-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/introduction-user-guide-to-ocer_130129.pdf
April 26, 2012 - ,26 the ISPE
(International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology)
Guidelines for Good Pharmacoepidemiology … STROBE) guidelines,29 the ISPOR (International
Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes
Research) Good … Information about the GRACE principles—the
Good ReseArch for Comparative Effectiveness
initiative. … Guidelines for good pharmacoepidemiology
practices (GPP). … Prospective observational studies to assess
comparative effectiveness: The ISPOR Good
Research Practices
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/decision-models-guidance_methods.pdf
October 01, 2016 - Modeling good research practices--
overview: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM
Modeling Good Research Practices … Modeling good research practices--
overview: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM
Modeling Good Research Practices … ISPOR Task Force on Good
Research Practices--Modeling Studies. … Principles of good modeling practice in
healthcare cost-effectiveness studies. … Good manners in good modeling:
mathematical models and computer
simulations of physiological systems
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/antidepressants-update/research-protocol
July 13, 2011 - life
Functional capacity
Hospitalization
Study design
Head-to-head, double-blind, RCTs
Good … or fair quality meta-analyses
Good or fair quality, controlled observational studies
Minimum study … or fair quality meta-analyses
Good or fair quality, controlled observational studies
Minimum study … use predefined criteria based on those developed by the US Preventive Services Task Force (ratings: good … In general terms, a “good” study has the least bias and results are considered to be valid.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/antidepressants-update_research-protocol.pdf
July 13, 2011 - life
Functional capacity
Hospitalization
Study design
Head-to-head, double-blind, RCTs
Good … Question 2a:
Maintenance of remission
Study design
Head-to-head, double-blind, RCTs
Good … or fair quality meta-analyses
Good or fair quality, controlled observational studies
Minimum study … symptoms
sexual side effects
Adherence
Study design
Head-to-head, double-blind, RCTs
Good … In
general terms, a “good” study has the least bias and results are considered to be valid.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/dementia-nursing-home-characteristics_disposition-comments.pdf
October 23, 2012 - We agree that good care for all residents could very well be
good for residents with dementia. … TEP Reviewer
#3
Methods The use of Donabedian’s model is good. … Lack of finidngs or lack of good
studies? … I would maintain that a good AL/RC is always
better over a bad NF and just the opposite. … Unfortunately, it
demonstrates the lack of good evidence.
Thank you.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/pressure-ulcer-prevention/research
May 08, 2013 - One good- and two poor-quality studies evaluated effects of using a risk-assessment tool on clinical … outcomes, with the good-quality randomized trial showing no difference between use of the Waterlow scale
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/hawley-presentation.pdf
November 11, 2015 - , Rimer and colleagues that came out in 2004 because it’s the only paper that
does a really good … Informing patients so that they can make a good informed decision is one thing. …
When I thought about this talk I realized I didn’t really have a handy good … According to responses to these questions,
there is a good percentage of people who trust in … their physicians and a good
percentage of people in all racial and ethnic groups in our study
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-200-comments-post-acs.pdf
November 14, 2017 - TEP #3 Quality of
Report
Good Thank you.
4. TEP #4 Quality of
Report
Good Thank you.
5. … TEP #5 Quality of
Report
Good Thank you.
6. TEP #6 Quality of
Report
Good Thank you.
7. … Peer Reviewer #1 Quality of
Report
Good Thank you.
8. … Peer Reviewer #4 Introduction Good. Thank you.
43. … TEP #1
Results Good. Thank you.
65.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mrsa-screening-2010_executive.pdf
January 01, 2010 - Three quality categories were
used: good, fair, and poor. … The ratings of good, fair,
and poor quality are reserved for CCS studies. … study24 was a good-quality cluster RCT. … The evidence base included an RCT of good quality, so
the starting level for the SOE was high. … MRSA Surgical Site Infection
One good quality CCS study27 reported on MRSA
SSI.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/treatment-resistant-depression_executive.pdf
September 01, 2011 - We rated the quality of individual studies as good, fair,
or poor; only good or fair studies are included … Results: Overview
From a total of 2,754 citations retrieved, we ultimately
identified 79 good-, fair … rTMS vs. sham Remission rate 223 Moderate 3 trials (2 good, 1 fair): rTMS had
significantly greater … VNS vs. sham Response rate 235 Low 1 good trial: VNS and sham did not differ
significantly. … rTMS vs. sham Cognitive 161 Insufficient 4 trials (1 good, 3 fair): Some evidence
functioning suggests
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cesarean-birth-2010_executive.pdf
January 01, 2010 - management strategies that
significantly reduced the use of cesarean in individual
studies, all of good … Evidence about measurement of labor progress is
conflicting in two studies of good quality, one study … The six RCTs of active management have
conflicting findings, but as fair- and good-quality studies … A larger good-quality study that compared
high- versus low-dose epidural reported significantly
fewer … Of these, one was
good quality and five were fair.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/mrsa-screening-2010_disposition-comments.pdf
January 01, 2010 - The Robicsek study was an observational study of
good quality. … It would
be a good reference to refer back to throughout the document. … Reviewer #4
(Peer)
Methods Methods: Good. … This was a major factor in two of only three studies
which were ranked as “Good”. … and one additional study of good or fair quality are
of medium risk of bias.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/prostate-cancer-risk-assessment-genes_disposition-comments.pdf
July 03, 2012 - Peer Reviewer 3 Introduction Good overview Thank you. … Peer Reviewer 3 Discussion good Thank you. … JCO by
Andrew Vickers titled "Prediction Models: Revolutionary in Principle, But
Do They Do More Good … Peer Reviewer 3 Clarity and
Usability
Very good Thank you.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/haller.pdf
January 06, 2017 - --
typically if you want to sort of find out what the outcomes of future events
are, it's not a good … (UNKNOWN): (inaudible)
(LAUGHTER)
HALLER: That's not a good idea. … It's a little bit out there but I think there's really good use cases. … So having good mechanisms for outreach is really important. … The problem is that if a good idea comes on the first day, everybody rates
it up, it's gonna sit on
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/delilberative-methods-design-gupta-2.pdf
January 11, 2017 - Does not take on an “expert” role
Keeps people focused and on track without being rigid
Asks good
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/tech-brief-32-pharm-non-pharm-ptsd.pdf
May 14, 2019 - TEP Reviewer #7 Background Provides a good description of the problem. … Introduction
Peer Reviewer #1 Guiding
Questions
Very good. These are clear. … Peer Reviewer #1 Methods Very good. Rigorous searches included numerous databases. … Peer Reviewer #1 Summary and
Implications
Good. Thank you. … Peer Reviewer #1 Next Steps Good Thank for your comment.
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/ebc_challenge_final_submission_planning_worksheet1.pdf
June 20, 2012 - Good Luck!
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/cf_deliberativemethodswebinar_facilitation.pdf
May 18, 2012 - Does not take on an “expert” role
• Keeps people focused and on track without being rigid
• Asks good
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/Masks-appendix-table-b-1-surveillance-report.xlsx
April 09, 2020 - Alcohol-based hand sanitizer use (mean, number of times per day): 5.20 vs. 2.31 vs. 2.02 Open-label Good … C
Daily average handwashing use (log transformed): 1.72 vs. 1.76 vs. 1.78 Open-label Good Not reported … C
Index cases
Reported mask worn often or always: 45% vs. 28% vs. 30%
Reported good hand hygiene often … vs. 63% vs. 31%
Household contacts
Reported mask worn often or always: 21% vs. 4% vs. 1%
Reproted good … Hand washing episodes: 3.9 (95% CI not reported) Open-label Good Not reported Not reported Fever plus
-
effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/masks-surveillance-2-appendix-table-a-1.xlsx
April 09, 2020 - Alcohol-based hand sanitizer use (mean, number of times per day): 5.20 vs. 2.31 vs. 2.02 Open-label Good … C
Daily average handwashing use (log transformed): 1.72 vs. 1.76 vs. 1.78 Open-label Good Not reported … C
Index cases
Reported mask worn often or always: 45% vs. 28% vs. 30%
Reported good hand hygiene often … vs. 63% vs. 31%
Household contacts
Reported mask worn often or always: 21% vs. 4% vs. 1%
Reproted good … Hand washing episodes: 3.9 (95% CI not reported) Open-label Good Not reported Not reported Fever plus