Results

Total Results: 58 records

Showing results for "scenarios".

21. Microsoft Word - covtoc.doc (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/APS-DRGsV20DefinitionsManual.pdf
    January 13, 2015 - The resulting CMS model recognized three different severity- adjustment scenarios. … Each CDRG was severity-adjusted using one of the following scenarios: VERSION 20.0 APS-DRG® DEFINITIONS

22. Microsoft Word - APS_DRG_Def_Public_V211.doc (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/APS-DRGs%20V21%20Definitions%20Manual.pdf
    January 13, 2015 - The resulting CMS model recognized three different severity- adjustment scenarios. … Each CDRG was severity-adjusted using one of the following scenarios: VERSION 21.0 APS-DRG® DEFINITIONS

23. ___APS-Def_Public.book (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/APS-Def_Public_v24.pdf
    March 01, 2008 - The resulting CMS model recognized three different severity- adjustment scenarios. … Each CDRG was severity-adjusted using one of the following scenarios: S-DRGs® Definitions Manual 5

24. ___APS-Def_Public.book (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/APS-DRGs%20V23%20Definitions%20Manual.pdf
    August 01, 2006 - The resulting CMS model recognized three different severity- adjustment scenarios. … Each CDRG was severity-adjusted using one of the following scenarios: S-DRGs® Definitions Manual 5

25. Finalreport100109 (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/datainnovations/clinicaldata/Finalreport100109.pdf
    October 01, 2009 - held in Rochester Minnesota pertaining specifically to POA coding history, definitions and case study scenarios

26. Adding Clinical Data to Statewide Administrative Data: Pilot Projects - Final Report
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/datainnovations/clinicaldata/Finalreport100109.jsp
    July 01, 2016 - held in Rochester Minnesota pertaining specifically to POA coding history, definitions and case study scenarios

27. ___APS-Def_Public.book (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/APS-DRGs%20V22%20Definitions%20Manual.pdf
    April 01, 2006 - The resulting CMS model recognized three different severity- adjustment scenarios. … Each CDRG was severity-adjusted using one of the following scenarios: rsion 22 APS-DRGs® Definitions

28. Ahrqfinalreportvhi (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/datainnovations/clinicaldata/AHRQFINALREPORTVHI.pdf
    December 01, 2009 - incorporated the POA indicator into the AHRQ quality indicator software and provided before-after POA scenarios

29. MS2019-04 (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2019-04.pdf
    January 01, 2019 - Across all example counties, for both scenarios (ED visits involving diabetes and inpatient stays for

30. 2017-01 (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2017-01.pdf
    January 01, 2017 - is an overview of the primary issues and not intended to be a comprehensive account of all possible scenarios

31. Microsoft Word - POA Methods 11_01.doc (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2011_05.pdf
    January 01, 2011 - of DRG assignments that would change and consequent payment differences were calculated based on scenarios

32. HCUP_methods_series_cover.ai (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2005_02.pdf
    January 01, 2005 - • One HCUP Partner accepts zero charge records in three specific scenarios: (1) patients registered

33. Microsoft Word - CaseforPOAIndicator_final_060806 _2_.doc (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2007_02.pdf
    January 01, 2007 - However, to assess the impact of changing the stratification variables, we examined two scenarios using

34. User Guide (v2025.1) for Elixhauser Comorbidity Software Refined for ICD-10-CM (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/comorbidityicd10/CMR-User-Guide-v2025-1.pdf
    November 01, 2024 - A comorbidity of cerebrovascular disease (CMR_CBVD = 1) is indicated by one of the following scenarios

35. Icd-10 Dxccs Trends112817 (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/datainnovations/ICD-10_DXCCS_Trends112817.pdf
    November 28, 2017 - Recommended Citation: Moore BJ, McDermott KW, Elixhauser A. ICD-10-CM Diagnosis Coding in HCUP Data: Comparisons With ICD-9-CM and Precautions for Trend Analyses. ONLINE. November 28, 2017. U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/datainnovations/icd10_resources.…

36. THE HCUP NATIONWIDE READMISSIONS DATABASE (NRD), 2013
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nrd/NRD_Introduction_2013.jsp
    January 01, 2013 - The different scenarios described below detail how we combined different types of information:

37. 2006 05 Nistrendsreport 1988-2004A (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/2006_05_NISTrendsReport_1988-2004A.pdf
    January 01, 2006 - Variables (1998) To assess the impact of changing the stratification variables, we examined two scenarios

38. HCUP_methods_series_cover.ai (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/reports/methods/TrendReport2005_1.pdf
    March 19, 2004 - However, to assess the impact of changing the stratification variables, we examined two scenarios using

39. Introduction to the NRD, 2022 (pdf file)
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nrd/NRDIntroduction2022.pdf
    December 01, 2024 - The different scenarios described below detail how different types of information were combined:

40. THE HCUP NATIONWIDE READMISSIONS DATABASE (NRD), 2014
    hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nrd/NRD_Introduction_2010-2014.jsp
    January 01, 2014 - The different scenarios described below detail how we combined different types of information: