-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/treatment-resistant-depression_executive.pdf
September 01, 2011 - We rated the quality of individual studies as good, fair,
or poor; only good or fair studies are included … Results: Overview
From a total of 2,754 citations retrieved, we ultimately
identified 79 good-, fair … rTMS vs. sham Remission rate 223 Moderate 3 trials (2 good, 1 fair): rTMS had
significantly greater … VNS vs. sham Response rate 235 Low 1 good trial: VNS and sham did not differ
significantly. … rTMS vs. sham Cognitive 161 Insufficient 4 trials (1 good, 3 fair): Some evidence
functioning suggests
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/app-e-surv-report-3-acute-pain.xlsx
May 29, 2025 - (0/74), RR 12.66 (95% CI 0.73 to 220.85) NR Block Institute for Clinical and Translational Research Good … D
Global assessment very good or excellent: 73.9% (151/204) vs. 85.0% (178/209) vs. 52.3% (107/205) vs … D
0.5% (1/206) vs. 1.4% (3/209) vs. 1.5% (3/206) vs. 0% (0/208) Grunenthal SA Good
Thota, 2021 Outpatient … B
Perception of medication good or very good: 80.6% (29/36) vs. 73.5% (25/34), RR 1.10 (95% CI 0.85 to … 8.3% (3/36) vs. 2.9% (1/34), p=0.62
Dizziness: 25.0% (9/36) vs. 0% (0/34), p=0.002 None reported None Good
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/app-e-surv-report-2-acute-pain.xlsx
May 29, 2025 - (0/74), RR 12.66 (95% CI 0.73 to 220.85) NR Block Institute for Clinical and Translational Research Good … D
Global assessment very good or excellent: 73.9% (151/204) vs. 85.0% (178/209) vs. 52.3% (107/205) vs … D
0.5% (1/206) vs. 1.4% (3/209) vs. 1.5% (3/206) vs. 0% (0/208) Grunenthal SA Good
Thota, 2021 Outpatient … B
Perception of medication good or very good: 80.6% (29/36) vs. 73.5% (25/34), RR 1.10 (95% CI 0.85 to … 8.3% (3/36) vs. 2.9% (1/34), p=0.62
Dizziness: 25.0% (9/36) vs. 0% (0/34), p=0.002 None reported None Good
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mrsa-screening-2010_disposition-comments.pdf
January 01, 2010 - The Robicsek study was an observational study of
good quality. … It would
be a good reference to refer back to throughout the document. … Reviewer #4
(Peer)
Methods Methods: Good. … This was a major factor in two of only three studies
which were ranked as “Good”. … and one additional study of good or fair quality are
of medium risk of bias.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cesarean-birth-2010_executive.pdf
January 01, 2010 - management strategies that
significantly reduced the use of cesarean in individual
studies, all of good … Evidence about measurement of labor progress is
conflicting in two studies of good quality, one study … The six RCTs of active management have
conflicting findings, but as fair- and good-quality studies … A larger good-quality study that compared
high- versus low-dose epidural reported significantly
fewer … Of these, one was
good quality and five were fair.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/masks-appendix-table-b-1-version-1.xlsx
April 09, 2020 - Alcohol-based hand sanitizer use (mean, number of times per day): 5.20 vs. 2.31 vs. 2.02 Open-label Good … C
Daily average handwashing use (log transformed): 1.72 vs. 1.76 vs. 1.78 Open-label Good Not reported … 3,823)
No use of facemask: 21% (808/3,864) vs. 44% (1,672/3,823)
Handwashing: 84% vs. 82% Open-label Good … C
Index cases
Reported mask worn often or always: 45% vs. 28% vs. 30%
Reported good hand hygiene often … Hand washing episodes: 3.9 (95% CI not reported) Open-label Good Not reported Not reported Fever plus
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/masks-surveillance-2-appendix-table-a-1.xlsx
April 09, 2020 - Alcohol-based hand sanitizer use (mean, number of times per day): 5.20 vs. 2.31 vs. 2.02 Open-label Good … C
Daily average handwashing use (log transformed): 1.72 vs. 1.76 vs. 1.78 Open-label Good Not reported … C
Index cases
Reported mask worn often or always: 45% vs. 28% vs. 30%
Reported good hand hygiene often … vs. 63% vs. 31%
Household contacts
Reported mask worn often or always: 21% vs. 4% vs. 1%
Reproted good … Hand washing episodes: 3.9 (95% CI not reported) Open-label Good Not reported Not reported Fever plus
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/masks-appendix-table-b-1-version-2.xlsx
April 09, 2020 - Alcohol-based hand sanitizer use (mean, number of times per day): 5.20 vs. 2.31 vs. 2.02 Open-label Good … C
Daily average handwashing use (log transformed): 1.72 vs. 1.76 vs. 1.78 Open-label Good Not reported … C
Index cases
Reported mask worn often or always: 45% vs. 28% vs. 30%
Reported good hand hygiene often … vs. 63% vs. 31%
Household contacts
Reported mask worn often or always: 21% vs. 4% vs. 1%
Reproted good … Hand washing episodes: 3.9 (95% CI not reported) Open-label Good Not reported Not reported Fever plus
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/Masks-appendix-table-b-1-surveillance-report.xlsx
April 09, 2020 - Alcohol-based hand sanitizer use (mean, number of times per day): 5.20 vs. 2.31 vs. 2.02 Open-label Good … C
Daily average handwashing use (log transformed): 1.72 vs. 1.76 vs. 1.78 Open-label Good Not reported … C
Index cases
Reported mask worn often or always: 45% vs. 28% vs. 30%
Reported good hand hygiene often … vs. 63% vs. 31%
Household contacts
Reported mask worn often or always: 21% vs. 4% vs. 1%
Reproted good … Hand washing episodes: 3.9 (95% CI not reported) Open-label Good Not reported Not reported Fever plus
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/tech-brief-32-pharm-non-pharm-ptsd.pdf
May 14, 2019 - TEP Reviewer #7 Background Provides a good description of the problem. … Introduction
Peer Reviewer #1 Guiding
Questions
Very good. These are clear. … Peer Reviewer #1 Methods Very good. Rigorous searches included numerous databases. … Peer Reviewer #1 Summary and
Implications
Good. Thank you. … Peer Reviewer #1 Next Steps Good Thank for your comment.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/prostate-cancer-risk-assessment-genes_disposition-comments.pdf
July 03, 2012 - Peer Reviewer 3 Introduction Good overview Thank you. … Peer Reviewer 3 Discussion good Thank you. … JCO by
Andrew Vickers titled "Prediction Models: Revolutionary in Principle, But
Do They Do More Good … Peer Reviewer 3 Clarity and
Usability
Very good Thank you.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/benefits-harms-modeling_research.pdf
November 19, 2009 - discuss costs and
cost-effectiveness analyses, nor do we provide guidelines and recommendations for good … Many excellent publications
describe guidelines for good modeling practices, especially in the context … Good practice guidelines for decision-
analytic modelling in health technology
assessment: a review … Principles of good practice for
decision analytic modeling in health-
care evaluation: report of the … ISPOR
Task Force on Good Research
Practices--Modeling Studies.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/osteoarthritis-pain-2006_executive.pdf
January 01, 2006 - • There is good evidence from short-term trials that,
on average, nonselective NSAIDs raise mean
blood … • Evidence from good-quality observational studies
suggests that rofecoxib is associated with greater … • One good-quality, prospective observational
study found an increased risk of CV events
with heavy … • Among patients who had a recent episode of upper
GI bleeding, there is good evidence that rates of … Effects of coprescribing H2-antagonists,
misoprostol, or PPIs
• Consistent evidence from good-quality
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/mcda_webinar_transcript2.pdf
August 27, 2012 - MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Webinar
August 27, 2012
1
Webinar
[START RECORDING]
PENNY MOHR: Good … KRISHNAN, MD, PhD: Good afternoon everyone. … Again, this is very good news. … We have gotten pretty good success
in comparing caregiver versus patient preferences. … That’s a good answer. Really good.
DR.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/communicating_risk_media_wilkes.ppt
April 01, 2006 - Need to recognize the limitations of language
Human beings are not good at statistical reasoning
Very … care is well defined
Newer is always better
Doctors adopt medical advances only on the basis of good … science
Medical test are always good – how can information be bad? … Arguably, understanding statistics is much more important for good citizenship than knowing algebra.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/acs-pci-adjunctive-devices_executive.pdf
December 01, 2011 - Studies
were then given an overall quality score of good, fair, or
poor. … These analyses were conducted
to assess the methodological study quality (analyses
limited to “good” … When a large
preponderance of data available for an outcome was of
good quality, the strength of evidence … Limiting the analysis to good-quality
trials5,16,19,20,22-29,66,68,69 did not affect the results. … flow.43,47 The RCTs evaluating distal
balloon embolic protection devices were not determined
to be of good
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cancer-ovarian-contraceptives_executive.pdf
June 01, 2013 - Seven
studies were rated good quality, seven fair quality, and one
poor quality. … Four studies were rated good quality
and two were rated fair quality. … Four studies were rated good quality and four were
rated fair quality. … with 3,181 participants)
• Women of different gravidity and parity (2 case-control
studies [both good … quality, 5 fair quality, and 1 poor quality) and 8 cohort
studies (3 good quality, 4 fair, and 1 poor
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/acs-pci-adjunctive-devices_surveillance.pdf
April 01, 2013 - cardiovascular events (MACE)
and coronary dissection were significantly
lower in the overall analysis and the good … MACE, coronary
dissection, and coronary perforation in the
overall analyses and analyses limited to good … effect of distal filter on target
revascularization) was seen in overall analyses
or those limited to good-quality … cardiovascular events (MACE) and coronary dissection were
significantly lower in the overall analysis and the good … MACE, coronary dissection, and coronary perforation in the
overall analyses and analyses limited to good-quality
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/health-information-exchange-disposition-160504.pdf
December 15, 2015 - Peer Reviewer #8 Introduction Good. Concise and useful. … Good narrative combinations.
Noted. Thank you. … Tables are good--very standard and clear. … Peer Reviewer #8 Discussion Section was good. … Good searching for the population information.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/hypertension-pulmonary-arterial_executive.pdf
April 01, 2013 - One good-quality study evaluated the diagnostic value of
serum NT-proBNP in a noninvasive diagnostic … Fourteen studies (4 good quality, 7 fair, and 3 poor)
evaluated biomarkers in patients both with and … Of these
studies, 68 were rated good quality, 29 fair quality, and
2 poor quality. … Of these RCTs, 18 (64%)
were rated good quality, 9 (32%) fair quality, and 1 (4%)
poor quality. … Most of the studies included in this review for
KQ 3 were RCTs with generally good internal validity