-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/quality-gap-palliative-hospice_research-protocol.pdf
June 27, 2011 - Abstract screening: Each title and abstract is reviewed by two independent reviewers. … Review of Key Questions
For all EPC reviews, key questions will be reviewed and refined as needed … Panel (TEP) to assure that the questions are specific and explicit
about what information is being reviewed … They have not reviewed the report,
except as given the opportunity to do so through the public review
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/rapid-response-cardio-dental.pdf
July 01, 2023 - peer-reviewed literature and professional guidelines from the last 50 years
to identify research and … One team member reviewed each title and abstract. … Each study
included at the abstract review stage was then reviewed in full text to determine its final … All results of these searches were reviewed at the title/abstract level, and any
potentially relevant … guidelines were then reviewed at the full-text level by one reviewer.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/stroke-afib-update_research-protocol-amended.pdf
October 27, 2017 - For each study, one investigator will assess methodological
quality which will be reviewed by a second … Because contextual questions are not reviewed using systematic review methodology,
formal data synthesis … The workshops reviewed
scoping for the updated review, prioritization of key questions, a discussion … They have not
reviewed the report, except as given the opportunity to do so through the peer or public … The AHRQ Task Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for
Source: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/renal-artery-stenosis_appendixes.pdf
April 01, 2005 - Peer Reviewers
Peer Reviewers
We gratefully acknowledge the following individuals who reviewed
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guide-editorial_methods.pdf
July 01, 2012 - Two deputy editors from the Journal (GS and CU) reviewed the peer and
public review comments, and author
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/tinnitus_disposition-comments.pdf
August 23, 2013 - A
large number of peer reviewed articles (9,725) were reviewed but
following exclusions, only 52 eligible … The technical expert panel reviewed our search
strategy. … The strategy was then reviewed and
approved by the investigative team that
conducted this comparative … The search
strategy was developed by an experienced
medical librarian and reviewed by the technical … Our conclusions flow directly from our review of
the evidence, which was based on methods
reviewed
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-201-indoor-allergen-asthma-disposition-comments.pdf
February 15, 2018 - We
carefully reviewed the information
contained in the Scientific Information
Package while conducting … TEP Reviewer 2
Results There are some studies that I didn't see included as
reviewed:
-Shirai: … The Butz study was reviewed and
excluded because it focuses on
tobacco smoke as an inhaled irritant … We reviewed and excluded the study
by Butz because it focuses on
tobacco smoke as an inhaled irritant … This
long-term history presents its own
challenge, because some of the
studies we reviewed include
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mental-illness-heart_executive.pdf
April 01, 2013 - feedback
on an initial draft of the review protocol, which was then
refined based on their input, reviewed … The reference lists for these articles were manually
reviewed and cross-referenced against our library … At the full-text screening
stage, two investigators independently reviewed each
article to determine … gray literature, the above-described procedures were
modified such that a single screener initially reviewed … One investigator abstracted the data, and
the second reviewed the article and the accompanying
completed
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/coronary-artery-stenting_executive.pdf
February 01, 2013 - Data Extraction
Each study extraction was conducted by one investigator
and reviewed by at least one … Applicability
Reviewed studies were conducted in tertiary care centers
and were carried out mostly … The majority of the patients in these studies
were men, and the reviewed studies specifically excluded … Most IVUS trials (seven of nine RCTs)
reviewed were performed before 2000. … The reporting
of timing of intravascular diagnostic technique application
in reviewed studies was often
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/cultural-competence_research-protocol.pdf
July 09, 2014 - Search results will be downloaded to EndNote.6 Titles and abstracts will be reviewed
by two independent … Evidence
tables will be reviewed and verified for accuracy by a second investigator. … Key Informants are not involved in
analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed … They have not reviewed the report, except as
given the opportunity to do so through the peer or public … The Task Order
Officer reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to contract requirements and
quality
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/menopause-protocol-130612.pdf
June 12, 2013 - b Bibliographies of meta-analyses and systematic reviews will be reviewed for any trials not identified … For identified citations, the full text will be reviewed in the same fashion to determine their
inclusion … Review of Key Questions
For all EPC reviews, key questions were reviewed and refined as needed by … Key Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not
reviewed … The Task
Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to contract requirements and quality
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/kidney-stone-prevention_disposition-comments.pdf
July 26, 2012 - We reviewed
titles/abstracts of all publications by Tiselius
HG that included any of several MESH terms … The issue of fluid intake may be
related to lower target urine volumes in the studies reviewed. … We re-reviewed our
assessments for individual study quality. … We re-reviewed
the quality ratings for each study. … We re-reviewed the strength of evidence
ratings throughout the report.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/cancer-decision-support-tools_research-protocol.pdf
November 12, 2013 - The
extracted data will be reviewed and confirmed by at least one other team member (data
verification … Review of Key Questions
For all EPC reviews, key questions were reviewed and refined as needed by the … and the TEP to assure that the questions are specific
and explicit about what information is being reviewed … Key Informants are not involved in
analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed … The Task Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to
contract requirements and quality
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/infantile-hemangioma_research-protocol.pdf
December 23, 2014 - Two team members independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of
the non-English language literature … All searches will be created by an expert librarian and reviewed by a second expert librarian. … Each abstract will be reviewed by at least two members of the
investigative team. … Each article will be
reviewed by at least two members of the investigative team. … Key
Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not
reviewed
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/rapid-reviews-end-user_white-paper.pdf
April 01, 2016 - Two research assistants analyzed content of the
transcripts, and two investigators independently reviewed … Two investigators with qualitative experience
independently reviewed all transcripts and verified themes … To ensure reliability
of the coding structure, all themes and subthemes were reviewed with the larger … Many are not published in traditional peer-reviewed sources, indexed in bibliographic
databases, or
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/abnormal-uterine-bleeding_research-protocol.pdf
November 21, 2011 - Review of Key Questions
The Key Questions were reviewed and refined by the EPC with input from Key … Panel (TEP) to assure that the questions are specific
and explicit about what information is being reviewed … Key Informants are not involved in
analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed … Technical Experts do not do analysis of any
kind nor contribute to the writing of the report and have not reviewed … The
Task Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to contract
requirements, including
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/restless-legs_disposition-comments.pdf
November 27, 2012 - Methods Consider evaluation of additional ropinirole studies – please see
enclosed responses
We have reviewed … We have reviewed and included our data in the report. … Overall the results were presented
and reviewed in a manner which was logical. … We reviewed and included outcomes from eligible studies of
gabapentin enacarbil. … No place for this in a scientific report)
We have reviewed, clarified and stand by the general
context
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-193-naloxone-executive-summary.pdf
November 01, 2017 - representatives of federal
agencies involved in naloxone or opioid overdose research
(CDC, NIDA, SAMHSA), and reviewed … Study Selection and Data Extraction
Abstracts were reviewed by two investigators to identify
studies … Two investigators then
independently reviewed all full-text articles for final
inclusion. … All
data abstractions were reviewed by a second investigator
for accuracy. … identified through
searches and other sources:* 1,934
Excluded abstracts: 1,732
Full-text articles reviewed
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/assessing-applicability.ppt
January 01, 2009 - Applicability issues do not have to be reviewed for each study. … Unlike benefits and harms data, applicability data do not have to be reviewed systematically. … of factors that are most likely to influence applicability of evidence for the specific issue being reviewed … of factors that are most likely to influence applicability of evidence for the specific issue being reviewed … Next, the demographics need to be reviewed.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/assessing-applicability.ppt
January 01, 2009 - Applicability issues do not have to be reviewed for each study. … Unlike benefits and harms data, applicability data do not have to be reviewed systematically. … of factors that are most likely to influence applicability of evidence for the specific issue being reviewed … of factors that are most likely to influence applicability of evidence for the specific issue being reviewed … Next, the demographics need to be reviewed.