-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/app-e-surv-report-3-acute-pain.xlsx
May 29, 2025 - , 24 hours, 72 hours <1 day
1 day to <1 week A vs. … 24 hours, 48 hours 1 day to 1 week A vs. … 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours <1 day A vs. … 5.3 at 6 hours, 2.0 vs. 5.3 at 12 hours, 1.1 vs. 4.8 at 24 hours
Pain ≥4 on 0 to 10 scale (estimated … vs. 4.9 vs. 5.6 at 6 hours, 5.7 vs. 7.0 vs. 6.2 at 24 hours, 5.1 vs. 7.0 vs. 6.6 at 48 hours NR NR
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/app-e-surv-report-2-acute-pain.xlsx
May 29, 2025 - , 24 hours, 72 hours <1 day
1 day to <1 week A vs. … 24 hours, 48 hours 1 day to 1 week A vs. … 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours <1 day A vs. … 5.3 at 6 hours, 2.0 vs. 5.3 at 12 hours, 1.1 vs. 4.8 at 24 hours
Pain ≥4 on 0 to 10 scale (estimated … vs. 4.9 vs. 5.6 at 6 hours, 5.7 vs. 7.0 vs. 6.2 at 24 hours, 5.1 vs. 7.0 vs. 6.6 at 48 hours NR NR
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/app-e-surv-rept-1-acute-pain.xlsx
May 29, 2025 - , 24 hours, 72 hours <1 day
1 day to <1 week A vs. … 2 hours, 4 hours, 6 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours <1 day A vs. … 5.3 at 6 hours, 2.0 vs. 5.3 at 12 hours, 1.1 vs. 4.8 at 24 hours
Pain ≥4 on 0 to 10 scale (estimated … , 4.9 vs. 5.3 vs. 4.8 vs. 4.8 at 6 hours, 5.7 vs. 6.0 vs. 5.7 vs. 6.0 at 24 hours
NR A vs. … vs. 4.9 vs. 5.6 at 6 hours, 5.7 vs. 7.0 vs. 6.2 at 24 hours, 5.1 vs. 7.0 vs. 6.6 at 48 hours NR NR
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/fatigue-sleepiness-protocol.pdf
July 01, 2023 - Making Healthcare Safer IV: Fatigue and Sleepiness of Clinicians Due to Hours of Service
1 … Protocol
Project Title: Making Healthcare Safer IV: Fatigue and
Sleepiness of Clinicians Due to Hours … is the frequency and severity of harms associated with fatigue and sleepiness
of clinicians due to hours … used to prevent or mitigate the
harms associated with fatigue and sleepiness of clinicians due to hours … used to prevent or mitigate the harms associated
with fatigue and sleepiness of clinicians due to hours
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cer-239-acute-migraine-evidence-summary.pdf
December 01, 2020 - and
increase the likelihood of being pain-free at 2 hours, 1 day, and at 1 week, and
restore function … Effectiveness and harms:
• Tramadol in combination with acetaminophen may reduce pain at 2 hours and … • Butorphanol may reduce pain at 2 hours, 1 day, and 1 week, compared with placebo
(low SOE). … (moderate to high SOE) and increased the likelihood of being
pain free at 2 hours (moderate to high … SOE), and also resolved pain at 2 hours (high SOE), 1 day (high SOE)
and 1 week (moderate SOE).
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/episodic-migraine-surveillance-report-2.pdf
June 01, 2022 - at 2 hours,
sustained pain free at 24
hours, or adverse events. … , and sustained pain
free at 24 hours and 48 hours. … , pain relief at 2 hours, sustained pain free at 24 hours, or
adverse events; no serious adverse events … and sustained pain free at 24 hours and 48 hours compared with
placebo. … in pain free at 2
hours, pain relief at 2 hours, sustained pain free at 24
hours, or adverse events
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/episodic-migraine-surveillance-report-1.pdf
June 01, 2022 - and sustained pain free
and sustained pain relief at
24 hours. … at 24
hours. … and at 24 hours. … of pain scale at 2 hours. … and 24 hours.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/episodic-migraine-surveillance-report-3.pdf
August 01, 2022 - , pain
relief at 2 hours, sustained
pain free at 24 hours, or
adverse events. … , and sustained
pain free at 24 hours and 48
hours. … and at 24 hours. … in pain free at 2
hours, pain relief at 2 hours, sustained pain free at 24
hours, or adverse events … and 24 hours.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/fatigue-sleepiness/rapid-research
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cer-238-cervical-ripening-appendix-e-1.xlsx
January 01, 2009 - Patient communicated with RN every 4 hours to capture pain and satisfaction scores. … Patient returns after 12 hours for NST and assessment. … Those not in labor were sent home for another 12 hours. 24 hours after initial application, patients … , and it was allowed to remain in place for up to 24 hours. … -Patients returned to the hospital 24 hours later for final evaluation.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-report-improving-health-systems-access.pdf
August 01, 2019 - to
2850 hours. … and
2850 hours, respectively). … 331 hours to complete. … 90-hours per
product
60 hours 55 hours
(Estimated
range 30-50 if
more familiar
with content) … 300 hours 100 hours 50 hours 2850 hours 331 hours
Evaluation
results *
• “Pushing”
information
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/peripheral-nerve-blocks-disposition-comments.pdf
August 15, 2025 - , not catheter) fascial plane blocks
beyond 12 hours. … less frequent
assessments between 12 and 24 hours, and
the tail end is noise. … We can’t expect a
drug effect from an LA that does not last 24
hours. … The retrosternal pain is worst in the first
24-48 hours, and not 0-12 hours. … Both
studies reported total opioids at 24 hours.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/pilot-projects-supplementing-white-paper.pdf
December 01, 2024 - • Conducting supplemental data analyses is feasible but required substantial additional total
hours … Study planning and design ranged from 25 hours (Minnesota) to 180 hours (Mayo). … hours for both Mayo and ECRI–Penn and 90 estimated hours for Minnesota. … There
was a wide variation in the hours for carrying out statistical analyses: 2 hours (Minnesota), … 60
hours (ECRI–Penn) and 120 hours (Mayo).
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/transparency-infertility_research.pdf
June 01, 2017 - Person-hours required, investigators versus staff ................................................... … A secondary goal was to estimate the person-hours required to complete these analyses. … Person-Hours Required for Data Collection and Analysis
Overall, the project team devoted an estimated … 74.5 hours to planning and conducting this
study. … Person-hours required, investigators versus staff
Name Administrative
(meetings, etc.)
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/cancer-quality-indicator-testing_research.pdf
April 01, 2010 - The mean abstraction time
at JHH/SKCCC was approximately 2.5 hours for patients with a hospitalization … and at
VAGLAHS was 2.3 hours. … there should be an assessment of
whether or not the change in treatment reduced the pain within 4 hours … resonance imaging (MRI) scan or myelography should be performed as
soon as possible, but within 24 hours … ,
then within 48 hours of ICU admission, the medical record should document the
patient’s preferences
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/masks-surveillance-2-appendix-table-a-1.xlsx
April 09, 2020 - C
Mask wearing (mean, hours per day): 2.99 vs. 3.92 vs. … C
Mask wearing (hours/day): 5.08 (SD 2.23) vs. 5.04 (SD 2.20) vs. … B
Mask use ≥5 hours/day: 76% (56/75) vs. 12% (11/89) Open-label
Baseline differences between groups
No … Changed mask every three hours or if damaged. … C when restricted to contacts of index cases receiving intervention within 36 hours of symptom onset
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/masks-appendix-table-b-1-version-2.xlsx
April 09, 2020 - C
Mask wearing (mean, hours per day): 2.99 vs. 3.92 vs. … C
Mask wearing (hours/day): 5.08 (SD 2.23) vs. 5.04 (SD 2.20) vs. … B
Mask use ≥5 hours/day: 76% (56/75) vs. 12% (11/89) Open-label
Baseline differences between groups
No … Changed mask every three hours or if damaged. … C when restricted to contacts of index cases receiving intervention within 36 hours of symptom onset
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/Masks-appendix-table-b-1-surveillance-report.xlsx
April 09, 2020 - C
Mask wearing (mean, hours per day): 2.99 vs. 3.92 vs. … C
Mask wearing (hours/day): 5.08 (SD 2.23) vs. 5.04 (SD 2.20) vs. … B
Mask use ≥5 hours/day: 76% (56/75) vs. 12% (11/89) Open-label
Baseline differences between groups
No … Changed mask every three hours or if damaged. … C when restricted to contacts of index cases receiving intervention within 36 hours of symptom onset
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/masks-appendix-table-b-1-version-1.xlsx
April 09, 2020 - C
Mask wearing (mean, hours per day): 2.99 vs. 3.92 vs. … C
Mask wearing (hours/day): 5.08 (SD 2.23) vs. 5.04 (SD 2.20) vs. … B
Mask use ≥5 hours/day: 76% (56/75) vs. 12% (11/89) Open-label
Baseline differences between groups
No … Changed mask every three hours or if damaged. … C when restricted to contacts of index cases receiving intervention within 36 hours of symptom onset
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cer-238-cervical-ripening-appendix-e-2.xlsx
January 01, 2017 - not specified, includes CD), median (h): 21.4 (95% CI 19.2 to 23.5) vs. 20.7 (95% CI 18.4 to 23.0) hours … rate: 23.49% (35/149) vs. 24.67% (37/150)
RR 0.95 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.42) Labor or delivery within 24 hours … CD rate: 22.36% (91/407) vs. 22.95% (95/414)
RR 0.97 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.25)
Vaginal birth within 24 hours … CD rate: 23.72% (51/215) vs. 26.67% (56/210)
RR 0.89 (95% CI 0.64 to 1.24)
Vaginal birth within 24 hours … : 2.82% (2/71) vs. 2.44% (2/82)
- 24-48 hours: 2.82% (2/71) vs. 2.44% (2/82)
- > 48 hours: 1.41% (1/