Results

Total Results: 1,881 records

Showing results for "group".

121. Ahrq Community Forum Webinar Branson (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/ahrq_community_forum_webinar_branson.pdf
     October 13, 2011 - • Patients/survivors/thrivers • Patient advocacy group members • Community advocacy group members … • Provide time immediately after their contribution for one- on-one or small group debriefing.

122. Evidence-based Practice Center Systematic Review Protocol (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/vaccine-safety_research-protocol.pdf
     September 18, 2012 - group necessary, but must control for multiple factors in a regression analysis) • Vaccination with … vaccine versus another dose in elderly adults • Vaccination of pregnant women versus a nonpregnant group … Studies will be included for analysis if information about the total number of people in each group … and the number of people with events in each group is available. … Thus, we are including observational studies that contain an unvaccinated control/comparison group such

123. Dementia-Nursing-Home-Characteristics Executive (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/dementia-nursing-home-characteristics_executive.pdf
     October 01, 2012 - Processes of Care Evidence for group activity interventions was mixed. … A validation therapy group was superior to a social control group and/or usual care control group in … . 36% in the control group; low SOE). … Regarding processes of care, evidence for group activity interventions was mixed. … than the control group (low SOE).

124. Effectiveness and Safety of Bronchial Thermoplasty in Management of Asthma: Evidence Summary (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/evidence-summary-cer-202-bronchial-thermoplasty-asthma.pdf
     December 01, 2017 - identified by an National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Advisory Council Asthma Expert Working Group … While rates of mild exacerbations improved to a greater 3 extent in the BT and standard care group … than in the standard care only group, the clinical importance of the difference is unclear. … proportion of patients who achieved the minimum important difference) favored the BT and standard care group … National Heart, Lung, and Blood Advisory Council Asthma Expert Working Group.

125. Layout 1 (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/prostate-cancer_executive.pdf
     February 01, 2008 - (66 Gy in 33 fractions) than the short-arm group (52.5 Gy in 20 fractions). … and 61 percent in the conventional-dose group). … Overall, freedom from failure significantly better in the high-dose group. … Among WW subjects, there were more deaths in bicalutamide than placebo group. … Fewer overall deaths for vaccine group than nilutamide group.

126. Treatments for Fecal Incontinence: Current State of the Evidence (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/fecal-incontinence_clinician.pdf
     July 01, 2016 - of life No significant difference in FIQL score was found between groups at 2 to 3 months; neither group … sham injections 1 206 Severity The mean increase in number of FI-free days was greater in the treated group … (3.1 days, SD 4.1) when compared with the sham group (1.7 days, SD 3.5). ��� Severity There was no … : 6.0 episode reduction [IQR 0.0–12.5] vs. sham group: 3.0 episode reduction [IQR 0.0–8.9]). ��� Quality … was found between groups in Vaizey score** improvement at 6 months (-4.6 points for the dextranomer group

127. Obesity (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/obesity-horizon-scan-high-impact-1512.pdf
     December 01, 2015 - with 31.9% in the control group. … group (p<0.001). … in the BMP-only group. … The balloon group had 10.5%±6.6% mean TBWL, compared with 4.7%±5.1% in the BMP-only group (p<0.001 … and 5.0% in the placebo group.

128. Patient-Monitoring-Systems-Appendix-C (xls file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/patient-monitoring-systems-appendix-c.xlsx
     January 01, 2024 - , Fig. 5). indicating the WMS group had a reduced risk of complications (RR, 0.77; 95% CI 0.44 to 1.32 … ) against 14.2 (95% CI 12.0–16.3) in the control group [30]. … and 2851 patients in control group.29,48,51 A trend towards 39% (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.26–1.43) reduction … and 2851 patients in control group. … August 2018 to July 2019 The Netherlands Observational study with a comparison group Academic 1 Adult

129. Amended Protocol: Interventions for Breathlessness in Patients with Advanced Cancer (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/dyspnea-protocol-amended.pdf
     May 19, 2020 - studies with a concurrent comparison group, and prospective or retrospective cohort studies where … : RCTs and nonrandomized controlled trials and observational trials with a concurrent comparison group … KQ 4: RCTs, nonrandomized controlled trials, observational studies with a concurrent comparison group … RCTs and other intervention studies with a comparison group will be analyzed separately. … Technical Experts Technical Experts constitute a multi-disciplinary group of clinical, content, and

130. Disposition of Comments Report for Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis and/or Asthma (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/asthma-immunotherapy-2010_disposition-comments.pdf
     January 01, 2010 - (low dose) and 48 microgram group). … Our group did not use statistical significance/precision to grade articles. … lower dose group a moderate (15-40%) magnitude of effect. … , and a higher dose group; these 2 treatment groups were compared to a 3rd placebo group. … , 4 in the SLIT group and none in the SLIT vs SCIT group.

131. EPC Systematic Review Protocol: Achieving Health Equity in Preventive Services: Systematic Evidence Review (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/health-equity-protocol.pdf
     January 01, 2020 - (AHRQ) staff and the National Institutes of Health/Office of Disease Prevention (NIH/ODP) Working Group … NIH/ODP Working Group In place of Key Informants, an NIH/ODP Working Group (including subject matter … The NIH/ODP Working Group has participated in monthly calls with AHRQ staff and the EPC; provided written … Technical Experts Technical Experts constitute a multi-disciplinary group of clinical, content, and … Technical Experts provided information to AHRQ, the NIH/ODP Working Group, and the EPC on the important

132. Osteoporosis-Vibration-Therapy Research-Protocol (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/osteoporosis-vibration-therapy_research-protocol.pdf
     January 01, 2020 - Experts in the field will be convened by a group conference call. … Clinicians and advocates may also be separately convened by a group conference call. … Presence of men in treatment group (yes or no) Presence of minorities in treatment group (yes or no … in treatment group (yes or no) Patients receiving other treatments for osteoporosis in addition to … Number of participants in comparison group O — Outcomes Bone mass density as outcome of interest

133. Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews_Inclusion of Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions in Systematic Reviews of Intervention Effectiveness: An Update (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/product/pdf/methods-guide-inclusion-nonrandomized-studies.pdf
     September 01, 2022 - controlled vs. uncontrolled/single group) 2. … than the control group. … that received the intervention and a group that did not receive it. … group. … would have been the same for the control group had the intervention group not been treated (i.e., the

134. Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews_Inclusion of Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions in Systematic Reviews of Intervention Effectiveness: An Update (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/pdf/methods-guide-inclusion-nonrandomized-studies.pdf
     September 01, 2022 - controlled vs. uncontrolled/single group) 2. … than the control group. … that received the intervention and a group that did not receive it. … group. … would have been the same for the control group had the intervention group not been treated (i.e., the

135. Evidence Summary: Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 238: Cervical Ripening (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cer-238-cervical-ripening-evidence-summary.pdf
     March 01, 2021 - c There were 3 cases total (1 in the outpatient and 2 in the inpatient group) which included 1 case each … laceration plus cephalohematoma; authors did not report which specific injuries occurred in which group … other two trials reported a higher proportion of neonates with shoulder dystocia in the dinoprostone group … was also a difference in the proportion of neonates with birth weight >4000 gm in the dinoprostone group … defined populations and did not analyze effects in important subgroups such as women over 30 or 35, Group

136. Evidence-based Practice Center Technical Brief Protocol (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/pain-chronic_research-protocol.pdf
     July 28, 2010 - (if any) relates to the study treatment group. … how the comparison group relates to the study treatment group with regard to any prior pain therapy … How did the comparison group, if any, relate to the treatment group (e.g., on what characteristics … Examples include length of treatment (length of each session, sessions per week, number of weeks), group … Key Informant Group Potential Questions Third party payer (payer) 1.

137. Layout 1 (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/type-2-diabetes-medications-2007_executive.pdf
     January 01, 2007 - group (absolute risk, 1.7 percent vs. 0.8 percent). … No serious events occurred in either group in these RCTs. 4&5b. … The between-group absolute risk differences were ~ 5-15%. … The range in between-group absolute risk differences was 2-21%. … The absolute between-group differences were ~1-5%. 4&5h.

138. Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation: Executive summary for the update of an ASTRO Evidence-Based Consensus Statement (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/topic-nomination-apbi-breast-cancer.pdf
     April 01, 2017 - MCL holds position of the National Coordinator of IORTWorking Group on behalf of the Italian Society … CC is a steering committee member of the Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). … Include age greater than or equal to 50 years in the “suitable” group (moderate quality of evidence [ … Similar results were noted in the initial publication of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG … Table 1 Comparison of patient groups in original and updated consensus statements Patient group Risk

139. Autism-Adolescents Executive (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/autism-adolescents_executive.pdf
     August 01, 2012 - an entire birth cohort of individuals with autism.10 A study of health care utilization in a large group … were significantly more likely to find paid employment than those in the control group (63.3% vs. … compared with those in the control group (p<0.001). … • Nonrandom assignment to groups in 3 studies, no comparison group in 2 case series; attrition not … Population studies may be helpful to empirically group ASD patients by age in a way that fosters more

140. Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews Chapter 12 (pdf file)
     effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-tests-prognostic_methods.pdf
     July 01, 2012 - For practical purposes, it is often useful to group the results of a prognostic test into parsimonious … and 25 percent of the 400 people in the higher risk group. … The differences between the estimated probabilities and observed outcomes for each prognostic group … In the group who 12-8 did not experience the outcome event, the net improvement is the proportion … If clinicians do not treat patients in the lower risk group, then one minus the observed time-dependent