Results

Total Results: 3,220 records

Showing results for "grade".
Users also searched for: grade

  1. Untitled (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/antipsychotics-children-update_research-protocol.pdf
    December 04, 2015 - GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1311-6. … GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence-- imprecision. … $(child*$or$grade$school*$or$kid$or$kids$or$kindergar?
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mrsa-screening-2010_disposition-comments.pdf
    January 01, 2010 - and this came through in several sections of the report (e.g., the assignment of a “poor” quality grade … assessment conducted using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and evaluation (GRADE … Preventative Services Task Force and the strength of evidence provided by the findings as assessed by the GRADE … The overall grade for the strength of evidence then is then classified as “insufficient.” … by the Key Informants and TEP and was posted for comment We have clarified the methodology used to grade
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/renal-function_executive.pdf
    August 01, 2014 - We classified the strength of evidence pertaining to the KQs into four basic grades: (1) “high” grade … research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of the effect), (2) “moderate” grade … research may change our confidence in the estimate of the effect and may change the estimate), (3) “low” grade … confidence in the estimate of the effect and is likely to change the estimate), and (4) “insufficient” grade
  4. digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r21hs018214-olson-final-report-2012.pdf
    January 01, 2012 - Participants were recruited from adolescents grade 9 or higher that indicated during their electronic … 36 (35.3%) 56 (74.7%) 19 (25.3%) .16 Age in years (mean SD) 15.37 (1.6) 15.43 (1.8) .84 Grade
  5. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/gestational-diabetes-screening-2008
    May 15, 2008 - Recommendation Download  JAMA  PDF Recommendation Summary Population Recommendation Grade … Diagnosed With Diabetes Recommendation No Recommendation due to insufficient evidence * Grade
  6. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/obesity-in-adults-screening-and-management-2012
    June 15, 2012 - Recommendation Download  JAMA  PDF Recommendation Summary Population Recommendation GradeGrade: B Screening Tests Body mass index is calculated from the measured weight and height
  7. cds.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/workgroups/231/apr-2017-cholesterol-wg-notes.docx
    January 01, 2017 - artifacts that align with ACC/AHA and Million Hearts recommendations: · Consider representing the lesser grade
  8. Psn-Pdf (pdf file)

    psnet.ahrq.gov/node/49658/psn-pdf
    July 01, 2012 - A follow-up report card on computer-assisted diagnosis—the grade: C+.
  9. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/iron-deficiency-anemia-in-young-children-screening
    September 07, 2015 - Recommendation Download  JAMA  PDF Recommendation Summary Population Recommendation GradeGrade: I statement (insufficient evidence) Risk Assessment No studies assessed the performance
  10. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/tobacco-use-in-children-and-adolescents-primary-care-interventions-2013
    August 15, 2013 - Recommendation Download  JAMA  PDF Recommendation Summary Population Recommendation GradeGrade: B Risk Assessment The strongest factors associated with smoking initiation in children
  11. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/genital-herpes-screening-november-2016
    December 20, 2016 - Recommendation Download  JAMA  PDF Recommendation Summary Population Recommendation GradeGrade: D Screening Tests The most widely used, currently available serologic screening test
  12. www.ahrq.gov/faqs/index.html?page=4
    June 12, 2025 - There are also two other questions that ask about: The patient safety "grade" the respondent would
  13. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/antibiotic-use/ambulatory-care/sinusitis-guide.docx
    September 01, 2022 - Note that the presence of low-grade fever, facial or dental pain, or colored nasal discharge are not
  14. www.ahrq.gov/es/patient-safety/settings/hospital/resource/nicu/coaching.html
    December 01, 2013 - Health Coach develops information for family caregivers ( Appendix A ) that: Is written at 5 th grade
  15. www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/settings/hospital/resource/nicu/coaching.html
    December 01, 2013 - Health Coach develops information for family caregivers ( Appendix A ) that: Is written at 5 th grade
  16. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/KFZpoMBYuoo8TRW6nhRev8
    October 23, 2023 - (314/2693) Any kidney adverse event: 10% (263/2694) vs 10% (266/2693) in primary (interim) analysis Grade … in the Supplement).10,21,46,65 Oral PrEP was associated with increased risk of kidney (primar- ily �grade … 1610) Gonorrhea: 7.8% (126/1614) vs 7.8% (125/1610) Trichomonas: 7.7% (124/1614) vs 6.8% (109/1610) Grade … All adverse events were grade 1 except in 1 patient with grade 2 symptoms. … - gravir and daily oral TDF/FTC were associated with very similar risk of serious adverse events or grade
  17. www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/systems/hospital/qitoolkit/combined/d4i_combo_psi12-dvt-bestpractices.pdf
    May 20, 2016 - may include dry cough, pleuritic pain, hemoptysis, syncope, cyanosis, hypotension, anxiety, a low-grade
  18. digital.ahrq.gov/ahrq-funded-projects/using-electronic-data-improve-care-patients-known-or-suspected-cancer
    January 01, 2023 - detect an estimated 1,048 instances of delayed or missed followup of abnormal findings and 47 high-grade
  19. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/home/getfilebytoken/hhrqMCEgbsBMJ_Ppbcp4yJ
    January 14, 2025 - tion rationale and assessment and the eFigure in the Supplement for information on the recommendation grade … Population Recommendation Grade USPSTF indicates US Preventive Services Task Force. … Grade: I statement What does the USPSTF recommend? … Grade: B Postmenopausal women younger than 65 years with 1 or more risk factors for osteoporosis: Screen … Grade: B USPSTF indicates US Preventive Services Task Force.
  20. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/ccsr/DXCCSR-ChangeLog-v20241-v20251.xlsx
    November 01, 2024 - NEO076 Hodgkin lymphoma in remission NEO076 Hodgkin lymphoma in remission C820A Follicular lymphoma grade … Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in remission NEO077 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in remission C821A Follicular lymphoma grade … Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in remission NEO077 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in remission C822A Follicular lymphoma grade … Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in remission NEO077 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in remission C823A Follicular lymphoma grade … Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in remission NEO077 Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in remission C824A Follicular lymphoma grade