Results

Total Results: over 10,000 records

Showing results for "intervention".

  1. www.cpsi.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps/longtermcare/module11/ts2-0ltc_module11_ig_implementation.pdf
    June 26, 2017 - • If the test shows that the intervention was successful, monitor intervention effectiveness, sustain … Define the aims of your TeamSTEPPS intervention. 4. Design a TeamSTEPPS intervention. 5. … Aims can be based on the process of the TeamSTEPPS intervention itself or on the outcomes of that intervention … Draft your TeamSTEPPS intervention. … Stated aims of the TeamSTEPPS intervention 4.
  2. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps/longtermcare/module11/ts2-0ltc_module11_ig_implementation.pdf
    June 26, 2017 - • If the test shows that the intervention was successful, monitor intervention effectiveness, sustain … Define the aims of your TeamSTEPPS intervention. 4. Design a TeamSTEPPS intervention. 5. … Aims can be based on the process of the TeamSTEPPS intervention itself or on the outcomes of that intervention … Draft your TeamSTEPPS intervention. … Stated aims of the TeamSTEPPS intervention 4.
  3. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/instructor/fundamentals/module11/igimplement.pdf
    March 04, 2014 - • If the test shows that the intervention was successful, monitor intervention effectiveness, … Define the aims of your TeamSTEPPS intervention. 4. Design a TeamSTEPPS intervention. 5. … Aims can be based on the process of the TeamSTEPPS intervention itself or on the outcomes of that intervention … Draft your TeamSTEPPS intervention. … Stated aims of the TeamSTEPPS intervention 4.
  4. www.cpsi.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/hais/tools/ambulatory-surgery/sections/implementation/implementation-guide/appendix-k-study-elements.docx
    April 13, 2017 - Consider testing a new intervention. … · Keep the intervention as simple as possible to avoid confusion and change overload for the team. … Change Data Compare the baseline data with the data collected after the intervention was initiated. … Consider testing a new intervention. … Use the new data to perform the analyses again and determine a new corrective action/intervention.
  5. www.innovations.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/hais/tools/ambulatory-surgery/sections/implementation/implementation-guide/appendix-k-study-elements.docx
    April 13, 2017 - Consider testing a new intervention. … · Keep the intervention as simple as possible to avoid confusion and change overload for the team. … Change Data Compare the baseline data with the data collected after the intervention was initiated. … Consider testing a new intervention. … Use the new data to perform the analyses again and determine a new corrective action/intervention.
  6. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/hais/tools/ambulatory-surgery/sections/implementation/implementation-guide/appendix-k-study-elements.docx
    April 13, 2017 - Consider testing a new intervention. … · Keep the intervention as simple as possible to avoid confusion and change overload for the team. … Change Data Compare the baseline data with the data collected after the intervention was initiated. … Consider testing a new intervention. … Use the new data to perform the analyses again and determine a new corrective action/intervention.
  7. www.talkingquality.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/hais/tools/ambulatory-surgery/sections/implementation/implementation-guide/appendix-k-study-elements.docx
    April 13, 2017 - Consider testing a new intervention. … · Keep the intervention as simple as possible to avoid confusion and change overload for the team. … Change Data Compare the baseline data with the data collected after the intervention was initiated. … Consider testing a new intervention. … Use the new data to perform the analyses again and determine a new corrective action/intervention.
  8. www.monahrq.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/hais/tools/ambulatory-surgery/sections/implementation/implementation-guide/appendix-k-study-elements.docx
    April 13, 2017 - Consider testing a new intervention. … · Keep the intervention as simple as possible to avoid confusion and change overload for the team. … Change Data Compare the baseline data with the data collected after the intervention was initiated. … Consider testing a new intervention. … Use the new data to perform the analyses again and determine a new corrective action/intervention.
  9. www.healthcare411.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/hais/tools/ambulatory-surgery/sections/implementation/implementation-guide/appendix-k-study-elements.docx
    April 13, 2017 - Consider testing a new intervention. … · Keep the intervention as simple as possible to avoid confusion and change overload for the team. … Change Data Compare the baseline data with the data collected after the intervention was initiated. … Consider testing a new intervention. … Use the new data to perform the analyses again and determine a new corrective action/intervention.
  10. preventiveservices.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/hais/tools/ambulatory-surgery/sections/implementation/implementation-guide/appendix-k-study-elements.docx
    April 13, 2017 - Consider testing a new intervention. … · Keep the intervention as simple as possible to avoid confusion and change overload for the team. … Change Data Compare the baseline data with the data collected after the intervention was initiated. … Consider testing a new intervention. … Use the new data to perform the analyses again and determine a new corrective action/intervention.
  11. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/hais/tools/ambulatory-surgery/sections/implementation/implementation-guide/appendix-k-study-elements.docx
    April 13, 2017 - Consider testing a new intervention. … · Keep the intervention as simple as possible to avoid confusion and change overload for the team. … Change Data Compare the baseline data with the data collected after the intervention was initiated. … Consider testing a new intervention. … Use the new data to perform the analyses again and determine a new corrective action/intervention.
  12. www.cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/chipra-medical-home-academyhealth.pdf
    December 12, 2015 - and comparison groups in preventable ED use decrease for intervention vs. comparison practices ( … βtime*intervention = 0.13, p = 0.20) • Effect did not differ significantly (using p < 0.05 standard … ) for children with versus without chronic conditions, but came close (βtime*intervention … than comparison practices (βtime*intervention = -0.30, p = 0.03) Key Conclusions • During the … LC, preventable ED use declined in both intervention and comparison groups, and among children with
  13. www.talkingquality.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/chipra-medical-home-academyhealth.pdf
    December 12, 2015 - and comparison groups in preventable ED use decrease for intervention vs. comparison practices ( … βtime*intervention = 0.13, p = 0.20) • Effect did not differ significantly (using p < 0.05 standard … ) for children with versus without chronic conditions, but came close (βtime*intervention … than comparison practices (βtime*intervention = -0.30, p = 0.03) Key Conclusions • During the … LC, preventable ED use declined in both intervention and comparison groups, and among children with
  14. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/chipra-medical-home-academyhealth.pdf
    December 12, 2015 - and comparison groups in preventable ED use decrease for intervention vs. comparison practices ( … βtime*intervention = 0.13, p = 0.20) • Effect did not differ significantly (using p < 0.05 standard … ) for children with versus without chronic conditions, but came close (βtime*intervention … than comparison practices (βtime*intervention = -0.30, p = 0.03) Key Conclusions • During the … LC, preventable ED use declined in both intervention and comparison groups, and among children with
  15. www.healthcare411.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/chipra-medical-home-academyhealth.pdf
    December 12, 2015 - and comparison groups in preventable ED use decrease for intervention vs. comparison practices ( … βtime*intervention = 0.13, p = 0.20) • Effect did not differ significantly (using p < 0.05 standard … ) for children with versus without chronic conditions, but came close (βtime*intervention … than comparison practices (βtime*intervention = -0.30, p = 0.03) Key Conclusions • During the … LC, preventable ED use declined in both intervention and comparison groups, and among children with
  16. www.innovations.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/chipra-medical-home-academyhealth.pdf
    December 12, 2015 - and comparison groups in preventable ED use decrease for intervention vs. comparison practices ( … βtime*intervention = 0.13, p = 0.20) • Effect did not differ significantly (using p < 0.05 standard … ) for children with versus without chronic conditions, but came close (βtime*intervention … than comparison practices (βtime*intervention = -0.30, p = 0.03) Key Conclusions • During the … LC, preventable ED use declined in both intervention and comparison groups, and among children with
  17. www.monahrq.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/chipra-medical-home-academyhealth.pdf
    December 12, 2015 - and comparison groups in preventable ED use decrease for intervention vs. comparison practices ( … βtime*intervention = 0.13, p = 0.20) • Effect did not differ significantly (using p < 0.05 standard … ) for children with versus without chronic conditions, but came close (βtime*intervention … than comparison practices (βtime*intervention = -0.30, p = 0.03) Key Conclusions • During the … LC, preventable ED use declined in both intervention and comparison groups, and among children with
  18. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/chipra-medical-home-academyhealth.pdf
    December 12, 2015 - and comparison groups in preventable ED use decrease for intervention vs. comparison practices ( … βtime*intervention = 0.13, p = 0.20) • Effect did not differ significantly (using p < 0.05 standard … ) for children with versus without chronic conditions, but came close (βtime*intervention … than comparison practices (βtime*intervention = -0.30, p = 0.03) Key Conclusions • During the … LC, preventable ED use declined in both intervention and comparison groups, and among children with
  19. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/advances-in-patient-safety/vol3/Furmaga.pdf
    January 01, 2005 - intervention. … Third intervention For the third intervention we tracked prescription numbers for 559 unique patients … Advances in Patient Safety: Vol. 3 284 Fourth and final intervention An intervention was taken … The third intervention was able to identify use by patient. … Second intervention: indications for Table 2. Second intervention: interventions for Table 3.
  20. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/resources/advances-in-patient-safety-2/vol4/Advances-Raebel_53.pdf
    May 07, 2008 - The overall intervention design was similar for all projects. … o Intervention group: 79.1% (P <0.001). … o Intervention group, 64% (P <0.001). … o Intervention group, 2.9% (P <0.001). … o Intervention group 77%.