Results

Total Results: 2,618 records

Showing results for "reviewed".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/cancer-decision-support-tools_research-protocol.pdf
    November 12, 2013 - The extracted data will be reviewed and confirmed by at least one other team member (data verification … Review of Key Questions For all EPC reviews, key questions were reviewed and refined as needed by the … and the TEP to assure that the questions are specific and explicit about what information is being reviewed … Key Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed … The Task Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to contract requirements and quality
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/infantile-hemangioma_research-protocol.pdf
    December 23, 2014 - Two team members independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the non-English language literature … All searches will be created by an expert librarian and reviewed by a second expert librarian. … Each abstract will be reviewed by at least two members of the investigative team. … Each article will be reviewed by at least two members of the investigative team. … Key Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/coronary-artery-stenting_executive.pdf
    February 01, 2013 - Data Extraction Each study extraction was conducted by one investigator and reviewed by at least one … Applicability Reviewed studies were conducted in tertiary care centers and were carried out mostly … The majority of the patients in these studies were men, and the reviewed studies specifically excluded … Most IVUS trials (seven of nine RCTs) reviewed were performed before 2000. … The reporting of timing of intravascular diagnostic technique application in reviewed studies was often
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mental-illness-heart_executive.pdf
    April 01, 2013 - feedback on an initial draft of the review protocol, which was then refined based on their input, reviewed … The reference lists for these articles were manually reviewed and cross-referenced against our library … At the full-text screening stage, two investigators independently reviewed each article to determine … gray literature, the above-described procedures were modified such that a single screener initially reviewed … One investigator abstracted the data, and the second reviewed the article and the accompanying completed
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/assessing-applicability.ppt
    January 01, 2009 - Applicability issues do not have to be reviewed for each study. … Unlike benefits and harms data, applicability data do not have to be reviewed systematically. … of factors that are most likely to influence applicability of evidence for the specific issue being reviewed … of factors that are most likely to influence applicability of evidence for the specific issue being reviewed … Next, the demographics need to be reviewed.
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/abnormal-uterine-bleeding_research-protocol.pdf
    November 21, 2011 - Review of Key Questions The Key Questions were reviewed and refined by the EPC with input from Key … Panel (TEP) to assure that the questions are specific and explicit about what information is being reviewed … Key Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed … Technical Experts do not do analysis of any kind nor contribute to the writing of the report and have not reviewed … The Task Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to contract requirements, including
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-193-naloxone-executive-summary.pdf
    November 01, 2017 - representatives of federal agencies involved in naloxone or opioid overdose research (CDC, NIDA, SAMHSA), and reviewed … Study Selection and Data Extraction Abstracts were reviewed by two investigators to identify studies … Two investigators then independently reviewed all full-text articles for final inclusion. … All data abstractions were reviewed by a second investigator for accuracy. … identified through searches and other sources:* 1,934 Excluded abstracts: 1,732 Full-text articles reviewed
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/restless-legs_disposition-comments.pdf
    November 27, 2012 - Methods Consider evaluation of additional ropinirole studies – please see enclosed responses We have reviewed … We have reviewed and included our data in the report. … Overall the results were presented and reviewed in a manner which was logical. … We reviewed and included outcomes from eligible studies of gabapentin enacarbil. … No place for this in a scientific report) We have reviewed, clarified and stand by the general context
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/assessing-applicability.ppt
    January 01, 2009 - Applicability issues do not have to be reviewed for each study. … Unlike benefits and harms data, applicability data do not have to be reviewed systematically. … of factors that are most likely to influence applicability of evidence for the specific issue being reviewed … of factors that are most likely to influence applicability of evidence for the specific issue being reviewed … Next, the demographics need to be reviewed.
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/depression-treatment-ssri_research-protocol.pdf
    June 15, 2010 - The first box in the figure shows the last question (KQ5) where current guidelines are reviewed. … , and Publication types: Inclusions: Full text reports as well as unpublished literature will be reviewed … Key study elements will be reviewed by a second person (study investigator) with respect to study outcomes … For other systematic reviews, key questions submitted by partners are reviewed and refined as needed … Panel (TEP) to assure that the questions are specific and explicit about what information is being reviewed
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/pneumonia-antibiotic-treatment_executive.pdf
    November 01, 2014 - We reviewed our search strategy with Technical Expert Panel members and incorporated their input into … our Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) librarian, ran the searches; another EPC librarian peer-reviewed … Study Selection Two trained members of the research team independently reviewed all titles and abstracts … Two trained members of the research team independently reviewed each full-text article for inclusion … Trained reviewers recorded relevant data from the studies; a second member of the team reviewed all
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/arthritis-knee-physical-therapy_research-protocol.pdf
    April 01, 2010 - and harms of physical therapy interventions.31 We will include unpublished RCTs presented at peer-reviewed … Review of Key Questions For all EPC reviews, key questions were reviewed and refined as needed by the … Panel (TEP) to assure that the questions are specific and explicit about what information is being reviewed … Key Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed … Technical Experts do not do analysis of any kind nor contribute to the writing of the report and have not reviewed
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/public-reporting-quality-improvement_executive.pdf
    July 01, 2012 - The Key Questions were reviewed and refined in consultation with the Technical Expert Panel as well … At the full-text stage, all articles were reviewed by two of the three principal reviewers and inclusion … From these, reviewers identified 1,632 articles that were possibly relevant and were reviewed by two … prove, that there are studies of public reporting that exist but that have not been published in peer-reviewed
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/nursing-home-safety_research-protocol.pdf
    July 22, 2015 - The search will be updated while the draft report is being reviewed … Information Management Key informant interviews will be transcribed, reviewed for themes and woven … Informants do not do analysis of any kind nor contribute to the writing of the report and have not reviewed … The Task Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to contract requirements and quality
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/breast-cancer-imaging_research-protocol.pdf
    December 17, 2013 - All titles and abstracts identified through searches will be independently reviewed for eligibility … Each full-text article will be independently reviewed by two trained members of the research team (LG … All data abstractions will be reviewed for completeness and accuracy by another member of the team.
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/skin-substitute_0.pdf
    October 03, 2019 - per study arm for RCTs and prospective non-randomized comparative studies Publication type Peer-reviewed … Informants do not do analysis of any kind nor contribute to the writing of the report and have not reviewed … The Task Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to contract requirements and quality
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/ebc-webinar-slides.pptx
    June 01, 2014 - Dissemin-ation Early 2013 Close Oct. 19 Judging Process All entries were reviewed by … conference 3rd place: Two members receive a one-year subscription to UpToDate, an evidence-based, peer reviewed
  18. EBC-webinar-slides (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/ebc-webinar-slides.pdf
    June 01, 2014 - Slide  15   Judging  Process    All  entries  were  reviewed  by  a  panel  of … receive  a  one-­‐year  subscription  to  UpToDate,  an  evidence-­‐based,  peer   reviewed
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/stakeholder-engagement_research.pdf
    September 01, 2011 - Each of the work groups reviewed processes and products of the EHC Program and offered suggestions for … In addition to participating on conference calls and at face-to-face meetings, work group members reviewed … much uncertainty and inadequate evidence on key clinical decision points for patients on subjects reviewed
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/Guidelines-Peer-Public-Review.pdf
    November 08, 2013 - Guidelines-Peer-Public-Review …

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: