Results

Total Results: 1,347 records

Showing results for "standard".

  1. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary25/folic-acid-to-prevent-neural-tube-defects-preventive-medication-2009
    May 15, 2009 - We used standard USPSTF methodology on internal and external validity to quality-rate the articles for … , interprets reference standard independently of screening test, reliability of test assessed, has few … , interprets reference standard independent of screening test, moderate sample size (50-100 subjects) … , interprets reference standard independently of screening test, reliability of test assessed, has few … , interprets reference standard independently of screening test, moderate sample size (50-100 subjects
  2. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/sites/default/files/file/supporting_documents/cvd-prevention-electrocardiography-screening-news-bulletin.pdf
    June 12, 2018 - reviewed evidence on whether adding ECG, a test that records the activity of a person’s heart, to the standard … Based on the evidence, The Task Force recommends against adding ECG screening to standard risk assessments … also found that there is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against adding ECG screening to standard
  3. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/y6xRBv7uSZY5bGCx7y48x7
    May 01, 2009 - We used standard USPSTF methodology on internal and external validity to quality- rate the articles for … , interprets reference standard independently of screening test, reliability of test assessed, has few … , interprets reference standard independent of screening test, moderate sample size (50–100 subjects) … , performed regardless of test results Reference standard interpreted independently of screening test … , interprets reference standard independently of screening test, moderate sample size (50–100 subjects
  4. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/announcements/public-comment-draft-research-plan-medication-reduce-risk-breast-cancer
    January 31, 2024 - Note the public comment period has been expanded from the standard four weeks to five weeks to account
  5. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/announcements/public-comment-draft-recommendation-statement-and-draft-evidence-review-screening-syphilis-pregnancy
    December 23, 2024 - Note the public comment period has been expanded from the standard four weeks to five weeks to account
  6. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/announcements/public-comment-draft-recommendation-statement-draft-evidence-review-and-draft-modeling-report-screening-cervical-cancer
    January 13, 2025 - Note the public comment period has been expanded from the standard four weeks to five weeks to account
  7. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-research-plan/hypertension-in-adults-screening
    October 04, 2018 - during a single encounter as initial screening for high blood pressure compared with the reference standard … measurement in adults who initially screen positive for high blood pressure compared with the reference standard … Within-class comparative effectiveness of devices (e.g., automated vs. automated; random zero vs. standard
  8. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/announcements/public-comment-draft-research-plan-screening-syphilis-pregnant-persons
    January 04, 2023 - Note the public comment period has been expanded from the standard four weeks to five weeks to account
  9. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspstf/announcements/public-comment-draft-research-plan-anal-cancer-screening
    January 11, 2023 - Note the public comment period has been expanded from the standard four weeks to five weeks to account
  10. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/announcements/screening-hpylori-infection-draft-research-plan-comment
    December 21, 2022 - Note the public comment period has been expanded from the standard four weeks to five weeks to account
  11. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/announcements/public-comment-draft-research-plan-prep-hiv-prevention
    December 08, 2021 - Note: the public comment period has been extended from the standard four weeks to five weeks to account
  12. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/announcements/public-comment-draft-research-plan-screening-obstructive-sleep-apnea-adults
    January 20, 2021 - The public comment period has been expanded from its standard four weeks to five weeks to account for
  13. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/announcements/public-comment-draft-research-plan-screening-syphilis-infection-nonpregnant-adolescents-and-adults-0
    December 23, 2020 - The public comment period has been expanded from its standard four weeks to five weeks to account for
  14. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/draft-research-plan/hypertension-in-adults-screening
    June 07, 2018 - during a single encounter as initial screening for high blood pressure compared with the reference standard … measurement in adults who initially screen positive for high blood pressure compared with the reference standard … Within-class comparative effectiveness of devices (e.g., automated vs. automated; random zero vs. standard
  15. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-evidence-summary11/carotid-artery-stenosis-screening-december-2007
    December 15, 2007 - Quality evaluations of articles for all key questions were performed by using standard USPSTF methods … A recent good-quality systematic review that used comprehensive data sources and a standard appraisal … Medical management included the standard risk factor management at the time of the trials, including … ; interprets reference standard independently of screening test; reliability of test assessed; has few … ; interprets reference standard independently of screening test; reliability of test assessed; has few
  16. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/announcements/public-comment-draft-recommendation-statement-and-draft-evidence-review-vitamin-d-and-calcium-supplementation-prevent-falls-and
    January 21, 2025 - Please note the public comment period has been expanded from the standard four weeks to five weeks to
  17. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/article/prostate-cancer-screening-2008
    August 05, 2008 - ; interprets reference standard independently of screening test; reliability of test assessed; has few … ; interprets reference standard independent of screening test; moderate sample size (50–100 participants … ; screening test improperly administered; biased ascertainment of reference standard; very small sample … ; interprets reference standard independently of screening test; reliability of test assessed; has few … ; screening test improperly administered; biased ascertainment of reference standard; very small sample
  18. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/NhXnjZM5ubvygH5GrqDZHC
    August 01, 2008 - ; interprets reference standard independently of screening test; reliability of test assessed; has few … ; screening test improperly administered; biased ascertainment of reference standard; very small sample … , performed regardless of test results Reference standard interpreted independently of screening test … ; interprets reference standard independently of screening test; reliability of test assessed; has few … ; screening test improperly administered; biased ascertainment of reference standard; very small sample
  19. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-research-plan105/latent-tuberculosis-infection-screening
    September 25, 2014 - because of underlying immunosuppression and for whom LTBI screening and treatment would be part of standard … screening in patients at the highest risk for progression from LTBI to active TB disease is part of standard … comparisons with screening tests or treatments not being evaluated in this review KQ 2: No referent standard … also removed any indication of a preferential order of sequential testing or of TST as a reference standard … , as there is no gold standard test for LTBI.
  20. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/final-research-plan15/depression-in-children-and-adolescents-screening
    September 15, 2013 - KQs 1, 3, 4: Screened vs. unscreened KQ 2: Screening instrument vs. gold standard … reported at 6-week followup or later KQ 2: Diagnostic accuracy compared with an independent standard … weeks following screening or treatment KQ 2: Diagnostic accuracy compared with an independent standard … since 2011 Criteria specific to KQ 2: Test/retest studies (test compared with gold standard … Does not report sensitivity and specificity compared with an independently assessed criterion standard

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: