Results

Total Results: 1,033 records

Showing results for "grade".
Users also searched for: grade

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/genitourinary-symptoms-protocol_0.pdf
    July 10, 2023 - )28 for rating evidence certainty, we will use the GRADE approach to assess the overall quality of … We will GRADE the 8 consensus outcomes identified in the Core Outcomes in Menopause (COMMA) review.29 … The GRADE approach assesses five criteria which measure either internal validity (risk of bias, … Guyatt GH OA, Kunz R, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ; GRADE Working Group. … GRADE guidelines: 11.
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/methods-guidance-tests-grading/slides
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-guidance-bias-individual-studies_methods.pdf
    March 01, 2012 - and evidence from randomized controlled trials a high grade. … GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence-imprecision. … GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence-indirectness. … GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence-inconsistency. … GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence-publication bias.
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/obesity-child_executive.pdf
    March 31, 2010 - Within this hierarchy, each study contributed only one weight-related measure to the grade. … We did not grade adverse events or clinical outcomes. … We classified evidence pertaining to the KQs into four categories: (1) “high” grade, indicating high … research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of the effect; (2) “moderate” grade … We caution that a high strength-of-evidence grade is not necessarily an indicator of effectiveness;
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/glaucoma-screening_research-protocol.pdf
    November 16, 2010 - We will use an evidence-grading scheme recommended by the GRADE Working http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov … evaluated by at least one randomized controlled trial and by observational studies, our evidence grade … If an outcome is evaluated by one or no randomized controlled trials, our evidence grade will be based … Effectiveness Reviews15 and by Owens and colleagues.16 For each outcome of interest, two reviewers will grade … Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al, for the GRADE Working Group.
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/assessing-quality.ppt
    January 01, 2010 - Assessing the Quality of Individual Studies Assessing the Quality of Individual Studies Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Training Modules for Methods Guide on Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews Assessing the Quality of Individual Studies Systematic Review Process Overview * …
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/gastric-cancers-protocol-amendment.pdf
    May 02, 2025 - 3, 4, 5) • Direct mild treatment adverse events (grade 1, 2) • Indirect adverse events from treatment … long-term opioid use for pain management) N/A Timing All KQs: Any follow-up duration for grade … 3-5 or indirect adverse events and quality of life; minimum of 1 year N/A for grade 1-2 adverse … Grade 1-2 AEs will be characterized as mild, and grades 3-5 characterized as moderate. … otherwise.21 Grading the Strength of Evidence (SOE) for Major Comparisons and Outcomes: We will grade
  8. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/acs-pci-adjunctive-devices_executive.pdf
    December 01, 2011 - (MBG): An angiographic method of grading myocardial tissue perfusion ranging from grade 0 to grade 3 … In grade 1, the dye slowly enters but fails to exit the microvasculature. … In grade 2, there is delayed entry and exit of dye from the microvasculature. … In grade 3, there is normal entry and exit of dye from the microvasculature. … A grade of 0 is defined as complete occlusion of the infarct- related artery.
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/gastric-cancers-protocol.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - 3, 4, 5) • Direct mild treatment adverse events (grade 1, 2) • Indirect adverse events from treatment … long-term opioid use for pain management) N/A Timing All KQs: Any follow-up duration for grade … 3-5 or indirect adverse events and quality of life; minimum of 1 year for grade 1-2 adverse events … Grade 1-2 AEs will be characterized as mild, and grades 3-5 characterized as moderate. … otherwise.21 Grading the Strength of Evidence (SOE) for Major Comparisons and Outcomes: We will grade
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/prioritization-selection-of-harms.pdf
    February 01, 2018 - using GRADE methods to prioritize harms, and few had experience applying a formal GRADE prioritization … GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. … GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes. … Do you use GRADE or another formal process to prioritize which harms to review? … • Don’t use GRADE or grading scale.
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/menopausal-symptoms-protocol.pdf
    October 15, 2024 - Preventive Services Task Force recommends against use of HT to prevent chronic conditions (Grade D).9 … ) Working Group.45 We will grade the SOE for KQ 1 outcomes from RCT bodies of evidence separately from … Otherwise, we will assign an overall SOE grade for each comparison and outcome as high, moderate, low … To grade the SOE, we will consider the domains of consistency, precision, directness, study limitations … GRADE Guidance 34: update on rating imprecision using a minimally contextualized approach.
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-220-disposition-comments-analgesics-prehospital-setting.pdf
    September 03, 2019 - TEP reviewer #1 Methods Page 28, Line 16: The use of only 2 reviewers to grade the strength of evidence … Each conclusion is accompanied with a SOE grade to further qualify our certainty of the conclusion.
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/menopause_research-protocol.pdf
    March 25, 2012 - primary evidence base34 (supplemented by any more recent RCTs and observational studies when the GRADE … members concur that if obtained, evidence could impact results meaningfully (i.e., alter evidence GRADE … Moreover, all observational data are considered lesser (low) GRADE strength.45 The perspective here … based on the Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) approach,32,33 which is conceptually similar to the GRADEGRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(4):401-6.
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/nephropathy-contrast-induced_executive-2016.pdf
    January 01, 2016 - Following the guidance of the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation … The body of evidence was considered high grade if study limitations were low and there were no problems … GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence--imprecision.
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/acs-pci-adjunctive-devices_research-protocol.pdf
    July 01, 2010 - patent coronary vessels—often defined as (1) a thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade … vessel patency and the absence of dissection, spasm or distal macroembolus, or (2) a myocardial blush grade … pertaining to each key question will be classified into three broad categories: high, moderate, or low grade … Definitions for grading the strength of evidence Grade Definition High There is high confidence that … syndrome EPC Evidence-based Practice Center MACE major adverse cardiac event MBG myocardial blush grade
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/improving-utility-evidence-synthesis-white-paper.pdf
    April 01, 2021 - unacceptable deficiencies, precluding reaching a conclusion.”1 By contrast, the lowest category of GRADE … analysis; c. the unique setting of coverage decisions; d. making guideline recommendations using GRADEGRADE Working Group. 2013. 3. … Acronyms AHRQ Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality EPC Evidence-based Practice Center GRADE … disorder What SGA may have lower major AEs over short- or long-term treatment Marching across GRADE
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/celiac-disease_clinician.pdf
    July 01, 2016 - * The overall evidence grade was assessed based on the ratings for the following domains: study limitations … Marsh grade 1 or grade 2 lesions—in the absence of clinical or serological evidence—are nonspecific … Marsh grade 3 lesions are the classic celiac disease lesions and are characteristic but not diagnostic
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/ehc-presentation-quantitative-synthesis-chapter-5.pdf
    February 01, 2018 - GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency. … Rating strength of evidence • Original EPC and GRADE evidence was simple and involved rating down all … • More recently, GRADE published a new approach based on evaluating strength of evidence separately … GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency. … A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/weight-gain-prevention_executive.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - We used four domains to yield a final evidence grade: Risk of Bias, Consistency, Directness, and Precision … We classified evidence pertaining to Key Questions 1 through 6 into four categories: (1) “high” grade … research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of the effect); (2) “moderate” grade … The team members discussed the process they used to grade the evidence throughout the report writing … When a team member felt the evidence grade was questionable, this comparison-outcome evidence grade
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/glaucoma-treatment_research-protocol.pdf
    November 16, 2010 - We will use an evidence grading scheme recommended by the GRADE Working Group,13 adapted by AHRQ in … evaluated by at least one randomized controlled trial and by observational studies, our evidence grade … If an outcome is evaluated by one or no randomized controlled trials, our evidence grade will be based … Effectiveness Reviews14 and by Owens and colleagues.15 For each outcome of interest, two reviewers will grade

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: