-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/workgroups/143366/CDS_Connect_WG_April_2022_Summary.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Maria Michaels then reviewed the agenda and facilitated the rest of the
discussion. … Roundtable and Discussion on Partnering Experience
Michelle Lenox (MITRE) reviewed the CDS Connect … Van Leeuwen reviewed a series of related topics. … Van Leeuwen next reviewed exemplary onboarding practices that they had
experienced, noting that a patient
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/workgroups/71451/CDS_Connect_WG_March_2022_Summary.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Maria Michaels (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) then reviewed
the agenda and facilitated … Panel discussion on versioning choices
Susan Haas (MITRE) reviewed an ongoing decision MITRE is facing … For the second example, Chris Moesel (MITRE) reviewed a decision to update a version of the
Abnormal
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/workgroups/13461/CDS_Connect_WG_June_2021_Summary_0.pdf
January 01, 2021 - Dan
Malone from the University of Utah reviewed CDS artifacts created using CDS Connect. … Boyce reviewed the results of testing an example CDS artifact showing that the CDS artifact
decreased … Malone reviewed how the app assesses patient preference for
medication or non-medication management.
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/workgroups/28166/CDS_Connect_WG_Summary_August%202021.pdf
August 19, 2021 - MEETING SUMMARY
Following roll call and review of agenda, AHRQ and MITRE team members reviewed an AHRQ … Krautscheid, the CEDAR Technical Lead at MITRE, reviewed the conceptual operations of CEDAR. … Caputy then reviewed the efforts to test the platform against the guiding principles of FAIR.
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/workgroups/58631/CDS_Connect_WG_February_2022_Summary.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Maria Michaels then reviewed the agenda and facilitated the rest of the
discussion. … Kim reviewed the digital health barriers faced by individuals in rural and underserved
communities, … Kim reviewed several frameworks and methods for participatory research to engage stakeholders
in identifying
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/workgroups/34806/CDS_Connect_WG_October_2021_Summary.pdf
January 01, 2021 - Maria Michaels then reviewed the agenda and facilitated the rest of the
discussion. … Fabian reviewed the general themes that the WG has considered in the past (enforcing standards
compliance … • A WG member reported on a recent Politico article that reviewed the future of similar
repositories
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/workgroups/33746/CDS_Connect_WG_Summary_September_2021.pdf
January 01, 2021 - MEETING SUMMARY
Following roll call and review of the agenda, the MITRE team reviewed the key updates … Maria Michaels then reviewed the agenda and facilitated the discussion that
followed. … CDS Connect Key Updates September 2020 – 2021
MITRE reviewed its progress on developing CDS Connect
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/workgroups/184656/CDS_Connect_WG_June_2022_Summary.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Support (CDS)
• Open Discussion
• Close
ACTION ITEMS
• None
MEETING SUMMARY
Presenters reviewed … Maria Michaels then reviewed the agenda and facilitated the rest of the
discussion.
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/workgroups/27826/CDS_Connect_WG_Summary_July_2021.pdf
January 01, 2021 - Randolph Barrows from Elimu Informatics reviewed their experience using CDS Connect to
develop a CDS … Maria Michaels then reviewed the agenda and facilitated the rest of the discussion.
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/AHRQ_Final_Report_2022.pdf
January 01, 2022 - • Reviewed the materials the WG Patient-Partnering Panel subgroup developed. … • Prepared a peer-reviewed publication detailing the approach to implementing a governance
process … The team and
AHRQ reviewed the Repository User Guide content and images, then transferred the information … Standards Conformance: CDS Artifacts
The team reviewed all MITRE-authored CDS Artifacts (Table 1). … A final WG meeting reviewed the efforts and accomplishments of
the WG over the past 6 years and allowed
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/AHRQ_Final_Report_2020.pdf
January 01, 2020 - Each page was thoroughly reviewed and
then revised after consultation with the appropriate stakeholders … The proposal was reviewed with the CDS Connect WG. … The team first prototyped and then reviewed the new schema with the CDS
Connect WG in June 2020. … A subject matter expert reviewed the application, and
addressed and identified various accessibility … all the pain-related content with content
pertaining to COVID-19.
2.3.4 CDS Artifacts
The team reviewed
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/workgroups/143366/CDS_Connect_WG_April_2022_Presentation.pdf
January 01, 2022 - from outside the WG
• Provide insights to other efforts or venues
(e.g., conference submissions/peer reviewed
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cds/artifact/1056/2024_Intervention_Content_Statin_Patient_1.xlsx
January 01, 2024 - This link to their Quality Guidelines provides additional information on how resources are reviewed and
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/workgroups/27826/CDS_Connect_WG_Slides_July_2021.pdf
January 01, 2021 - LAMA
► Clinical relevance, strength of recommendation, certainty of evidence
• Artifact proposals reviewed
-
cds.ahrq.gov/cdsconnect/userguide/artifactneedsreview
April 06, 2025 - Search All AHRQ Sites
Careers
Contact Us
Español
FAQs
Email Updates
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/CDS_Connect_2024_Final_Report.pdf
January 01, 2024 - CDS “artifacts”—actionable
medical knowledge
(e.g., clinical practice
guidelines, peer-reviewed
articles
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/AHRQ_Final_Report_2023.pdf
January 01, 2023 - CDS "artifacts" – actionable
medical knowledge (e.g.,
clinical practice guidelines,
peer-reviewed
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cds/artifact/1061/2024_Intervention_Content_Prediabetes_and_Type_2_Diabetes_Part_one_Screening.xlsx
January 01, 2024 - This link to their Quality Guidelines provides additional information on how resources are reviewed and
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/workgroups/1266/CDS_Connect_April2021_WG_Meeting_Slides.pdf
April 01, 2021 - Date written, last updated, reviewed by someone
Do they have a vested interest? Who paid for it?
-
cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cds/artifact/711/Anthrax_Post_Exposure_Prophylaxis_CDS_Validation_Report.pdf
October 17, 2018 - of the validation of CDS in general is discussed, and a plan for validating
the Anthrax PEP CDS is reviewed … Two evaluators were used for the
first 10 synthetic patient records, and the remaining records were reviewed … Any inconsistencies found in the remaining records were reviewed by both evaluators, and then
confirmed … The SME evaluators first reviewed a synthetic patient record, and then examined the
corresponding CDS … Validation of CDS was
discussed, and a plan for validating the Anthrax PEP CDS was reviewed.