Results

Total Results: over 10,000 records

Showing results for "participant".

461. TeamSTEPPS Module 10: Measurement (Instructor Guide) (pdf file)
     www.monahrq.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/fundamentals/module10/igmeasure.pdf
     January 01, 2004 - In addition, participant reactions can tell you whether participants found TeamSTEPPS useful and … Participant reactions also provide information regarding: • What participants will say about the … A customizable TeamSTEPPS Course Evaluation Form for assessing participant reactions can be found in … To identify changes in attitudes, participant attitudes should be measured both before and after … Similar to measuring attitude changes, measurement of participant knowledge would take place both

462. TeamSTEPPS Module 10: Measurement (Instructor Guide) (pdf file)
     www.healthcare411.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/fundamentals/module10/igmeasure.pdf
     January 01, 2004 - In addition, participant reactions can tell you whether participants found TeamSTEPPS useful and … Participant reactions also provide information regarding: • What participants will say about the … A customizable TeamSTEPPS Course Evaluation Form for assessing participant reactions can be found in … To identify changes in attitudes, participant attitudes should be measured both before and after … Similar to measuring attitude changes, measurement of participant knowledge would take place both

463. TeamSTEPPS Module 10: Measurement (Instructor Guide) (pdf file)
     www.talkingquality.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/fundamentals/module10/igmeasure.pdf
     January 01, 2004 - In addition, participant reactions can tell you whether participants found TeamSTEPPS useful and … Participant reactions also provide information regarding: • What participants will say about the … A customizable TeamSTEPPS Course Evaluation Form for assessing participant reactions can be found in … To identify changes in attitudes, participant attitudes should be measured both before and after … Similar to measuring attitude changes, measurement of participant knowledge would take place both

464. TeamSTEPPS Module 10: Measurement (Instructor Guide) (pdf file)
     www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/fundamentals/module10/igmeasure.pdf
     January 01, 2004 - In addition, participant reactions can tell you whether participants found TeamSTEPPS useful and … Participant reactions also provide information regarding: • What participants will say about the … A customizable TeamSTEPPS Course Evaluation Form for assessing participant reactions can be found in … To identify changes in attitudes, participant attitudes should be measured both before and after … Similar to measuring attitude changes, measurement of participant knowledge would take place both

465. Creating a Foundation for the Design of Culturally Informed Health IT - Final Report (pdf file)
     digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r36hs018809-valdez-final-report-2012.pdf
     January 01, 2012 - was more exhaustive than originally proposed (two interviews with each participant instead of one; … Participant Flow through Study. … The researcher attempted contacting a participant five times to schedule the first interview before … determining that a participant was lost to follow-up. … A list of potential people that a participant may want to include was provided to help the participant

466. SRDR - Systematic Review Data Repository |
     srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186847
     January 01, 2015 - Antibiotics: long course IV Total Comments Answer Follow-up Answer Follow-up Answer Follow-up Participant … 47.8 Male 51.0 Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Participant … 86 Range 24–85 Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Participant … Was selection of participants into the study (or into the analysis) based on participant characteristics … Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Q2: Did the study divide the follow up time of each individual participant

467. SRDR - Systematic Review Data Repository |
     srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186776
     January 01, 2004 - Baseline Characteristics Question Elective surgery Total Comments Answer Follow-up Answer Follow-up Participant … characteristics Male 46.6 Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Participant … Participant Age - Categorical data <58 Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View … Was selection of participants into the study (or into the analysis) based on participant characteristics … Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Q2: Did the study divide the follow up time of each individual participant

468. SRDR - Systematic Review Data Repository |
     srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186228
     January 01, 2012 - Setting: Outpatient management Total Comments Answer Follow-up Answer Follow-up Answer Follow-up Participant … 45 Male 50 Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Participant … Range 32–83 Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Participant … Was selection of participants into the study (or into the analysis) based on participant characteristics … Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Q2: Did the study divide the follow up time of each individual participant

469. SRDR - Systematic Review Data Repository |
     srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186801
     January 01, 2007 - Cephalosporin + Metronidazole Total Comments Answer Follow-up Answer Follow-up Answer Follow-up Participant … 37 Male 36 Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Participant … 59 Mean 60 Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Participant … Was selection of participants into the study (or into the analysis) based on participant characteristics … Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Q2: Did the study divide the follow up time of each individual participant

470. SRDR - Systematic Review Data Repository |
     srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186172
     January 01, 2018 - Setting: Inpatient management Total Comments Answer Follow-up Answer Follow-up Answer Follow-up Participant … Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Not reported Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Participant … Post/View SD 13 Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Participant … Was selection of participants into the study (or into the analysis) based on participant characteristics … Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Q2: Did the study divide the follow up time of each individual participant

471. SRDR - Systematic Review Data Repository |
     srdr.ahrq.gov/projects/1520/studies/186174
     January 01, 2014 - Setting: Outpatient management Total Comments Answer Follow-up Answer Follow-up Answer Follow-up Participant … 51.5 Male 54.5 Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Participant … 13.4 SD 13.0 Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Participant … Was selection of participants into the study (or into the analysis) based on participant characteristics … Comments ( 0 ) | Post/View Q2: Did the study divide the follow up time of each individual participant

472. Mod5-Comm-Assessment (pdf file)
     www.innovations.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/candor/module5/mod5-comm-assessment.pdf
     April 01, 2016 - The participant must then describe first the liked and then the disliked person in as much detail as … The result is a cognitive complexity score for each participant. … To make this assessment, ask each participant to read two hypothetical communication scenarios (a group … response to determine if the participant fits in one of the following categories: ■ Expressive or … Based on the descriptions, each participant response should be grouped into one category.

473. Mod5-Comm-Assessment (pdf file)
     www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/candor/module5/mod5-comm-assessment.pdf
     April 01, 2016 - The participant must then describe first the liked and then the disliked person in as much detail as … The result is a cognitive complexity score for each participant. … To make this assessment, ask each participant to read two hypothetical communication scenarios (a group … response to determine if the participant fits in one of the following categories: ■ Expressive or … Based on the descriptions, each participant response should be grouped into one category.

474. Mod5-Comm-Assessment (pdf file)
     www.monahrq.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/candor/module5/mod5-comm-assessment.pdf
     April 01, 2016 - The participant must then describe first the liked and then the disliked person in as much detail as … The result is a cognitive complexity score for each participant. … To make this assessment, ask each participant to read two hypothetical communication scenarios (a group … response to determine if the participant fits in one of the following categories: ■ Expressive or … Based on the descriptions, each participant response should be grouped into one category.

475. Mod5-Comm-Assessment (pdf file)
     www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/candor/module5/mod5-comm-assessment.pdf
     April 01, 2016 - The participant must then describe first the liked and then the disliked person in as much detail as … The result is a cognitive complexity score for each participant. … To make this assessment, ask each participant to read two hypothetical communication scenarios (a group … response to determine if the participant fits in one of the following categories: ■ Expressive or … Based on the descriptions, each participant response should be grouped into one category.

476. Mod5-Comm-Assessment (pdf file)
     www.cpsi.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/candor/module5/mod5-comm-assessment.pdf
     April 01, 2016 - The participant must then describe first the liked and then the disliked person in as much detail as … The result is a cognitive complexity score for each participant. … To make this assessment, ask each participant to read two hypothetical communication scenarios (a group … response to determine if the participant fits in one of the following categories: ■ Expressive or … Based on the descriptions, each participant response should be grouped into one category.

477. Mod5-Comm-Assessment (pdf file)
     www.healthcare411.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/candor/module5/mod5-comm-assessment.pdf
     April 01, 2016 - The participant must then describe first the liked and then the disliked person in as much detail as … The result is a cognitive complexity score for each participant. … To make this assessment, ask each participant to read two hypothetical communication scenarios (a group … response to determine if the participant fits in one of the following categories: ■ Expressive or … Based on the descriptions, each participant response should be grouped into one category.

478. Mod5-Comm-Assessment (pdf file)
     www.talkingquality.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/candor/module5/mod5-comm-assessment.pdf
     April 01, 2016 - The participant must then describe first the liked and then the disliked person in as much detail as … The result is a cognitive complexity score for each participant. … To make this assessment, ask each participant to read two hypothetical communication scenarios (a group … response to determine if the participant fits in one of the following categories: ■ Expressive or … Based on the descriptions, each participant response should be grouped into one category.

479. Mod5-Comm-Assessment (pdf file)
     monahrq.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/candor/module5/mod5-comm-assessment.pdf
     April 01, 2016 - The participant must then describe first the liked and then the disliked person in as much detail as … The result is a cognitive complexity score for each participant. … To make this assessment, ask each participant to read two hypothetical communication scenarios (a group … response to determine if the participant fits in one of the following categories: ■ Expressive or … Based on the descriptions, each participant response should be grouped into one category.

480. Mod5-Comm-Assessment (pdf file)
     cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/candor/module5/mod5-comm-assessment.pdf
     April 01, 2016 - The participant must then describe first the liked and then the disliked person in as much detail as … The result is a cognitive complexity score for each participant. … To make this assessment, ask each participant to read two hypothetical communication scenarios (a group … response to determine if the participant fits in one of the following categories: ■ Expressive or … Based on the descriptions, each participant response should be grouped into one category.