Results

Total Results: 1,117 records

Showing results for "good".

  1. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/tech-brief-35-asthma-self-management-comments.pdf
    April 27, 2020 - Public Reviewer #5 Introduction Good summary and background on the need of the study, good supporting … Public Reviewer #5 Methods Clear, good detail, used variety of sources Thank you for your review and
  2. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/technical-brief-34-health-worker-certification-comments.pdf
    March 27, 2020 - to support states as they seek to increase connection between community and health care while being good … level accreditation accounts for other essential elements like hiring the right people, providing good … Yet, I think the report did a good job balancing this out with Key Informants.
  3. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/bundled-payments-quality-effects_disposition-comments.pdf
    August 24, 2012 - It would be good to have the whole spelling of each listed. … We explain the rationale for all studies rated “poor” or “good” in Appendix A. … Appendix A includes explanations for all “good” or “poor” ratings. … Peer Reviewer #2 Results p. 41 lines 3-6: Emphasize those with good design. … Peer Reviewer #6 General In general this is a good report.
  4. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/children-special-needs-transition_disposition-comments.pdf
    June 17, 2014 - It is an interesting question and agree it would be good for future research. … Reviewer 7 (TEP) Background Good background review generally. … Reviewer 5 (TEP) General-Clarity and Usability I felt the summary was very good. … to provide a good beginning. … I do commend the authors for all the good information.
  5. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/surveillance-report-2-noninvasive-nonpharma.pdf
    April 01, 2022 - sham or UC Function, short term Insufficient evidence 1 RCT (N=49) *1 good-quality RCT (N=84 … (upgraded one level) Function, intermediate term Insufficient evidence 2 RCTs (N=109) *1 good-quality … Low (upgraded one level) Pain, intermediate term Insufficient evidence 2 RCTs (N=109) *1 good-quality … and pulsed US vs. sham Function and pain, short term No effect SOE: Low 3 RCTs (N=249) 1 good-quality … UC, NT, or sham Function, short term No effect SOE: Low 5 RCTs (N=944) 1 good-quality RCT
  6. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/trauma-child-interventions_disposition-comments.pdf
    February 11, 2013 - N/A TEP #1 Introduction Good N/A TEP #2 Introduction Thorough and clear. … Reviewer #2 Introduction In the Introduction, the PICOTS framework is described, and there is a good … TEP #3 Discussion/ Conclusion The major finding of this report is that we do not have good evidence … indicators of trauma symptomatology or good indicators of clinical improvement in trauma effects. … This is a good point and has been incorporated into our Discussion section.
  7. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/public-reporting-cost-measures_disposition-comments.pdf
    March 05, 2015 - We agree that this would be good in a fuller environmental scan, but not feasible within the current … Reviewer #1 Methods The methods section was very good clear about the process that was used. … So making it an imperative without good empirical evidence that it is a crucial element to the success … There is good evidence about the importance of not making the websites cognitively burdensome. … We never say that 8 of 15 is a good score – perhaps all websites should be scoring a full 15 to be
  8. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/app-e-surv-rept-1-acute-pain.xlsx
    May 29, 2025 - (0/74), RR 12.66 (95% CI 0.73 to 220.85) NR Block Institute for Clinical and Translational Research Good … D Global assessment very good or excellent: 73.9% (151/204) vs. 85.0% (178/209) vs. 52.3% (107/205) vs … D 0.5% (1/206) vs. 1.4% (3/209) vs. 1.5% (3/206) vs. 0% (0/208) Grunenthal SA Good Thota, 2021 Outpatient
  9. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/methods-usability-testing.pdf
    November 01, 2018 - (Participant 5) “I think it’s good. … Yes because it’s the biggest bubble but it’s not, it’s just good to have three studies […].” … Another participant did not think that the figure was good value for space. … I think it’s good.” … (Participant 5) There was consensus that three pages was a good length for the summary.
  10. Roblin_final (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/roblin.pdf
    January 01, 2010 - motivational:  “[The messages] normally started out positive and then show that you care and say ‘good … ”  “It was  really good because I really  didn't know what my  mother was going  through or
  11. Schwitzer_ECCS2012 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/schwitzer_eccs2012.pdf
    July 23, 2012 - Receive theWorst News  Coverage: Breast Cancer (5 of 6) “All screening programmes do harm; some do good … Slide 18: An Example of Good Health Journalism • A blog, “What Do Engaged Patients Do?
  12. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/nonopioid-chronic-pain-summary.pdf
    April 01, 2020 - Studies rated “good” are considered to have the least risk of bias, and their results are considered … Overall, 30 trials were rated poor quality, 129 fair quality, and 25 good quality (Appendix G of the … Of the good- and fair-quality trials, 128 were classified as short duration (3 months to <6 months) … Forty good- or fair- quality trials evaluated harms of antidepressants. … Subgroup analyses indicated that studies of patients with knee pain only and those of good quality
  13. Bar-Cohen_ ECCS2012 (pdf file)

    effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/bar-cohen_-eccs2012.pdf
    January 01, 2012 - Although we all prefer to use only the good passport, sooner or later each of us is obliged,  at least
  14. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/worker-health_disposition-comments.pdf
    May 31, 2016 - TEP Reviewer #1 Quality of the Report Good Thank you. … Peer Reviewer #3 Quality of the Report Good Thank you. … Peer Reviewer #4 Quality of the Report Good Thank you. … TEP Reviewer #3 Quality of the Report Good Thank you. … Although somewhat repetitive, the overall quality of this report is very good.
  15. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/osteoarthritis-knee-update-disposition-archived.pdf
    May 04, 2017 - TEP Reviewer #2 Quality of Report Good No response needed. … TEP Reviewer #3 Quality of Report Good No response needed. … Peer Reviewer #5 Quality of Report Good No response needed. … TEP Reviewer #3 Introductio n The introduction is good. … The reviewer raises a good point.
  16. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/osteoarthritis-knee-update-disposition.pdf
    May 04, 2017 - TEP Reviewer #2 Quality of Report Good No response needed. … TEP Reviewer #3 Quality of Report Good No response needed. … Peer Reviewer #5 Quality of Report Good No response needed. … TEP Reviewer #3 Introductio n The introduction is good. … The reviewer raises a good point.
  17. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/atrial-fibrillation-ablation_disposition-comments.pdf
    October 01, 2010 - : As only 1 of the 5 RCTs was graded as good in quality, and evidence was required from 2 good RCTs … It is possibly noteworthy that the designation of an RCT as good in quality required the reporting … and transparently used AADs for some period of time following ablation would be rated as less than good … some restricted period of time after the procedure was not a reason for rating the study less than good … We would like to suggest that the pacemaker population is a good model for future baseline review; this
  18. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/progestogens-preterm-birth-disposition-121205.pdf
    September 07, 2012 - The Meis study has been changed to good. … ” (p33) and Rouse is “good” by the same group as the Meis trial. … As noted above Meis has been changed to good on the basis of consideration that Figure 1 data is in … Of the four studies, 3 are rated “good” quality and one fair. … And, if 2 other trials (one fair, one good) are included in the analysis (as discussed on page 42),
  19. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/infantile-hemangioma_executive.pdf
    January 01, 2016 - We considered 6 of these comparative studies to be good quality, 22 fair quality, and 14 poor quality … We considered 14 of these as good quality for harms reporting, 3 as fair quality for harms reporting … Four studies were good quality; nine were fair quality; and five were poor quality. … 10 To assess for methodologic heterogeneity, we ran additional models with only RCTs and with only good … We considered one RCT as good, two RCTs and two cohort studies as fair, and the remainder of studies
  20. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/related_files/cer-203-adhd-disposition-comments.pdf
    January 01, 2018 - TEP Reviewer #1 Quality of Report Good No response needed. 2. … TEP Reviewer #2 Quality of Report Good No response needed. 3. … TEP Reviewer #5 Quality of Report Good No response needed. 6. … Peer Reviewer #1 Quality of Report Good No response needed. 8. … Still no good data that they improve long term outcomes. Negative small impact on height.

Search the AHRQ Archive

Information and reports more than 5 years old may be found in the AHRQ Archive site.

Search Archive

Search Within A Specific AHRQ Site

You selected to view results for the following site: