Results

Total Results: 1,033 records

Showing results for "grade".
Users also searched for: grade

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/screening-counseling-interventions-protocol.pdf
    October 01, 2023 - Depression and Suicide Risk (B and I Grades) − Screening for Eating Disorders (adolescents only; I Grade … Grading the Strength of Evidence for Major Comparisons and Outcomes We will grade the strength of evidence … the guidance established by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE … We will grade the seven outcomes, rated as most important for decision making. … GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/transparency-neuropathy_research.pdf
    March 01, 2018 - grade remained “Insufficient.” … No effect Although we now have a body of evidence to grade, the overall evidence grade remained “ … , the overall evidence grade remained “Insufficient.” … No effect Although we now have a body of evidence to grade, the overall evidence grade remained “ … The overall evidence grade would remain “Insufficient.”
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/menopausal-symptoms-protocol-final.pdf
    October 15, 2024 - Overview of the GRADE Approach. In: Neumann I SH, ed The GRADE Book. … .: The GRADE Working Group; 2025:https://book.gradepro.org/guideline/overview-of-the-grade-approach. … GRADE Guidance 34: update on rating imprecision using a minimally contextualized approach. … https://book.gradepro.org/guideline/overview-of-the-grade-approach 20 VI. … Certainty of Evidence Grades Definitions (based on GRADE definitions) V. References VII.
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/dietary-supplements_executive.pdf
    April 01, 2012 - Objectives The objective of this Comparative Effectiveness Review was to systematically synthesize and grade … Overall, no significant differences (grade: insufficient; results inconclusive) were seen between the … The mean SBP was significantly lowered in the supplement-statin combination group (grade: low) in 22 … : low), and triglycerides (grade: low), but not HDL-C (inconclusive, grade: insufficient) or SBP (inconclusive … Likewise, there was no significant difference in blood pressure (inconclusive; grade: insufficient)
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/dcis-mri-utilization_research.pdf
    August 01, 2012 - Grade: We defined grade using the field provided by SEER: well dif- ferentiated, moderately/intermediately … Increasing size and higher grade are related to higher rates of MRI use for women with DCIS but not … Among women with invasive cancer, rates of MRI use de- creased with higher grade disease. … Use was higher for women with larger or higher grade tumors. … Size <1 cm (incl micro) 438 13.9 1,801 19.0 <2 cm 274 17.5 2,643 19.4 ≥2 cm 240 22.5 1,669 17.7 Grade
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/TND_0210_12-07-2009.pdf
    January 01, 2009 - adolescents, and adults with sustained cognitive, physical, and/or psychological impairments from a grade … Staff-Generated PICO Population(s): Children, adolescents, and adults six months post an initial grade
  7. Slide 1 (ppt file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/marketing_evidence_evans.ppt
    September 13, 2006 - 0.564 _Idma* All Grades Trend in actual smoking Predicted trend if truth did not exist 8th Grade … 0.8132422 0.000 pctotfund2 0.973652 0.033 rprice 0.9999468 1.000 _Idma* 10th Grade … medumiss 0.9907165 0.883 pctotfund2 1.004672 0.752 rprice 1.00859 0.92 _Idma* 12th Grade … 0.564 _Idma* All Grades Trend in actual smoking Predicted trend if truth did not exist 8th Grade … 0.8132422 0.000 pctotfund2 0.973652 0.033 rprice 0.9999468 1.000 _Idma* 10th Grade
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/head-neck-cancer-update_research-protocol.pdf
    February 04, 2014 - The EPC should specify the comparison and outcome for which the SOE grade applies. … In the EPC grading system, a body of evidence including RCTs is assigned a provisional SOE grade of … This type of evidence is generally assigned a provisional initial SOE grade of “low”. … The overall SOE grade is classified into four categories as shown in Table 2. … The overall SOE grade for each outcome will be specifically reported in this table. Table 2.
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/kidney-stones-protocol.pdf
    September 24, 2024 - (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) working group.21 We will grade … We will grade SOE for the outcomes detailed in Table 2 as they are critical or important to decision … Otherwise, we will assign an overall SOE grade for each comparison and outcome as high, moderate, low … GRADE Working Group. Welcome to the GRADE working group. 2024. https://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/. … GRADE Guidance 34: update on rating imprecision using a minimally contextualized approach.
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/bladder-cancer-non-muscle-invasive_disposition-comments.pdf
    October 27, 2015 - On one end of the spectrum are patients with low grade noninvasive tumors that rarely develop tumors … Suggest deleting this retaining the description as a flat high grade cancer confined to the inside … As noted by the reviewer, accuracy increased with higher tumor stage and grade. … I assume that these (low and high grade) were lumped together. … As noted by the reviewer, accuracy increased with higher tumor stage and grade.
