-
ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/2018mosopsdatabasereport-part2.pdf
April 01, 2018 - (G1a)
Excellent or Very Good 76% 78% 73% 70% 69% 68% 65%
5 - Excellent 41% 42% 37% 34% 32% 30% 29% … (G1b)
Excellent or Very Good 76% 75% 71% 71% 69% 68% 67%
5 - Excellent 37% 39% 35% 33% 31% 29% 31% … (G1d)
Excellent or Very Good 67% 69% 63% 60% 58% 54% 48%
5 - Excellent 32% 32% 27% 26% 22% 20% 16% … (G1a)
Excellent or Very Good 73% 69%
5 - Excellent 38% 31%
4 - Very Good 35% 38%
3 - Good 22% … (G1b)
Excellent or Very Good 73% 68%
5 - Excellent 36% 29%
4 - Very Good 37% 40%
3 - Good 23%
-
pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/2018mosopsdatabasereport-part2.pdf
April 01, 2018 - (G1a)
Excellent or Very Good 76% 78% 73% 70% 69% 68% 65%
5 - Excellent 41% 42% 37% 34% 32% 30% 29% … (G1b)
Excellent or Very Good 76% 75% 71% 71% 69% 68% 67%
5 - Excellent 37% 39% 35% 33% 31% 29% 31% … (G1d)
Excellent or Very Good 67% 69% 63% 60% 58% 54% 48%
5 - Excellent 32% 32% 27% 26% 22% 20% 16% … (G1a)
Excellent or Very Good 73% 69%
5 - Excellent 38% 31%
4 - Very Good 35% 38%
3 - Good 22% … (G1b)
Excellent or Very Good 73% 68%
5 - Excellent 36% 29%
4 - Very Good 37% 40%
3 - Good 23%
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet,
ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory,
effective
3 = Excellent … , more than adequate,
exceeded, very effective
Introduction
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 1: Communication
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3
Module 2: Team Leadership
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4
Module 4: Mutual Support
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
-
talkingquality.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet,
ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory,
effective
3 = Excellent … , more than adequate,
exceeded, very effective
Introduction
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 1: Communication
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3
Module 2: Team Leadership
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4
Module 4: Mutual Support
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
-
teamstepps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet,
ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory,
effective
3 = Excellent … , more than adequate,
exceeded, very effective
Introduction
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 1: Communication
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3
Module 2: Team Leadership
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4
Module 4: Mutual Support
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
-
pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet,
ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory,
effective
3 = Excellent … , more than adequate,
exceeded, very effective
Introduction
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 1: Communication
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3
Module 2: Team Leadership
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4
Module 4: Mutual Support
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
-
cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet,
ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory,
effective
3 = Excellent … , more than adequate,
exceeded, very effective
Introduction
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 1: Communication
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3
Module 2: Team Leadership
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4
Module 4: Mutual Support
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
-
healthcare411.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet,
ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory,
effective
3 = Excellent … , more than adequate,
exceeded, very effective
Introduction
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 1: Communication
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3
Module 2: Team Leadership
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4
Module 4: Mutual Support
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
-
monahrq.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet,
ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory,
effective
3 = Excellent … , more than adequate,
exceeded, very effective
Introduction
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 1: Communication
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3
Module 2: Team Leadership
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4
Module 4: Mutual Support
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
-
patientregistry.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet,
ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory,
effective
3 = Excellent … , more than adequate,
exceeded, very effective
Introduction
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 1: Communication
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3
Module 2: Team Leadership
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4
Module 4: Mutual Support
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
-
ahrqpubs.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet,
ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory,
effective
3 = Excellent … , more than adequate,
exceeded, very effective
Introduction
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 1: Communication
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3
Module 2: Team Leadership
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4
Module 4: Mutual Support
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
-
preventiveservices.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet,
ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory,
effective
3 = Excellent … , more than adequate,
exceeded, very effective
Introduction
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 1: Communication
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3
Module 2: Team Leadership
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4
Module 4: Mutual Support
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
-
ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet,
ineffective
2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory,
effective
3 = Excellent … , more than adequate,
exceeded, very effective
Introduction
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3
Comments:
Module 1: Communication
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3
Module 2: Team Leadership
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4
Module 4: Mutual Support
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
-
ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-appendix.pdf
January 01, 2024 - (Item G1D)
Excellent or Very good 57% 66% 61% 58% 54% 51%
Excellent 28% 26% 25% 23% 20% 16% … (Item G1E)
Excellent or Very good 82% 83% 82% 80% 78% 75%
Excellent 56% 55% 53% 53% 47% 42% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 66% 59%
Excellent 27% 22%
Very good 38% 37%
Good 26% 31% … (Item G1D)
Excellent or Very good 59% 61% 57% 53%
Excellent 23% 23% 19% 18%
Very good 36% 38% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 64% 65% 69% 66%
Excellent 24% 22% 27% 28%
Very good 40%
-
pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-appendix.pdf
January 01, 2024 - (Item G1D)
Excellent or Very good 57% 66% 61% 58% 54% 51%
Excellent 28% 26% 25% 23% 20% 16% … (Item G1E)
Excellent or Very good 82% 83% 82% 80% 78% 75%
Excellent 56% 55% 53% 53% 47% 42% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 66% 59%
Excellent 27% 22%
Very good 38% 37%
Good 26% 31% … (Item G1D)
Excellent or Very good 59% 61% 57% 53%
Excellent 23% 23% 19% 18%
Very good 36% 38% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 64% 65% 69% 66%
Excellent 24% 22% 27% 28%
Very good 40%
-
www.talkingquality.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-appendix.pdf
January 01, 2024 - (Item G1D)
Excellent or Very good 57% 66% 61% 58% 54% 51%
Excellent 28% 26% 25% 23% 20% 16% … (Item G1E)
Excellent or Very good 82% 83% 82% 80% 78% 75%
Excellent 56% 55% 53% 53% 47% 42% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 66% 59%
Excellent 27% 22%
Very good 38% 37%
Good 26% 31% … (Item G1D)
Excellent or Very good 59% 61% 57% 53%
Excellent 23% 23% 19% 18%
Very good 36% 38% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 64% 65% 69% 66%
Excellent 24% 22% 27% 28%
Very good 40%
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-appendix.pdf
January 01, 2024 - (Item G1D)
Excellent or Very good 57% 66% 61% 58% 54% 51%
Excellent 28% 26% 25% 23% 20% 16% … (Item G1E)
Excellent or Very good 82% 83% 82% 80% 78% 75%
Excellent 56% 55% 53% 53% 47% 42% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 66% 59%
Excellent 27% 22%
Very good 38% 37%
Good 26% 31% … (Item G1D)
Excellent or Very good 59% 61% 57% 53%
Excellent 23% 23% 19% 18%
Very good 36% 38% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 64% 65% 69% 66%
Excellent 24% 22% 27% 28%
Very good 40%
-
www.monahrq.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-appendix.pdf
January 01, 2024 - (Item G1D)
Excellent or Very good 57% 66% 61% 58% 54% 51%
Excellent 28% 26% 25% 23% 20% 16% … (Item G1E)
Excellent or Very good 82% 83% 82% 80% 78% 75%
Excellent 56% 55% 53% 53% 47% 42% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 66% 59%
Excellent 27% 22%
Very good 38% 37%
Good 26% 31% … (Item G1D)
Excellent or Very good 59% 61% 57% 53%
Excellent 23% 23% 19% 18%
Very good 36% 38% … (Item G2)
Excellent or Very good 64% 65% 69% 66%
Excellent 24% 22% 27% 28%
Very good 40%
-
www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/nursing-home/2014/nhsurv14-chap6.html
November 01, 2014 - In at least one nursing home, few respondents (6 percent) gave their unit a rating of "Excellent" or … 6-6 , from at least one nursing home where few respondents (6 percent) gave their unit a rating of "Excellent … and 71 percent, respectively) who gave their nursing home an overall rating on resident safety of "Excellent … highest percentage (63 percent) who gave their nursing home an overall rating on resident safety of "Excellent … highest percentage (66 percent) who gave their nursing home an overall rating on resident safety of "Excellent
-
www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/officebasedcare/handouts/courseeval.pdf
December 02, 2015 - did not meet, ineffective
Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
(Circle one) 3 = Excellent … than adequate, exceeded,
very effective
TeamSTEPPS Fundamentals
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … .......... 1 2 3
Comments:
Summary: Putting It All Together
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … did not meet, ineffective
Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective
(Circle one) 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded,
very effective
Measurement
Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent