Results

Total Results: 707 records

Showing results for "grade".
Users also searched for: grade

61. Section 1. Preventive Services Recommended by the USPSTF | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    www.ahrq.gov/prevention/guidelines/guide/section1.html
    June 01, 2014 - All these services have received an "A" or a "B" (recommended) grade from the Task Force.

62. AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture: Items and Dimensions (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/hospital/hsops-items-composites.pdf
    February 16, 2021 - (negatively worded) Patient Safety Grade (Excellent, Very Good, Acceptable, Poor, Failing) E1. … Please give your work area/unit in this hospital an overall grade on patient safety.

63. References | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    www.ahrq.gov/pqmp/implementation-qi/toolkit/antipsychotic/references.html
    July 01, 2021 - GRADE guidelines: 15. … J., & GRADE Working Group (2008). … GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

64. MEASURE SUMMARY (CHIPRA Core Set Candidate Measures) - Control #: PHP-12 (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/overview/background/measures-PHP-12.pdf
    December 14, 2010 - USPSTF Grade if applicable: FEASIBILITY I. Measure Specifications Submitted? J.

65. MEASURE SUMMARY (CHIPRA Core Set Candidate Measures) - Control #: AC-2 (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/overview/background/measures-AC-2.pdf
    December 16, 2010 - USPSTF Grade if applicable: FEASIBILITY I. Measure Specifications Submitted? J.

66. Evaluating the Process of Creating and Promoting a Quality Report | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    www.ahrq.gov/talkingquality/assess/what-you-evaluate/process.html
    November 01, 2018 - A good process evaluation is not designed to get you a “grade.”

67. MEASURE SUMMARY (CHIPRA Core Set Candidate Measures) - Control #: AS-1 (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/overview/background/measures-AS-1.pdf
    December 16, 2010 - USPSTF Grade if applicable: FEASIBILITY I. Measure Specifications Submitted? J.

68. MEASURE SUMMARY (CHIPRA Core Set Candidate Measures) - Control #: PHP-11 (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/overview/background/measures-PHP-11.pdf
    December 14, 2010 - USPSTF Grade if applicable: FEASIBILITY I. Measure Specifications Submitted? J.

69. MEASURE SUMMARY (CHIPRA Core Set Candidate Measures) - Control #: PHP-2 (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/overview/background/measures-PHP-2.pdf
    December 14, 2010 - USPSTF Grade if applicable: FEASIBILITY I. Measure Specifications Submitted? J.

70. MEASURE SUMMARY (CHIPRA Core Set Candidate Measures) - Control #: AC-10 (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/overview/background/measures-AC-10.pdf
    December 16, 2010 - USPSTF Grade if applicable: FEASIBILITY I. Measure Specifications Submitted? J.

71. MEASURE SUMMARY (CHIPRA Core Set Candidate Measures) - Control #: PHP-38 (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/overview/background/measures-PHP-38.pdf
    December 17, 2010 - USPSTF Grade if applicable: FEASIBILITY I. Measure Specifications Submitted? J.

72. Rating the Raters: How the Informed Patient Institute Assesses Health Care Quality Reports | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    www.ahrq.gov/cahps/news-and-events/podcasts/rating-raters.html
    March 01, 2016 - Rating the Raters: How the Informed Patient Institute Assesses Health Care Quality Reports In this podcast, Carol Cronin from the Informed Patient Institute (IPI) talks about how the IPI assesses and grades comparative reports on health care quality. Listen to the Podcast (MP3, 18 minutes 29 seconds) Tra…

73. Final Progress Report: Improving Transplant Med Safety through a Pharmacist-Led, mHealth-Based Program (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/2024-02/taber-report.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - risk ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.28 to 0.55; P, 0.001) and a significantly lower risk of grade … Rates of grade 1 and grade 2 AEs were comparable between treatment arms. … Participants in the intervention arm experienced numerically lower rates of grade 3 AEs, but the difference … Participants in the intervention group also experienced a 45% lower incidence risk of composite grade … The treatment produced a significant reduction in medication errors, lower rates of grade 3 or higher

74. AHRQ Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture: Items and Dimensions (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/hospital/userguide/hospital-survey-items.pdf
    July 25, 2017 - (negatively worded) Patient Safety Grade (Excellent, Very Good, Acceptable, Poor, Failing) E1. … Please give your work area/unit in this hospital an overall grade on patient safety.

75. Hospital SOPS Translation Information | Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    www.ahrq.gov/sops/international/hospital/translators.html
    October 01, 2014 - Patient Safety Grade (Excellent, Very Good, Acceptable, Poor, Failing) E1. … Please give your work area/unit in this hospital an overall grade on patient safety. ( More about this … item: A "grade" is a rating given to assess work performance. … The term "rating" can be used instead of "grade." ) Number of Events Reported (No event reports,

76. Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture: Background and Information for Translators (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/hospital/resources/infotranshsops.pdf
    September 01, 2009 - Patient Safety Grade (Excellent, Very Good, Acceptable, Poor, Failing) E1. … Please give your work area/unit in this hospital an overall grade on patient safety. … (More about this item: A “grade” is a rating given to assess work performance. … The term “rating” can be used instead of “grade.”)

77. MEASURE SUMMARY (CHIPRA Core Set Candidate Measures) - Control #: CC-13 (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/overview/background/measures-CC-13.pdf
    December 16, 2010 - USPSTF Grade if applicable: FEASIBILITY I. Measure Specifications Submitted? J.

78. Development and Evaluation of Breast Cancer Prevention Communication Prototypes for the CUIDARSE Project (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/clinicians-providers/iadapt/lara.pdf
    December 19, 2014 - behaviors from baseline to post-intervention, especially among the 36% that reported less than a 6th grade

79. MEASURE SUMMARY (CHIPRA Core Set Candidate Measures) - Control #: PHP-5 (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/overview/background/measures-PHP-5.pdf
    December 14, 2010 - USPSTF Grade if applicable: FEASIBILITY I. Measure Specifications Submitted? J.

80. MEASURE SUMMARY (CHIPRA Core Set Candidate Measures) - Control #: CC-19 (pdf file)
    www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/policymakers/chipra/overview/background/measures-CC-19.pdf
    December 14, 2010 - USPSTF Grade if applicable: FEASIBILITY I. Measure Specifications Submitted? J.