Results

Total Results: 1,179 records

Showing results for "statistically significant".

  1. S123 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/s123.pdf
    October 01, 2007 - . (5) is estimated and a Chow F-test42 can be used to assess whether the instrument (Z) describes a significant … The Chow F-statistics enable us to test whether the specified instrument described a statistically significant … ‡§Statistically different rate across groups at 0.99 and 0.95 confidence levels, respectively. … †‡Statistically significant at 0.99 and 0.95 confidence level, respectively. TABLE 3. … significant at 0.95 and 0.99 confidence level, respectively.
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/rapid-response-chemotherapy-dental.pdf
    July 01, 2023 - No differences were statistically significant. 22 Author, Year Country Funding Source … This difference between groups is statistically significant (p = 0.0004). … This was statistically significant (p < 0.01) in one trial,34 non-significant in one,35 and not analyzed … significant. … This difference was reported to be statistically significant (p = 0.001).
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cer-242-radiation-therapy-brain-metastases-disposition-comments.pdf
    June 09, 2021 - in KQ3 showed that none of the individual studies or pooled results across studies demonstrated a statistically … radiation therapy may decrease the risk of dying from brain metastases, but the pooled effect was not statisticallysignificant”: compared to what? … Re page 9: This point refers to a result that is no longer relevant (both outcomes do not show an statistically … Peer Reviewer #1 Results Page 51 of 280 Fatigue- "The study did not find a statistically significant
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/urinary-incontinence-treatment_surveillance.pdf
    October 29, 2012 - Control Urinary leakage Consistent to the original CER findings there was statistically significant … There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for UI episodes, UI symptoms, UI … The differences were small but statistically significant for UI impact, severity measure, and sleep-energy … significant result in the original CER is now NOT statistically significant or vice versa- that is … a previously non-significant result become statistically significant.
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/major-depressive-disorder_clinician.pdf
    September 01, 2016 - However, the difference is not statistically different (see Table 2). �� The evidence is too limited … ⬌ = no statistically significant difference; CBT = cognitive behavioral therapy; CI = confidence interval
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/topic-nomination-bone-metastases.pdf
    February 01, 2017 - 53 56 (assessable pa fx, fraction; MF, multiple fractions; NR, not reported; RCT, randomized con a Statistically … 17 18 at 4 wk NR 13.3 8.8 a 19 17% at 3 mo 10 20 a (acute grade 2-4) 15 5 a 0 0 at 1 month No statistically … NR NR Studies using samarium-153 Baczyk, 201313 177, prostate 153Sm 153Sm + EBRT 85 89 43 63 No statistically … zoledronic acid 88 31 NR NR NR Zorga, 201126 49, all histologies 89Sr 77 NR Hemotoxicity in 80% NR NR *Statisticallysignificant comparison.
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/labor-nitrous-oxide_disposition-comments.pdf
    August 23, 2012 - While the increased duration of second stage labor may be statistically significant, it needs to be … How big would differences have to be to be statistically significant? … Were there any trends even if not statistically significant? Thank you. … Lack of a statistically significant difference is not the same thing as proof of no difference. … Some statistically significant differences are found by chance, and the more associations are looked
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/high-cholestorol-medicines-update_disposition-comments.pdf
    September 01, 2014 - There were no statistically significant differences between the arms. … There were no statistically significant differences between the arms. … None of the studies, despite being fairly large, found a statistically significant effect. … There were no statistically significant differences between the arms. … There were no statistically significant differences between the arms.
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/quantitative-synthesis-expanded-methods_methods.pdf
    March 01, 2013 - The studies are statistically heterogeneous, with significant Q statistic and I2=60 percent. … sclerotherapy in patients with cirrhosis and esophagogastric varices.22 The naïve approach estimated a statistically … A RD of 2 percent could be clinically significant if the change is from 3 percent to 1 percent of an … , a survey designed to examine physician diagnostic practices for patients with chest pain noted a statistically … Although this finding was statistically significant, the clinical significance of a difference of 1.51
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/osteoporosis-bone-fracture_disposition-comments.pdf
    March 01, 2012 - It is important to note that this subgroup analysis was not statistically powered. … Treatment by age interaction was not statistically significant by a subset analysis of the randomized … significant benefits in fracture reduction.” … significant.” … As opposed to the observational literature, we did not find a statistically significant increase in
  11. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/high-cholestorol-medications_executive.pdf
    September 01, 2009 - A large amount of observational data, as well as clinical trials, support a significant, modifiable role … For individuals requiring intensive therapy, two trials employing fixed dose or titrations could be statistically … Scant evidence from two statin- ezetimibe trials was not statistically combined because of heterogeneity … No significant difference was noted for other combinations. … for LDL-c reduction, but a significant increase in HDL-c of 5 percent favored the combination.
  12. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/ace-inhibitor-arb-update_executive.pdf
    June 01, 2011 - to have a greater reduction in blood pressure compared to the ACEI ramipril (two studies) and no significant … There was no statistically evident difference in the rate antihypertensive medication? … progression of but this difference is both small and most likely not clinically renal disease: meaningful or significant … ACEI renin inhibitor trials did not find a statistically significant persistence with drug therapy, and
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/atrial-fibrillation_executive.pdf
    June 01, 2013 - This decrease was statistically significant in the RCT but not in the observational study. … However, the RCT differed from the observational studies in showing a statistically significantly lower … lenient control; while also favoring lenient control, the observational study did not demonstrate a statistically … • Based on four RCTs (one good, three fair quality) involving 393 patients, there was no statistically … the AFFIRM study, that systematically assessed differences in mortality between AADs; it found no statistically
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/ehc-presentation-quantitative-synthesis-chapter-4.pdf
    July 01, 2019 - not interpret the Q statistic in isolation due to low power (especially with few studies) • Non-significant … issues affecting these statistics will also affect I2. • I2 should be calculated even when Q is not statisticallysignificant. … • A non-significant Q should not be interpreted as the absence of heterogeneity, and there are nuances
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/alcohol-misuse-drug-therapy_clinician.pdf
    February 01, 2016 - In the NNT column, NA indicates that the risk difference (95-percent confidence interval) was not statisticallysignificant and that an NNT was not calculated or that the effect measure was not one that allows direct … Percentage of drinking days 2 720 Not significanta ��� a The 95-percent confidence interval was not statisticallysignificant
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/antipsychotics-children-surveillance-150120.pdf
    October 01, 2014 - Differences among SGAs were not statistically significant. … RESULTS: The combined use of atomoxetine and olanzapine resulted in statistically significant improvement … Nonoverlapping 95% CIs were considered as indicating a statistically significant difference. … Similarly in the other study, authors reported no statistically significant difference in clinical response … Results yielded an effect estimate of -0.18 (95% CI -0.70 to 0.34), which was statistically non-significant
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/osteoarthritis-pain-disposition-120516.pdf
    October 01, 2011 - Souich Results In page 52, based on the meta-analysis of Wandel et al.(1)it is stated that: “a statisticallysignificant in Wandel et al but statistically significant in Hochberg et al). … Absolute differences in VAS scores were statistically significant after 1 month of treatment (chondroitin … At the end of the treatment period, absolute differences were statistically significant as compared … for psoriasis, chondroitin sulphate at dose of 800 mg/day demonstrated a statistically significant
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/13_pulmonary_potential_high_impact_2012-12-11.pdf
    January 01, 2012 - In trials, effects on pulmonary function were reported as early as 2 weeks, and a statistically significant … Even for patients with prescription drug coverage, copayments are expected to be significant. … Patients treated with ivacaftor also demonstrated a significant improvement in quality of life (p<0.001 … Final data from phase 2 combination study of VX- 809 and Kalydeco (ivacaftor) showed statisticallysignificant improvements in lung function in people with cystic fibrosis who have two copies of the
  19. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/gerd_executive.pdf
    September 01, 2011 - Where a P-value was reported, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. … medical treatment, patients who underwent antireflux surgery also demonstrated improvement (in some cases statisticallysignificant) on reflux symptom scales and quality-of-life measurements. … bias), 2 C-level (lowest quality, most likelihood of significant bias) … There were no significant differences in other outcomes.
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/vitamin-d-calcium_executive.pdf
    September 01, 2014 - Eight of the nested case-control studies found no statistically significant dose-response relationship … However, two of the three B-rated nested case-control studies in women found statistically significant … One study of male smokers found a statistically significant relationship between increasing serum 25 … Another United Kingdom longitudinal study found a small but statistically significant association of … This difference was not statistically significant.

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: