Results

Total Results: 1,402 records

Showing results for "good".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/introduction-user-guide-to-ocer_130129.pdf
    April 26, 2012 - ,26 the ISPE (International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology) Guidelines for Good Pharmacoepidemiology … STROBE) guidelines,29 the ISPOR (International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research) Good … Information about the GRACE principles—the Good ReseArch for Comparative Effectiveness initiative. … Guidelines for good pharmacoepidemiology practices (GPP). … Prospective observational studies to assess comparative effectiveness: The ISPOR Good Research Practices
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/decision-models-guidance_methods.pdf
    October 01, 2016 - Modeling good research practices-- overview: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices … Modeling good research practices-- overview: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices … ISPOR Task Force on Good Research Practices--Modeling Studies. … Principles of good modeling practice in healthcare cost-effectiveness studies. … Good manners in good modeling: mathematical models and computer simulations of physiological systems
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/antidepressants-update/research-protocol
    July 13, 2011 - life Functional capacity Hospitalization Study design Head-to-head, double-blind, RCTs Good … or fair quality meta-analyses Good or fair quality, controlled observational studies Minimum study … or fair quality meta-analyses Good or fair quality, controlled observational studies Minimum study … use predefined criteria based on those developed by the US Preventive Services Task Force (ratings: good … In general terms, a “good” study has the least bias and results are considered to be valid.
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/antidepressants-update_research-protocol.pdf
    July 13, 2011 - life Functional capacity Hospitalization Study design Head-to-head, double-blind, RCTs Good … Question 2a: Maintenance of remission Study design Head-to-head, double-blind, RCTs Good … or fair quality meta-analyses Good or fair quality, controlled observational studies Minimum study … symptoms sexual side effects Adherence Study design Head-to-head, double-blind, RCTs Good … In general terms, a “good” study has the least bias and results are considered to be valid.
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/dementia-nursing-home-characteristics_disposition-comments.pdf
    October 23, 2012 - We agree that good care for all residents could very well be good for residents with dementia. … TEP Reviewer #3 Methods The use of Donabedian’s model is good. … Lack of finidngs or lack of good studies? … I would maintain that a good AL/RC is always better over a bad NF and just the opposite. … Unfortunately, it demonstrates the lack of good evidence. Thank you.
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/pressure-ulcer-prevention/research
    May 08, 2013 - One good- and two poor-quality studies evaluated effects of using a risk-assessment tool on clinical … outcomes, with the good-quality randomized trial showing no difference between use of the Waterlow scale
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/hawley-presentation.pdf
    November 11, 2015 - ,  Rimer and  colleagues that came  out in  2004 because  it’s the  only paper that does a  really good … Informing  patients so  that they can  make  a good informed  decision  is one  thing. …                 When  I thought about this talk I realized  I didn’t really have  a handy good … According  to  responses to  these  questions, there  is a  good percentage  of people  who  trust in …  their physicians and a good percentage  of people  in  all racial and  ethnic groups in  our study
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-200-comments-post-acs.pdf
    November 14, 2017 - TEP #3 Quality of Report Good Thank you. 4. TEP #4 Quality of Report Good Thank you. 5. … TEP #5 Quality of Report Good Thank you. 6. TEP #6 Quality of Report Good Thank you. 7. … Peer Reviewer #1 Quality of Report Good Thank you. 8. … Peer Reviewer #4 Introduction Good. Thank you. 43. … TEP #1 Results Good. Thank you. 65.
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mrsa-screening-2010_executive.pdf
    January 01, 2010 - Three quality categories were used: good, fair, and poor. … The ratings of good, fair, and poor quality are reserved for CCS studies. … study24 was a good-quality cluster RCT. … The evidence base included an RCT of good quality, so the starting level for the SOE was high. … MRSA Surgical Site Infection One good quality CCS study27 reported on MRSA SSI.
  10. Layout 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/treatment-resistant-depression_executive.pdf
    September 01, 2011 - We rated the quality of individual studies as good, fair, or poor; only good or fair studies are included … Results: Overview From a total of 2,754 citations retrieved, we ultimately identified 79 good-, fair … rTMS vs. sham Remission rate 223 Moderate 3 trials (2 good, 1 fair): rTMS had significantly greater … VNS vs. sham Response rate 235 Low 1 good trial: VNS and sham did not differ significantly. … rTMS vs. sham Cognitive 161 Insufficient 4 trials (1 good, 3 fair): Some evidence functioning suggests
  11. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cesarean-birth-2010_executive.pdf
    January 01, 2010 - management strategies that significantly reduced the use of cesarean in individual studies, all of good … Evidence about measurement of labor progress is conflicting in two studies of good quality, one study … The six RCTs of active management have conflicting findings, but as fair- and good-quality studies … A larger good-quality study that compared high- versus low-dose epidural reported significantly fewer … Of these, one was good quality and five were fair.
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mrsa-screening-2010_disposition-comments.pdf
    January 01, 2010 - The Robicsek study was an observational study of good quality. … It would be a good reference to refer back to throughout the document. … Reviewer #4 (Peer) Methods Methods: Good. … This was a major factor in two of only three studies which were ranked as “Good”. … and one additional study of good or fair quality are of medium risk of bias.
  13. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/prostate-cancer-risk-assessment-genes_disposition-comments.pdf
    July 03, 2012 - Peer Reviewer 3 Introduction Good overview Thank you. … Peer Reviewer 3 Discussion good Thank you. … JCO by Andrew Vickers titled "Prediction Models: Revolutionary in Principle, But Do They Do More Good … Peer Reviewer 3 Clarity and Usability Very good Thank you.
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/haller.pdf
    January 06, 2017 - -- typically if you want to sort of find out what the outcomes of future events are, it's not a good … (UNKNOWN): (inaudible) (LAUGHTER) HALLER: That's not a good idea. … It's a little bit out there but I think there's really good use cases. … So having good mechanisms for outreach is really important. … The problem is that if a good idea comes on the first day, everybody rates it up, it's gonna sit on
  15. Facilitation (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/delilberative-methods-design-gupta-2.pdf
    January 11, 2017 - Does not take on an “expert” role  Keeps people focused and on track without being rigid  Asks good
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/tech-brief-32-pharm-non-pharm-ptsd.pdf
    May 14, 2019 - TEP Reviewer #7 Background Provides a good description of the problem. … Introduction Peer Reviewer #1 Guiding Questions Very good. These are clear. … Peer Reviewer #1 Methods Very good. Rigorous searches included numerous databases. … Peer Reviewer #1 Summary and Implications Good. Thank you. … Peer Reviewer #1 Next Steps Good Thank for your comment.
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/ebc_challenge_final_submission_planning_worksheet1.pdf
    June 20, 2012 - Good Luck!
  18. Slide 1 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cf_deliberativemethodswebinar_facilitation.pdf
    May 18, 2012 - Does not take on an “expert” role • Keeps people focused and on track without being rigid • Asks good
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/Masks-appendix-table-b-1-surveillance-report.xlsx
    April 09, 2020 - Alcohol-based hand sanitizer use (mean, number of times per day): 5.20 vs. 2.31 vs. 2.02 Open-label Good … C Daily average handwashing use (log transformed): 1.72 vs. 1.76 vs. 1.78 Open-label Good Not reported … C Index cases Reported mask worn often or always: 45% vs. 28% vs. 30% Reported good hand hygiene often … vs. 63% vs. 31% Household contacts Reported mask worn often or always: 21% vs. 4% vs. 1% Reproted good … Hand washing episodes: 3.9 (95% CI not reported) Open-label Good Not reported Not reported Fever plus
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/masks-surveillance-2-appendix-table-a-1.xlsx
    April 09, 2020 - Alcohol-based hand sanitizer use (mean, number of times per day): 5.20 vs. 2.31 vs. 2.02 Open-label Good … C Daily average handwashing use (log transformed): 1.72 vs. 1.76 vs. 1.78 Open-label Good Not reported … C Index cases Reported mask worn often or always: 45% vs. 28% vs. 30% Reported good hand hygiene often … vs. 63% vs. 31% Household contacts Reported mask worn often or always: 21% vs. 4% vs. 1% Reproted good … Hand washing episodes: 3.9 (95% CI not reported) Open-label Good Not reported Not reported Fever plus

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: