Results

Total Results: 7,422 records

Showing results for "states".
Users also searched for: statin

  1. www.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/section2.html
    October 01, 2015 - States had a difficult time producing core measures that require EHR data because most States, health … We also reviewed medical home survey data submitted by States. … CMS did not require States to use the same assessment tool. … Eight States developed strategies for reporting quality measures to CMS, and all of the States sustained … , providers, and quality specialists in their own and other States.
  2. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/highlight01.pdf
    September 30, 2015 - and stakeholders in their States. … States with experienced data analysts reported that the analysts’ expertise helped States identify … When selecting data sources for measures, States weighed the ease of data collection for States and … All of the States are relying on data from practices. … The States are reporting measures not currently specified for use with EHR data.
  3. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/data/infographics/state-snapshot-infogr.pdf
    September 21, 2018 - Examples in this illustration show top-scoring States in 2015 in three areas – reducing breast cancer … Access the online State Snapshots for quality information on all 50 States and the District of Columbia … https://nhqrnet.ahrq.gov/inhqrdr/state/select TOP-PERFORMING STATES: HIGHEST PERCENTAGE OF HOSPICE … ALWAYS GOT HELP FROM CARE TEAMS 78% MAINE NEW 80% RHODE ISLAND 76% HAMPSHIRE TOP-PERFORMING STATES … RECEIVED BLOOD CLOT PREVENTION MEDICATION 98% 98% RHODE ISLAND WISCONSIN 97% TOP-PERFORMING STATES
  4. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/design_plan_for_chipra.pdf
    July 01, 2012 - Six of these States received grants to work in multi-State collaborations, bringing the number of States … 42 percent of all children under 18 years of age in the United States. … with those of non-participating States … Comparison States may include the eight CHIPRA-funded States that are not participating in Category … A, as well as States with no CHIPRA quality demonstration funding.
  5. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/publications/files/chipra-final-report_0.pdf
    February 21, 2016 - Three States did not request an extension. Table 1. … • States had a difficult time producing core measures that require EHR data because most States, … • Eight States developed strategies for reporting quality measures to CMS, and all of the States … We also offered States evaluation-focused TA. … Of the 12 PCMH States, we excluded from our planned analysis the States that did not agree to recruit
  6. www.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/demostates/nc.html
    March 01, 2019 - reports from the National Evaluation: Evaluation Highlight No. 1 : How are CHIPRA demonstration States … Evaluation Highlight No. 2 : How are States and evaluators measuring medical homeness in the CHIPRA Quality … Evaluation Highlight No . 3: How are CHIPRA Quality Demonstration States working to improve adolescent … Evaluation Highlight 11 : How are CHIPRA quality demonstration States using quality reports to drive … Article: Nine States’ Use of Collaboratives to Improve Children’s Health Care Quality in Medicaid and
  7. www.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/demostates/fl.html
    March 01, 2019 - Evaluation Highlight No. 6 : How are CHIPRA quality demonstration States working together to improve … Evaluation Highlight No. 11 : How are CHIPRA quality demonstration States using quality reports to drive … Evaluation Highlight No. 12: How are CHIPRA quality demonstration States improving perinatal care? … Article: Nine States’ Use of Collaboratives to Improve Children’s Health Care Quality in Medicaid and … What are the key lessons from Florida's experience that would be useful for other States?
  8. www.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/highlight04.html
    October 01, 2013 - In February 2010, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) awarded 10 grants, funding 18 States … The 18 demonstration States are implementing 51 projects in five general categories: Using quality … States that are trying to focus attention and resources on child and adolescent health issues. … Key messages from these States include: States have aligned their efforts with—and used their CHIPRA … State of the States: laying the foundation for health reform.
  9. www.ahrq.gov/news/newsroom/case-studies/index.html?page=29
    December 01, 2009 - Topic(s): Policy, Quality of Care Geographic Location: Wyoming Country: United States of America … Chronic Conditions, Policy, Patient Self-Management Geographic Location: Kansas Country: United States … Chronic Conditions, Policy, Patient Self-Management Geographic Location: Montana Country: United States … Topic(s): Policy, Medicaid, Disparities Geographic Location: Oregon Country: United States of America … Topic(s): Policy, Quality of Care Geographic Location: Tennessee Country: United States of America
  10. www.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/evaluate-more/index.html
    March 01, 2019 - grant program—the largest evaluation of child health care quality currently underway in the United States … Top of Page Evaluation Objectives As described elsewhere, 18 States implemented 52 projects in 5 … Determine the extent to which collaborations among States contributed to the success of the demonstration … with those of non-participating States. … This document describes the evaluation design based on information provided by the States in February
  11. www.ahrq.gov/ncepcr/funding/grants/impact/tools/index.html
    February 01, 2017 - These grants supported model initiatives in four States (Pennsylvania, New Mexico, North Carolina, and … agents to assist with primary care transformation efforts statewide and were then spread to partner States … Web page Model States: NM, NC, OK, PA National Academy for State Health Policy Select … Web site All model and partner States: NM, NC, OK, PA, KS, KY, OR, ID, MD, MT, WV, AR, MO, CO, … Carolina model and the strategies that the States implemented to overcome those challenges.
  12. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/publications/files/finalsummary.pdf
    February 21, 2016 - Expert Panel who provided sage advice over the years; staff and stakeholders at the demonstration States … Most States have not yet demonstrated widespread use of EHR data for calculating quality measures. … Physicians in demonstration States used quality reports for QI at about the same rate as physicians … • States may not be able to produce measures that require EHR data because States and health systems … Nonetheless, some States successfully implemented focused IT applications.
  13. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/finalsummary.pdf
    February 21, 2016 - Expert Panel who provided sage advice over the years; staff and stakeholders at the demonstration States … Most States have not yet demonstrated widespread use of EHR data for calculating quality measures. … Physicians in demonstration States used quality reports for QI at about the same rate as physicians … • States may not be able to produce measures that require EHR data because States and health systems … Nonetheless, some States successfully implemented focused IT applications.
  14. www.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/childhealth/index.html
    March 01, 2019 - Using the Core Set of Quality Measures Ten demonstration States are using the core set of quality … their strategies and lessons learned: Evaluation Highlight No. 1: How are CHIPRA demonstration States … State health policy agendas Evaluation Highlight No. 5: How are the CHIPRA Quality Demonstration States … Evaluation Highlight 11 : How are CHIPRA quality demonstration States using quality reports to drive … Some States are using grant funds to support the collection and reporting of the entire core set; some
  15. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pqmp/measures/duration/chipra-153-section-8a.pdf
    January 01, 2011 - However, states and programs do not have consistent reporting standards when contributing to MAX. … Some states do not report enrollment data, and none reports claims for their state funded (S-CHIP) … In states that do not report S-CHIP enrollment to MAX, we must assess only the Medicaid and M-CHIP … Of the 43 states we analyzed, 18 states reported S-CHIP data to MAX. … , we treated states that only had M-CHIP programs, for which we have complete data, as states that
  16. www.ahrq.gov/news/newsroom/case-studies/index.html?page=0
    February 01, 2024 - Curriculum, Patient Safety Learning Labs, Quality of Care Geographic Location: Virginia Country: United States … Ethnic Minorities, Quality of Care, Rural Health Geographic Location: New Mexico Country: United States … , Quality of Care, Surveys on Patient Safety Culture Geographic Location: Georgia Country: United States … Care, Quality of Care, Rural Health, Screening Geographic Location: Pennsylvania Country: United States … North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, Wisconsin Country: United States
  17. www.ahrq.gov/news/newsroom/case-studies/index.html
    July 01, 2024 - Safety, Quality of Care, Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Geographic Location: New Mexico Country: United States … Ethnic Minorities, Quality of Care, Rural Health Geographic Location: New Mexico Country: United States … , Quality of Care, Surveys on Patient Safety Culture Geographic Location: Georgia Country: United States … Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care Geographic Location: Michigan Country: United States … Care, Quality of Care, Rural Health, Screening Geographic Location: Pennsylvania Country: United States
  18. www.ahrq.gov/news/newsroom/case-studies/index.html?page=24
    January 01, 2011 - Quality of Care, Education: Patient and Caregiver Geographic Location: National Country: United States … KT-CQuiPS-57 AHRQ Product(s): Asthma Return-on-Investment Calculator, Quality Diagnostic Tools for States … USPSTF) Topic(s): Education: Curriculum, Prevention Geographic Location: Montana Country: United States … AHRQ Product(s): TeamSTEPPS® Topic(s): Patient Safety Geographic Location: Iowa Country: United States … Directors Learning Network Topic(s): Policy, Medicaid Geographic Location: Texas Country: United States
  19. www.ahrq.gov/news/newsroom/case-studies/index.html?page=31
    May 01, 2009 - KT-CDOM-12 AHRQ Product(s): Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Quality Diagnostic Tools for States … Topic(s): Policy, Medicaid Geographic Location: Iowa Country: United States of America Implementer … Policy, Chronic Conditions, Respiratory Conditions Geographic Location: New York Country: United States … Utilization Project (HCUP) Topic(s): Quality of Care Geographic Location: Kentucky Country: United States … (s): Chronic Conditions, Patient Self-Management Geographic Location: New Jersey Country: United States
  20. www.ahrq.gov/news/newsroom/case-studies/index.html?page=25
    December 01, 2010 - Policy, Women, Medication, Behavioral Health Geographic Location: Massachusetts Country: United States … Topic(s): Policy, Quality of Care Geographic Location: Connecticut Country: United States of America … &M Topic(s): Patient Safety, Education: Curriculum Geographic Location: National Country: United States … Topic(s): Policy, Quality of Care Geographic Location: Maine, Tennessee Country: United States of … America Implementer: States of Maine and Tennessee Date: October 2010 Nevada Uses AHRQ Tool

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: