Results

Total Results: over 10,000 records

Showing results for "participants".

  1. www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/patients-families/consumer-exp/reporting/chapter3.html
    August 01, 2022 - Characteristics of participants. … Three groups included 9 participants, one group included 8 participants, one group included 7 participants … The ability to self-identify was another important concern for participants. … , participants also recognized the value of a government agency's authority. … However, we were less successful in recruiting Hispanic participants, as several Hispanic participants
  2. www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps-program/curriculum/intro/teach.html
    August 01, 2023 - That way, you’ll have more time for exercises or scenarios that will help participants apply the tools … and the relationships you would like participants to develop with each other, and what you want participants … If participants sense your desire to learn, you’ll foster an environment where they will do the same. … It's vital for participants to create connections with others in the training. … Introductions allow participants to identify others they can interact with throughout the training.
  3. www.ahrq.gov/healthsystemsresearch/hspc-research-study/research-gaps.html
    June 01, 2020 - Other gaps mentioned by individual study participants are shown in Appendix D . … Participants discussed three approaches to engaged research. … Two PCR interview participants elaborated further on this gap. … Prioritization Criteria Suggested by Study Participants Participants identified four prioritization … Principles for the Prioritization Process Suggested by Study Participants Participants agreed
  4. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2025-03/taylor-report.pdf
    January 01, 2025 - Formative testing included nine participants in Round 1 and 13 participants in Round 2. … Formative Testing Round 1 Participants (Round 1) The study consisted of nine participants, including … Four participants did not have any previous exposure to the SRA Toolkit, and five participants did. … All 13 participants said that they would use the tool, although four participants mentioned that they … Five of the participants had some previous exposure to the SRA toolkit, and three participants had no
  5. www.ahrq.gov/health-literacy/improve/pharmacy/guide/part3.html
    September 01, 2020 - Recruiting Pharmacy Patient Focus Group Participants Focus group participants may be recruited using … Describe any incentive that will be offered to participants. … Give participants ample opportunity to ask questions. … Read questions out loud as participants follow along and answer each question. … Report any common themes that participants bring up during focus groups.
  6. www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/simulation/traininggd.html
    July 01, 2016 - Remind participants that perhaps the most powerful learning occurs during debriefing when participants … Encourage participants to skim through Tab A. (5 min.) … Tell participants that you will cover each of these in detail. … Review the triggers and expected team behaviors with participants. … Targeted responses Allow participants 25 minutes for this exercise.
  7. www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps-program/training/faq.html
    August 01, 2024 - A maximum of 30 participants per organization may participate in TeamSTEPPS for Diagnosis Improvement … Most trainings will have between 10 and 30 participants. Who else will be in my training? … AHRQ is offering virtual TeamSTEPPS trainings at no cost to participants though November 2024. … Participants may choose to earn CEU credits for a fee.  … CEUs are available for participants to purchase.
  8. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/advances-in-patient-safety/vol4/Hundt.pdf
    January 01, 2003 - and highlighting potential participants. … postoperative for all participants. … Respondents Of the 141 participants, 52 percent of the participants had ophthalmologic, 11 percent … Younger, healthier participants were more difficult to contact than elderly, less healthy participants … Study participants by center Table 2.
  9. digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/evaluation-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/all-workflow-tools/critical-incident
    January 01, 2023 - attempts to find information pertaining to organizational problems, and requires honest responses from the participants … This means that the participants must be assured they can freely express their opinions, and therefore … SELECT PARTICIPANTS IN THE ANALYSIS. … QUERY THE GROUP OF PARTICIPANTS. … Disadvantages Participants may withold information out of fear of repercussions unless assurances
  10. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2024-01/schade-willis-report.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - Scope : The conference participants were recruited from Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina. … either satisfied or very satisfied; 100% of participants viewed utility as either good or excellent. … All participants were asked in advance to bring a story board about themselves, their organizational … Below are two survey comments from participants on the 3-month post-conference survey. … Participants connected after the conference via the online community and in other ways.
  11. www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps-program/curriculum/team/teach/two-day.html
    February 01, 2024 - Ask participants to identify what team comes to mind when they think of effective teams. … Ask the participants why the structure of teams matters. … ,” ask the participants how they would define a team. … It’s not critical for participants to remember all the types of teams. … The next section will show participants how.
  12. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/products/deliberative-methods/research-2013-1
    January 01, 2019 - Study Sample Of the 1,774 participants recruited from the four locations, 961 participants took part … Ratings for the factor effect of deliberation on participants reflected participants’ perceptions that … Although participants in both methods placed value on taking part in deliberation, participants in the … Participants in CD reported significantly higher scores than ODP participants for five out of the eight … For African-American participants, concordance (i.e., the proportion of participants in a deliberative
  13. www.ahrq.gov/predictive-analytics-challenge/requirements.html
    October 01, 2020 - provide temporary access to data for participation in this Challenge, including relevant resources for participantsParticipants may supplement their access to AHRQ data, at their option, by using free, publicly available … Participants must submit an executed "AHRQ Bringing Predictive Analytics to Healthcare Challenge Data … How to Enter the Challenge To get access to the customized data files for this Challenge, participantsParticipants can register by visiting Challenge.gov  and selecting "Submit Solution" anytime during
  14. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/research/findings/final-reports/baker-report.pdf
    April 01, 2012 - Participants completed the reaction questionnaire post training only. … Participants were paid $150.00 to participate. … Five of the female participants were currently pregnant, and 11 of the participants had attended a … Participants completed the reaction questionnaire post training only. … Table 1 presents the results for participants’ attitudes.
  15. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2024-01/taekman-report.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - The participants then underwent training in their experimental group. … Twenty-eight of the participants were retained for long-term follow-up. … Participants had varied facility with healthcare team concepts. … Three different actor teams performed the scenarios and rated the participants. … The mean pre-test knowledge score across all participants was 81% correct, and participants improved
  16. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2024-09/segall-report.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - Methods Design and Participants The design was a randomized trial in which participants were randomly … Eight participants each completed the task in the 16-, 32-, and 40-patient conditions, and nine participantsParticipants received compensation for taking part in the study. … Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. … Results Forty-two participants completed the study. Their response times are shown in Figure 3.
  17. www.ahrq.gov/news/events/ahrq-research-summit-learning-health-system-summary.html
    October 01, 2020 - The meeting participants shared experiences relating to attempts to improve systems, discussed attributes … To recognize roles of the meeting participants in helping to create an LHS. … Regarding data, the participants stressed issues of patient-centeredness and patient need. … The meeting participants raised many issues in response to the conversation. … Participants brainstormed ideas and were asked to develop further the higher rated ideas.
  18. www.ahrq.gov/healthsystemsresearch/hspc-research-study/conclusions.html
    July 01, 2021 - Action steps included with each recommendation represent suggestions of study participants or the RAND … For example, study participants across the range of stakeholders noted AHRQ as the only agency that has … Participants also observed federal agencies to be adept at utilizing appropriate and effective formal … However, study participants commented on the lack of systematic processes for proactively identifying … Study participants also noted an additional risk.
  19. cds.ahrq.gov/cedar/AHRQ_CEDAR_Final_Pilot_Report_October_2022_508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - with 25 Participants 1017 and 1021. 26 Participants 1001, 1002, 1003, 1005, and 1014. 27 Participants … . 34 Participants 1006 and 1011. 35 Participants 1004, 1006, 1008, 1015, 1018, and 1019. 36 Participantsparticipants). … (seven participants), systematic reviews (five participants), clinical trials (five participants), and … ), SRDR (two participants), and USPSTF (seven participants).
  20. cdsic.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2024-07/OY1_FINAL%20TPC%20Patient%20Perspectives%20Generative%20AI.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - Participants were identified using purposive and convenience sampling. … would be shared with focus group participants. … Findings Patient and caregiver participants had a range of experiences with AI. … Most participants believed that they had encountered AI tools in a healthcare context; however, participantsParticipants observed that younger demographics may be more open to utilizing these tools.