-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/r18hs025638-yazdany-final-report-2022.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Participants
For Aim 1, participants were rheumatologists participating in the learning network. … As a learning network,
topics for discussion were selected by faculty with input from participants. … Participants were expected to attend learning sessions. … In March 2020,
all learning network participants shifted to telehealth. … Participants
III.
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/r21hs019023-mane-final-report-2014.pdf
January 01, 2014 - Our initial screening involved potential participants with various
backgrounds (MD, PhD, social worker … We also
intentionally avoided the use of focus groups, in which participants speculate on what
they … For the first cycle of evaluation,
we recruited three participants. … Afterward, we provided participants with data on a simulated patient and asked them to
interact with … The participants liked the different data views and the ability to
customize the evidence to meet their
-
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/veterans-administration-va-integrated-medication-manager/annual-summary/2011
January 01, 2011 - Participants were asked to review 10 patient cases and write assessments and plans for each patient. … Participants were randomly assigned to use only one of the programs for the task.
-
digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/andriole-kp-et-al-2002
January 01, 2002 - Study Design
Only postintervention (no control group)
Study Participants
Study participants
-
digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/keyser-djd-et-al-2009
January 01, 2009 - Study Design
Pre-postintervention (no control group)
Study Participants
The study participants
-
digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/glazner-je-et-al-2004
January 01, 2004 - Study Design
Pre-postintervention (no control group)
Study Participants
The study participants
-
digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/tierney-wm-et-al-2005
January 01, 2005 - Study Design
Randomized controlled trial (RCT)
Study Participants
The study participants included
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017308-samore-final-report-2011.pdf
January 01, 2011 - None of the participants had
prior experience with an electronic PHR.
Table 1. … All participants expressed an interest to use the UHR again at home. … One of the
16 participants was unable to be reached to respond to questions. … Participants received
14
$20 in compensation to reimburse them for their time. … Participants were asked about the quality and content of conversations with their physician.
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/r21hs026565-bull-final-report-2021.pdf
January 01, 2021 - Participant recruitment began early in the study, targeting an average enrollment
rate of three participants … Participants
There were 31 patient participants and 11 provider participants. … Table 1 describes these
participants. … Nearly all patient participants identified as White and Non-Hispanic. … Characteristics of patient participants.
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/r21hs021005-sorondo-final-report-2015.pdf
January 01, 2015 - Participants were enrolled and encouraged to
use all portal functions including completing the wellness … Scope: (Background, Context, Settings, Participants, Incidence, Prevalence)
Studies have indicated … Data were obtained from: 1) the electronic medical records reports on the forms filled by
participants … log-‐on into the portal) and, EHR documentation (number of days
participants used the portal for … Functional status (PROMIS® Functional Status) was
assessed from the participants’ global physical and
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/r03hs028033-frey-final-report-2024.pdf
January 01, 2024 - Methods: After enrollment, participants were randomized to the TEACHH intervention or a
standard care … Participants in TEACHH received all standard care measures. … After enrollment, participants were randomly assigned to TEACHH or SC. … Randomization:
At the end of the baseline assessment, participants were randomly assigned to either … Although two participants were lost to follow-up after leaving the
hospital, most participants in TEACHH
-
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/barriers-meaningful-use-medicaid
January 01, 2023 - Participants were asked about their own experiences with EHRs, including barriers and facilitators of … Participants were noted to have differing levels of knowledge about the Medicaid MU program.
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/r01hs025375-zhou-final-report-2022.pdf
January 01, 2022 - Participants also completed a post-test
interview. … Prospective participants were manually identified based on their usage level and/or their
informatics … While testing, the participants would be asked to
complete a few questions following specific steps. … Still, a little over a fifth of the
participants did not believe the dynamic pick list would affect … As predicted, most participants
reported using free text entries to provide specific details about a
-
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-laboratory-exchange-meeting
January 01, 2023 - Meeting Outcomes and Next Steps
Meeting participants explored, discussed, and debated a variety of
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/r01hs023701-ratwani-final-report-2021.pdf
January 01, 2021 - Based on these results an EHR usability and safety evaluation tool was developed and
tested with ten participants … Participants
The participants in this study were five resident and attending internal medicine physicians … This tool was
tested at two sites with five participants from each site. … currently underway and we have pilot tested use of the
evaluation tool at two hospitals with five participants … Abstract
Section I: Purpose
Objectives of the study
Section II: Scope
Background
Context
Settings
Participants
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/r21hs024335-rangachari-final-report-2018.pdf
January 01, 2018 - Advance
invitations to these sessions were sent to all SKN participants. … steps for accessing the SKN Reporting Tool
and SKN Yammer, which were made available to participants … A participant engagement plan, including follow-up emails to participants and
quarterly distribution … of $25 gift cards to selected participants, was implemented over the one-year SKN period,
to ensure … Each Lunch-and-Learn session lasted
~60 minutes; and was attended by ~20 participants.
-
digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/citation/r18hs017829-druss-poster-2011.pdf
January 01, 2011 - .
Participants receive a manualized computer skills assessment and basic computer
skills training … Access to computers less of a barrier than anticipated
• Low digital literacy: Significant portion of participants
-
digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/implementing-and-improving-integration-decision-support-outpatient-clinical/annual-summary/2010
January 01, 2010 - The three study participants—the Regenstrief Institute, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and … The qualitative analysis revealed broad support across participants for the design enhancements with
-
digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/experience/chapman-l-2009-ehr
January 01, 2009 - Study Design
Story
Study Participants
The study participants included the Graybill Medical
-
digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/research/buchanan-bg-et-al-1995
January 01, 1995 - Study Design
Only postintervention (no control group)
Study Participants
The study participants