-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/undescended-testicle_disposition-comments.pdf
December 11, 2012 - Peer Reviewer #3 Introduction This report does not deal with ascending testes (secondary or acquired … gradually emerged
that testes that are operated on later in childhood have progressively
more severe secondary
-
www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/publications/files/confidreportguide_1.pdf
March 01, 2016 - vi
A secondary aim is to foster discussion among report developers, the broader quality
improvement … a report before release, be it via cognitive or semistructured interviews or focus groups,
has a secondary … documentation available as
online appendixes.
28 Confidential Physician Feedback Reports
A secondary
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/reports/2002niscomparisonrpt.jsp
June 01, 2016 - the NHDS was as follows: if a symptom appeared as a first-listed code and a diagnosis appeared as a secondary … If a symptom appeared as a first-listed code and a diagnosis was listed as a secondary code, the diagnosis … NIS records to MedPAR data, only the NIS discharges for which Medicare was the expected primary or secondary … For example, when a symptom appeared as the first-listed code, the NHDS re-assigned the symptom as a secondary … both fee-for-service and managed care) for which Medicare was the expected payer (either primary or secondary
-
www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/document/evidence-summary/human-immunodeficiency-virus-hiv-infection-screening-2005
July 05, 2005 - these studies found that the cost-effectiveness improved to $15,000 per quality-adjusted life-year when secondary … lower than seen in the general population. 242 The other study, which did not directly incorporate secondary … The study by Sanders and colleagues found that the model was sensitive to the effects of screening on secondary … Sexual risk behaviors and implications for secondary HIV transmission during and after HIV seroconversion … † Includes studies of secondary prophylaxis.
Return to Table of Contents
Table 3.
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/MaskedStats_NIS_2020_Core_Weighted_V2.PDF
January 01, 2020 - Distribution for DRG_NOPOA
DRG_NoPOA Frequency
Percent
of Total
846: CHEMOTHERAPY WITHOUT ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY … DIAGNOSIS WITH MCC 15,690 0.05%
847: CHEMOTHERAPY WITHOUT ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS WITH … CC 73,305 0.23%
848: CHEMOTHERAPY WITHOUT ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS WITHOUT
CC/MCC
2,715
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/MaskedStats_NIS_2022_Core_Weighted.PDF
January 01, 2022 - DIFFERENT NEOPLASTIC DIAG WITHOUT
CC/MCC
1,015 0.00%
846: CHEMOTHERAPY WITHOUT ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY … DIAGNOSIS WITH MCC 17,710 0.05%
847: CHEMOTHERAPY WITHOUT ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS WITH … CC 68,550 0.21%
848: CHEMOTHERAPY WITHOUT ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS WITHOUT
CC/MCC
2,325
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/MaskedStats_NIS_2021_Core_Weighted.PDF
January 01, 2021 - POORLY DIFFERENT NEOPLASTIC DIAG WITHOUT
CC/MCC
985 0.00%
846: CHEMOTHERAPY WITHOUT ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY … DIAGNOSIS WITH MCC 16,170 0.05%
847: CHEMOTHERAPY WITHOUT ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS WITH … CC 72,325 0.22%
848: CHEMOTHERAPY WITHOUT ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS WITHOUT
CC/MCC
2,285
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/MaskedStats_NIS_2018_Core_Weighted.PDF
January 01, 2018 - MYELOPROLIF DIS OR POORLY DIFF NEOPL DIAG W/O CC/MCC 1,440 0.00%
846: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY … DIAGNOSIS W MCC 17,880 0.05%
847: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS W CC 82,390 … Distribution for DRG_NOPOA
DRG_NoPOA Frequency
Percent
of Total
848: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/MaskedStats_NIS_2018_Core.PDF
January 01, 2018 - MYELOPROLIF DIS OR POORLY DIFF NEOPL DIAG W/O CC/MCC 288 0.00%
846: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY … DIAGNOSIS W MCC 3,576 0.05%
847: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS W CC 16,478 … Distribution for DRG_NOPOA
DRG_NoPOA Frequency
Percent
of Total
848: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/tools/stats/MaskedStats_NIS_2019_Core_Weighted_V2.PDF
January 01, 2019 - MYELOPROLIF DIS OR POORLY DIFF NEOPL DIAG W/O CC/MCC 1,440 0.00%
846: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY … DIAGNOSIS W MCC 16,000 0.05%
847: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS W CC 83,400 … 0.24%
848: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS W/O CC/MCC 3,660 0.01%
849: RADIOTHERAPY
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nrd/stats/MaskedStats_NRD_2017_Core_Weighted.PDF
January 01, 2017 - MYELOPROLIF DIS OR POORLY DIFF NEOPL DIAG W/O CC/MCC 1,568 0.00%
846: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY … DIAGNOSIS W MCC 17,375 0.05%
847: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS W CC 84,355 … 0.24%
848: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS W/O CC/MCC 4,125 0.01%
849: RADIOTHERAPY
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nrd/stats/MaskedStats_NRD_2021_Core_Weighted.PDF
January 01, 2021 - POORLY DIFFERENT NEOPLASTIC DIAG WITHOUT
CC/MCC
974 0.00%
846: CHEMOTHERAPY WITHOUT ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY … DIAGNOSIS WITH MCC 16,176 0.05%
847: CHEMOTHERAPY WITHOUT ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS WITH … CC 70,935 0.21%
848: CHEMOTHERAPY WITHOUT ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS WITHOUT CC/MCC 1,992
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nrd/stats/MaskedStats_NRD_2016_Core_Weighted.PDF
January 01, 2016 - MYELOPROLIF DIS OR POORLY DIFF NEOPL DIAG W/O CC/MCC 1,780 0.00%
846: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY … DIAGNOSIS W MCC 15,715 0.04%
847: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS W CC 91,259 … 0.26%
848: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS W/O CC/MCC 5,525 0.02%
849: RADIOTHERAPY
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nrd/stats/MaskedStats_NRD_2018_Core_Weighted.PDF
January 01, 2018 - MYELOPROLIF DIS OR POORLY DIFF NEOPL DIAG W/O CC/MCC 1,409 0.00%
846: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY … DIAGNOSIS
W MCC
17,029 0.05%
847: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS
W CC
79,179 … 0.22%
848: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS
W/O CC/MCC
3,586 0.01%
849: RADIOTHERAPY
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/kid/tools/stats/KID_2019_MaskedStats_Core_Weighted_V2.PDF
January 01, 2019 - MYELOPROLIF DIS OR POORLY DIFF NEOPL DIAG W/O CC/MCC 87 0.00%
846: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY … DIAGNOSIS W MCC 3,806 0.06%
847: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS W CC 24,869 … 0.42%
848: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS W/O CC/MCC 1,423 0.02%
849: RADIOTHERAPY
-
hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/kid/tools/stats/KID_2016_MaskedStats_Core_Weighted.PDF
January 01, 2016 - MYELOPROLIF DIS OR POORLY DIFF NEOPL DIAG W/O CC/MCC 129 0.00%
846: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY … DIAGNOSIS W MCC 3,680 0.06%
847: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS W CC 27,214 … 0.43%
848: CHEMOTHERAPY W/O ACUTE LEUKEMIA AS SECONDARY DIAGNOSIS W/O CC/MCC 1,956 0.03%
849: RADIOTHERAPY
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/high-cholestorol-medicines-update_disposition-comments.pdf
September 01, 2014 - has been reported,
there are approaches to identification of the
highest risk individuals even in secondary … Statins
do not address these secondary goals, and
combination therapies have been shown to be
useful … added combo therapy have not shown “hard”
endpoint benefit, but have been seen as
effective for secondary
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/Health_IT_and_Safety_070910_comp.pdf
July 13, 2010 - of time spent
on medication administration did not
change after barcode/eMAR
implementation
• Secondary
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/telehealth-slides-06092020.pdf
June 09, 2020 - Primary outcome was the psychiatrist-completed Clinical Global
Impressions (CGI) severity (6 months)
• Secondary
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/radiotherapy-proton-beam_research.pdf
May 01, 2012 - )
Conditions of possible
benefit (Group 2)
Intraocular melanomas
Benign or malignant primary and secondary