Results

Total Results: over 10,000 records

Showing results for "good".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/app-f2-surv-report-2-nonopioid-pharmacol-chronic-pain.xlsx
    September 20, 2022 - Placebo 12 Short 2 33 0 33 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 1 33 33 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 33 33 Hudson, 2021 Good … Short NR NR 4 99 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 86 99 102 Sweating 31 99 102 58 99 102 NR NR NR Hudson, 2021 Good … NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Tired 85 129 153 66 122 153 NR NR NR Horne, 2020 and Hewitt, 2020 Good … NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Tired 68 120 153 32 114 153 NR NR NR Horne, 2020 and Hewitt, 2020 Good … NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Drowsy 64 124 153 NR NR NR NR NR NR Horne, 2020 and Hewitt, 2020 Good
  2. effectivehealthcare-admin.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/app-f2-surv-report-2-nonopioid-pharmacol-chronic-pain.xlsx
    September 20, 2022 - Placebo 12 Short 2 33 0 33 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 1 33 33 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 33 33 Hudson, 2021 Good … Short NR NR 4 99 NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 86 99 102 Sweating 31 99 102 58 99 102 NR NR NR Hudson, 2021 Good … NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Tired 85 129 153 66 122 153 NR NR NR Horne, 2020 and Hewitt, 2020 Good … NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Tired 68 120 153 32 114 153 NR NR NR Horne, 2020 and Hewitt, 2020 Good … NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Drowsy 64 124 153 NR NR NR NR NR NR Horne, 2020 and Hewitt, 2020 Good
  3. Psn-Pdf (pdf file)

    psnet.ahrq.gov/node/44650/psn-pdf
    November 11, 2015 - 'Providing good and comfortable care by building a bond of trust': nurses views regarding their role … 'Providing good and comfortable care by building a bond of trust': nurses views regarding their role … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/providing-good-and-comfortable-care-building-bond-trust-nurses-views- regarding-their-role … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/providing-good-and-comfortable-care-building-bond-trust-nurses-views-regarding-their-role … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/providing-good-and-comfortable-care-building-bond-trust-nurses-views-regarding-their-role
  4. Psn-Pdf (pdf file)

    psnet.ahrq.gov/node/46103/psn-pdf
    September 23, 2017 - Polypharmacy in the elderly--when good drugs lead to bad outcomes: a teachable moment. … Polypharmacy in the Elderly-When Good Drugs Lead to Bad Outcomes: A Teachable Moment. … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/polypharmacy-elderly-when-good-drugs-lead-bad-outcomes-teachable- moment … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/polypharmacy-elderly-when-good-drugs-lead-bad-outcomes-teachable-moment … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/polypharmacy-elderly-when-good-drugs-lead-bad-outcomes-teachable-moment
  5. Psn-Pdf (pdf file)

    psnet.ahrq.gov/node/60288/psn-pdf
    April 29, 2020 - Do some surgical implants do more harm than good? April 29, 2020 Groopman J. New Yorker Online. …   https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/do-some-surgical-implants-do-more-harm-good Medical devices support … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/do-some-surgical-implants-do-more-harm-good https://psnet.ahrq.gov/perspective
  6. Psn-Pdf (pdf file)

    psnet.ahrq.gov/node/44692/psn-pdf
    January 27, 2016 - Good people who try their best can have problems: recognition of human factors and how to minimise error … Good people who try their best can have problems: recognition of human factors and how to minimise error … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/good-people-who-try-their-best-can-have-problems-recognition-human-factors … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/good-people-who-try-their-best-can-have-problems-recognition-human-factors-and-how-minimise … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/good-people-who-try-their-best-can-have-problems-recognition-human-factors-and-how-minimise
  7. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 71% 60% 5 - Excellent 36% 23% 4 - Very good 35% 37% 3 - Good … (Item G1b) Excellent or Very good 73% 64% 5 - Excellent 36% 24% 4 - Very good 37% 40% 3 - Good … (Item G1c) Excellent or Very good 59% 50% 5 - Excellent 25% 16% 4 - Very good 34% 34% 3 - Good … (Item G1d) Excellent or Very good 63% 51% 5 - Excellent 28% 16% 4 - Very good 35% 35% 3 - Good … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 67% 56% 5 - Excellent 29% 18% 4 - Very good 38% 39% 3 - Good
  8. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 71% 60% 5 - Excellent 36% 23% 4 - Very good 35% 37% 3 - Good … (Item G1b) Excellent or Very good 73% 64% 5 - Excellent 36% 24% 4 - Very good 37% 40% 3 - Good … (Item G1c) Excellent or Very good 59% 50% 5 - Excellent 25% 16% 4 - Very good 34% 34% 3 - Good … (Item G1d) Excellent or Very good 63% 51% 5 - Excellent 28% 16% 4 - Very good 35% 35% 3 - Good … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 67% 56% 5 - Excellent 29% 18% 4 - Very good 38% 39% 3 - Good
  9. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 71% 60% 5 - Excellent 36% 23% 4 - Very good 35% 37% 3 - Good … (Item G1b) Excellent or Very good 73% 64% 5 - Excellent 36% 24% 4 - Very good 37% 40% 3 - Good … (Item G1c) Excellent or Very good 59% 50% 5 - Excellent 25% 16% 4 - Very good 34% 34% 3 - Good … (Item G1d) Excellent or Very good 63% 51% 5 - Excellent 28% 16% 4 - Very good 35% 35% 3 - Good … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 67% 56% 5 - Excellent 29% 18% 4 - Very good 38% 39% 3 - Good
  10. pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2022-MOSOPS-Database-Report-Part-II-508.pdf
    January 01, 2022 - (Item G1a) Excellent or Very good 71% 60% 5 - Excellent 36% 23% 4 - Very good 35% 37% 3 - Good … (Item G1b) Excellent or Very good 73% 64% 5 - Excellent 36% 24% 4 - Very good 37% 40% 3 - Good … (Item G1c) Excellent or Very good 59% 50% 5 - Excellent 25% 16% 4 - Very good 34% 34% 3 - Good … (Item G1d) Excellent or Very good 63% 51% 5 - Excellent 28% 16% 4 - Very good 35% 35% 3 - Good … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 67% 56% 5 - Excellent 29% 18% 4 - Very good 38% 39% 3 - Good
  11. www.ahrq.gov/sops/international/hospital/translators.html
    October 01, 2014 - "Shortcuts" also implies that this is not good, not safe for patients .) B4. … Our procedures and systems are good at preventing errors from happening. A10. … (negatively worded) ( More about this item: It is because of good luck or good fortune that more mistakes … There is good cooperation among hospital units that need to work together. F10. … Patient Safety Grade (Excellent, Very Good, Acceptable, Poor, Failing) E1.
  12. Psn-Pdf (pdf file)

    psnet.ahrq.gov/node/36548/psn-pdf
    March 03, 2011 - When good doctors go bad: a systems problem. March 3, 2011 Leape L. … When good doctors go bad: a systems problem. Ann Surg. 2006;244(5):649-652. … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/when-good-doctors-go-bad-systems-problem The author discusses the responsibilities … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/when-good-doctors-go-bad-systems-problem
  13. Psn-Pdf (pdf file)

    psnet.ahrq.gov/node/40387/psn-pdf
    March 08, 2015 - Medication reconciliation only as good as the IT allows. March 8, 2015 Page D. … Medication reconciliation only as good as the IT allows. … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/medication-reconciliation-only-good-it-allows This piece describes the … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/medication-reconciliation-only-good-it-allows https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primer
  14. Psn-Pdf (pdf file)

    psnet.ahrq.gov/node/73970/psn-pdf
    October 21, 2021 - The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly: Patient Experiences with CRPs. …   https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/good-bad-and-ugly-patient-experiences-crps Communication-and-resolution … https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/good-bad-and-ugly-patient-experiences-crps https://psnet.ahrq.gov/issue/
  15. meps.ahrq.gov/data_files/publications/st77/stat77.pdf
    May 01, 2005 - , or good mental health (6.9 percent) … , good, fair, or poor?” … For this report, the response categories “excellent,” “very good,” and “good” were collapsed into … , good, fair, or poor?” … For this report, the response categories “excellent,” “very good,” and “good” were collapsed into one
  16. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - (G1a) Excellent or Very good 71% 72% 5 - Excellent 34% 34% 4 - Very good 37% 38% 3 - Good 24% … (G1b) Excellent or Very good 71% 71% 5 - Excellent 33% 32% 4 - Very good 38% 39% 3 - Good 25% … (G1d) Excellent or Very good 62% 63% 5 - Excellent 26% 27% 4 - Very good 36% 35% 3 - Good 29% … (G1e) Excellent or Very good 84% 85% 5 - Excellent 58% 58% 4 - Very good 26% 26% 3 - Good … (G2) Excellent or Very good 68% 68% 5 - Excellent 29% 30% 4 - Very good 40% 38% 3 - Good 25%
  17. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - (G1a) Excellent or Very good 71% 72% 5 - Excellent 34% 34% 4 - Very good 37% 38% 3 - Good 24% … (G1b) Excellent or Very good 71% 71% 5 - Excellent 33% 32% 4 - Very good 38% 39% 3 - Good 25% … (G1d) Excellent or Very good 62% 63% 5 - Excellent 26% 27% 4 - Very good 36% 35% 3 - Good 29% … (G1e) Excellent or Very good 84% 85% 5 - Excellent 58% 58% 4 - Very good 26% 26% 3 - Good … (G2) Excellent or Very good 68% 68% 5 - Excellent 29% 30% 4 - Very good 40% 38% 3 - Good 25%
  18. pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - (G1a) Excellent or Very good 71% 72% 5 - Excellent 34% 34% 4 - Very good 37% 38% 3 - Good 24% … (G1b) Excellent or Very good 71% 71% 5 - Excellent 33% 32% 4 - Very good 38% 39% 3 - Good 25% … (G1d) Excellent or Very good 62% 63% 5 - Excellent 26% 27% 4 - Very good 36% 35% 3 - Good 29% … (G1e) Excellent or Very good 84% 85% 5 - Excellent 58% 58% 4 - Very good 26% 26% 3 - Good … (G2) Excellent or Very good 68% 68% 5 - Excellent 29% 30% 4 - Very good 40% 38% 3 - Good 25%
  19. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2020_MOSOPS_Part_II_508.pdf
    January 01, 2020 - (G1a) Excellent or Very good 71% 72% 5 - Excellent 34% 34% 4 - Very good 37% 38% 3 - Good 24% … (G1b) Excellent or Very good 71% 71% 5 - Excellent 33% 32% 4 - Very good 38% 39% 3 - Good 25% … (G1d) Excellent or Very good 62% 63% 5 - Excellent 26% 27% 4 - Very good 36% 35% 3 - Good 29% … (G1e) Excellent or Very good 84% 85% 5 - Excellent 58% 58% 4 - Very good 26% 26% 3 - Good … (G2) Excellent or Very good 68% 68% 5 - Excellent 29% 30% 4 - Very good 40% 38% 3 - Good 25%
  20. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-appendix.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - (Item G1A) Excellent or Very good 68% 63% Excellent 33% 27% Very good 36% 35% Good 24% 27% … (Item G1B) Excellent or Very good 70% 61% Excellent 32% 26% Very good 38% 36% Good 25% 30% … (Item G1C) Excellent or Very good 54% 49% Excellent 22% 18% Very good 32% 31% Good 28% 29% … (Item G1D) Excellent or Very good 60% 51% Excellent 24% 18% Very good 36% 33% Good 29% 31% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 66% 59% Excellent 27% 22% Very good 38% 37% Good 26% 31%