  11. 04-E029-1 Summary (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/prostate-cancer-surveillance_executive.pdf
    December 01, 2011 - The quality grade was confirmed by at least one other team member. … tumor grade (level of tumor differentiation or Gleason score). … Tumor grade Three studies reported information on prostate cancer mortality stratified by tumor grade … One required that less than 25 percent of the tumor was Gleason grade 4 and less than 5 percent gradegrade (≥7) tumors, and a concomitant increase in intermediate grade tumors (Gleason 5–6).
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/allergy-seasonal_disposition-comments.pdf
    July 17, 2013 - of “insufficient evidence” is not included in the GRADE approach and it might be reasonable to admit … that the grading used here was a modification of the GRADE approach. … The reference cited in the report states, “Strength of evidence receives a single grade: high, moderate … AHRQ Methods Guide states:5 “EPCs should grade strength of evidence separately for each major outcome … The translation of USPSTF quality ratings of individual trials to GRADE risk of bias assessments is
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/dcis-endocrine-therapy_research.pdf
    August 01, 2012 - With early inva- sive disease, use increased with increasing tumor size and declined with higher gradeGrade: We defined grade using the fields provided by SEER: well differentiated, moderately/intermediately … Use did not vary greatly across tumor size or grade. … Tumor Grade DCIS Early Invasive 0 25 50 75 100 Not Done Positive Negative Unknown Pa tie nt … With early invasive dis- ease, use increased with increasing tumor size and declined with higher grade
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/cystic-fibrosis-hgh_research-protocol.pdf
    August 22, 2008 - A separate grade will be given for all major outcomes, including benefits and harms. … We will then use the subsequent domains to modify the overall grade. … The evidence report will also include the definitions used, and the final grade of high, moderate, low … GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendation. … The GRADE Working Group, 2008.
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/stakeholder-report_0824.pdf
    August 01, 2024 - It focused on 20 high-priority clinical preventive services with Grade A or B recommendations from the … Grade Definition A The USPSTF recommends the service. … available at https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/about-uspstf/methods-and- processes/grade-definitions … https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/about-uspstf/methods-and-processes/grade-definitions … https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/about-uspstf/methods-and-processes/grade-definitions
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-future-research-steps-framework_research.pdf
    June 01, 2011 - • GRADE: The GRADE Working Group advises decreasing the grade of the quality of the evidence if … • GRADE: Consistency is a key element. … o GRADE: The GRADE Working Group advises decreasing the grade of the quality of the evidence if the … o GRADE: Consistency is a key element. … o GRADE: Directness is a key element.
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/renal-cancer_research-protocol.pdf
    April 20, 2015 - with cytopathology or surgical pathology) in establishing a diagnosis (malignancy, histology and grade … Major Comparisons and Outcomes: At the completion of our review, two reviewers will independently grade … We will grade the strength of evidence addressing management studies using the evidence grading scheme … ; 2) “moderate” grade; 3) “low” grade; and 4) “insufficient” grade. … Table 7 defines each strength of evidence grade. Table 7.
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cancer-pancreas_executive.pdf
    September 01, 2014 - The output is a grade of the strength of evidence: high, moderate, low, or insufficient. … This grade is made separately for each outcome of each comparison of each KQ. … The grade was provided by two independent raters, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. … We did not grade the strength of the evidence from systematic reviews. … We did not grade the strength of evidence for harms.
  19. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/antidepressants-update_executive.pdf
    December 01, 2011 - Some results are now supported by better evidence than in 2007, which is reflected in a higher grade … Some results are now supported by better evidence than in 2007, which is reflected in a higher grade
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/prostate-cancer-surveillance_research-protocol.pdf
    May 19, 2011 - either regional lymph node involvement (N0–X) or metastases (M0–X), regardless of age, histologic grade … Grading the Strength of Evidence When it is appropriate to do so, we will grade the strength of

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: