Results

Total Results: 1,991 records

Showing results for "participants".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/safety-vaccines/protocol
    April 06, 2020 - (Table 1): Table 1: Eligibility criteria Domain Inclusion Exclusion Population Human participants … vaccine) Studies without intervention comparator Outcomes Adverse events identified in participants … e.g., use of a scale or checklist) and whether adverse event data were collected actively (e.g., all participants … were asked about the occurrence of specific harms) or passively (e.g., participants might have reported … In addition, we will review whether the authors specified the number of participants affected by each
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/prosthesis/research
    September 06, 2018 - No eligible study addressed how study participants' preprescription expectations of ambulation align
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/migraine-prevention/research-2013
    April 18, 2013 - network meta-analysis, and calculated numbers of outcome events attributable to treatments per 1,000 participants
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/bonoff-text.pdf
    January 01, 2000 - advocacy careers § Collaborative: designed by NBCC with scientists, academics, and consumers § Select participants
  5. Slide 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/ahrq_community_forum_webinar_bonoff.pdf
    January 01, 2000 - careers • Collaborative: designed by NBCC with scientists, academics, and consumers • Select participants
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/patient-family-engagement-protocol.pdf
    December 31, 2019 - Office of Management and Budget requirements to avoid using survey methods with more than 9 participants
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pdf/epc-ki-tep-confidentiality-form.pdf
    August 01, 2020 - Disclosure Policy and Form EPC Key Informant and Technical Expert Agreement The primary role of the Key Informant is to provide input on proposed review questions to help the EPC ensure that a resulting evidence review will be useful for people making real-world decisions. The primary role of the Technical…
  8. Gout Executive-2016 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/gout_executive-2016.pdf
    January 01, 2016 - be identified for a diagnostic test of interest, studies were also included if some or all of the participants … Studies were excluded if participants had already been definitively diagnosed with gout prior to enrollment … Applicability Applicability is a measure of the extent to which the participants, interventions, and … We reviewed 255 full-text articles, of which 234 were excluded for the following reasons: participants … Relatively few studies enrolled only participants with an inflamed joint or even with suspected gout
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-207-ptsd-disposition-comments.pdf
    May 17, 2018 - All studies included a majority of participants with clinical PTSD and the portion who did not had … the 2013 SR reports, for the same study, “At 6- month follow-up, more than twice the percentage of participants … No participants achieved this level of relief in the fluoxetine or placebo group.” … Participants were randomized to a multi- component collaborative care intervention and not to psychotherapy … None of the participants in the RCTs of psychological interventions were blinded while all of the participants
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-report-creating-efficiencies-extraction-data.pdf
    August 01, 2021 - 3 abstracts to identify the first 75 randomized trials that reported on outcomes for participants … ExaCT’s extraction: Sentence Ranking Sentence 1 Participants were randomly assigned to an experimental … cartridge” ExaCT’s extraction: Sentence Ranking Sentence 1 After a 7-day washout period when participants … received Peptamen 1.5 with their usual dose of PERT products but without digestive cartridge, participants … received Peptamen 1.5 with their usual dose of PERT products but without digestive cartridge, participants
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cell-free-dna-protocol.pdf
    June 05, 2024 - % of participants <50 years (if reported) Text % Female Note … Text Age range of included population (if reported) Text % of participants ≥65 years (if … Radio Yes No Other Length of followup (in years) used to consider participants cancer free … with cancer identified through clinical presentation (if reported Text N (%) of participants … N True Negatives(participants without cancer and negative test) N False Positives (participants
  12. 8 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/methodsguide_chou_assessing_harms_when_comparing.pdf
    November 01, 2008 - Data are often insufficient to assess the methods used to select participants. 45 In addition, because … Participants are asked in structured questionnaires or interviews about the occurrence of specific adverse … Passive surveillance of harms Participants are not specifically asked about or tested for the occurrence … Was the NUMBER of participants that withdrew or were lost to follow-up specified for each study group … Was the TOTAL NUMBER of participants affected by harms specified for each study arm? 14.
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/renal-cancer_research-protocol.pdf
    April 20, 2015 - Performance bias Blinding of participants and personnel Assessments should be made for each main … Performance bias due to knowledge of the allocated interventions by participants and personnel during … Were participants analyzed according to their initial intervention group throughout follow up? … Risk of bias judgment Bias in selection of participants into the study 2.1. … 6.2 Were outcome assessors unaware of the intervention received by study participants?
  14. 8 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-harms_methods.pdf
    November 01, 2008 - Data are often insufficient to assess the methods used to select participants. 45 In addition, because … Participants are asked in structured questionnaires or interviews about the occurrence of specific adverse … Passive surveillance of harms Participants are not specifically asked about or tested for the occurrence … Was the NUMBER of participants that withdrew or were lost to follow-up specified for each study group … Was the TOTAL NUMBER of participants affected by harms specified for each study arm? 14.
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/tympanostomy-tubes-executive-170523.pdf
    May 01, 2017 - n/N (%) Odds ratio (95% CI) Goldstein 2005 15689760 7/1996-6/1999 U.S. 1 year Ear plugs All Participants … 42/90 (46.7) 0.68 (0.37 – 1.25) No precautions All Participants 46/82 (56.1) [reference] Ear plugs … 18/30 (60.0) 0.71 (0.29 – 1.76) Ear plugs† All Participants 13/15 (86.7) 3.10 (0.64 – 15.04) No precautions … All Participants 42/62 (67.7) [reference] †Randomized to the nonswimming group, but self-selected to … Across RCTs relative to KQs 1 and 2, there was universal lack of blinding of participants and, in many
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/case-management-future_research.pdf
    June 01, 2015 - The research team sent written invitations to the potential stakeholders/participants (see Appendix … Participation at all stages was voluntary, and participants were free to decline to participate in any … Audio recordings were made after the participants provided verbal permission to record the discussions … We incorporated suggestions from pilot participants before sending the final link to stakeholders. … Participants will then take part in a modified Delphi process to prioritize research topics.
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/ehc-presentation-quantitative-synthesis-chapter-2.pdf
    February 01, 2018 - Special topics: Crossover trials • In a crossover trial all participants receive both the treatment … control/pooled) Special topics: Cluster-randomized trials • Cluster randomized trials are those where participants
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/ebc-webinar-slides.pptx
    June 01, 2014 - private chat message to the “HOST 1 COMMUNITY FORUM (Host)” or a public message to “Everyone” which all participants … private chat message to the “HOST 1 COMMUNITY FORUM (Host)” or a public message to “Everyone” which all participants
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/breast-cancer-risk-reduction_research.pdf
    October 25, 2010 - led to differences in the numbers reported for allocation of participants. … Participants were contacted no more than three times. … Participants were asked to complete the questionnaire by July 16. … (Figure 3) and the numbers of participants by stakeholder category (Table 1). … Participants were not substantially different from non-participants.
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cer-225-substance-abuse-adolescents-comments.pdf
    May 21, 2020 - We recommend adding in any available information of participants’ demographics in the studies reviewed

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: