Results

Total Results: 1,881 records

Showing results for "groups".

21. Executive Summary: Pain Management Interventions for Hip Fracture (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cer30_hip-fracture-pain-executive-summary_20110517.pdf
    May 01, 2011 - There was no significant difference between groups (MD = ­0.98; 95% CI ­2.06, 0.10; p = 0.07). … Both studies reported delirium and found no significant difference between groups. … There were no significant differences between groups. … There was no significant difference between groups (MD ­0.35; 95% CI ­1.10, 0.39; p = 0.35). … There was no significant difference between groups. KQ 3: Adverse effects.

22. S143 (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/s143.pdf
    October 01, 2007 - In a randomized drug trial, the allocation of subjects to treatment and control groups at random leads … to groups that are similar with respect to both measured and unmeasured baseline characteristics. … This baseline comparability supports the conclusion that any differences between groups in the occur- … In an observational setting, matching groups of patients (cohorts) on the characteristics that are part … By forming treatment and untreated groups that are individually matched in this way, an observational

23. Prognostic Tests (ppt file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/medical-test-reviews-prognostic.ppt
    June 01, 2012 - For prognostic tests, the population category refers to the characteristics of the prognostic groups … The estimates of absolute risk in different groups are more relevant. … The columns show how the patients were placed into groups after adding the new prognostic test. … (i.e., groups that would be treated differently in practice). … These groups also need to be described in detail, including their outcome probabilities.

24. Prognostic Tests (ppt file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/medical-test-reviews-prognostic.ppt
    June 01, 2012 - For prognostic tests, the population category refers to the characteristics of the prognostic groups … The estimates of absolute risk in different groups are more relevant. … The columns show how the patients were placed into groups after adding the new prognostic test. … (i.e., groups that would be treated differently in practice). … These groups also need to be described in detail, including their outcome probabilities.

25. Topic 0559 Disruptive Behavior Disorders in Children NSD FINAL SJ (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/TND-0655-131114.pdf
    May 22, 2013 - inpatient care vs. community based care, school, home), and sub-populations (e.g., sex/gender , age groups … girls, different age groups) that treat children and adolescents with DBDs. … interventions vary in effectiveness across sub-populations, such as: o Boys versus girls o Age groups … (< 6 years, 6-12 years, 13-18 years) o Racial/ethnic minority groups o Socioeconomic strata o

26. Medicare-Medication-Use Research (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/medicare-medication-use_research.pdf
    April 01, 2014 - In particular, the number of unique medications and number of unique medication groups is greatest … Drugs are consolidated into 95 drug groups, and drug groups are consolidated into 18 drug categories … diagnoses only or psychiatric diagnoses with medical comorbidity than other groups. … and lower among medical-only (67%) and no- diagnosis (62%) groups. … by more prescribers than other diagnosis groups in nearly every benefit phase (Table 9).

27. Back-Pain-Imaging Clinician (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/back-pain-imaging_clinician.pdf
    April 01, 2016 - costs of health care resources were significantly higher in the early radiograph and early MRI/CT groups … Questionnaire. »» The proportion of cancer diagnoses was similar for the early imaging and no early imaging groups … were not significantly different at any time point between the early imaging and no early imaging groups … However, the difference in leg pain was less than 1 point between groups and was well below any thresh … found; the proportion of cancer diagnoses was similar in both the early imaging and the control groups

28. Evidence-based Practice Center Systematic Review Protocol (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/procalcitonin_research-protocol.pdf
    September 08, 2011 - o Good: Meets all criteria; comparable groups are assembled initially and maintained throughout the … o Was there an attempt to balance groups by design? … o Were baseline prognostic characteristics clearly described and groups shown to be comparable? … o Were participants in treatment groups recruited in the same time period? … o Was there an attempt by investigators to allocate participants to treatment groups in an attempt

29. Enhanced Functionality for the Distributed Research Network Pilot (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/distributed-network-expansion_research.pdf
    April 01, 2012 - Organizations belong may belong to any number of groups (or no groups). … Groups – Remove button Removes the row selected in the Groups list. … Groups – Remove button Removes the row selected in the Groups list. … Groups – Remove button Removes the row selected in the Groups list. … Administer Groups (Allow access to administer groups). 3.

30. Surveillance Report: CER 30: Comparative Effectiveness of Pain Management for Hip Fracture (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/hip-fracture-pain_surveillance.pdf
    July 08, 2015 - There was no significant difference between groups (MD -0.35; 95% CI -1.10, 0.39; p = 0.35). … There was no significant difference between groups. … There were no significant differences between groups. … There was no significant difference between groups. … There were no significant differences between groups.

31. Continuous-Outcomes-Quantitative-Synthesis Methods (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/continuous-outcomes-quantitative-synthesis_methods.pdf
    March 01, 2011 - , that is, the difference between the two intervention groups. … intervention and control groups. … these groups, this indicates that the data are positively skewed. … and TSD and CSD are the standard deviations of the two intervention groups. … Ensuring the comparability of comparison groups: is randomization enough?

32. Treatments for Fecal Incontinence: Current State of the Evidence (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/fecal-incontinence_clinician.pdf
    July 01, 2016 - PFMT-BF alone* 2 109 Severity No significant difference was found between groups in improvement in the … score at 3 months. ��� Quality of life No significant difference in FIQL score was found between groups … There was no significant difference in improvement in the CCFIS score for the treated versus the sham groups … median decrease in the number of FI episodes over 2 weeks was not significantly different between groups … oral clonidine (0.2 mg/ day) vs. placebo 1 44 Severity No significant difference was found between groups

33. App-G-Surv-Report-3-Nonopioid-Pharmacol-Chronic-Pain (xls file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/app-g-surv-report-3-nonopioid-pharmacol-chronic-pain.xlsx
    May 29, 2025 - Randomization Adequate Allocation Concealment Adequate Patients and Personnel Masked Outcome Assessors Masked Groups … Similar at Baseline Intent-to-Treat Analysis (at Least 95% Analyzed) Attrition <20%; Difference Between Groups

34. Traumatic-Brain-Injury-Rehabilitation Executive (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/traumatic-brain-injury-rehabilitation_executive.pdf
    June 01, 2012 - They delivered therapies to small groups of individuals that progressed through rehabilitation together … Improvements in participation measures were sustained 6 months post-treatment for all treatment groups … Low (moderate risk of bias, single study) CIQ at end of treatment No difference between groups … Planners of cohort studies should carefully select comparison groups as similar as possible to the … Studies we reviewed demonstrated similar outcomes across treatment groups at 1-year followup intervals

35. Engaging-Caregivers-Appendix-C (xls file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/engaging-caregivers-appendix-c.xlsx
    May 29, 2025 - Groups Similar at Baseline? Patient Masked? Care Provider Masked? Outcome Assessors Masked? … Were the Groups Comparable at Baseline on Key Prognostic Factors (e.g., by Restriction or Matching)?

36. App-E-Surv-Report-1-Noninvasive-Nonpharma 0 (xls file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/app-e-surv-report-1-noninvasive-nonpharma_0.xlsx
    January 01, 2021 - Patient Blinded Care Provider Blinded Outcome Assessor/Data Analyst Blinded Compliance Acceptable in All Groups … Attrition Reported Attrition Acceptable Attrition B/w Groups Acceptable Timing of Outcome Assessment … in All Groups Similar Registered or Published Protocol Avoidance of Selective Outcomes Reporting Quality

37. App-E-Surv-Report-2-Noninvasive-Nonpharma (xls file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/app-e-surv-report-2-noninvasive-nonpharma.xlsx
    January 01, 2021 - Patient Blinded Care Provider Blinded Outcome Assessor/Data Analyst Blinded Compliance Acceptable in All Groups … Attrition Reported Attrition Acceptable Attrition B/w Groups Acceptable Timing of Outcome Assessment … in All Groups Similar Registered or Published Protocol Avoidance of Selective Outcomes Reporting Quality

38. Quantitative Synthesis II: Interactive Quiz (ppt file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/selecting-evidence-quiz.ppt
    May 29, 2025 - Detection bias refers to systematic differences in outcome assessments among comparison groups. … Attrition bias refers to systematic differences among comparison groups in the loss of participants from … Confounding by indication is a type of selection bias that occurs when study groups differ because they … assigned different treatments, which thereby introduces systematic differences into the comparison groups

39. Quantitative Synthesis II: Interactive Quiz (ppt file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/selecting-evidence-quiz.ppt
    May 29, 2025 - Detection bias refers to systematic differences in outcome assessments among comparison groups. … Attrition bias refers to systematic differences among comparison groups in the loss of participants from … Confounding by indication is a type of selection bias that occurs when study groups differ because they … assigned different treatments, which thereby introduces systematic differences into the comparison groups

40. Comparative Effectiveness Reiew 243_Prehospital Airway Management: A Systematic Review (pdf file)
    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cer-243-prehospital-airway-management-evidence-summary_0.pdf
    June 01, 2021 - • The most common finding, across emergency types and age groups, was of no differences in primary …  Construct comparisons that are more clearly defined by specific emergency types, patient groups … Given these differences, our results were organized into groups defined by age and emergency type. … Studies were not combined across these groups, as such combinations would not be clinically meaningful … Overview of conclusions: comparisons by emergency types and age groups Outcome Emergency Type and Age