Results

Total Results: 28 records

Showing results for "multicase review".

1. Appendix B. Products Produced By the National Evaluation Team | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
   www.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/appb.html
   October 01, 2015 - multicase study Illinois, Maine, Oregon, Pennsylvania Category A Interviews, DHHS report Under review … North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Ohio 1 Category A Interviews, physicians’ responses to survey Under review … grants to improve children’s health care quality All 18 States Cross-cutting Interviews Under review … CHIPRA quality demonstration Florida, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah Category C Interviews Under review

2. Appendix B. Products Produced By the National Evaluation Team | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
   www.cahps.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/appb.html
   October 01, 2015 - Staff Contacts Training & Education Funding Grant Application, Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review Award Process Post-Award Grant Management … multicase study Illinois, Maine, Oregon, Pennsylvania Category A Interviews, DHHS report Under review … grants to improve children’s health care quality All 18 States Cross-cutting Interviews Under review … CHIPRA quality demonstration Florida, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah Category C Interviews Under review

3. Appendix B. Products Produced By the National Evaluation Team | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
   www.innovations.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/appb.html
   October 01, 2015 - Staff Contacts Training & Education Funding Grant Application, Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review Award Process Post-Award Grant Management … multicase study Illinois, Maine, Oregon, Pennsylvania Category A Interviews, DHHS report Under review … grants to improve children’s health care quality All 18 States Cross-cutting Interviews Under review … CHIPRA quality demonstration Florida, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah Category C Interviews Under review

4. Appendix B. Products Produced By the National Evaluation Team | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
   www.monahrq.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/appb.html
   October 01, 2015 - Staff Contacts Training & Education Funding Grant Application, Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review Award Process Post-Award Grant Management … multicase study Illinois, Maine, Oregon, Pennsylvania Category A Interviews, DHHS report Under review … grants to improve children’s health care quality All 18 States Cross-cutting Interviews Under review … CHIPRA quality demonstration Florida, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah Category C Interviews Under review

5. Appendix B. Products Produced By the National Evaluation Team | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
   www.healthcare411.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/appb.html
   October 01, 2015 - Staff Contacts Training & Education Funding Grant Application, Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review Award Process Post-Award Grant Management … multicase study Illinois, Maine, Oregon, Pennsylvania Category A Interviews, DHHS report Under review … grants to improve children’s health care quality All 18 States Cross-cutting Interviews Under review … CHIPRA quality demonstration Florida, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah Category C Interviews Under review

6. Appendix B. Products Produced By the National Evaluation Team | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
   www.talkingquality.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/appb.html
   October 01, 2015 - Staff Contacts Training & Education Funding Grant Application, Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review Award Process Post-Award Grant Management … multicase study Illinois, Maine, Oregon, Pennsylvania Category A Interviews, DHHS report Under review … grants to improve children’s health care quality All 18 States Cross-cutting Interviews Under review … CHIPRA quality demonstration Florida, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah Category C Interviews Under review

7. Appendix B. Products Produced By the National Evaluation Team | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
   www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/appb.html
   October 01, 2015 - Staff Contacts Training & Education Funding Grant Application, Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review Award Process Post-Award Grant Management … multicase study Illinois, Maine, Oregon, Pennsylvania Category A Interviews, DHHS report Under review … grants to improve children’s health care quality All 18 States Cross-cutting Interviews Under review … CHIPRA quality demonstration Florida, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah Category C Interviews Under review

8. Appendix B. Products Produced By the National Evaluation Team | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
   ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/appb.html
   October 01, 2015 - Staff Contacts Training & Education Funding Grant Application, Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review Award Process Post-Award Grant Management … multicase study Illinois, Maine, Oregon, Pennsylvania Category A Interviews, DHHS report Under review … grants to improve children’s health care quality All 18 States Cross-cutting Interviews Under review … CHIPRA quality demonstration Florida, Oregon, South Carolina, Utah Category C Interviews Under review

9. Renal Artery Stenosis Update | Effective Health Care (EHC) Program
   effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/renal-update/research-protocol
   January 20, 2015 - Topic Timeline Jan. 15, 2015 Topic Initiated Jan. 20, 2015 Research Protocol Aug. 16, 2016 Systematic Review … We plan to build off of and improve on the tables used in the original review. … The EPC will complete a disposition of all peer review comments. … of reported cases") 14 not 15 limit 16 to "all adult (19 plus years)" 16 not 17 limit 18 to … review, academic or "review literature" or review, multicase or review, tutorial) limit 20 to meta

10. renal-update-2015-150115 (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/renal-update_research-protocol.pdf
    January 15, 2015 - Evidence-based Practice Center Systematic Review … We plan to build off of and improve on the tables used in the original review. … The EPC will complete a disposition of all peer review comments. … of reported cases") 16. 14 not 15 17. limit 16 to "all adult (19 plus years)" 18. 16 not 17 19. … " or review, academic or "review literature" or review, multicase or review, tutorial) 22. limit 20

11. Draft Comparative Effectiveness Review Appendicies (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/renal-artery-stenosis_appendixes.pdf
    April 01, 2005 - Draft Comparative Effectiveness Review Appendicies Appendix A. … of reported cases") 2736 16 14 not 15 7412 17 limit 16 to "all adult (19 plus years)" 4222 18 … " or review, academic or "review literature" or review, multicase or review, tutorial) 1316 22 limit … A review of the literature and personal experience of 41 operated patients. … BMJ 300(6724):569-72. 1990 Review Rappelli A, Glorioso N, Madeddu P, et al.

12. 2. Synthesis of Key Findings by Category | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    www.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/section2.html
    October 01, 2015 - We encourage readers to review specific products for additional findings and nuances that we have not … Using information from Illinois, Maine, Oregon, and Pennsylvania, the NET developed a manuscript (under review … collective effort from many stakeholders, some States formed workgroups or held formal meetings to review … registries; and Health Information Exchanges (HIEs) and provider-submitted data (direct EHR data or manual review … A review of information collected during site visits and other discussions with project staff underscores

13. 2. Synthesis of Key Findings by Category | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    www.cahps.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/section2.html
    October 01, 2015 - Staff Contacts Training & Education Funding Grant Application, Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review Award Process Post-Award Grant Management … We encourage readers to review specific products for additional findings and nuances that we have not … collective effort from many stakeholders, some States formed workgroups or held formal meetings to review … A review of information collected during site visits and other discussions with project staff underscores

14. 2. Synthesis of Key Findings by Category | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    www.innovations.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/section2.html
    October 01, 2015 - Staff Contacts Training & Education Funding Grant Application, Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review Award Process Post-Award Grant Management … We encourage readers to review specific products for additional findings and nuances that we have not … collective effort from many stakeholders, some States formed workgroups or held formal meetings to review … A review of information collected during site visits and other discussions with project staff underscores

15. 2. Synthesis of Key Findings by Category | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    www.healthcare411.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/section2.html
    October 01, 2015 - Staff Contacts Training & Education Funding Grant Application, Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review Award Process Post-Award Grant Management … We encourage readers to review specific products for additional findings and nuances that we have not … collective effort from many stakeholders, some States formed workgroups or held formal meetings to review … A review of information collected during site visits and other discussions with project staff underscores

16. 2. Synthesis of Key Findings by Category | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    www.monahrq.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/section2.html
    October 01, 2015 - Staff Contacts Training & Education Funding Grant Application, Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review Award Process Post-Award Grant Management … We encourage readers to review specific products for additional findings and nuances that we have not … collective effort from many stakeholders, some States formed workgroups or held formal meetings to review … A review of information collected during site visits and other discussions with project staff underscores

17. 2. Synthesis of Key Findings by Category | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    www.talkingquality.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/section2.html
    October 01, 2015 - Staff Contacts Training & Education Funding Grant Application, Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review Award Process Post-Award Grant Management … We encourage readers to review specific products for additional findings and nuances that we have not … collective effort from many stakeholders, some States formed workgroups or held formal meetings to review … A review of information collected during site visits and other discussions with project staff underscores

18. 2. Synthesis of Key Findings by Category | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/section2.html
    October 01, 2015 - Staff Contacts Training & Education Funding Grant Application, Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review Award Process Post-Award Grant Management … We encourage readers to review specific products for additional findings and nuances that we have not … collective effort from many stakeholders, some States formed workgroups or held formal meetings to review … A review of information collected during site visits and other discussions with project staff underscores

19. 2. Synthesis of Key Findings by Category | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/final-report/section2.html
    October 01, 2015 - Staff Contacts Training & Education Funding Grant Application, Review … Study Sections for Scientific Peer Review Award Process Post-Award Grant Management … We encourage readers to review specific products for additional findings and nuances that we have not … collective effort from many stakeholders, some States formed workgroups or held formal meetings to review … A review of information collected during site visits and other discussions with project staff underscores

20. National Evaluation of the CHIPRA Quality Demonstration Grant Program: Final Project Report (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/publications/files/chipra-final-report_0.pdf
    February 21, 2016 - We encourage readers to review specific products for additional findings and nuances that we have not … information from Illinois, Maine, Oregon, and Pennsylvania, the NET developed a manuscript (under review … collective effort from many stakeholders, some States formed workgroups or held formal meetings to review … A review of information collected during site visits and other discussions with project staff underscores … We believe that future grant programs with similar goals should include review criteria in the grant