Results

Total Results: 2,623 records

Showing results for "reviewed".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/quality-gap-palliative-hospice_research-protocol.pdf
    June 27, 2011 - Abstract screening: Each title and abstract is reviewed by two independent reviewers. … Review of Key Questions For all EPC reviews, key questions will be reviewed and refined as needed … Panel (TEP) to assure that the questions are specific and explicit about what information is being reviewed … They have not reviewed the report, except as given the opportunity to do so through the public review
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/rapid-response-cardio-dental.pdf
    July 01, 2023 - peer-reviewed literature and professional guidelines from the last 50 years to identify research and … One team member reviewed each title and abstract. … Each study included at the abstract review stage was then reviewed in full text to determine its final … All results of these searches were reviewed at the title/abstract level, and any potentially relevant … guidelines were then reviewed at the full-text level by one reviewer.
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/stroke-afib-update_research-protocol-amended.pdf
    October 27, 2017 - For each study, one investigator will assess methodological quality which will be reviewed by a second … Because contextual questions are not reviewed using systematic review methodology, formal data synthesis … The workshops reviewed scoping for the updated review, prioritization of key questions, a discussion … They have not reviewed the report, except as given the opportunity to do so through the peer or public … The AHRQ Task Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for Source: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/renal-artery-stenosis_appendixes.pdf
    April 01, 2005 - Peer Reviewers Peer Reviewers We gratefully acknowledge the following individuals who reviewed
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guide-editorial_methods.pdf
    July 01, 2012 - Two deputy editors from the Journal (GS and CU) reviewed the peer and public review comments, and author
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/tinnitus_disposition-comments.pdf
    August 23, 2013 - A large number of peer reviewed articles (9,725) were reviewed but following exclusions, only 52 eligible … The technical expert panel reviewed our search strategy. … The strategy was then reviewed and approved by the investigative team that conducted this comparative … The search strategy was developed by an experienced medical librarian and reviewed by the technical … Our conclusions flow directly from our review of the evidence, which was based on methods reviewed
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-201-indoor-allergen-asthma-disposition-comments.pdf
    February 15, 2018 - We carefully reviewed the information contained in the Scientific Information Package while conducting … TEP Reviewer 2 Results There are some studies that I didn't see included as reviewed: -Shirai: … The Butz study was reviewed and excluded because it focuses on tobacco smoke as an inhaled irritant … We reviewed and excluded the study by Butz because it focuses on tobacco smoke as an inhaled irritant … This long-term history presents its own challenge, because some of the studies we reviewed include
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mental-illness-heart_executive.pdf
    April 01, 2013 - feedback on an initial draft of the review protocol, which was then refined based on their input, reviewed … The reference lists for these articles were manually reviewed and cross-referenced against our library … At the full-text screening stage, two investigators independently reviewed each article to determine … gray literature, the above-described procedures were modified such that a single screener initially reviewed … One investigator abstracted the data, and the second reviewed the article and the accompanying completed
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/coronary-artery-stenting_executive.pdf
    February 01, 2013 - Data Extraction Each study extraction was conducted by one investigator and reviewed by at least one … Applicability Reviewed studies were conducted in tertiary care centers and were carried out mostly … The majority of the patients in these studies were men, and the reviewed studies specifically excluded … Most IVUS trials (seven of nine RCTs) reviewed were performed before 2000. … The reporting of timing of intravascular diagnostic technique application in reviewed studies was often
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/cultural-competence_research-protocol.pdf
    July 09, 2014 - Search results will be downloaded to EndNote.6 Titles and abstracts will be reviewed by two independent … Evidence tables will be reviewed and verified for accuracy by a second investigator. … Key Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed … They have not reviewed the report, except as given the opportunity to do so through the peer or public … The Task Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to contract requirements and quality
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/menopause-protocol-130612.pdf
    June 12, 2013 - b Bibliographies of meta-analyses and systematic reviews will be reviewed for any trials not identified … For identified citations, the full text will be reviewed in the same fashion to determine their inclusion … Review of Key Questions For all EPC reviews, key questions were reviewed and refined as needed by … Key Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed … The Task Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to contract requirements and quality
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/kidney-stone-prevention_disposition-comments.pdf
    July 26, 2012 - We reviewed titles/abstracts of all publications by Tiselius HG that included any of several MESH terms … The issue of fluid intake may be related to lower target urine volumes in the studies reviewed. … We re-reviewed our assessments for individual study quality. … We re-reviewed the quality ratings for each study. … We re-reviewed the strength of evidence ratings throughout the report.
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/cancer-decision-support-tools_research-protocol.pdf
    November 12, 2013 - The extracted data will be reviewed and confirmed by at least one other team member (data verification … Review of Key Questions For all EPC reviews, key questions were reviewed and refined as needed by the … and the TEP to assure that the questions are specific and explicit about what information is being reviewed … Key Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed … The Task Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to contract requirements and quality
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/infantile-hemangioma_research-protocol.pdf
    December 23, 2014 - Two team members independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the non-English language literature … All searches will be created by an expert librarian and reviewed by a second expert librarian. … Each abstract will be reviewed by at least two members of the investigative team. … Each article will be reviewed by at least two members of the investigative team. … Key Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/rapid-reviews-end-user_white-paper.pdf
    April 01, 2016 - Two research assistants analyzed content of the transcripts, and two investigators independently reviewed … Two investigators with qualitative experience independently reviewed all transcripts and verified themes … To ensure reliability of the coding structure, all themes and subthemes were reviewed with the larger … Many are not published in traditional peer-reviewed sources, indexed in bibliographic databases, or
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/abnormal-uterine-bleeding_research-protocol.pdf
    November 21, 2011 - Review of Key Questions The Key Questions were reviewed and refined by the EPC with input from Key … Panel (TEP) to assure that the questions are specific and explicit about what information is being reviewed … Key Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed … Technical Experts do not do analysis of any kind nor contribute to the writing of the report and have not reviewed … The Task Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to contract requirements, including
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/restless-legs_disposition-comments.pdf
    November 27, 2012 - Methods Consider evaluation of additional ropinirole studies – please see enclosed responses We have reviewed … We have reviewed and included our data in the report. … Overall the results were presented and reviewed in a manner which was logical. … We reviewed and included outcomes from eligible studies of gabapentin enacarbil. … No place for this in a scientific report) We have reviewed, clarified and stand by the general context
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-193-naloxone-executive-summary.pdf
    November 01, 2017 - representatives of federal agencies involved in naloxone or opioid overdose research (CDC, NIDA, SAMHSA), and reviewed … Study Selection and Data Extraction Abstracts were reviewed by two investigators to identify studies … Two investigators then independently reviewed all full-text articles for final inclusion. … All data abstractions were reviewed by a second investigator for accuracy. … identified through searches and other sources:* 1,934 Excluded abstracts: 1,732 Full-text articles reviewed
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/assessing-applicability.ppt
    January 01, 2009 - Applicability issues do not have to be reviewed for each study. … Unlike benefits and harms data, applicability data do not have to be reviewed systematically. … of factors that are most likely to influence applicability of evidence for the specific issue being reviewed … of factors that are most likely to influence applicability of evidence for the specific issue being reviewed … Next, the demographics need to be reviewed.
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/assessing-applicability.ppt
    January 01, 2009 - Applicability issues do not have to be reviewed for each study. … Unlike benefits and harms data, applicability data do not have to be reviewed systematically. … of factors that are most likely to influence applicability of evidence for the specific issue being reviewed … of factors that are most likely to influence applicability of evidence for the specific issue being reviewed … Next, the demographics need to be reviewed.

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: