Results

Total Results: over 10,000 records

Showing results for "excellent".

  1. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/2018mosopsdatabasereport-part2.pdf
    April 01, 2018 - (G1a) Excellent or Very Good 76% 78% 73% 70% 69% 68% 65% 5 - Excellent 41% 42% 37% 34% 32% 30% 29% … (G1b) Excellent or Very Good 76% 75% 71% 71% 69% 68% 67% 5 - Excellent 37% 39% 35% 33% 31% 29% 31% … (G1d) Excellent or Very Good 67% 69% 63% 60% 58% 54% 48% 5 - Excellent 32% 32% 27% 26% 22% 20% 16% … (G1a) Excellent or Very Good 73% 69% 5 - Excellent 38% 31% 4 - Very Good 35% 38% 3 - Good 22% … (G1b) Excellent or Very Good 73% 68% 5 - Excellent 36% 29% 4 - Very Good 37% 40% 3 - Good 23%
  2. pcmh.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/2018mosopsdatabasereport-part2.pdf
    April 01, 2018 - (G1a) Excellent or Very Good 76% 78% 73% 70% 69% 68% 65% 5 - Excellent 41% 42% 37% 34% 32% 30% 29% … (G1b) Excellent or Very Good 76% 75% 71% 71% 69% 68% 67% 5 - Excellent 37% 39% 35% 33% 31% 29% 31% … (G1d) Excellent or Very Good 67% 69% 63% 60% 58% 54% 48% 5 - Excellent 32% 32% 27% 26% 22% 20% 16% … (G1a) Excellent or Very Good 73% 69% 5 - Excellent 38% 31% 4 - Very Good 35% 38% 3 - Good 22% … (G1b) Excellent or Very Good 73% 68% 5 - Excellent 36% 29% 4 - Very Good 37% 40% 3 - Good 23%
  3. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
    June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Introduction Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 1: Communication Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3 Module 2: Team Leadership Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4 Module 4: Mutual Support Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  4. talkingquality.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
    June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Introduction Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 1: Communication Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3 Module 2: Team Leadership Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4 Module 4: Mutual Support Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  5. teamstepps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
    June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Introduction Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 1: Communication Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3 Module 2: Team Leadership Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4 Module 4: Mutual Support Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  6. pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
    June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Introduction Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 1: Communication Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3 Module 2: Team Leadership Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4 Module 4: Mutual Support Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  7. cahps.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
    June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Introduction Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 1: Communication Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3 Module 2: Team Leadership Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4 Module 4: Mutual Support Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  8. healthcare411.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
    June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Introduction Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 1: Communication Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3 Module 2: Team Leadership Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4 Module 4: Mutual Support Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  9. monahrq.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
    June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Introduction Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 1: Communication Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3 Module 2: Team Leadership Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4 Module 4: Mutual Support Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  10. patientregistry.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
    June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Introduction Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 1: Communication Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3 Module 2: Team Leadership Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4 Module 4: Mutual Support Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  11. ahrqpubs.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
    June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Introduction Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 1: Communication Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3 Module 2: Team Leadership Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4 Module 4: Mutual Support Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  12. preventiveservices.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
    June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Introduction Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 1: Communication Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3 Module 2: Team Leadership Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4 Module 4: Mutual Support Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  13. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/teamstepps-program/tools/ts-course-evaluation-form.pdf
    June 01, 2023 - Poor, inadequate, did not meet, ineffective 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Introduction Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … 1 2 3 Comments: Module 1: Communication Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent To what extent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 3 Module 2: Team Leadership Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … TeamSTEPPS Training Evaluation Form 4 Module 4: Mutual Support Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent
  14. ce.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-appendix.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - (Item G1D) Excellent or Very good 57% 66% 61% 58% 54% 51% Excellent 28% 26% 25% 23% 20% 16% … (Item G1E) Excellent or Very good 82% 83% 82% 80% 78% 75% Excellent 56% 55% 53% 53% 47% 42% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 66% 59% Excellent 27% 22% Very good 38% 37% Good 26% 31% … (Item G1D) Excellent or Very good 59% 61% 57% 53% Excellent 23% 23% 19% 18% Very good 36% 38% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 64% 65% 69% 66% Excellent 24% 22% 27% 28% Very good 40%
  15. pbrn.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-appendix.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - (Item G1D) Excellent or Very good 57% 66% 61% 58% 54% 51% Excellent 28% 26% 25% 23% 20% 16% … (Item G1E) Excellent or Very good 82% 83% 82% 80% 78% 75% Excellent 56% 55% 53% 53% 47% 42% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 66% 59% Excellent 27% 22% Very good 38% 37% Good 26% 31% … (Item G1D) Excellent or Very good 59% 61% 57% 53% Excellent 23% 23% 19% 18% Very good 36% 38% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 64% 65% 69% 66% Excellent 24% 22% 27% 28% Very good 40%
  16. www.talkingquality.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-appendix.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - (Item G1D) Excellent or Very good 57% 66% 61% 58% 54% 51% Excellent 28% 26% 25% 23% 20% 16% … (Item G1E) Excellent or Very good 82% 83% 82% 80% 78% 75% Excellent 56% 55% 53% 53% 47% 42% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 66% 59% Excellent 27% 22% Very good 38% 37% Good 26% 31% … (Item G1D) Excellent or Very good 59% 61% 57% 53% Excellent 23% 23% 19% 18% Very good 36% 38% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 64% 65% 69% 66% Excellent 24% 22% 27% 28% Very good 40%
  17. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-appendix.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - (Item G1D) Excellent or Very good 57% 66% 61% 58% 54% 51% Excellent 28% 26% 25% 23% 20% 16% … (Item G1E) Excellent or Very good 82% 83% 82% 80% 78% 75% Excellent 56% 55% 53% 53% 47% 42% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 66% 59% Excellent 27% 22% Very good 38% 37% Good 26% 31% … (Item G1D) Excellent or Very good 59% 61% 57% 53% Excellent 23% 23% 19% 18% Very good 36% 38% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 64% 65% 69% 66% Excellent 24% 22% 27% 28% Very good 40%
  18. www.monahrq.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/sops/surveys/medical-office/2024-medical-office-database-report-appendix.pdf
    January 01, 2024 - (Item G1D) Excellent or Very good 57% 66% 61% 58% 54% 51% Excellent 28% 26% 25% 23% 20% 16% … (Item G1E) Excellent or Very good 82% 83% 82% 80% 78% 75% Excellent 56% 55% 53% 53% 47% 42% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 66% 59% Excellent 27% 22% Very good 38% 37% Good 26% 31% … (Item G1D) Excellent or Very good 59% 61% 57% 53% Excellent 23% 23% 19% 18% Very good 36% 38% … (Item G2) Excellent or Very good 64% 65% 69% 66% Excellent 24% 22% 27% 28% Very good 40%
  19. www.ahrq.gov/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patientsafetyculture/nursing-home/2014/nhsurv14-chap6.html
    November 01, 2014 - In at least one nursing home, few respondents (6 percent) gave their unit a rating of "Excellent" or … 6-6 , from at least one nursing home where few respondents (6 percent) gave their unit a rating of "Excellent … and 71 percent, respectively) who gave their nursing home an overall rating on resident safety of "Excellent … highest percentage (63 percent) who gave their nursing home an overall rating on resident safety of "Excellent … highest percentage (66 percent) who gave their nursing home an overall rating on resident safety of "Excellent
  20. www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/education/curriculum-tools/teamstepps/officebasedcare/handouts/courseeval.pdf
    December 02, 2015 - did not meet, ineffective Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective (Circle one) 3 = Excellent … than adequate, exceeded, very effective TeamSTEPPS Fundamentals Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … .......... 1 2 3 Comments: Summary: Putting It All Together Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent … did not meet, ineffective Scale 2 = Good, adequate, met, satisfactory, effective (Circle one) 3 = Excellent … , more than adequate, exceeded, very effective Measurement Instructor Name: Poor Good Excellent