Results

Total Results: 1,117 records

Showing results for "good".

  1. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/treatment-resistant-depression_executive.pdf
    September 01, 2011 - We rated the quality of individual studies as good, fair, or poor; only good or fair studies are included … Results: Overview From a total of 2,754 citations retrieved, we ultimately identified 79 good-, fair … rTMS vs. sham Remission rate 223 Moderate 3 trials (2 good, 1 fair): rTMS had significantly greater … VNS vs. sham Response rate 235 Low 1 good trial: VNS and sham did not differ significantly. … rTMS vs. sham Cognitive 161 Insufficient 4 trials (1 good, 3 fair): Some evidence functioning suggests
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/app-e-surv-report-3-acute-pain.xlsx
    May 29, 2025 - (0/74), RR 12.66 (95% CI 0.73 to 220.85) NR Block Institute for Clinical and Translational Research Good … D Global assessment very good or excellent: 73.9% (151/204) vs. 85.0% (178/209) vs. 52.3% (107/205) vs … D 0.5% (1/206) vs. 1.4% (3/209) vs. 1.5% (3/206) vs. 0% (0/208) Grunenthal SA Good Thota, 2021 Outpatient … B Perception of medication good or very good: 80.6% (29/36) vs. 73.5% (25/34), RR 1.10 (95% CI 0.85 to … 8.3% (3/36) vs. 2.9% (1/34), p=0.62 Dizziness: 25.0% (9/36) vs. 0% (0/34), p=0.002 None reported None Good
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/app-e-surv-report-2-acute-pain.xlsx
    May 29, 2025 - (0/74), RR 12.66 (95% CI 0.73 to 220.85) NR Block Institute for Clinical and Translational Research Good … D Global assessment very good or excellent: 73.9% (151/204) vs. 85.0% (178/209) vs. 52.3% (107/205) vs … D 0.5% (1/206) vs. 1.4% (3/209) vs. 1.5% (3/206) vs. 0% (0/208) Grunenthal SA Good Thota, 2021 Outpatient … B Perception of medication good or very good: 80.6% (29/36) vs. 73.5% (25/34), RR 1.10 (95% CI 0.85 to … 8.3% (3/36) vs. 2.9% (1/34), p=0.62 Dizziness: 25.0% (9/36) vs. 0% (0/34), p=0.002 None reported None Good
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mrsa-screening-2010_disposition-comments.pdf
    January 01, 2010 - The Robicsek study was an observational study of good quality. … It would be a good reference to refer back to throughout the document. … Reviewer #4 (Peer) Methods Methods: Good. … This was a major factor in two of only three studies which were ranked as “Good”. … and one additional study of good or fair quality are of medium risk of bias.
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cesarean-birth-2010_executive.pdf
    January 01, 2010 - management strategies that significantly reduced the use of cesarean in individual studies, all of good … Evidence about measurement of labor progress is conflicting in two studies of good quality, one study … The six RCTs of active management have conflicting findings, but as fair- and good-quality studies … A larger good-quality study that compared high- versus low-dose epidural reported significantly fewer … Of these, one was good quality and five were fair.
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/masks-appendix-table-b-1-version-1.xlsx
    April 09, 2020 - Alcohol-based hand sanitizer use (mean, number of times per day): 5.20 vs. 2.31 vs. 2.02 Open-label Good … C Daily average handwashing use (log transformed): 1.72 vs. 1.76 vs. 1.78 Open-label Good Not reported … 3,823) No use of facemask: 21% (808/3,864) vs. 44% (1,672/3,823) Handwashing: 84% vs. 82% Open-label Good … C Index cases Reported mask worn often or always: 45% vs. 28% vs. 30% Reported good hand hygiene often … Hand washing episodes: 3.9 (95% CI not reported) Open-label Good Not reported Not reported Fever plus
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/masks-surveillance-2-appendix-table-a-1.xlsx
    April 09, 2020 - Alcohol-based hand sanitizer use (mean, number of times per day): 5.20 vs. 2.31 vs. 2.02 Open-label Good … C Daily average handwashing use (log transformed): 1.72 vs. 1.76 vs. 1.78 Open-label Good Not reported … C Index cases Reported mask worn often or always: 45% vs. 28% vs. 30% Reported good hand hygiene often … vs. 63% vs. 31% Household contacts Reported mask worn often or always: 21% vs. 4% vs. 1% Reproted good … Hand washing episodes: 3.9 (95% CI not reported) Open-label Good Not reported Not reported Fever plus
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/masks-appendix-table-b-1-version-2.xlsx
    April 09, 2020 - Alcohol-based hand sanitizer use (mean, number of times per day): 5.20 vs. 2.31 vs. 2.02 Open-label Good … C Daily average handwashing use (log transformed): 1.72 vs. 1.76 vs. 1.78 Open-label Good Not reported … C Index cases Reported mask worn often or always: 45% vs. 28% vs. 30% Reported good hand hygiene often … vs. 63% vs. 31% Household contacts Reported mask worn often or always: 21% vs. 4% vs. 1% Reproted good … Hand washing episodes: 3.9 (95% CI not reported) Open-label Good Not reported Not reported Fever plus
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/Masks-appendix-table-b-1-surveillance-report.xlsx
    April 09, 2020 - Alcohol-based hand sanitizer use (mean, number of times per day): 5.20 vs. 2.31 vs. 2.02 Open-label Good … C Daily average handwashing use (log transformed): 1.72 vs. 1.76 vs. 1.78 Open-label Good Not reported … C Index cases Reported mask worn often or always: 45% vs. 28% vs. 30% Reported good hand hygiene often … vs. 63% vs. 31% Household contacts Reported mask worn often or always: 21% vs. 4% vs. 1% Reproted good … Hand washing episodes: 3.9 (95% CI not reported) Open-label Good Not reported Not reported Fever plus
  10. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/tech-brief-32-pharm-non-pharm-ptsd.pdf
    May 14, 2019 - TEP Reviewer #7 Background Provides a good description of the problem. … Introduction Peer Reviewer #1 Guiding Questions Very good. These are clear. … Peer Reviewer #1 Methods Very good. Rigorous searches included numerous databases. … Peer Reviewer #1 Summary and Implications Good. Thank you. … Peer Reviewer #1 Next Steps Good Thank for your comment.
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/prostate-cancer-risk-assessment-genes_disposition-comments.pdf
    July 03, 2012 - Peer Reviewer 3 Introduction Good overview Thank you. … Peer Reviewer 3 Discussion good Thank you. … JCO by Andrew Vickers titled "Prediction Models: Revolutionary in Principle, But Do They Do More Good … Peer Reviewer 3 Clarity and Usability Very good Thank you.
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/benefits-harms-modeling_research.pdf
    November 19, 2009 - discuss costs and cost-effectiveness analyses, nor do we provide guidelines and recommendations for good … Many excellent publications describe guidelines for good modeling practices, especially in the context … Good practice guidelines for decision- analytic modelling in health technology assessment: a review … Principles of good practice for decision analytic modeling in health- care evaluation: report of the … ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices--Modeling Studies.
  13. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/osteoarthritis-pain-2006_executive.pdf
    January 01, 2006 - • There is good evidence from short-term trials that, on average, nonselective NSAIDs raise mean blood … • Evidence from good-quality observational studies suggests that rofecoxib is associated with greater … • One good-quality, prospective observational study found an increased risk of CV events with heavy … • Among patients who had a recent episode of upper GI bleeding, there is good evidence that rates of … Effects of coprescribing H2-antagonists, misoprostol, or PPIs • Consistent evidence from good-quality
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/mcda_webinar_transcript2.pdf
    August 27, 2012 - MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY POLICY Webinar August 27, 2012 1 Webinar [START RECORDING] PENNY MOHR: Good … KRISHNAN, MD, PhD: Good afternoon everyone. … Again, this is very good news. … We have gotten pretty good success in comparing caregiver versus patient preferences. … That’s a good answer. Really good. DR.
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/communicating_risk_media_wilkes.ppt
    April 01, 2006 - Need to recognize the limitations of language Human beings are not good at statistical reasoning Very … care is well defined Newer is always better Doctors adopt medical advances only on the basis of good … science Medical test are always good – how can information be bad? … Arguably, understanding statistics is much more important for good citizenship than knowing algebra.
  16. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/acs-pci-adjunctive-devices_executive.pdf
    December 01, 2011 - Studies were then given an overall quality score of good, fair, or poor. … These analyses were conducted to assess the methodological study quality (analyses limited to “good” … When a large preponderance of data available for an outcome was of good quality, the strength of evidence … Limiting the analysis to good-quality trials5,16,19,20,22-29,66,68,69 did not affect the results. … flow.43,47 The RCTs evaluating distal balloon embolic protection devices were not determined to be of good
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cancer-ovarian-contraceptives_executive.pdf
    June 01, 2013 - Seven studies were rated good quality, seven fair quality, and one poor quality. … Four studies were rated good quality and two were rated fair quality. … Four studies were rated good quality and four were rated fair quality. … with 3,181 participants) • Women of different gravidity and parity (2 case-control studies [both good … quality, 5 fair quality, and 1 poor quality) and 8 cohort studies (3 good quality, 4 fair, and 1 poor
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/acs-pci-adjunctive-devices_surveillance.pdf
    April 01, 2013 - cardiovascular events (MACE) and coronary dissection were significantly lower in the overall analysis and the good … MACE, coronary dissection, and coronary perforation in the overall analyses and analyses limited to good … effect of distal filter on target revascularization) was seen in overall analyses or those limited to good-quality … cardiovascular events (MACE) and coronary dissection were significantly lower in the overall analysis and the good … MACE, coronary dissection, and coronary perforation in the overall analyses and analyses limited to good-quality
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/health-information-exchange-disposition-160504.pdf
    December 15, 2015 - Peer Reviewer #8 Introduction Good. Concise and useful. … Good narrative combinations. Noted. Thank you. … Tables are good--very standard and clear. … Peer Reviewer #8 Discussion Section was good. … Good searching for the population information.
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/hypertension-pulmonary-arterial_executive.pdf
    April 01, 2013 - One good-quality study evaluated the diagnostic value of serum NT-proBNP in a noninvasive diagnostic … Fourteen studies (4 good quality, 7 fair, and 3 poor) evaluated biomarkers in patients both with and … Of these studies, 68 were rated good quality, 29 fair quality, and 2 poor quality. … Of these RCTs, 18 (64%) were rated good quality, 9 (32%) fair quality, and 1 (4%) poor quality. … Most of the studies included in this review for KQ 3 were RCTs with generally good internal validity

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: