Results

Total Results: 3,418 records

Showing results for "reviewed".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/coronary-artery-stenting/research-protocol
    August 29, 2011 - contemporary practice, as recent literature (e.g., for drug-eluting stents) has not yet been thoroughly reviewed … The full-text articles of all eligible abstracts will then be reviewed for eligibility. … and Data Management Each study extraction will be conducted by one experienced methodologist and reviewed … Panel (TEP) to assure that the questions are specific and explicit about what information is being reviewed … Key Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed
  2. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/pelvic-pain_executive.pdf
    January 01, 2012 - Informant input, we drafted initial KQs, which the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) reviewed … Using public input, we drafted final KQs, which AHRQ reviewed. … In addition, the draft report was peer reviewed and available for public comment. … We reviewed the full text of 623 articles and included 39 articles, comprising 36 unique studies, in … study size n = 565 • Not original research n = 85 • Not English language n = 1 Full-text articles reviewed
  3. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/renal-artery-stenosis_executive.pdf
    October 01, 2006 - All the studies reviewed either implicitly or explicitly included only patients with generally stable … Description of reviewed studies No study directly compared angioplasty with stent placement to aggressive … received angioplasty mostly after 1993 and reported long-term (6 months) outcomes of interest were reviewed … The reviewed studies did not report any indicators that may predict improved outcomes. … As the reviewed studies did not explicitly address the population of patients who may need acute intervention
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/acute-pain-treatment/protocol
    February 12, 2019 - Which populations, acute pain conditions, and treatments have been sufficiently systematically reviewed … We then reviewed committee and workgroup members on various public and private endeavors aimed at strengthening … Informants do not do analysis of any kind nor contribute to the writing of the report and have not reviewed … The Task Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to contract requirements and quality
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cer-244-safety-vaccines-update-evidence-summary.pdf
    May 01, 2021 - In addition, we reference-mined existing reviews; searched the trial registry Clinicaltrials.gov; reviewed … CRD42020180089).7 Results We identified 189 studies in this update, adding to research studies reviewed … on vaccine safety published in 2011).1, 2 In total, 338 studies reported in 518 publications were reviewed … We reviewed the rates of key adverse events reported in vaccine studies that used a comparator, regardless
  6. Untitled (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/field-triage-glascow_research-protocol.pdf
    February 25, 2016 - Hand Searching: Reference lists of included articles will also be reviewed for includable literature … To ensure accuracy, all excluded abstracts will be reviewed by a second person. … Each full-text article will be independently reviewed for eligibility by two team members using the … They have not reviewed the report, except as given the opportunity to do so through the peer or public … The Task Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to contract requirements and quality
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/ankyloglossia/research-protocol
    June 30, 2014 - Two team members independently reviewed the titles and abstracts of the non-English language literature … Each abstract will be reviewed by at least two members of the investigative team. … Each article will be reviewed by at least two members of the investigative team. … Key Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed … They have not reviewed the report, except as given the opportunity to do so through the peer or public
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/nephropathy-contrast-induced/research-protocol
    November 12, 2013 - We briefly reviewed the seven meta-analyses published within the last 12 months on CIN and summarized … Full text articles included at the abstract level will be reviewed independently by two reviewers and … Review of Key Questions For all EPC reviews, key questions were reviewed and refined as needed by the … Key Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed … The Task Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to contract requirements and quality
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs4-implicit-bias-protocol.pdf
    August 04, 2023 - the literature search to team members, with plans to have the title and abstract of each citation reviewed … The full text of each remaining potentially eligible article will similarly be reviewed by a single … Content last reviewed October 2022.
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/data-repository-reviews_overview-2012.pdf
    January 01, 2012 - SRDR Systematic Review Data Repository™ What is SRDR? SRDR is an easy-to-use Web-based tool for conducting systematic reviews. It serves as: • A tool for extracting and storing information from studies. • An open and searchable archive of key questions addressed in systematic reviews. • A public repository…
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/gout_consumer.pdf
    January 01, 2017 - Managing Gout: A Review of the Research for Adults Managing Gout A Review of the Research for Adults e Is This Information Right for Me? This information is right for you if: � Your health care professional* has said that you have gout. � You are age 18 or older. This information is from research on adults. …
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-observational-studies_methods.pdf
    June 01, 2010 - Use of Observational Studies in Systematic Reviews of Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews Selecting Observational Studies for Comparing Medical Interventions Comparative Effectiveness Reviews are systematic reviews of existing research on the effectiveness, comparative…
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/autism-update_disposition-comments.pdf
    August 06, 2014 - TEP Reviewer #4 Abstract I’d suggests including the number of studies reviewed originally, so that the … We hope to get this information to multiple audiences through publication in the peer reviewed literature … Peer reviewer #2 General Global comment: Given that there are now N=37 RCTs to be reviewed I do not … It should be noted, however, that these materials are based on what is in the reviewed in the report … As noted in the report, we reviewed all relevant research for establishing comparative effectiveness
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guide-editorial_methods.pdf
    July 01, 2012 - Two deputy editors from the Journal (GS and CU) reviewed the peer and public review comments, and author
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mhs4-failure-rescue-protocol_0.pdf
    July 01, 2023 - the literature search to team members, with plans to have the title and abstract of each citation reviewed … The title and abstract of each citation will be reviewed by a team member, and then the AI Classifier … The full text of each remaining potentially eligible article will be reviewed by a single team member
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/asthma-nonpharmacologic-treatment/research-protocol
    October 11, 2016 - The article must be published as a full-length, peer-reviewed study. … Scientific Information Packets (SIPs) submitted by interested parties will also be reviewed. … Key Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed … They have not reviewed the report, except as given the opportunity to do so through the peer or public … The TOO reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to contract requirements and quality.
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/rapid-reviews-end-user_white-paper.pdf
    April 01, 2016 - Two research assistants analyzed content of the transcripts, and two investigators independently reviewed … Two investigators with qualitative experience independently reviewed all transcripts and verified themes … To ensure reliability of the coding structure, all themes and subthemes were reviewed with the larger … Many are not published in traditional peer-reviewed sources, indexed in bibliographic databases, or
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/venous-ulcers-treatment_disposition-comments.pdf
    January 27, 2014 - We agree that the key messages are limited by the nature of the studies reviewed. … We have reviewed the studies excluded for “other” reasons, and reclassified these when possible. … Most of the therapies you reviewed are used “in addition to” compression therapy. … If it were, you would have not reviewed over 10,000 articles and only used about 70 of them. … While this may be an accurate statement for the majority of the products/interventions reviewed,
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/wireless-motility-capsule/research-protocol
    March 14, 2012 - Abstracts will be reviewed independently by two investigators and will be excluded if both investigators … Review of Key Questions For all EPC reviews, key questions were reviewed and refined as needed by the … Panel (TEP) to assure that the questions are specific and explicit about what information is being reviewed … Key Informants are not involved in analyzing the evidence or writing the report and have not reviewed … The Task Order Officer reviewed contract deliverables for adherence to contract requirements and quality
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/nt_docs/cervical-degenerative-topic-brief.pdf
    March 01, 2023 - surgical to non-operative treatment in patients with mild or no cervical spondylotic myelopathy, we reviewed … 6-11 four retrospective cohort studies,12-15 and three in-process trials.16-18 For KQ3, • We reviewed … and fusion in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy or myelopathy at 1 or 2 levels, we reviewed … Because a large number of articles were identified for KQs 1 and 3, we reviewed a random sample of 200 … titles and abstracts for those KQs and reviewed all titles and abstracts for all other KQs.

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: