None of the TURP patients needed to return to surgery; the difference was not statistically significant … The adjusted mean change in IPSS scores for the TURP versus laser therapy group was statistically significant … No statistically significant difference Mean difference at endpoint: no statistically significantsignificant difference No statistically significant difference No statistically significant
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/treatment-outcomes-chronic-kidney-rapid-research.pdf
    November 01, 2024 - Statistically significant reduction of systemic inflammation markers like CRP23,25,27 and IL-6 levels23,27 … Overall, most of the studies/meta-analyses show statistically significant reductions in CRP in as little … Note: all described changes are statistically significant (p < 0.05) post-dental treatment relative … Note: all described changes are statistically significant (p < 0.05) Evidence from 6 SRs (1 of high … Of these, IL6 showed statistically significant reductions in a majority of the studies where it was
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/unpublished-drug-trials-white-paper.pdf
    December 01, 2024 - show significant associations. … a Statistically significant benefit shown in the LOCF analysis of CAPS-2 score but not in the observed … This indicates a statistically significant effect that is just below the threshold for a clinically … significant effect based on the 10-point MCID criterion. 4 Figure 1. … and clinically significant.
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/dietary-supplements_surveillance.pdf
    January 01, 2013 - Coenzyme Q + statins, fenofibrate, ACE inhibitors, or statins: No statistically significant differences … No statistically significant effects were observed in withdrawal due to adverse events, bleeding, renal … No statistically significant differences were observed for total adverse events, incidence of headache … Coenzyme Q + statins, fenofibrate, ACE inhibitors, or statins: No statistically significant differences … No statistically significant differences were observed for total adverse events, incidence of headache
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/bladder-cancer-non-muscle-invasive_executive.pdf
    October 01, 2015 - MMC was associated with increased risk of recurrence, but the difference was not statistically significant … Doxorubicin Versus Thiotepa: • There was no statistically significant difference between doxorubicin … no intravesical therapy: Progression Low Epirubicin was associated with a non– statistically significant … MMC was associated with increased risk of recurrence, but the difference was not statistically significant … Doxorubicin vs. thiotepa: Recurrence Low There was no statistically significant difference in risk

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: