Results

Total Results: 7,004 records

Showing results for "size".

  1. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2024-12/karsh-report.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - Based on availability and desired focus group size, the physicians were divided into two focus groups
  2. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2024-03/strom2-report.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - Results: The final sample size of 910 was composed of 220 cases and 690 controls.
  3. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/hais/tools/surgery/modules/implementation/imp_learn_from_defects.pptx
    December 01, 2017 - Outline your data collection and audit plans: the frequency of the collection or the audit and the sample size
  4. JAMA (pdf file)

    www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/WN7F3WW6RQFDkHay87a3Dx
    November 18, 2020 - decreasing sensitivity.21 The other 2 studies found that use of I-ELCAP criteria (increase in nodule size
  5. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/-hnLT26c2NHs6thK9yznPF
    July 01, 2002 - were double-blinded, used concealed allocation to intervention and control groups, based their study size
  6. digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/r01hs024713-adelman-final-report-2023.pdf
    January 01, 2023 - versus post-implementation of patient photos in the EHR.12 This study was limited by small sample size
  7. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb232-Hepatitis-C-Hospital-Stays-Trends.pdf
    June 19, 2017 - The vast size of the NIS allows the study of topics at the national and regional levels for specific
  8. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary/breast-cancer-medications-for-risk-reduction-2002
    May 06, 2002 - were double-blinded, used concealed allocation to intervention and control groups, based their study size
  9. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/asc/Part-I-SOPS-ASC-DatabaseReport.pdf
    December 01, 2021 - Statistical significance is greatly influenced by sample size; as the number of observations in comparison
  10. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/asc/part-i-asc_database_report-rev091721.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - Statistical significance is greatly influenced by sample size; as the number of observations in comparison
  11. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/2019-pharmacy-sops-database-report-parti-rev091721.pdf
    January 01, 2019 - Statistical significance is greatly influenced by sample size; as the number of observations in comparison
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/people-with-disabilities-protocol.pdf
    January 16, 2024 - abstracted into Excel tables, including elements such as: study design, year, setting, country, sample size
  13. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/statbriefs/sb207-Sports-Hospital-Emergency-Department-2013.jsp
    July 01, 2016 - The vast size of the NIS allows the study of topics at the national and regional levels for specific
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/procalcitonin_executive.pdf
    October 01, 2012 - was judged insufficient to make conclusions on mortality and morbidity because of the small study size
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/juvenile-arthritis-dmards_surveillance.pdf
    March 14, 2013 - change in statistical significance (from nonsignificant to significant) B2 A change in relative effect size
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/juvenile-arthritis-dmards_surveillance.pdf
    March 14, 2013 - change in statistical significance (from nonsignificant to significant) B2 A change in relative effect size
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/rheumatoid-arthritis-medicine_surveillance.pdf
    March 01, 2013 - in statistical significance (from nonsignificant to significant) B2 A change in relative effect size
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/rheumatoid-arthritis-medicine_surveillance.pdf
    March 01, 2013 - in statistical significance (from nonsignificant to significant) B2 A change in relative effect size
  19. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2008_05.pdf
    January 01, 2008 - location, which includes gradations of metropolitan, micropolitan, and non-core counties by population size
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/breast-abnormalities-tests-update_surveillance.pdf
    September 01, 2012 - in statistical significance (from nonsignificant to significant) B2 A change in relative effect size