Email Updates
Go to Basic Search
Results
Total Results: 2,197 records
Showing results for "reviewed".
-
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/developing-and-using-valid-clinical-quality-metrics-health-information/annual-summary/2010January 01, 2010 - The project team developed a methodology for reporting on the metrics, which was reviewed by the Institutional
-
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/improving-outpatient-medication-lists-using-temporal-reasoning-and-clinical/annual-summary/2011January 01, 2011 - Evaluators manually reviewed and compared 30 free-text and 10 structured outpatient notes with MTERMS
-
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/medication-reconciliation-improve-quality-transitional-care/annual-summary/2012January 01, 2012 - Project staff reviewed a list of more than 1,000 medications to create groupings of records that identify
-
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/evaluation-ahrqs-time-pressure-ulcer-program/annual-summary/2010January 01, 2010 - The draft fall prevention tools were reviewed with members of the Advisory Panel in September and October
-
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/evaluation-computer-generated-after-visit-summaries-support-patient-centered/annual-summary/2010January 01, 2010 - The team will draft and submit a manuscript about the research effort to a peer-reviewed journal, as
-
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/using-electronic-data-improve-care-patients-known-or-suspected-cancer/annual-summary/2010January 01, 2010 - Of the 120 patient charts reviewed, 90 (75 percent) were true trigger positives.
-
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/synthesizing-lessons-learned-using-health-information-technology/annual-summary/2011January 01, 2011 - Each project is being reviewed individually for new interpretations and previously unidentified concepts
-
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/synthesizing-lessons-learned-using-health-information-technology/annual-summary/2012January 01, 2012 - Each of seven nationally funded PPRNet initiatives was reviewed for new interpretations and previously
-
digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/kuperman-gj-et-al-2003January 01, 2003 - Study Design Systematic literature review Study Participants Eighteen studies were reviewed
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/TPC%20Pat%20Engage%20Handbook%20Final.pdfSeptember 01, 2023 - This handbook was developed through a targeted review of the peer-reviewed and grey literature for patient … We then conducted a series of targeted searches of the peer-reviewed and grey literature to verify the … Literature that spoke to patient engagement practices relevant to PC CDS were full text reviewed. … We included 71 peer- reviewed publications and 31 grey literature resources in the development of this … Handbook guidance was reviewed and validated by the CDSiC Trust & Patient-Centeredness Workgroup.
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/PAIGE%20Assessment%20Report_Public%20Version.pdfAugust 01, 2024 - All qualitative research activities conducted by the CDSiC are reviewed by the NORC at the University … This summary can then be reviewed by the patient and, if deemed appropriate, sent to their clinician … All methods and processes for this assessment were reviewed and approved by the NORC Institutional Review … A senior research team member reviewed the key themes to ensure they were comprehensive, useful, and … For the clinician assessment, two research team members reviewed free-text survey responses and email
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/uc1hs015350-horn-final-report-2008.pdfJanuary 01, 2008 - • Progress Year 3: Reports were reviewed by Nursing Leadership, Dietician, and MDS nurse; results … Before the end of my shift I have reviewed CNA documentation for completeness [Completely agree.]. … CNA documentation was not reviewed on a regular basis previously and was not used in reports that were … Reports are reviewed and discussed by a group of clinical team members (not reviewed by just one person … Nurse managers reviewed Nutrition and Priority reports with clinical teams each week to confirm care
-
Background Report Final (pdf file)
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/background_report_final.pdfSeptember 01, 2011 - One source of data was an extensive environmental scan of the peer-reviewed and grey literatures for … We also reviewed notable design books including Ulrich 2008 and Verganti 2009. … Table 3 details the frequency of the top six design methods used by the reviewed products, in order … Table 3: Most frequently used methods by reviewed products Of note is that the most frequently used … Design Method Percentage of Reviewed Products Using Method Number of Reviewed Products Using -
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/trial-aggregate-data-extraction-maintenance-certification-and-raising-qualityJanuary 01, 2023 - complete a certification activity, and nearly 25 percent of physicians in the intervention arm never reviewed
-
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/research-agenda-patient-centered-medical-homeJanuary 01, 2023 - Disseminate the synthesis of the conference, including background and descriptive information, via peer-reviewed
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/r21hs021544-zhou-final-report-2014.pdfJanuary 01, 2014 - Medication lists are then retrieved from the EHR and patient updates are captured and reviewed by providers … Clinicians can click the “reviewed” button after they reviewed the medication discrepancies to remove … Two pharmacists manually reviewed all patients’ notes, annotated medication names and their status (
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017150-lapane-final-report-2010.pdfJanuary 01, 2010 - We first reviewed the 2003 update of the Beers criteria drugs to identify potentially inappropriate … expertise in geriatrics and one pharmacy faculty member with expertise in community pharmacy practice also reviewed … The pharmacists reviewed the list of 39 PIM from the Beers criteria to identify drugs that were not … The CMEs were reviewed and deemed acceptable for up to 6 Prescribed credit(s) by the American Academy
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/uc1hs014965-schmidt-final-report-2007.pdfJanuary 01, 2007 - These documents were reviewed and approved by a committee of all participating pharmacists at the hub … The Minnesota Board of Pharmacy also reviewed and approved these policies and procedures, a copy of … upon Donabedian’s model for evaluating the quality of healthcare services.13 Evaluation plans were reviewed … Clinical Messages since mid May, 2007 through the end of September, 2007 will be reviewed and categorized
-
Electronic Medication Management (pdf file)
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r03hs018250-vawdrey-final-report-2011.pdfJanuary 01, 2011 - Of 253 medications lists reviewed, 181 lists (72%) had at least one medication missing a dose, route … Each clinical note was reviewed to identify a medication list within the note. … during medication reconciliation process Medication lists deemed incomplete were independently reviewed … As each annotation was reviewed and categorized, the additional themes of “Historical Information” and -
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/enhancing-self-management-t2dm-automated-reminder-and-feedback-system/annual-summary/2010January 01, 2010 - Statisticians reviewed the data files to merge and reconcile data recorded by the glucometers and data
SHARE:
Search the AHRQ Archive
Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.
Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site
You selected to view results for the following site:
